Top

Head & Face Medicine

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process

Authors: Claudia Reicheneder, Bernd Hofrichter, Andreas Faltermeier, Peter Proff, Carsten Lippold, Christian Kirschneck

Published in: Head & Face Medicine | Issue 1/2014

Abstract

Introduction

We aimed to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different retainer wires and three different bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process of enamel surface sandblasting.

Methods

400 extracted bovine incisors were divided into 10 groups of 20 paired specimens each. 10 specimens of each group were pretreated by enamel sandblasting. The retainer wires Bond-A-Braid™, GAC-Wildcat®-Twistflex and everStick®ORTHO were bonded to the teeth with the adhesives Transbond™-LR, Tetric-EvoFlow™ and Stick®FLOW and then debonded measuring the SBS.

Results

While sandblasting generally increased SBS for all tested combinations, the retainer wires bonded with Transbond™-LR showed the highest SBS both with and without prior sandblasting. Significantly lower SBS were found for Tetric-EvoFlow™ that were comparable to those for everStick®ORTHO.

Conclusions

Pretreatment of enamel surfaces by sandblasting increased the SBS of all retainer-wires. Transbond™-LR showed the best results compared to Tetric-EvoFlow™ and everStick®ORTHO, while all combinations used provided sufficient bonding strengths for clinical use.

Available only for authorised users

Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA: Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1981, 80: 349-365. 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90171-8.CrossRef

Little RM: Stability and relapse of dental arch alignment. Br J Orthod. 1990, 7: 235-241.CrossRef

Cobourne MT, DiBiase AT: Handbook of Orthodontics. 2009, Edinburgh, New York: Mosby

Zachrisson BU: Clinical experience with direct-bonded orthodontic retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1977, 71: 440-448. 10.1016/0002-9416(77)90247-0.CrossRef

Gottlieb EL, Nelson AH, Vogels DS: JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 1996, 30: 615-629.PubMed

Artun J, Spadafora AT, Shapiro PA: A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod. 1997, 19: 501-509. 10.1093/ejo/19.5.501.CrossRefPubMed

Dahl EH, Zachrisson BU: Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1991, 25: 619-630.PubMed

Aldrees AM, Al-Mutairi TK, Hakami ZW, Al-Malki MM: Bonded orthodontic retainers: a comparison of initial bond strength of different wire-and-composite combinations. J Orofac Orthop. 2010, 71: 290-299. 10.1007/s00056-010-9947-5.CrossRefPubMed

Diamond M: Resin fiberglass bonded retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1987, 21: 182-183.PubMed

10.

Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV: Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2006, 33: 205-212. 10.1179/146531205225021624.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Cal-Neto JP, Castro S, Moura PM, Ribeiro D, Miguel JAM: Influence of enamel sandblasting prior to etching on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded lingual appliances. Angle Orthod. 2011, 81: 149-152. 10.2319/050210-237.1.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Reynolds IR: A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975, 2: 171-178.CrossRef

13.

Reicheneder CA, Gedrange T, Lange A, Baumert U, Proff P: Shear and tensile bond strength comparison of various contemporary orthodontic adhesive systems: an in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009, 135: 422-10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.12.001. e1-6; discussion 422–3CrossRefPubMed

14.

Radlanski RJ, Zain ND: Stability of the bonded lingual wire retainer - a study of the initial bond strength. J Orofac Orthoped. 2004, 65: 321-335.CrossRef

15.

Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD: Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mat. 2001, 17: 184-189. 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00068-3.CrossRef

16.

Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T: Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res. 1983, 62: 1076-1081. 10.1177/00220345830620101501.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Faltermeier A, Behr M, Müssig D: A comparative evaluation of bracket bonding with 1-, 2-, and 3-component adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007, 132: 144-e1-5PubMed

18.

Zachrisson BJ: Third-generation mandibular bonded lingual 3–3 retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1995, 29: 39-48.PubMed

19.

Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Henderson S: Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001, 119: 625-631. 10.1067/mod.2001.113789.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F: Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997, 111: 366-373. 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80018-2.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Foek DLS, Ozcan M, Krebs E, Sandham A: Adhesive properties of bonded orthodontic retainers to enamel: stainless steel wire vs fiber-reinforced composites. J Adhes Dent. 2009, 11: 381-390.PubMed

22.

Waters NE: Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. Sym Soc Exp Biol. 1980, 34: 99-135.

Title: Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process
Authors: Claudia Reicheneder
Bernd Hofrichter
Andreas Faltermeier
Peter Proff
Carsten Lippold
Christian Kirschneck
Publication date: 01-12-2014
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Head & Face Medicine / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1746-160X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-51

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Shear bond strength of different retainer wires and bonding adhesives in consideration of the pretreatment process

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Smoothened gene alterations in keratocystic odontogenic tumors

Efficiency of pivot splints as jaw exercise apparatus in combination with stabilization splints in anterior disc displacement without reduction: a retrospective study

A comparison of mandibular and maxillary alveolar osteogenesis over six weeks: a radiological examination

Oral health survey and oral health questionnaire for high school students in Tibet, China

A retrospective analysis of the relationship between rhinosinusitis and sinus lift dental implantation

Impact of removing mastoid process for advanced parotid cancer on facial nerve identification, preservation and reconstruction