Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Study protocol

The OPERA trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential and nursing accommodation

Authors: David R Ellard, Stephanie JC Taylor, Suzanne Parsons, Margaret Thorogood

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The OPERA trial is large cluster randomised trial testing a physical activity intervention to address depression amongst people living in nursing and residential homes for older people. A process evaluation was commissioned alongside the trial and we report the protocol for this process evaluation. Challenges included the cognitive and physical ability of the participants, the need to respect the privacy of all home residents, including study non-participants, and the physical structure of the homes. Evaluation activity had to be organised around the structured timetable of homes, leaving limited opportunities for data collection. The aims of this process evaluation are to provide findings that will assist in the interpretation of the clinical trial results, and to inform potential implementation of the physical activity intervention on a wider scale.

Methods/design

Quantitative data on recruitment of homes and individuals is being collected. For homes in the intervention arm, data on dose and fidelity of the intervention delivered; including individual rates of participation in exercise classes are collected. In the control homes, uptake and delivery of depression awareness training is monitored. These data will be combined with qualitative data from an in-depth study of a purposive sample of eight homes (six intervention and two control).

Discussion

Although process evaluations are increasingly funded alongside trials, it is still rare to see the findings published, and even rarer to see the protocol for such an evaluation published. Process evaluations have the potential to assist in interpreting and understanding trial results as well as informing future roll-outs of interventions. If such evaluations are funded they should also be reported and reviewed in a similar way to the trial outcome evaluation.

Trial Registration

ISRCTN No: ISRCTN43769277
Literature
1.
go back to reference Underwood M: Protocol for the OPERA trial: a randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential and nursing accommodation. [ISRCTN No: 43769277]. BMC Trials. 2010, 12: 27-CrossRef Underwood M: Protocol for the OPERA trial: a randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential and nursing accommodation. [ISRCTN No: 43769277]. BMC Trials. 2010, 12: 27-CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Matthews FE, Dening T: Prevalence of dementia in institutional care. The Lancet. 2002, 360: 225-226. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09461-8.CrossRef Matthews FE, Dening T: Prevalence of dementia in institutional care. The Lancet. 2002, 360: 225-226. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09461-8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Steckler A, Linnan L, (Eds.): Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. 2002, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Steckler A, Linnan L, (Eds.): Process Evaluation for Public Health Interventions and Research. 2002, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
6.
go back to reference Weiss CH: Evaluation research. 1972, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall Weiss CH: Evaluation research. 1972, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
7.
go back to reference Weiss CH: Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory: Exploring Theory-based Evaluation in Complex Community Initiatives for Children and Families. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Edited by: Connell J, Kubish A, Schorr L, Weiss CH. 1995, Washington, DC Aspen Institute Weiss CH: Nothing as Practical as a Good Theory: Exploring Theory-based Evaluation in Complex Community Initiatives for Children and Families. New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Edited by: Connell J, Kubish A, Schorr L, Weiss CH. 1995, Washington, DC Aspen Institute
8.
go back to reference Weiss CH: How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway?. Evaluation Review. 1997, 21: 501-524. 10.1177/0193841X9702100405.CrossRef Weiss CH: How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway?. Evaluation Review. 1997, 21: 501-524. 10.1177/0193841X9702100405.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bryman A: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?. Qualitative Research. 2006, 6: 97-113. 10.1177/1468794106058877.CrossRef Bryman A: Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: how is it done?. Qualitative Research. 2006, 6: 97-113. 10.1177/1468794106058877.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995, 311: 42-45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pope C, Mays N: Qualitative Research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ. 1995, 311: 42-45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006, 332: 413-416. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006, 332: 413-416. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Oakley A, Strange V, Stephenson J, Forrest S, Monteiro H: Evaluating Processes: A Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Sex Education. Evaluation. 2004, 10: 440-462. 10.1177/1356389004050220.CrossRef Oakley A, Strange V, Stephenson J, Forrest S, Monteiro H: Evaluating Processes: A Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Sex Education. Evaluation. 2004, 10: 440-462. 10.1177/1356389004050220.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Morgan DL: Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research. Qual Health Res. 1998, 8: 362-376. 10.1177/104973239800800307.CrossRefPubMed Morgan DL: Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research. Qual Health Res. 1998, 8: 362-376. 10.1177/104973239800800307.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference McKee KJ, Houston DM, Barnes S: Methods for Assessing Quality of Life and Well-Being in Frail Older People. Psychology and Health. 2002, 17: 737-751. 10.1080/0887044021000054755.CrossRef McKee KJ, Houston DM, Barnes S: Methods for Assessing Quality of Life and Well-Being in Frail Older People. Psychology and Health. 2002, 17: 737-751. 10.1080/0887044021000054755.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Parker C, Barnes S, McKee K, Morgan K, Torrington J, Tregenza P: Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people. Ageing & Society. 2004, 24: 941-962.CrossRef Parker C, Barnes S, McKee K, Morgan K, Torrington J, Tregenza P: Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people. Ageing & Society. 2004, 24: 941-962.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2006, QSR International Pty Ltd, Version 7: NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2006, QSR International Pty Ltd, Version 7:
17.
go back to reference PASW Statistics 18.0:: Predictive Analytics SoftWare Statistics (Version 18). 2009, SPSS inc PASW Statistics 18.0:: Predictive Analytics SoftWare Statistics (Version 18). 2009, SPSS inc
Metadata
Title
The OPERA trial: a protocol for the process evaluation of a randomised trial of an exercise intervention for older people in residential and nursing accommodation
Authors
David R Ellard
Stephanie JC Taylor
Suzanne Parsons
Margaret Thorogood
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-28

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Trials 1/2011 Go to the issue