Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Commentary

Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective

Author: M Zia Sadique

Published in: Emerging Themes in Epidemiology | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Individuals' free choices in vaccination do not guarantee social optimum since individuals' decision is based on imperfect information, and vaccination decision involves positive externality. Public policy of compulsory vaccination or subsidised vaccination aims to increase aggregate private demand closer to social optimum. However, there is controversy over the effectiveness of public intervention compared to the free choice outcome in vaccination, and this article provides a brief discussion on this issue. It can be summarised that individuals' incentives to vaccination and accordingly their behavioural responses can greatly influence public policy's pursuit to control disease transmission, and compulsory (or subsidised) vaccination policy without incorporating such behavioural responses will not be able to achieve the best social outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brito DL, Sheshinski E, Intrilligator MD: Externalities and compulsory vaccinations. Journal of Public Economics. 1991, 45 (1): 69-90. 10.1016/0047-2727(91)90048-7.CrossRef Brito DL, Sheshinski E, Intrilligator MD: Externalities and compulsory vaccinations. Journal of Public Economics. 1991, 45 (1): 69-90. 10.1016/0047-2727(91)90048-7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Geoffard P, Philipson T: Disease eradication: private versus public vaccination. The American Economic Review. 1997, 87 (1): 222-230. Geoffard P, Philipson T: Disease eradication: private versus public vaccination. The American Economic Review. 1997, 87 (1): 222-230.
3.
go back to reference Francis PJ: Dynamic epidemiology and the market for vaccinations. Journal of Public Economics. 1997, 63: 383-406. 10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01586-1.CrossRef Francis PJ: Dynamic epidemiology and the market for vaccinations. Journal of Public Economics. 1997, 63: 383-406. 10.1016/S0047-2727(96)01586-1.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Geoffard P, Philipson T: Rationale epidemics and their public control. International Economic Review. 1996, 37 (3): 603-624. 10.2307/2527443.CrossRef Geoffard P, Philipson T: Rationale epidemics and their public control. International Economic Review. 1996, 37 (3): 603-624. 10.2307/2527443.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Philipson T: Economic epidemiology and infectious disease. Handbook of Health Economics. Edited by: Cuyler AJ, Newhouse JP. Amsterdam: North Holland; 2000. Philipson T: Economic epidemiology and infectious disease. Handbook of Health Economics. Edited by: Cuyler AJ, Newhouse JP. Amsterdam: North Holland; 2000.
6.
go back to reference Gersovitz M, Hammer JS: Infectious diseases, public policy and the marriage of economics and epidemiology. The World Bank Research Observer. 2003, 18 (2): 129-157. 10.1093/wbro/lkg011.CrossRef Gersovitz M, Hammer JS: Infectious diseases, public policy and the marriage of economics and epidemiology. The World Bank Research Observer. 2003, 18 (2): 129-157. 10.1093/wbro/lkg011.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Fine PEM, Clarkson JA: Individual versus public priorities in the determination of optimal vaccination policies. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1996, 124 (6): 1012-20. Fine PEM, Clarkson JA: Individual versus public priorities in the determination of optimal vaccination policies. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1996, 124 (6): 1012-20.
Metadata
Title
Individual freedom versus collective responsibility: an economic epidemiology perspective
Author
M Zia Sadique
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1742-7622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-3-12

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Emerging Themes in Epidemiology 1/2006 Go to the issue