Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research

Paying clinicians to join clinical trials: a review of guidelines and interview study of trialists

Authors: James Raftery, Christine Kerr, Sheila Hawker, John Powell

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The motivations of clinicians to participate in clinical trials have been little studied. This project explored the potential role of payment for participation in publicly funded clinical trials in the UK. The aims were to review relevant guidelines and to collate and analyse views of clinical trialists on the role of payments and other factors that motivated clinicians to join clinical trials.

Methods

Review of guidelines governing payments to clinicians for recruitment to trials. Semi-structured interviews with a range of NHS clinical trial leaders, analysed using qualititative methods.

Results

While UK guidelines had little to say specifically on payments linked to recruitment, all payments have become highly regulated and increasingly transparent. Interview participants believed that expenses arising from research should be covered. Payments in excess of expenses were seen as likely to increase participation but with the risk of reducing quality. Motivations such as interest in the topic, the scope for patients to benefit and intellectual curiosity were considered more important. Barriers to involvement included bureaucracy and lack of time.

Discussion

Limited scope exists for paying clinicians over-and-above the cost of their time to be involved in research. Most trialists favour full payment of all expenses related to research.

Conclusion

Payment of clinicians beyond expenses is perceived to be a less important motivating factor than researching important, salient questions, and facilitating research by reducing bureaucracy and delay.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Campbell MK, Snowden C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, Enthwistel V, Garcia J, Roberts I, Grant A, (the STEPS group): Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technology Assessment. 2007, 11 (48): http://www.ncchta.org/project/htapubs.asp Campbell MK, Snowden C, Francis D, Elbourne D, McDonald AM, Knight R, Enthwistel V, Garcia J, Roberts I, Grant A, (the STEPS group): Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrolment and participation study. The STEPS study. Health Technology Assessment. 2007, 11 (48): http://​www.​ncchta.​org/​project/​htapubs.​asp
3.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Horwitz RI: Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation. British Medical Journal. 1984, 289 (6454): 1281-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Charlson ME, Horwitz RI: Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation. British Medical Journal. 1984, 289 (6454): 1281-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Jack WJ, Chetty U, Rodger A: Recruitment to a prospective breast conservation trial: why are so few patients randomised?. British Medical Journal. 1990, 301: 83-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jack WJ, Chetty U, Rodger A: Recruitment to a prospective breast conservation trial: why are so few patients randomised?. British Medical Journal. 1990, 301: 83-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Peto V, Coulter A, Bond A: Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study. Fam Pract. 1993, 10 (2): 207-11. 10.1093/fampra/10.2.207.CrossRefPubMed Peto V, Coulter A, Bond A: Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study. Fam Pract. 1993, 10 (2): 207-11. 10.1093/fampra/10.2.207.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Fayter D, McDaid C, Ritchie G, Stirk L, Eastwood A: Systematic Review of Barriers, Modifiers and Benefits Involved in Participation in Cancer Trials. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2006, University of York; York, Report No.: 31 Fayter D, McDaid C, Ritchie G, Stirk L, Eastwood A: Systematic Review of Barriers, Modifiers and Benefits Involved in Participation in Cancer Trials. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2006, University of York; York, Report No.: 31
8.
go back to reference Rendell JM, Merrit RK, Geddes JR: Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, MR000021-2 Rendell JM, Merrit RK, Geddes JR: Incentives and disincentives to participation by clinicians in randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, MR000021-2
9.
go back to reference Bryant J, Powell J: Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2005, 331: 1377-1378. 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bryant J, Powell J: Payment to healthcare professionals for patient recruitment to trials: a systematic review. British Medical Journal. 2005, 331: 1377-1378. 10.1136/bmj.331.7529.1377.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Asch S, Connor SE, Hamilton EG, Fox SA: Problems in recruiting community based physicians for health services research. J Gen Intern Med. 2000, 15 (8): 591-9. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Asch S, Connor SE, Hamilton EG, Fox SA: Problems in recruiting community based physicians for health services research. J Gen Intern Med. 2000, 15 (8): 591-9. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.02329.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hawker S, Kerr C: Doing grounded theory. Analysing quantitative data in psychology. Edited by: Lyons E, Coyle A. 2007, Sage Publications, London, 87-97.CrossRef Hawker S, Kerr C: Doing grounded theory. Analysing quantitative data in psychology. Edited by: Lyons E, Coyle A. 2007, Sage Publications, London, 87-97.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nvivo: Qualitataive data analysis software. Version 2.0 [computer program]. 1999 Nvivo: Qualitataive data analysis software. Version 2.0 [computer program]. 1999
15.
go back to reference Department of Health: National Health Service income generation – Best practice: Revised guidance on income generation in the NHS. London. 2006 Department of Health: National Health Service income generation – Best practice: Revised guidance on income generation in the NHS. London. 2006
21.
go back to reference British Medical Association: British Medical Association – Ethical considerations. London. 2006 British Medical Association: British Medical Association – Ethical considerations. London. 2006
22.
go back to reference Department of Health: Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, London. 2005, 2 Department of Health: Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, London. 2005, 2
24.
go back to reference Department of Health: Best research for best health. London. 2006 Department of Health: Best research for best health. London. 2006
Metadata
Title
Paying clinicians to join clinical trials: a review of guidelines and interview study of trialists
Authors
James Raftery
Christine Kerr
Sheila Hawker
John Powell
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-10-15

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Trials 1/2009 Go to the issue