Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2007

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Research

Whales, dolphins or fishes? The ethnotaxonomy of cetaceans in São Sebastião, Brazil

Authors: Shirley P Souza, Alpina Begossi

Published in: Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Abstract

The local knowledge of human populations about the natural world has been addressed through ethnobiological studies, especially concerning resources uses and their management. Several criteria, such as morphology, ecology, behavior, utility and salience, have been used by local communities to classify plants and animals. Studies regarding fishers' knowledge on cetaceans in the world, especially in Brazil, began in the last decade. Our objective is to investigate the folk classification by fishers concerning cetaceans, and the contribution of fishers' local knowledge to the conservation of that group. In particular, we aim to record fishers' knowledge in relation to cetaceans, with emphasis on folk taxonomy. The studied area is São Sebastião, located in the southeastern coast of Brazil, where 70 fishers from 14 communities were selected according to their fishing experience and interviewed through questionnaires about classification, nomenclature and ecological aspects of local cetaceans' species. Our results indicated that most fishers classified cetaceans as belonging to the life-form 'fish'. Fishers' citations for the nomenclature of the 11 biological species (10 biological genera), resulted in 14 folk species (3 generic names). Fishers' taxonomy was influenced mostly by the phenotypic and cultural salience of the studied cetaceans. Cultural transmission, vertical and horizontal, was intimately linked to fishers' classification process. The most salient species, therefore well recognized and named, were those most often caught by gillnets, in addition to the biggest ones and those most exposed by media, through TV programs, which were watched and mentioned by fishers. Our results showed that fishers' ecological knowledge could be a valuable contribution to cetaceans' conservation, helping to determine areas and periods for their protection, indicating priority topics for research and participating in alternative management related to the gillnet fisheries.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Murphy RE: A quarter century of American Anthropology. Perspectives in Cultural Anthropology. Edited by: Applebaum H. 1987, New York: State University of New York Press, 5-30.
2.
Begossi A, Hanazaki N, Silvano RAM: Ecologia humana, etnoecologia e conservação. Métodos de coleta e análise de dados em etnobiologia, etnoecologia e disciplinas correlatas. Edited by: Amorozo MCM, Ming LC, da Silva SM. 2002, Rio Claro: UNESP/CNPq, 93-128.
3.
Berlin B: Ethnobiological classification – Principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. 1992, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
4.
Conklin HC: The lexicographical treatment of folk taxonomies. Internacional Journal of American Linguistics. 1962, 28: 119-141. 10.1086/464679.CrossRef
5.
Atran S: Itzaj Maya folkbiological taxonomy: cognitive universal and cultural particulars. Folkbiology. Edited by: Medin DL, Atran S. 1999, Massachusetts: MIT Press – Cambridge, 119-204.
6.
Simpson GG: Principles of animal taxonomy. 1961, New York: Columbia University Press
7.
Mishler B, Donoghue MJ: Species concept: a case for pluralism. Systematic Zoology. 1982, 31: 491-503. 10.2307/2413371.CrossRef
8.
Ereshefsky M: The Units of Evolution – Essays on the Nature of Species. 1992, Cambridge: MIT Press
9.
Darwin C: On the Origin of Species by means of natural selection. 1859, London: Murray
10.
Dobzhansky T: Genetics and the Origin of Species. 1937, New York: Columbia University Press
11.
Begossi A, Clauzet M, Guarano L, Lima RV, MacCord PF, Ramires M, Silvano RAM: Are biological species and high-ranking groups real? The ethnotaxonomy of fish on the Atlantic Forest coast of Brazil. 20th Meeting of the Society for Human Ecology. 2005, Salt Lake City, USA
12.
Mourão JS, Araújo HFP, Almeida FS: Ethnotaxonomy of mastofauna as practiced by hunters of the municipality of Paulista, state of Paraíba-Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine. 2006, 2: 19-10.1186/1746-4269-2-19. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-2-19.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
Hunn E: The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. American Anthropologist. 1982, 84 (4): 830-847. 10.1525/aa.1982.84.4.02a00070.CrossRef
14.
Begossi A, Castro F, Silvano RAM: Ecologia humana e conservação. Ecologia de pescadores da Mata Atlântica e da Amazônia. Edited by: Begossi A. 2004, São Paulo: Ed. Hucitec, 313-324.
15.
Silvano RAM, Begossi A: Ethnoichthyology and fish conservation in Piracicaba River, Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology. 2002, 22 (2): 285-306.
16.
Ruddle K: Systems of knowledge: dialogue, relationships and process. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2000, 2: 277-304. 10.1023/A:1011470209408.CrossRef
17.
Drew JA: Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology. 2005, 1286-1293. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00158.x. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00158.x
18.
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C: Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications. 2000, 10 (5): 1251-1262. 10.2307/2641280.CrossRef
19.
Anderson EN: Sacred fish. Man, New Series. 1969, 4 (3): 443-449.
20.
Busnel RG: Symbiotic relationship between man and dolphins. Annuary of NewYork Academic Science. 1973, 35 (2): 112-31.
21.
Acheson JM: Anthropology of fishing. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1981, 10: 275-316. 10.1146/annurev.an.10.100181.001423.CrossRef
22.
Begossi A, Figueiredo JL: Ethnoichthyology of southern coastal fishermen: cases from Búzios Island and Sepetiba Bay (Brazil). Bulletin of Marine Science. 1995, 56 (2): 710-717.
23.
Marques JGW: Etnoictiologia: pescando pescadores nas águas da transdisciplinaridade. XI Encontro Brasileiro de Ictiologia. 1995, Campinas: PUC
24.
Foale S: What's in a name? An analysis of the West Nggela (Solomon Islands) fish taxonomy. SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin. 1998, 9: 2-19.
25.
Johannes RE, Freeman MR, Hamilton RJ: Ignore fishers' knowledge and miss the boat. Fish and Fisheries. 2000, 1: 257-271. 10.1046/j.1467-2979.2000.00019.x.CrossRef
26.
Marques JGW: Pescando pescadores – Ciência e etnociência em uma perspectiva ecológica. 2001, São Paulo: NUPAUB – USP
27.
Seixas CS, Begossi A: Ethnozoology of fishing communities from Ilha Grande (Atlantic Forest coast, Brazil). Journal of Ethnobiology. 2001, 21 (1): 107-135.
28.
Souza MR, Barrella W: Conhecimento popular sobre peixes numa comunidade caiçara da Estação Ecológica de Juréia-Itatins/SP. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca. 2001, 27 (2): 123-130.
29.
Silvano RAM, Begossi A: Local knowledge on a cosmopolitan fish – Ethnoecology of Pomatomus saltatrix (Pomatomidae) in Brazil and Australia. Fisheries Research. 2005, 71: 43-59. 10.1016/j.fishres.2004.07.007.CrossRef
30.
Silvano RAM, Lopes PFM, Lima RV, Begossi A: When does this fish spawn? Fishermen's local knowledge of migration and reproduction of Brazilian coastal fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 2006, doi:10.1007/s10641-006-9043-2.
31.
Przbylski CB, Monteiro-Filho ELA: Interação entre pescadores e mamíferos marinhos no litoral do Estado do Paraná – Brasil. Biotemas. 2001, 14 (2): 141-156.
32.
Pinheiro L, Cremer MJ: Etnoecologia e captura acidental de golfinhos (Cetacea: Pontoporiidae e Delphinidae) na Baía da Babitonga, Santa Catarina. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente. 2003, 8: 69-75.
33.
Alarcon DT, Schiavetti A: O conhecimento dos pescadores artesanais de Itacaré sobre a fauna de vertebrados (não peixes) associados às atividades. Gestão Costeira Integrada. 2005, 4: 1-4.
34.
Peterson D: Etnobiologia de botos (Tursiops truncatus) e a pesca cooperativa em Laguna, Santa Catarina. Florianópolis. 2005, Bachelor's monography, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
35.
Oliveira F, Monteiro-Filho ELA: Relação entre pescadores e botos de Cananéia – Olhar e percepção caiçara. Enciclopédia Caiçara, v.5, Festas, lendas e mitos caiçaras. Edited by: Diegues AC. 2006, São Paulo: Ed. Hucitec, USP/NUPAUB/CEC
36.
Souza SP, Begossi A: Etnobiologia de Sotalia fluviatilis (Gervais, 1853) no litoral norte do estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Workshop on Research and Conservation of the Genus Sotalia, Rio de Janeiro. 2006, 39-
37.
Reeves RR, Smith BD, Crespo EA, Notarbartolo di Sciara G: Dolphins, Whales and Porpoises: 2002 – 1020 Conservation Action Plan for the World's Cetaceans. 2003, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN/SSC Cetacean Specialist GroupCrossRef
38.
Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais e Renováveis – IBAMA: Mamíferos Aquáticos do Brasil. Plano de ação. 2001, Brasília: MMA/IBAMA
39.
Perrin WF, Donovan GP, Barlow J: Gillnets and Cetaceans. Report of the International Whaling Commission. 1994, 15-
40.
41.
Bailey KD: Methods of social research. 1982, New York: The Free Press, Macmillan Publishers
42.
Begossi A: Ecologia de pescadores da Mata Atlântica e da Amazônia. 2004, São Paulo: Ed. Hucitec
43.
Martuscelli P, Olmos F, Silva e Silva R, Mazzarella IP, Pino FP, Raduan EM: Cetaceans of São Paulo, Southeastern Brazil. Mammalia. 1996, 60 (1): 125-139.CrossRef
44.
Souza SP, Winck M: Captura acidental de pequenos cetáceos no litoral norte de São Paulo. IV Encontro Nacional sobre Conservação e Pesquisa de Mamíferos Aquáticos. 2005, Santa Catarina, 28-
45.
Souza SP, Campos FP, Winck M: Ocorrência de cetáceos no Arquipélago dos Alcatrazes. I Congresso Brasileiro de Biologia Marinha. Rio de Janeiro. 2006, 264-2
46.
Souza SP, Winck M, Siles S: Ocorrência de Sotalia fluviatilis (Gervais, 1853) no litoral norte do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Workshop on Research and Conservation of the genus Sotalia, Rio de Janeiro. 2006, 53-
47.
Jefferson TA, Leatherwood S, Webber MA: Marine mammals of the World. FAO Species identification guide. 1993, Rome: UNEP
48.
Berlin B: Folk systematics in relation to biological classification and nomenclature. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 1973, 4: 250-271. 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.001355.CrossRef
49.
Hays TE: Utilitarian/adaptionist explanations of folk biological classification: some cautionary notes. Journal of Ethnobiology. 1982, 2 (1): 89-94.
50.
Dougherty JWD: Salience and relativity in classification. American Ethnologist. 1978, 5 (1): 66-80. 10.1525/ae.1978.5.1.02a00060.CrossRef
51.
Brown CH: Mode of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy. Current Anthropology. 1985, 26 (1): 43-62. 10.1086/203224.CrossRef
52.
Brown CH: Language and living things. 1984, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press
53.
Atran S: Cognitive foundations of Natural History – Towards an anthropology of Science. 1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
54.
Paz VA, Begossi A: Ethnoichthyology of Gamboa fishermen of Sepetiba Bay, Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology. 1996, 16 (2): 157-168.
55.
Dupré J: Are whales fish?. Folkbiology. Edited by: Medin DL, Atran S. 1999, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 461-476.
56.
Pianka ER: Evolutionary Ecology. 1983, New York: Harper & Brown
57.
Hunn E: Size as limiting the recognition of biodiversity in folkbiological classifications: one of four factors governing the cultural recognition of biological factors. Folkbiology. Edited by: Medin DL, Atran S. 1999, Massachusetts: MIT Press – Cambridge, 47-70.
58.
Siciliano S: Review of small cetaceans and fishery interactions in coastal waters of Brazil. Report International Whaling Comission. 1994, 15: 241-250.
59.
Di Beneditto AP, Ramos RMA, Lima NRW: Os golfinhos: origem, classificação, captura acidental, hábito alimentar. 2001, Porto Alegre: Editora Cinco Continentes, 148-
60.
Freitas Netto R: Levantamento das artes de pesca no litoral do Estado do Espírito santo e suas interações com cetáceos. Campos dos Goytacazes. 2003, Master's Dissertation, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense
Metadata
Title
Whales, dolphins or fishes? The ethnotaxonomy of cetaceans in São Sebastião, Brazil
Authors
Shirley P Souza
Alpina Begossi
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1746-4269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-3-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1/2007 Go to the issue

Research

Traditional medicinal plant knowledge and use by local healers in Sekoru District, Jimma Zone, Southwestern Ethiopia

Research

Plants traditionally used to make brooms in several European countries

Research

Plants used traditionally to treat malaria in Brazil: the archives of Flora Medicinal

Research

Pathways as "signatures in landscape": towards an ethnography of mobility among the Mbya-Guaraní(Northeastern Argentina)

Research

Wild food plants of popular use in Sicily

Research

Ethnomedicine and dominant medicine in multicultural Australia: a critical realist reflection on the case of Korean-Australian immigrants in Sydney