Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health

Authors: Andrew Harmer, Yina Xiao, Eduardo Missoni, Fabrizio Tediosi

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as ‘BRICS’ (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature?

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature.

Results

Our initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS’ collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries’ material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily ‘opportunity seekers’ and region mobilisers but with potential to become ‘issue leaders’ and region organisers.

Conclusion

Though small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be ‘early days’ for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Financing global health 2012: the End of the global age?. 2012, Seattle, WA: IHME Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation: Financing global health 2012: the End of the global age?. 2012, Seattle, WA: IHME
2.
go back to reference Harmer A, Folayinka D, Lesong C: The BRICS: what is their contribution to global health?. A Global Village. 2013, 9: 34-37. Harmer A, Folayinka D, Lesong C: The BRICS: what is their contribution to global health?. A Global Village. 2013, 9: 34-37.
7.
go back to reference Armijo L: The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as analytical category: mirage or insight?. Asian Perspective. 2007, 31 (4): 7-42. Armijo L: The BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as analytical category: mirage or insight?. Asian Perspective. 2007, 31 (4): 7-42.
9.
go back to reference Hau M, Scott J, Hulme D: Beyond the BRICs: alternative strategies of influence in the global politics of development. Eur J Dev Res. 2012, 24: 187-204. 10.1057/ejdr.2012.6.CrossRef Hau M, Scott J, Hulme D: Beyond the BRICs: alternative strategies of influence in the global politics of development. Eur J Dev Res. 2012, 24: 187-204. 10.1057/ejdr.2012.6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cox R: Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. J Int Stud. 1981, 10: 126-155. Cox R: Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory. J Int Stud. 1981, 10: 126-155.
11.
go back to reference Bozorgmehr K: Rethinking the ‘global’ in global health: a dialectic approach. Glob Health. 2010, 6: 19-10.1186/1744-8603-6-19.CrossRef Bozorgmehr K: Rethinking the ‘global’ in global health: a dialectic approach. Glob Health. 2010, 6: 19-10.1186/1744-8603-6-19.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Key players in global health: How brazil, Russia, India, china and south Africa Are influencing the game. Edited by: Bliss K. 2010, Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies Global Health Policy Center Key players in global health: How brazil, Russia, India, china and south Africa Are influencing the game. Edited by: Bliss K. 2010, Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies Global Health Policy Center
13.
go back to reference Bliss K: Health diplomacy of foreign governments. 2011, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies Global Health Policy Center Bliss K: Health diplomacy of foreign governments. 2011, Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies Global Health Policy Center
14.
go back to reference Tytel B, Callahan K: Shifting paradigm: how the BRICS are reshaping global health and development. 2012, New York: Global Health Strategies Initiative Tytel B, Callahan K: Shifting paradigm: how the BRICS are reshaping global health and development. 2012, New York: Global Health Strategies Initiative
15.
go back to reference Gomez E: The politics of receptivity and resistance: how Brazil, India, China, and Russia strategically use the international health community in response to HIV/AIDS: a theory. 2009, Governance: Global Health, 3(1)- Gomez E: The politics of receptivity and resistance: how Brazil, India, China, and Russia strategically use the international health community in response to HIV/AIDS: a theory. 2009, Governance: Global Health, 3(1)-
16.
go back to reference BRICS: The 2012 New Delhi Summit. Edited by: Kirton J, Larionova M, Alagh Y. 2012, Toronto: Newsdesk Media BRICS: The 2012 New Delhi Summit. Edited by: Kirton J, Larionova M, Alagh Y. 2012, Toronto: Newsdesk Media
17.
go back to reference Ruger J, Ng N: Emerging and transitioning Countries’ role in global health. Saint Louis University J Health Law Policy. 2010, 3: 253-289. Ruger J, Ng N: Emerging and transitioning Countries’ role in global health. Saint Louis University J Health Law Policy. 2010, 3: 253-289.
18.
go back to reference Yu P: Access to medicines, BRICS alliances, and collective action. Am J Law Med. 2008, 34: 345-394.PubMed Yu P: Access to medicines, BRICS alliances, and collective action. Am J Law Med. 2008, 34: 345-394.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Hodgson G: What are institutions?. J Economic Issues. 2006, XL (1): 1-25. Hodgson G: What are institutions?. J Economic Issues. 2006, XL (1): 1-25.
21.
go back to reference Heywood M: South Africa’s treatment action campaign: combining Law and social mobilization to realize the right to health. J Human Rights Pract. March 2009, 1 (1): 14-36. 10.1093/jhuman/hun006.CrossRef Heywood M: South Africa’s treatment action campaign: combining Law and social mobilization to realize the right to health. J Human Rights Pract. March 2009, 1 (1): 14-36. 10.1093/jhuman/hun006.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kragelund P: The return of Non-DAC donors to Africa: new prospects for African development?. Dev Policy Rev. 2008, 26 (5): 555-584. 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00423.x.CrossRef Kragelund P: The return of Non-DAC donors to Africa: new prospects for African development?. Dev Policy Rev. 2008, 26 (5): 555-584. 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2008.00423.x.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kragelund P: Back to BASICs? the rejuvenation of Non-traditional Donors’ development cooperation with Africa. Dev Change. 2011, 42 (2): 585-607. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01695.x.CrossRef Kragelund P: Back to BASICs? the rejuvenation of Non-traditional Donors’ development cooperation with Africa. Dev Change. 2011, 42 (2): 585-607. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01695.x.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Mawdsley E: From recipients to donors: emerging powers and the changing development landscape. 2012, London: Zed Books Mawdsley E: From recipients to donors: emerging powers and the changing development landscape. 2012, London: Zed Books
30.
go back to reference Roberts C: Polity forum: challengers or stakeholders? BRICs and the liberal world order: introduction. Polity. 2010, 42: 1-13. 10.1057/pol.2009.20.CrossRef Roberts C: Polity forum: challengers or stakeholders? BRICs and the liberal world order: introduction. Polity. 2010, 42: 1-13. 10.1057/pol.2009.20.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference La¨di Z: BRICS: Sovereignty power and weakness. Int Politics. 2012, 49 (5): 614-632. 10.1057/ip.2012.17.CrossRef La¨di Z: BRICS: Sovereignty power and weakness. Int Politics. 2012, 49 (5): 614-632. 10.1057/ip.2012.17.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
‘BRICS without straw’? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies’ influence in global health
Authors
Andrew Harmer
Yina Xiao
Eduardo Missoni
Fabrizio Tediosi
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-9-15

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Globalization and Health 1/2013 Go to the issue