Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 2/2003

01-04-2003 | Meeting abstract

Assessment of variables affecting the accuracy of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by single versus double indicator dilution techniques in ARDS patients

Authors: E Maggioni, F Sala, A Manfio, E Saccavino, B Cortinovis, G Bellani, N Patroniti

Published in: Critical Care | Special Issue 2/2003

Login to get access

Excerpt

Estimation of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by the single indicator dilution technique (SDT) implemented in the PICCO monitoring system relies on a relationship between intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and global end diastolic volume (GEDV), which has been derived from a large population of mixed critically ill patients using the double indicator dilution technique (thermal and indocyanine green dyes, DDT): ITBVsdt = 1.25 × GEDV [1]. Since the difference between ITBV and GEDV corresponds to pulmonary blood volume (PBV), we can write: PBVsdt = 0.25 × GEDV. Any factor influencing this relationship can affect SDT accuracy. The aims of our study were: 1) to compare SDT versus DDT for EVLW measurements in ARDS patients; and 2) to explore factors influencing the PBV and GEDV relationship, and affecting SDT accuracy. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sakka SG, et al.: Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26: 180-187. 10.1007/s001340050043CrossRefPubMed Sakka SG, et al.: Assessment of cardiac preload and extravascular lung water by single transpulmonary thermodilution. Intensive Care Med 2000, 26: 180-187. 10.1007/s001340050043CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of variables affecting the accuracy of extravascular lung water (EVLW) by single versus double indicator dilution techniques in ARDS patients
Authors
E Maggioni
F Sala
A Manfio
E Saccavino
B Cortinovis
G Bellani
N Patroniti
Publication date
01-04-2003
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue Special Issue 2/2003
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2075

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2003

Critical Care 2/2003 Go to the issue