Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study

Authors: Vincenzo Giordano, Hilton Augusto Koch, Juliano de Sousa Prado, Leonardo Schiavo de Morais, Rafael de Araújo Hara, Felipe Serrão de Souza, Ney Pecegueiro do Amaral

Published in: Patient Safety in Surgery | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The issue of safety in the surgical procedure has recently been widely and openly discussed at the World Health Organization. The use of latex gloves is the current standard of protection during surgery, as they remain intact throughout the procedure. The present study was designed to evaluate the rate of glove perforation during a two-hand technique using polyester sutures in a controlled experimental study.

Methods

Hypothesis was that the gloves used during a two-hand technique using polyester suture suffer punctures. We used 150 pairs of gloves during the experiment. Each investigator performed 30 tests always using double gloving. They made five surgical knots on each test over a custom-made table specifically developed for the experiment. Ten tests were done at a time with a week- interval. The Control Group (CG) has 30 pairs of intact surgical gloves. The gloves were tested to impermeability by water filling and leaking was observed at three different times. Statistics relating to the perforation rate were analyzed using the chi-square test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

During the experiment there was no loss of gloves by drilling or inadvertent error in performing the impermeability test. No perforations were detected at any time during the impermeability test with the gloves used for sutures. Also, the CG presented no leakage of the liquid used for the test. There was no statistical difference between the groups underwent suture nor between them and the GC.

Conclusion

Under the studied conditions, the authors’ hypotheses could not be proved. There was no damage to the surgical gloves during the entire experiment. The authors believe that the skin abrasions observed in the ulnar side of the little finger, constant throughout the experiment, must be caused by friction. We feel there is no risk of perforation of surgical gloves during a two-hand technique using polyester suture.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R: Comparison of cloth gloves used in orthopaedic surgery: a clinical and experimental evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 1998, 12: 106-110. 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00007.CrossRefPubMed Herscovici D, DiPasquale T, Sanders R: Comparison of cloth gloves used in orthopaedic surgery: a clinical and experimental evaluation. J Orthop Trauma. 1998, 12: 106-110. 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00007.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Laine T, Aarnio P: How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system. Am J Surg. 2001, 181: 564-566. 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00626-2.CrossRefPubMed Laine T, Aarnio P: How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system. Am J Surg. 2001, 181: 564-566. 10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00626-2.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Louis SS, Steiberg EL, Grun OA, Bartlett CS, Helfet D: Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex. J Orthop Trauma. 1998, 12: 101-105. 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00006.CrossRefPubMed Louis SS, Steiberg EL, Grun OA, Bartlett CS, Helfet D: Outer gloves in orthopaedic procedures: a polyester/stainless steel wire weave glove liner compared with latex. J Orthop Trauma. 1998, 12: 101-105. 10.1097/00005131-199802000-00006.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McAdam TK, McLaughlin RE, McNicholl B: Non-touch suturing technique fails to reduce glove puncture rates in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2004, 21: 560-561. 10.1136/emj.2002.001461.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McAdam TK, McLaughlin RE, McNicholl B: Non-touch suturing technique fails to reduce glove puncture rates in an accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2004, 21: 560-561. 10.1136/emj.2002.001461.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sebold EJ, Jordan LR: Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993, 297: 242-244. Sebold EJ, Jordan LR: Intraoperative glove perforation. A comparative analysis. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1993, 297: 242-244.
7.
go back to reference Tanner J, Parkinson H: Double Gloving to Reduce Surgical Cross-Infection (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. 2007, Oxford: Update Software, Issue 4 Tanner J, Parkinson H: Double Gloving to Reduce Surgical Cross-Infection (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library. 2007, Oxford: Update Software, Issue 4
8.
go back to reference Thomas S, Agarwal M, Mehta G: Intraoperative glove perforation – single versus double gloving protection against skin contamination. Postgrad Med J. 2001, 77: 459-460. Thomas S, Agarwal M, Mehta G: Intraoperative glove perforation – single versus double gloving protection against skin contamination. Postgrad Med J. 2001, 77: 459-460.
9.
go back to reference Wright KU, Moran CG, Briggs PJ: Glove perforation during hip arthroplasty. A randomized prospective study of new taperpoint needle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993, 75: 918-920. Wright KU, Moran CG, Briggs PJ: Glove perforation during hip arthroplasty. A randomized prospective study of new taperpoint needle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1993, 75: 918-920.
10.
go back to reference Ilani OA, Younas SA, Ho DM, Noble PC: Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med. 2008, 36: 2407-2414. 10.1177/0363546508323745.CrossRef Ilani OA, Younas SA, Ho DM, Noble PC: Security of knots tied with ethibond, fiberwire, orthocord, or ultrabraid. Am J Sports Med. 2008, 36: 2407-2414. 10.1177/0363546508323745.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Knapp R, Miller M: Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 1992, Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore Knapp R, Miller M: Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 1992, Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore
14.
go back to reference Palmer JD, Rickett JW: The mechanisms and risks of surgical glove perforation. J Hosp Infect. 1992, 22: 279-286. 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90013-C.CrossRefPubMed Palmer JD, Rickett JW: The mechanisms and risks of surgical glove perforation. J Hosp Infect. 1992, 22: 279-286. 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90013-C.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Is the surgical knot tying technique associated with a risk for unnoticed glove perforation? An experimental study
Authors
Vincenzo Giordano
Hilton Augusto Koch
Juliano de Sousa Prado
Leonardo Schiavo de Morais
Rafael de Araújo Hara
Felipe Serrão de Souza
Ney Pecegueiro do Amaral
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1754-9493
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-9493-8-26

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2014 Go to the issue