Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 6/2011

01-12-2011 | Erratum

Erratum To: Combination of lung ultrasound (a comet-tail sign) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in differentiating acute heart failure from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma as cause of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting

Authors: Gregor Prosen, Petra Klemen, Matej Strnad, Štefek Grmec

Published in: Critical Care | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

Following publication of our article [1], we noted that Table 2 (1) was published with several incorrect data values. The correct values should be:
Table 2
Univariate analysis for all demographic and clinical variables pertinent to diagnosis of acute HF or pulmonary disease (N = 218)a
Variablesb
Pulmonary-related dyspnea
(n= 89)
Acute HF-related dyspnea
(n= 129)
p-valuec
Mean age (years)
52.3 + 15.3
70.9 + 11.7
0.001
Sex, males/females (%)
65.2/34.8
57.9/42.1
0.74
Nocturnal dyspnea (Y/N)
6/83
43/86
< 0.001
Orthopnea (Y/N)
7/82
39/90
< 0.001
Cough (Y/N)
48/41
34/95
< 0.001
Sputum production (Y/N)
24/65
8/121
< 0.001
Fever (Y/N)
21/68
7/122
< 0.001
Murmur (Y/N)
8/81
29/100
< 0.001
Rales (Y/N)
10/79
76/53
< 0.001
Wheezes (Y/N)
68/21
47/82
< 0.001
Pulse (rate/min)
115.7 + 14.1
106.3 + 12.8
0.564
Jugular venous distension (Y/N)
3/86
30/99
< 0.001
Lower extremity edema (Y/N)
12/77
62/67
< 0.001
ECG-normal sinus rhythm (Y/N)
72/17
55/72
< 0.001
Asthma/COPD medications (Y/N)
78/11
13/116
< 0.001
HF medications (Y/N)
33/56
83/46
< 0.001
Troponin T > 0.03 ng/mL (Y/N)
8/81
49/80
< 0.001
PetCO2 (kPa)
6.9 + 1.6
3.6 + 1.1
0.01
NT-pro BNP (pg/mL)
598.2 + 361.8
2263 + 641.2
0.008
SaO2 (%)
75.7 + 10.1
67.9 + 12.8
0.76
Ultrasound examination positive (Y/N)
5/84
129/0
< 0.001
Previous arrhythmia (Y/N)
7/82
52/77
< 0.001
Previous AMI (Y/N)
7/82
45/84
< 0.001
Previous CHF (Y/N)
17/72
80/49
< 0.001
Previous asthma/COPD (Y/N)
70/19
27/102
< 0.001
ETI (Y/N)
3/86
10/119
< 0.001
Modified Boston criteria for diagnosing HFd
4.6 + 1.2
10.9 + 1.8
< 0.001
aY, yes; N, no; petCO2, partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide; NT-proBNP, amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; ECG, electrocardiogram; HF, heart failure; CHF, congestive heart failure; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; SaO2, arterial oxygen saturation; ETI, endotracheal intubation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. bResults are presented as means ± standard deviation for normally distributed data or ratio or percentage for other variables. cUnivariate comparison was made using the χ2 test for categorical variables and a t-test for continuous variables. For evaluation of diagnostic accuracy, patients were divided into two groups: HF-related acute dyspnea and pulmonary-related acute dyspnea (COPD/asthma). dModified Boston criteria according to Table 1 and Remes et al. [6].
Literature
1.
go back to reference Prosen G, Kleman P, Strnad M, Grmec S: Combination of lung ultrasound (a comet-tail sign) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in differentiating acute heart failure from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma as cause of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting. Critical Care. 2011, 15: R114-10.1186/cc10140.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Prosen G, Kleman P, Strnad M, Grmec S: Combination of lung ultrasound (a comet-tail sign) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in differentiating acute heart failure from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma as cause of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting. Critical Care. 2011, 15: R114-10.1186/cc10140.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Erratum To: Combination of lung ultrasound (a comet-tail sign) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in differentiating acute heart failure from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma as cause of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting
Authors
Gregor Prosen
Petra Klemen
Matej Strnad
Štefek Grmec
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue 6/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10511

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Critical Care 6/2011 Go to the issue