Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Implementation Science 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Using behavioural theories to optimise shared haemodialysis care: a qualitative intervention development study of patient and professional experience

Authors: Liz Glidewell, Stephen Boocock, Kelvin Pine, Rebecca Campbell, Julia Hackett, Shamila Gill, Martin Wilkie

Published in: Implementation Science | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients in control of their own haemodialysis report better outcomes than those receiving professional controlled care in a hospital setting, even though home and hospital haemodialysis are largely equivalent from mechanical and physiological perspectives. Shared Haemodialysis Care (SHC) describes an initiative in which hospital haemodialysis patients are supported by dialysis staff to become as involved as they wish in their own care; and can improve patient safety, satisfaction and may reduce costs. We do not understand why interventions to support self-management in other conditions have variable effects or how to optimise the delivery of SHC. The purpose of this study was to identify perceived patient and professional (nurses and healthcare assistants) barriers to the uptake of SHC, and to use these data to identify intervention components to optimise care.

Methods

Individual semi-structured interviews with patients and professionals were conducted to identify barriers and facilitators. Data were coded to behavioural theory to identify solutions. A national UK learning event with multiple stakeholders (patients, carers, commissioners and professionals) explored the salience of these barriers and the acceptability of solutions.

Results

A complex intervention strategy was designed to optimise SHC for patients and professionals. Interviews were conducted with patients (n = 15) and professionals (n = 7) in two hospitals and three satellite units piloting SHC. Data from patient and professional interviews could be coded to behavioural theory. Analyses identified key barriers (knowledge, beliefs about capabilities, skills and environmental context and resources). An intervention strategy that focuses on providing, first, patients with information about the shared nature of care, how to read prescriptions and use machines, and second, providing professionals with skills and protected time to teach both professionals/patients, as well as providing continual review, may improve the implementation of SHC and be acceptable to stakeholders.

Conclusions

We have developed an intervention strategy to improve the implementation of SHC for patients and professionals. While this intervention strategy has been systematically developed using behavioural theory, it should be rigorously tested in a subsequent effectiveness evaluation study prior to implementation to ensure that shared haemodialysis care can be delivered equitably, efficiently and safely for all patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Coulter A, Collins A: Making shared decision-making a reality. In No decision about me, without me London: the King’s fund & the foundation for informed decision making. 2011, London W1G 0AN:: The King’s Fund 11–13 Cavendish Square, Coulter A, Collins A: Making shared decision-making a reality. In No decision about me, without me London: the King’s fund & the foundation for informed decision making. 2011, London W1G 0AN:: The King’s Fund 11–13 Cavendish Square,
2.
go back to reference Christensen AJ: Patient-by-treatment context interaction in chronic disease: a conceptual framework for the study of patient adherence. Psychosom Med. 2000, 62: 435-443.CrossRefPubMed Christensen AJ: Patient-by-treatment context interaction in chronic disease: a conceptual framework for the study of patient adherence. Psychosom Med. 2000, 62: 435-443.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Palmer SC, Palmer AR, Craig JC, Johnson DW, Stroumza P, Frantzen L, Leal M, Hoischen S, Hegbrant J, Strippoli GFM: Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD009535. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009535 Palmer SC, Palmer AR, Craig JC, Johnson DW, Stroumza P, Frantzen L, Leal M, Hoischen S, Hegbrant J, Strippoli GFM: Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for end-stage kidney disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD009535. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009535
5.
go back to reference Tibbles R, Bovill L, Breen C, Vinen K: Haemodialysis: a self-care service. Nursing Mgt. 2009, 15 (10): 28-34.CrossRef Tibbles R, Bovill L, Breen C, Vinen K: Haemodialysis: a self-care service. Nursing Mgt. 2009, 15 (10): 28-34.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference O’Connor SM, Jardine AG, Millar K: The prediction of self-care behaviors in end-stage renal disease patients using Leventhal’s self-regulatory model. J Psychosom Res. 2008, 65 (2): 191-200.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor SM, Jardine AG, Millar K: The prediction of self-care behaviors in end-stage renal disease patients using Leventhal’s self-regulatory model. J Psychosom Res. 2008, 65 (2): 191-200.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Perico N, Remuzzi G: Chronic kidney disease: a research and public health priority. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012, 0: 1-8. Perico N, Remuzzi G: Chronic kidney disease: a research and public health priority. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012, 0: 1-8.
9.
go back to reference Ng TG, Tan SH: Novel trends in haemodialysis: where are we heading. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010, 39 (6): 482-488.PubMed Ng TG, Tan SH: Novel trends in haemodialysis: where are we heading. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2010, 39 (6): 482-488.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Coulter A: Implementing shared decision making in the UK: a report for the Health Foundation produced as a scoping paper for the health foundation in 2009. 2009, London: The Health Foundation, 1: 1-52. Coulter A: Implementing shared decision making in the UK: a report for the Health Foundation produced as a scoping paper for the health foundation in 2009. 2009, London: The Health Foundation, 1: 1-52.
12.
go back to reference Mactier R, Mitra S, Boakes S, Collins K, Crecraft M, Dixon D: Renal Association working party on home haemodialysis. 2009, 1: 1-13. Mactier R, Mitra S, Boakes S, Collins K, Crecraft M, Dixon D: Renal Association working party on home haemodialysis. 2009, 1: 1-13.
13.
go back to reference Bower P, Kennedy A, Reeves D, Rogers A, Blakeman T, Chew-Graham C: A cluster randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a’whole systems’ model of self-management support for the management of long-term conditions in primary care: trial protocol. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 7-doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bower P, Kennedy A, Reeves D, Rogers A, Blakeman T, Chew-Graham C: A cluster randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a’whole systems’ model of self-management support for the management of long-term conditions in primary care: trial protocol. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 7-doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle VA, Zwarenstein M, Dick J: Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, Art. No.: CD003267. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003267, 4CrossRef Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle VA, Zwarenstein M, Dick J: Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001, Art. No.: CD003267. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003267, 4CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wanless D: Securing our future health: taking a long term view. 2002, London: Department of Health Wanless D: Securing our future health: taking a long term view. 2002, London: Department of Health
16.
go back to reference Wilkie M, Campbell R, Newstead C, Laboi P, Stubbs C, Henwood A: Sharing haemodialysis care: improving outcomes. 2010, Health Foundation Wilkie M, Campbell R, Newstead C, Laboi P, Stubbs C, Henwood A: Sharing haemodialysis care: improving outcomes. 2010, Health Foundation
17.
go back to reference Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000, 321 (7262): 694-696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D: Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000, 321 (7262): 694-696.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005, 14 (1): 26-33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005, 14 (1): 26-33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference French S, Green S, O’Connor D, McKenzie J, Francis J, Michie S: Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012, 7 (1): 38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral French S, Green S, O’Connor D, McKenzie J, Francis J, Michie S: Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012, 7 (1): 38CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Francis J, O’Connor D, Curran J: Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012, 7 (1): 35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Francis J, O’Connor D, Curran J: Theories of behaviour change synthesised into a set of theoretical groupings: introducing a thematic series on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2012, 7 (1): 35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference McLaughlin K, Jones H, VanderStraeten C, Mills C, Visser M, Taub K: Why do patients choose self-care dialysis?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008, 23 (12): 3972CrossRefPubMed McLaughlin K, Jones H, VanderStraeten C, Mills C, Visser M, Taub K: Why do patients choose self-care dialysis?. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008, 23 (12): 3972CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mitchell A, Farrand P, James H, Luke R, Purtell R, Wyatt K: Patients’ experience of transition onto hameodialysis: a qualitative study. J Ren Care. 2009, 35 (2): 99-107.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell A, Farrand P, James H, Luke R, Purtell R, Wyatt K: Patients’ experience of transition onto hameodialysis: a qualitative study. J Ren Care. 2009, 35 (2): 99-107.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012, 7 (1): 37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012, 7 (1): 37CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Francis J, Michie S, Johnston M, Hardeman W, Eccles M: How do behaviour change techniques map on to psychological constructs?. Results Consens Process: Galway, Ireland. 2005, 20 (Suppl 1): 83-84. Francis J, Michie S, Johnston M, Hardeman W, Eccles M: How do behaviour change techniques map on to psychological constructs?. Results Consens Process: Galway, Ireland. 2005, 20 (Suppl 1): 83-84.
26.
go back to reference Wang LM, Chiou CP: Effectiveness of interactive multimedia CD on self-care and powerlessness in hemodialysis patients. J Nurs Res. 2011, 19 (2): 102-111.CrossRefPubMed Wang LM, Chiou CP: Effectiveness of interactive multimedia CD on self-care and powerlessness in hemodialysis patients. J Nurs Res. 2011, 19 (2): 102-111.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Aasen EM, Kvangarsnes M, Heggen K: Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011, 26: 61-69.CrossRefPubMed Aasen EM, Kvangarsnes M, Heggen K: Perceptions of patient participation amongst elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in a dialysis unit. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011, 26: 61-69.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Kupfer JM, Bond EU: Patient satisfaction and patient-centred care necessary but not equal. JAMA. 2012, 308 (2): 139-140.CrossRefPubMed Kupfer JM, Bond EU: Patient satisfaction and patient-centred care necessary but not equal. JAMA. 2012, 308 (2): 139-140.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bray S: Why self-care can make a difference. Nephrol News Issues. 2011, 25 (12): 18PubMed Bray S: Why self-care can make a difference. Nephrol News Issues. 2011, 25 (12): 18PubMed
30.
go back to reference Ziebland S: Why listening to health care users really matters. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012, 17 (2): 68-69.CrossRefPubMed Ziebland S: Why listening to health care users really matters. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012, 17 (2): 68-69.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Entwistle V, Firnigl D, Ryan M, Francis J, Kinghorn P: Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012, 17 (2): 70-78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Entwistle V, Firnigl D, Ryan M, Francis J, Kinghorn P: Which experiences of health care delivery matter to service users and why? A critical interpretive synthesis and conceptual map. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012, 17 (2): 70-78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference McCullough K, Sharma P, Ali T, Khan I, Smith WCS, MacLeod A: Measuring the population burden of chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review of the estimated prevalence of impaired kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012, 27 (5): 1812-1821.CrossRefPubMed McCullough K, Sharma P, Ali T, Khan I, Smith WCS, MacLeod A: Measuring the population burden of chronic kidney disease: a systematic literature review of the estimated prevalence of impaired kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012, 27 (5): 1812-1821.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell E, Grimshaw J: What is an adequate sample size?. 2009, Psychology and Health: Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies Francis J, Johnston M, Robertson C, Glidewell E, Grimshaw J: What is an adequate sample size?. 2009, Psychology and Health: Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies
34.
go back to reference Timmers L, Thong M, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Heijmans M, Rijken M: Illness perceptions in dialysis patients and their association with quality of life. Psychol Health. 2008, 23 (6): 679-690.CrossRefPubMed Timmers L, Thong M, Dekker FW, Boeschoten EW, Heijmans M, Rijken M: Illness perceptions in dialysis patients and their association with quality of life. Psychol Health. 2008, 23 (6): 679-690.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Francis J, Stockton C, Eccles M, Johnston M, Cuthbertson B, Grimshaw J: Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2009, 14 (4): 625-646.CrossRefPubMed Francis J, Stockton C, Eccles M, Johnston M, Cuthbertson B, Grimshaw J: Evidence-based selection of theories for designing behaviour change interventions: using methods based on theoretical construct domains to understand clinicians’ blood transfusion behaviour. Br J Health Psychol. 2009, 14 (4): 625-646.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Using behavioural theories to optimise shared haemodialysis care: a qualitative intervention development study of patient and professional experience
Authors
Liz Glidewell
Stephen Boocock
Kelvin Pine
Rebecca Campbell
Julia Hackett
Shamila Gill
Martin Wilkie
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Implementation Science / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1748-5908
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-118

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Implementation Science 1/2013 Go to the issue