Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Review

Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration

Author: Phil Edwards

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

A good questionnaire design for a clinical trial will minimise bias and maximise precision in the estimates of treatment effect within budget. Attempts to collect more data than will be analysed may risk reducing recruitment (reducing power) and increasing losses to follow-up (possibly introducing bias). The mode of administration can also impact on the cost, quality and completeness of data collected. There is good evidence for design features that improve data completeness but further research is required to evaluate strategies in clinical trials. Theory-based guidelines for style, appearance, and layout of self-administered questionnaires have been proposed but require evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Armstrong BG: Optimizing power in allocating resources to exposure assessment in an epidemiologic study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 144: 192-197.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong BG: Optimizing power in allocating resources to exposure assessment in an epidemiologic study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996, 144: 192-197.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hill AB: Observation and experiment. N Engl J Med. 1953, 248: 995-1001. 10.1056/NEJM195306112482401.CrossRefPubMed Hill AB: Observation and experiment. N Engl J Med. 1953, 248: 995-1001. 10.1056/NEJM195306112482401.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, 3: MR000008-PubMed Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, 3: MR000008-PubMed
5.
go back to reference CIOMS: Management of safety information from clinical trials: report of CIOMS working group VI. 2005, Geneva, Switzerland: Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) CIOMS: Management of safety information from clinical trials: report of CIOMS working group VI. 2005, Geneva, Switzerland: Council for International Organisations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS)
6.
go back to reference Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2004, Oxford University Press, 3 Streiner DL, Norman GR: Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2004, Oxford University Press, 3
7.
go back to reference Farr JN, Jenkins JJ, Paterson DG: Simplification of Flesch reading ease formula. J Appl Psychol. 1951, 35: 333-337. 10.1037/h0062427.CrossRef Farr JN, Jenkins JJ, Paterson DG: Simplification of Flesch reading ease formula. J Appl Psychol. 1951, 35: 333-337. 10.1037/h0062427.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R: Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 1995, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 21: Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R: Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. 1995, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 21:
9.
10.
go back to reference Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad F: Spacing, position, and order: interpretive heuristics for visual features of survey questions. Pub Opin Quart. 2004, 68: 368-393. 10.1093/poq/nfh035.CrossRef Tourangeau R, Couper MP, Conrad F: Spacing, position, and order: interpretive heuristics for visual features of survey questions. Pub Opin Quart. 2004, 68: 368-393. 10.1093/poq/nfh035.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tufte E: The visual display of quantitative information. 1999, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press Tufte E: The visual display of quantitative information. 1999, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press
13.
go back to reference Garber MC, Nau DP, Erickson SR, Aikens JE, Lawrence JB: The concordance of self-report with other measures of medication adherence: a summary of the literature. Med Care. 2004, 42: 649-652. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000129496.05898.02.CrossRefPubMed Garber MC, Nau DP, Erickson SR, Aikens JE, Lawrence JB: The concordance of self-report with other measures of medication adherence: a summary of the literature. Med Care. 2004, 42: 649-652. 10.1097/01.mlr.0000129496.05898.02.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Heerwegh D: Mode differences between face-to-face and web surveys: an experimental investigation of data quality and social desirability effects. Int J Pub Opin Res. 2009, 21: 111-121. 10.1093/ijpor/edn054.CrossRef Heerwegh D: Mode differences between face-to-face and web surveys: an experimental investigation of data quality and social desirability effects. Int J Pub Opin Res. 2009, 21: 111-121. 10.1093/ijpor/edn054.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Greenland S: Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1977, 106: 184-187.PubMed Greenland S: Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1977, 106: 184-187.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kenward MG, Carpenter J: Multiple imputation: current perspectives. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007, 16: 199-218. 10.1177/0962280206075304.CrossRefPubMed Kenward MG, Carpenter J: Multiple imputation: current perspectives. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007, 16: 199-218. 10.1177/0962280206075304.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Sandercock P, Frost C: Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?. Contr Clin Trials. 2004, 25: 31-52. 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013.CrossRef Edwards P, Roberts I, Sandercock P, Frost C: Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?. Contr Clin Trials. 2004, 25: 31-52. 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rothman K, Mikkelsen EM, Riis A, Sørensen HT, Wise LA, Hatch EE: Randomized trial of questionnaire length. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 154-10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818f2e96.CrossRefPubMed Rothman K, Mikkelsen EM, Riis A, Sørensen HT, Wise LA, Hatch EE: Randomized trial of questionnaire length. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 154-10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818f2e96.CrossRefPubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Edwards P, Cooper R, Roberts I, Frost C: Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2005, 59: 987-999. 10.1136/jech.2005.034397.CrossRef Edwards P, Cooper R, Roberts I, Frost C: Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2005, 59: 987-999. 10.1136/jech.2005.034397.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Scott P, Edwards P: Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006, 6: 111-10.1186/1472-6963-6-111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scott P, Edwards P: Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006, 6: 111-10.1186/1472-6963-6-111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE: Maximising response to postal questionnaires - a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 5-10.1186/1471-2288-6-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE: Maximising response to postal questionnaires - a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006, 6: 5-10.1186/1471-2288-6-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones D, Taylor D, Salt A, Marlow N, Brocklehurst P: The effect of a monetary incentive on return of a postal health and development questionnaire: a randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005, 5: 55-10.1186/1472-6963-5-55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kenyon S, Pike K, Jones D, Taylor D, Salt A, Marlow N, Brocklehurst P: The effect of a monetary incentive on return of a postal health and development questionnaire: a randomised trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2005, 5: 55-10.1186/1472-6963-5-55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Gates S, Williams MA, Withers E, Williamson E, Mt-Isa S, Lamb SE: Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? The MINT incentive study. Trials. 2009, 10: 44-10.1186/1745-6215-10-44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gates S, Williams MA, Withers E, Williamson E, Mt-Isa S, Lamb SE: Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? The MINT incentive study. Trials. 2009, 10: 44-10.1186/1745-6215-10-44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference McColl E: Commentary: methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Int J Epidemiol. 2007, 36: 968-PubMed McColl E: Commentary: methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Int J Epidemiol. 2007, 36: 968-PubMed
27.
go back to reference McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J: Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001, 5: 1-256.CrossRefPubMed McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, Steen N, Thomas R, Harvey E, Garratt A, Bond J: Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001, 5: 1-256.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Edwards P, Fernandes J, Roberts I, Kuppermann N: Young men were at risk of becoming lost to follow-up in a cohort of head-injured adults. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 417-424. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.021.CrossRefPubMed Edwards P, Fernandes J, Roberts I, Kuppermann N: Young men were at risk of becoming lost to follow-up in a cohort of head-injured adults. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007, 60: 417-424. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.021.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Nakash R, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J: Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial - a qualitative study of the patient's perspective. J Eval Clin Prac. 2008, 14: 226-235. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00838.x.CrossRef Nakash R, Hutton JL, Lamb SE, Gates S, Fisher J: Response and non-response to postal questionnaire follow-up in a clinical trial - a qualitative study of the patient's perspective. J Eval Clin Prac. 2008, 14: 226-235. 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00838.x.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
Author
Phil Edwards
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Trials 1/2010 Go to the issue