Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Government capacities and stakeholders: what facilitates ehealth legislation?

Author: Achim Lang

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Newly established high-technology areas such as eHealth require regulations regarding the interoperability of health information infrastructures and data protection. It is argued that government capacities as well as the extent to which public and private organizations participate in policy-making determine the level of eHealth legislation. Both explanatory factors are influenced by international organizations that provide knowledge transfer and encourage private actor participation.

Methods

Data analysis is based on the Global Observatory for eHealth - ATLAS eHealth country profiles which summarizes eHealth policies in 114 countries. Data analysis was carried out using two-component hurdle models with a truncated Poisson model for positive counts and a hurdle component model with a binomial distribution for zero or greater counts.

Results

The analysis reveals that the participation of private organizations such as donors has negative effects on the level of eHealth legislation. The impact of public-private partnerships (PPPs) depends on the degree of government capacities already available and on democratic regimes. Democracies are more responsive to these new regulatory demands than autocracies. Democracies find it easier to transfer knowledge out of PPPs than autocracies. Government capacities increase the knowledge transfer effect of PPPs, thus leading to more eHealth legislation.

Conclusions

All international regimes – the WHO, the EU, and the OECD – promote PPPs in order to ensure the construction of a national eHealth infrastructure. This paper shows that the development of government capacities in the eHealth domain has to be given a higher priority than the establishment of PPPs, since the existence of some (initial) capacities is the sine qua non of further capacity building.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buse K, Walt G: Global public-private partnerships: part I-a new development in health?. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 549-561.PubMedPubMedCentral Buse K, Walt G: Global public-private partnerships: part I-a new development in health?. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 549-561.PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Buse K, Walt G: Global public-private partnerships: part II-what are the health issues for global governance?. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 699-709.PubMedPubMedCentral Buse K, Walt G: Global public-private partnerships: part II-what are the health issues for global governance?. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 699-709.PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
go back to reference Richter J: Public-private partnerships for health: a trend with no alternatives?. Development. 2004, 47: 43-48.CrossRef Richter J: Public-private partnerships for health: a trend with no alternatives?. Development. 2004, 47: 43-48.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mackintosh M, Chaudhuri S, Mujinja P: Can NGOs regulate medicines markets? social enterprise in wholesaling, and access to essential medicines. Glob Health. 2011, 7: 4-10.1186/1744-8603-7-4.CrossRef Mackintosh M, Chaudhuri S, Mujinja P: Can NGOs regulate medicines markets? social enterprise in wholesaling, and access to essential medicines. Glob Health. 2011, 7: 4-10.1186/1744-8603-7-4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Howlett M, Ramesh M: Patterns of policy instrument choice: policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience. Review of Policy Research. 1993, 12: 3-24.CrossRef Howlett M, Ramesh M: Patterns of policy instrument choice: policy styles, policy learning and the privatization experience. Review of Policy Research. 1993, 12: 3-24.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A: Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. 2009, Oxford: Oxford University Press Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A: Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. 2009, Oxford: Oxford University Press
8.
go back to reference Potrafke N: Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? empirical Evidence from OECD countries. Public Choice. 2010, 143: 135-155. 10.1007/s11127-009-9494-z.CrossRef Potrafke N: Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? empirical Evidence from OECD countries. Public Choice. 2010, 143: 135-155. 10.1007/s11127-009-9494-z.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference WHO Global Observatory for eHealth: Building foundations for ehealth: progress of member states. 2006, Geneva: WHO WHO Global Observatory for eHealth: Building foundations for ehealth: progress of member states. 2006, Geneva: WHO
11.
go back to reference Howlett M: Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: a multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci. 2009, 42: 73-89. 10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1.CrossRef Howlett M: Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: a multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci. 2009, 42: 73-89. 10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hall PA: Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics. 1993, 25: 275-296. 10.2307/422246.CrossRef Hall PA: Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics. 1993, 25: 275-296. 10.2307/422246.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dougherty JE, Pfaltzgraff RL: Contending theories of international relations: a comprehensive survey. 2001, New York: Longman Dougherty JE, Pfaltzgraff RL: Contending theories of international relations: a comprehensive survey. 2001, New York: Longman
14.
go back to reference Levy ML, Young OR, Zürn M: The study of international regimes. 1995, Laxenburg (Austria): International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Working Paper) Levy ML, Young OR, Zürn M: The study of international regimes. 1995, Laxenburg (Austria): International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (Working Paper)
15.
go back to reference Young OR: International regimes: problems of concept formation. World Politics. 1980, 32: 331-356. 10.2307/2010108.CrossRef Young OR: International regimes: problems of concept formation. World Politics. 1980, 32: 331-356. 10.2307/2010108.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Young OR: International regimes: toward a new theory of institutions. World Politics. 1986, 39: 104-122. 10.2307/2010300.CrossRef Young OR: International regimes: toward a new theory of institutions. World Politics. 1986, 39: 104-122. 10.2307/2010300.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference UN Millennium Project: Investing in development: a practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. 2005, New York: Earthscan UN Millennium Project: Investing in development: a practical plan to achieve the millennium development goals. 2005, New York: Earthscan
18.
go back to reference Geissbuhler A, Haux R, Kwankam SY: Towards health for all: who and IMIA intensify collaboration. Methods Inf Med. 2007, 47: 503-505.CrossRef Geissbuhler A, Haux R, Kwankam SY: Towards health for all: who and IMIA intensify collaboration. Methods Inf Med. 2007, 47: 503-505.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kay M, Santos J: Report on the world health organization global observatory for ehealth strategic planning workshop, april 2008. Methods Inf Med. 2007, 46: 503-505.CrossRef Kay M, Santos J: Report on the world health organization global observatory for ehealth strategic planning workshop, april 2008. Methods Inf Med. 2007, 46: 503-505.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Commission E: Lisbon strategy evaluation document. Commission staff working document. 2010, European Commission: Brussels Commission E: Lisbon strategy evaluation document. Commission staff working document. 2010, European Commission: Brussels
21.
go back to reference Commission E: Looking beyond tomorrow: scientific research in the European union. 2004, European Commission: Brussels Commission E: Looking beyond tomorrow: scientific research in the European union. 2004, European Commission: Brussels
22.
go back to reference Commission E: Lead market initiative for Europe: mid-term progress report. 2009, European Commission: Brussels Commission E: Lead market initiative for Europe: mid-term progress report. 2009, European Commission: Brussels
23.
go back to reference Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: National braodband plans. 2011, Paris: OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: National braodband plans. 2011, Paris: OECD
24.
go back to reference Hofmarcher MM, Oxley H, Rusticelli E: Improved health system performance through better care coordination. 2007, Paris: OECDCrossRef Hofmarcher MM, Oxley H, Rusticelli E: Improved health system performance through better care coordination. 2007, Paris: OECDCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Reich MR: Public-private partnerships for public health. Public-private partnerships for public health. Edited by: Reich MR. 2002, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1-18. Reich MR: Public-private partnerships for public health. Public-private partnerships for public health. Edited by: Reich MR. 2002, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1-18.
26.
go back to reference Lucas AO: Public-private partnerships: illustrative examples. Public-private partnerships for public health. Edited by: Reich MR. 2002, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 19-39. Lucas AO: Public-private partnerships: illustrative examples. Public-private partnerships for public health. Edited by: Reich MR. 2002, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 19-39.
27.
go back to reference Farzin YH, Bond CA: Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ. 2006, 81: 213-235. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.04.003.CrossRef Farzin YH, Bond CA: Democracy and environmental quality. J Dev Econ. 2006, 81: 213-235. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.04.003.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mukherjee S, Chakraborty D: Is environmental sustainability influenced by socioeconomic and sociopolitical factors? cross-country empirical evidence. Sustain Dev. 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sd.502 Mukherjee S, Chakraborty D: Is environmental sustainability influenced by socioeconomic and sociopolitical factors? cross-country empirical evidence. Sustain Dev. 2010, DOI: 10.1002/sd.502
29.
go back to reference Deacon RT: Dictatorship, democracy, and the provision of public goods: working paper. 2003, San Diego: Department of Economics, University of California Deacon RT: Dictatorship, democracy, and the provision of public goods: working paper. 2003, San Diego: Department of Economics, University of California
30.
go back to reference Bertelli AM, Whitford AB: Perceiving credible commitments: how independent regulators shape elite perceptions of regulatory quality. Br J Polit Sci. 2009, 39: 517-537. 10.1017/S0007123409000623.CrossRef Bertelli AM, Whitford AB: Perceiving credible commitments: how independent regulators shape elite perceptions of regulatory quality. Br J Polit Sci. 2009, 39: 517-537. 10.1017/S0007123409000623.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Grant W: Private Organizations as Agents of Public Policy: the Case of Milk Marketing in Britain. Private interest governments. Edited by: Streeck W, Schmitter PC. 1985, London/Newbury Park/New Delhi: Sage, 182-196. Grant W: Private Organizations as Agents of Public Policy: the Case of Milk Marketing in Britain. Private interest governments. Edited by: Streeck W, Schmitter PC. 1985, London/Newbury Park/New Delhi: Sage, 182-196.
32.
go back to reference Governing interests: business associations facing internationalization. Edited by: Streeck W, Grote JR, Schneider V, Visser J. 2006, London: Routledge Governing interests: business associations facing internationalization. Edited by: Streeck W, Grote JR, Schneider V, Visser J. 2006, London: Routledge
33.
go back to reference Streeck W, Schmitter PC: Community, market, state - and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. Eur Sociol Rev. 1985, 1: 119-138. Streeck W, Schmitter PC: Community, market, state - and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. Eur Sociol Rev. 1985, 1: 119-138.
34.
go back to reference Buse K, Walt G: An unruly melange? Coordinating external resources to the health sector: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45: 449-463. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00365-6.PubMedCrossRef Buse K, Walt G: An unruly melange? Coordinating external resources to the health sector: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1997, 45: 449-463. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00365-6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Morss ER: Institutional destruction resulting from donor and project proliferation in Sub-Saharan African countries. World Dev. 1984, 12: 465-470. 10.1016/0305-750X(84)90024-X.CrossRef Morss ER: Institutional destruction resulting from donor and project proliferation in Sub-Saharan African countries. World Dev. 1984, 12: 465-470. 10.1016/0305-750X(84)90024-X.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Carmignani F, Lordan G, Tang KK: Does donor assistance for HIV respond to media pressure?. Health economics. 2012, 21: 18-32.PubMedCrossRef Carmignani F, Lordan G, Tang KK: Does donor assistance for HIV respond to media pressure?. Health economics. 2012, 21: 18-32.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Esser DE, Bench KK: Does global health funding respond to recipients’ needs? Comparing public and private donors’ allocations in 2005–2007. World Dev. 2011, 39: 1271-1280. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.005.CrossRef Esser DE, Bench KK: Does global health funding respond to recipients’ needs? Comparing public and private donors’ allocations in 2005–2007. World Dev. 2011, 39: 1271-1280. 10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.005.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Shiffman J: Donor funding priorities for communicable disease control in the developing world. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21: 411-420. 10.1093/heapol/czl028.PubMedCrossRef Shiffman J: Donor funding priorities for communicable disease control in the developing world. Health Policy Plan. 2006, 21: 411-420. 10.1093/heapol/czl028.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Shiffman J: Has donor prioritization of HIV/AIDS displaced aid for other health issues?. Health Policy Plan. 2008, 23: 95-100.PubMedCrossRef Shiffman J: Has donor prioritization of HIV/AIDS displaced aid for other health issues?. Health Policy Plan. 2008, 23: 95-100.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Giri A, Khatiwada P, Shrestha B, Chettri RK: Perceptions of government knowledge and control over contributions of aid organizations and INGOs to health in Nepal: a qualitative study. Glob Health. 2013, 9: 1-10.1186/1744-8603-9-1.CrossRef Giri A, Khatiwada P, Shrestha B, Chettri RK: Perceptions of government knowledge and control over contributions of aid organizations and INGOs to health in Nepal: a qualitative study. Glob Health. 2013, 9: 1-10.1186/1744-8603-9-1.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Shortell SM, Zukoski AP, Alexander JA, Bazzoli GJ, Conrad DA, Hasnain-Wynia R, Sofaer S, Chan BY, Casey E, Margolin FS: Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002, 27: 49-92. 10.1215/03616878-27-1-49.PubMedCrossRef Shortell SM, Zukoski AP, Alexander JA, Bazzoli GJ, Conrad DA, Hasnain-Wynia R, Sofaer S, Chan BY, Casey E, Margolin FS: Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002, 27: 49-92. 10.1215/03616878-27-1-49.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Global Observatory fo eHealth: Global Observatory for eHealth - ATLAS eHealth country profiles. 2011, Geneva: WHO Global Observatory fo eHealth: Global Observatory for eHealth - ATLAS eHealth country profiles. 2011, Geneva: WHO
43.
go back to reference WHO Global Observatory fo eHealth: Management of patient information: trends and challenges in member states. 2012, Geneva: WHO WHO Global Observatory fo eHealth: Management of patient information: trends and challenges in member states. 2012, Geneva: WHO
44.
45.
go back to reference Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M: Amelia II: a program for missing data. J Stat Softw. 2011, 45: 1-47.CrossRef Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M: Amelia II: a program for missing data. J Stat Softw. 2011, 45: 1-47.CrossRef
47.
48.
go back to reference Loeys T, Moerkerke B, De Smet O, Buysse A: The analysis of zero-inflated count data: beyond zero-inflated poisson regression. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2012, 65: 163-180. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02031.x.PubMedCrossRef Loeys T, Moerkerke B, De Smet O, Buysse A: The analysis of zero-inflated count data: beyond zero-inflated poisson regression. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2012, 65: 163-180. 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02031.x.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S: Regression models for count data in R. J Stat Softw. 2008, 27: 1-25. Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S: Regression models for count data in R. J Stat Softw. 2008, 27: 1-25.
51.
go back to reference Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM: Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. 2009, New York: SpringerCrossRef Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM: Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. 2009, New York: SpringerCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG): “Strategie eHealth” Schweiz. 2007, Bern: Bundesamt für Gesundheit Bundesamt für Gesundheit (BAG): “Strategie eHealth” Schweiz. 2007, Bern: Bundesamt für Gesundheit
53.
go back to reference Lang A, Mertes A: Die Einführung der elektronischen Gesundheitskarte in Deutschland: der Einfluss von Interessenpositionen und Sektorzugehörigkeit auf die Entstehung des Implementationsnetzwerks. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2011, 73: e12-e20. 10.1055/s-0029-1246177.PubMedCrossRef Lang A, Mertes A: Die Einführung der elektronischen Gesundheitskarte in Deutschland: der Einfluss von Interessenpositionen und Sektorzugehörigkeit auf die Entstehung des Implementationsnetzwerks. Das Gesundheitswesen. 2011, 73: e12-e20. 10.1055/s-0029-1246177.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Lang A, Mertes A: Governance of Large Innovation Projects: The Implementation of the Electronic Health Card in Germany. Innovation policy and governance in high-tech industries: the complexity of coordination. Edited by: Bauer JM, Lang A, Schneider V. 2012, Berlin, New York: Springer, 245-260.CrossRef Lang A, Mertes A: Governance of Large Innovation Projects: The Implementation of the Electronic Health Card in Germany. Innovation policy and governance in high-tech industries: the complexity of coordination. Edited by: Bauer JM, Lang A, Schneider V. 2012, Berlin, New York: Springer, 245-260.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Gričar J: Innovative cross-border eRegion development: possible directions and impact. Organizacija. 2007, 40: 86-96. Gričar J: Innovative cross-border eRegion development: possible directions and impact. Organizacija. 2007, 40: 86-96.
56.
go back to reference Mandil S: Review of and recommended improvements to Turkey eHealth Strategy. 2004, Geneva: ITU Mandil S: Review of and recommended improvements to Turkey eHealth Strategy. 2004, Geneva: ITU
57.
go back to reference Dogac A, Hülür U, Caylan AK, Yuksel M, Heywood J: Country brief: Turkey. 2010, Ankara/Bonn: empirica - eHealth Strategies Dogac A, Hülür U, Caylan AK, Yuksel M, Heywood J: Country brief: Turkey. 2010, Ankara/Bonn: empirica - eHealth Strategies
Metadata
Title
Government capacities and stakeholders: what facilitates ehealth legislation?
Author
Achim Lang
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-10-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Globalization and Health 1/2014 Go to the issue