Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Globalization and Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Debate

CETA and pharmaceuticals: impact of the trade agreement between Europe and Canada on the costs of prescription drugs

Authors: Joel Lexchin, Marc-André Gagnon

Published in: Globalization and Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

On a per capita basis, Canadian drug costs are already the second highest in the world after the United States and are among the fastest rising in the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. The Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the European Union (EU) and Canada will further exacerbate the rise in costs by:
• Committing Canada to creating a new system of patent term restoration thereby delaying entry of generic medicines by up to two years;
• Locking in Canada’s current term of data protection, and creating barriers for future governments wanting to reverse it;
• Implementing a new right of appeal under the patent linkage system that will create further delays for the entry of generics.
CETA will only affect intellectual property rights in Canada—not the EU. This analysis estimates that CETA’s provisions will increase Canadian drug costs by between 6.2% and 12.9% starting in 2023. The Canadian government committed to compensating provinces for the rise in costs for their public drug plans. Importantly, this means that people paying out-of-pocket for their drugs or receiving them through private insurance, will be charged twice: once through higher drug costs and once more through their federal taxes.
As drug costs continue to grow, there are limited options available for provincial/territorial governments: restrict the choice of medicines in public drug plans; transfer costs to patients who typically are either elderly or sick; or take money from other places in the health system, and threaten the viability of Canada’s single payer system. CETA will therefore negatively impact the ability of Canada to offer quality health care.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference OECD : Health at a Glance 2013. OECD Indicators. 2013 OECD : Health at a Glance 2013. OECD Indicators. 2013
2.
go back to reference Patented Medicine Prices Review Board: Annual report 2012. 2013, Ottawa: PMPRB Patented Medicine Prices Review Board: Annual report 2012. 2013, Ottawa: PMPRB
3.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information: National health expenditure trends, 1975 to 2012. 2013, Ottawa: CIHI Canadian Institute for Health Information: National health expenditure trends, 1975 to 2012. 2013, Ottawa: CIHI
4.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information: Drug expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2011. 2012, Ottawa: CIHI Canadian Institute for Health Information: Drug expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2011. 2012, Ottawa: CIHI
5.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information: Drivers of prescription drug spending in Canada. 2012, Ottawa: CIHI Canadian Institute for Health Information: Drivers of prescription drug spending in Canada. 2012, Ottawa: CIHI
6.
go back to reference Prescrire Editorial Staff: New drugs and indications in 2011: France is better focused on patients’ interests after the Mediator scandal, but stagnation elsewhere. Prescrire Int. 2012, 21: 106-110. Prescrire Editorial Staff: New drugs and indications in 2011: France is better focused on patients’ interests after the Mediator scandal, but stagnation elsewhere. Prescrire Int. 2012, 21: 106-110.
7.
go back to reference Canadian Institute for Health Information: Drug expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2012. 2013, Ottawa: CIHI Canadian Institute for Health Information: Drug expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2012. 2013, Ottawa: CIHI
10.
go back to reference Canadian Life Health Insurance Association Inc: CLHIA report on prescription drug policy: ensuring the accessibility, affordability and sustainability of prescription drugs in Canada. 2013, Toronto: CLHIA Canadian Life Health Insurance Association Inc: CLHIA report on prescription drug policy: ensuring the accessibility, affordability and sustainability of prescription drugs in Canada. 2013, Toronto: CLHIA
11.
go back to reference Grootendorst P, Hollis A: The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement: an economic impact assessment of proposed pharmaceutical intellectual property provisions. J Generic Med. 2011, 8: 81-103. 10.1177/1741134311408275.CrossRef Grootendorst P, Hollis A: The Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic & Trade Agreement: an economic impact assessment of proposed pharmaceutical intellectual property provisions. J Generic Med. 2011, 8: 81-103. 10.1177/1741134311408275.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies: Reality check: analysis of the CGPA’s economic assessment of proposed pharmaceutical IP provisions. 2011, Ottawa: Rx & D Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies: Reality check: analysis of the CGPA’s economic assessment of proposed pharmaceutical IP provisions. 2011, Ottawa: Rx & D
13.
go back to reference Kierans P, Wall K, Daley J: CETA trade negotiations 2011 - drug market exclusivity in the EU and Canada. 2011, Toronto: Norton Rose Kierans P, Wall K, Daley J: CETA trade negotiations 2011 - drug market exclusivity in the EU and Canada. 2011, Toronto: Norton Rose
14.
go back to reference Hollis A, Grootendorst P: Drug market exclusivity in the EU and Canada: problems with Norton Rose’s comptive analysis. 2012, Toronto Hollis A, Grootendorst P: Drug market exclusivity in the EU and Canada: problems with Norton Rose’s comptive analysis. 2012, Toronto
15.
go back to reference Downing N, Aminawung J, Shah N, Braunstein J, Krumholz H, Ross J: Regulatory review of novel therapeutics - comparison of three regulatory agencies. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 2284-2293. 10.1056/NEJMsa1200223PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Downing N, Aminawung J, Shah N, Braunstein J, Krumholz H, Ross J: Regulatory review of novel therapeutics - comparison of three regulatory agencies. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 2284-2293. 10.1056/NEJMsa1200223PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Correa C: Protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals: implementing the standards of the TRIPS agreement. 2002, Geneva: The South Centre Correa C: Protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals: implementing the standards of the TRIPS agreement. 2002, Geneva: The South Centre
17.
go back to reference Government of Canada: Regulations amending the Food and Drug Regulations (Data Protection). Can Gazette Part II. 2006, 140: 1493-1502. Government of Canada: Regulations amending the Food and Drug Regulations (Data Protection). Can Gazette Part II. 2006, 140: 1493-1502.
18.
go back to reference Government of Canada: Technical summary of final negotiated outcomes: Canada-European Union comprehensive economic and trade deal. 2013, Government of Canada Government of Canada: Technical summary of final negotiated outcomes: Canada-European Union comprehensive economic and trade deal. 2013, Government of Canada
19.
go back to reference Faunce T, Lexchin J: Linkage pharmaceutical evergreening in Canada and Australia. Aust N Z Health Policy. 2007, 4: 8-10.1186/1743-8462-4-8.CrossRef Faunce T, Lexchin J: Linkage pharmaceutical evergreening in Canada and Australia. Aust N Z Health Policy. 2007, 4: 8-10.1186/1743-8462-4-8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America: Special 301 submission 2013. 2013, Washington D.C: PhRMA Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America: Special 301 submission 2013. 2013, Washington D.C: PhRMA
21.
go back to reference Bartucci S, Dawson L: Pills patents & profits III. 2013, Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute Bartucci S, Dawson L: Pills patents & profits III. 2013, Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute
22.
go back to reference Bouchard R: Patently innovative: how pharmaceutical firms use emerging patent law to extend monopolies on blockbuster drugs. 2011, Cambridge: Biohealthcare Publishing Ltd Bouchard R: Patently innovative: how pharmaceutical firms use emerging patent law to extend monopolies on blockbuster drugs. 2011, Cambridge: Biohealthcare Publishing Ltd
26.
go back to reference Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies: CETA IP changes - impact timeline. 2012, Ottawa: Rx & D Canada’s Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies: CETA IP changes - impact timeline. 2012, Ottawa: Rx & D
27.
go back to reference Canada yields on some EU drug IPR demands, but fends off others. 2013, Inside US Trade Canada yields on some EU drug IPR demands, but fends off others. 2013, Inside US Trade
28.
go back to reference Applied Management in association with Fraser Group Tristat Resources: Canadians’ access to insurance for prescription medicines: volume 2: the uninsured and the under-insured. 2000, Ottawa Applied Management in association with Fraser Group Tristat Resources: Canadians’ access to insurance for prescription medicines: volume 2: the uninsured and the under-insured. 2000, Ottawa
29.
go back to reference Law M, Cheng L, Dhalla I, Heard D, Morgan S: The effect of cost on adherence to prescription medications in Canada. CMAJ. 2012, 184: 297-302. 10.1503/cmaj.111270PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Law M, Cheng L, Dhalla I, Heard D, Morgan S: The effect of cost on adherence to prescription medications in Canada. CMAJ. 2012, 184: 297-302. 10.1503/cmaj.111270PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
CETA and pharmaceuticals: impact of the trade agreement between Europe and Canada on the costs of prescription drugs
Authors
Joel Lexchin
Marc-André Gagnon
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Globalization and Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1744-8603
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-10-30

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Globalization and Health 1/2014 Go to the issue