Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Radiation Oncology 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research

The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning

Authors: Carole Lambert, Robert Gagnon, David Nguyen, Bernard Charlin

Published in: Radiation Oncology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Script Concordance test (SCT) is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate clinical reasoning in complex situations where experts' opinions may be divided. Scores reflect the degree of concordance between the performance of examinees and that of a reference panel of experienced physicians. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate SCT's usefulness in radiation oncology.

Methods

A 90 items radiation oncology SCT was administered to 155 participants. Three levels of experience were tested: medical students (n = 70), radiation oncology residents (n = 38) and radiation oncologists (n = 47). Statistical tests were performed to assess reliability and to document validity.

Results

After item optimization, the test comprised 30 cases and 70 questions. Cronbach alpha was 0.90. Mean scores were 51.62 (± 8.19) for students, 71.20 (± 9.45) for residents and 76.67 (± 6.14) for radiation oncologists. The difference between the three groups was statistically significant when compared by the Kruskall-Wallis test (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The SCT is reliable and useful to discriminate among participants according to their level of experience in radiation oncology. It appears as a useful tool to document the progression of reasoning during residency training.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Blackstock AW, Govindan R: Definitive chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007,25(28):4146-4152. 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6581CrossRefPubMed Blackstock AW, Govindan R: Definitive chemoradiation for the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007,25(28):4146-4152. 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.6581CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Gonzalez RJ, Bonner E, Kuerer HM: Current treatment and clinical trial developments for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Oncologist 2007,12(11):1276-1287. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-11-1276CrossRefPubMed Boughey JC, Gonzalez RJ, Bonner E, Kuerer HM: Current treatment and clinical trial developments for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Oncologist 2007,12(11):1276-1287. 10.1634/theoncologist.12-11-1276CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hede K: Radioactive "seed" implants may rival surgery for low-risk prostate cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007,99(20):1507-1509. 10.1093/jnci/djm193CrossRefPubMed Hede K: Radioactive "seed" implants may rival surgery for low-risk prostate cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007,99(20):1507-1509. 10.1093/jnci/djm193CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Schön D: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. Schön D: The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.
5.
go back to reference Fox R: Medical Uncertainty Revisited. In Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. Edited by: Albrecht G, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw S. London: Sage Publications; 2000:409-425.CrossRef Fox R: Medical Uncertainty Revisited. In Handbook of Social Studies in Health and Medicine. Edited by: Albrecht G, Fitzpatrick R, Scrimshaw S. London: Sage Publications; 2000:409-425.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hool GR, Church JM, Fazio VW: Decision-making in rectal cancer surgery: survey of North American colorectal residency programs. Dis Colon Rectum 1998,41(2):147-152. 10.1007/BF02238240CrossRefPubMed Hool GR, Church JM, Fazio VW: Decision-making in rectal cancer surgery: survey of North American colorectal residency programs. Dis Colon Rectum 1998,41(2):147-152. 10.1007/BF02238240CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJFM, Feltovich Paul J: Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007, 41: 1179-1185.CrossRef Charlin B, Boshuizen HPA, Custers EJFM, Feltovich Paul J: Scripts and clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007, 41: 1179-1185.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP: A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. Acad Med 1990,65(10):611-21. 10.1097/00001888-199010000-00001CrossRefPubMed Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP: A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication. Acad Med 1990,65(10):611-21. 10.1097/00001888-199010000-00001CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Vleuten C: The Script Concordance Test: a Tool to Assess the Reflective Clinician. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2000, 12: 189-195. 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5CrossRefPubMed Charlin B, Roy L, Brailovsky C, Vleuten C: The Script Concordance Test: a Tool to Assess the Reflective Clinician. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 2000, 12: 189-195. 10.1207/S15328015TLM1204_5CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Meterissian S, Zabolotny B, Gagnon R, Charlin B: Is the script concordance test a valid instrument for assessment of intraoperative decision-making skills? Am J Surg 2007, 193: 248-251. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.012CrossRefPubMed Meterissian S, Zabolotny B, Gagnon R, Charlin B: Is the script concordance test a valid instrument for assessment of intraoperative decision-making skills? Am J Surg 2007, 193: 248-251. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.10.012CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Hellot MF, Weber J, Charlin B: Online clinical reasoning assessment with the Script Concordance Test: results of a French pilot study. BMC Medical Education 2006, 6: 45. 10.1186/1472-6920-6-45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sibert L, Darmoni SJ, Dahamna B, Hellot MF, Weber J, Charlin B: Online clinical reasoning assessment with the Script Concordance Test: results of a French pilot study. BMC Medical Education 2006, 6: 45. 10.1186/1472-6920-6-45PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Gagnon R, Charlin B, Coletti M, Sauvé E, Vleuten C: Assessment in the context of uncertainty: How many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? Med Educ 2005, 39: 284-291. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02092.xCrossRefPubMed Gagnon R, Charlin B, Coletti M, Sauvé E, Vleuten C: Assessment in the context of uncertainty: How many members are needed on the panel of reference of a script concordance test? Med Educ 2005, 39: 284-291. 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02092.xCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Charlin B, Vleuten C: Standardized assessment in context of uncertainty: The script concordance approach. Evaluation and the Health Professions 2004, 27: 304-319. 10.1177/0163278704267043CrossRefPubMed Charlin B, Vleuten C: Standardized assessment in context of uncertainty: The script concordance approach. Evaluation and the Health Professions 2004, 27: 304-319. 10.1177/0163278704267043CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B: Script Concordance Tests: Guidelines for construction. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008, 8: 18. 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fournier JP, Demeester A, Charlin B: Script Concordance Tests: Guidelines for construction. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2008, 8: 18. 10.1186/1472-6947-8-18PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wass V: Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001,357(9260):945-949. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5CrossRefPubMed Wass V: Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001,357(9260):945-949. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04221-5CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The script concordance test in radiation oncology: validation study of a new tool to assess clinical reasoning
Authors
Carole Lambert
Robert Gagnon
David Nguyen
Bernard Charlin
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Radiation Oncology / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1748-717X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-4-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Radiation Oncology 1/2009 Go to the issue