Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Economics Review 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

A cost-benefit analysis on the specialization in departments of obstetrics and gynecology in Japan

Authors: Junyi Shen, On Fukui, Hiroyuki Hashimoto, Takako Nakashima, Tadashi Kimura, Kenichiro Morishige, Tatsuyoshi Saijo

Published in: Health Economics Review | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

In April 2008, the specialization in departments of obstetrics and gynecology was conducted in Sennan area of Osaka prefecture in Japan, which aims at solving the problems of regional provision of obstetrical service. Under this specialization, the departments of obstetrics and gynecology in two city hospitals were combined as one medical center, whilst one hospital is in charge of the department of gynecology and the other one operates the department of obstetrics. In this paper, we implement a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the validity of this specialization. The benefit-cost ratio is estimated at 1.367 under a basic scenario, indicating that the specialization can generate a net benefit. In addition, with a consideration of different kinds of uncertainty in the future, a number of sensitivity analyses are conducted. The results of these sensitivity analyses suggest that the specialization is valid in the sense that all the estimated benefit-cost ratios are above 1.0 in any case.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Skelton AG: The relationship among cost, quality, and competition: an analysis of obstetrics services in Missouri hospitals. J Health Care Finance 1997,24(1):30–42.PubMed Skelton AG: The relationship among cost, quality, and competition: an analysis of obstetrics services in Missouri hospitals. J Health Care Finance 1997,24(1):30–42.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Schneider D: A methodology for the analysis of comparability of services and financial impact of closure of obstetrics services. Medical Care 1981,IX(4):393–409.CrossRef Schneider D: A methodology for the analysis of comparability of services and financial impact of closure of obstetrics services. Medical Care 1981,IX(4):393–409.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Capps C, Dranove D, Lindrooth RC: Hospital closure and economic efficiency. J Health Econ 2010, 29: 87–109. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.006PubMedCrossRef Capps C, Dranove D, Lindrooth RC: Hospital closure and economic efficiency. J Health Econ 2010, 29: 87–109. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.10.006PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mishan EJ, Quah E: Cost Benefit Analysis. 5th edition. London: Routledge; 2007. Mishan EJ, Quah E: Cost Benefit Analysis. 5th edition. London: Routledge; 2007.
6.
go back to reference Eguchi N: Policies to Secure Obstetricians: A Survey in Fifteen Countries. Working paper No. 185 in Japan Medical Association Research Institute 2009. (in Japanese) Eguchi N: Policies to Secure Obstetricians: A Survey in Fifteen Countries. Working paper No. 185 in Japan Medical Association Research Institute 2009. (in Japanese)
7.
go back to reference Small KA, Rosen HS: Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 1981,49(1):105–130. 10.2307/1911129CrossRef Small KA, Rosen HS: Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 1981,49(1):105–130. 10.2307/1911129CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Alpízar F, Carlsson F, Martinsson P: Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Economic Issues 2003,8(1):83–110. Alpízar F, Carlsson F, Martinsson P: Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Economic Issues 2003,8(1):83–110.
9.
go back to reference Anderson BL, Hale RW, Salsberg E, Schulkin J: Outlook for the future of the obstetrician-gynecologist workforce. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199: 88.e1–88.e8 tmm. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.013CrossRef Anderson BL, Hale RW, Salsberg E, Schulkin J: Outlook for the future of the obstetrician-gynecologist workforce. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199: 88.e1–88.e8 tmm. 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.013CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Loy CS, Warton RB, Dunbar JA: Workforce trends in specialist and GP obstetric practice in Victoria. The Medical Journal of Australia 2007, 186: 26–30.PubMed Loy CS, Warton RB, Dunbar JA: Workforce trends in specialist and GP obstetric practice in Victoria. The Medical Journal of Australia 2007, 186: 26–30.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.CrossRef Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Shen J: A review of stated choice method. International Public Policy Studies 2006,10(2):97–121. Shen J: A review of stated choice method. International Public Policy Studies 2006,10(2):97–121.
13.
go back to reference Carlsson F, Martinsson P: Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003, 12: 281–294. 10.1002/hec.729PubMedCrossRef Carlsson F, Martinsson P: Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ 2003, 12: 281–294. 10.1002/hec.729PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Huber J, Zwerina K: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice design. J Mark Res 1996, 33: 307–317. 10.2307/3152127CrossRef Huber J, Zwerina K: The importance of utility balance in efficient choice design. J Mark Res 1996, 33: 307–317. 10.2307/3152127CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A cost-benefit analysis on the specialization in departments of obstetrics and gynecology in Japan
Authors
Junyi Shen
On Fukui
Hiroyuki Hashimoto
Takako Nakashima
Tadashi Kimura
Kenichiro Morishige
Tatsuyoshi Saijo
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Health Economics Review / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 2191-1991
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-2-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Health Economics Review 1/2012 Go to the issue