Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Reproductive Health
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women’s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda

Authors: Allen Kabagenyi, Larissa Jennings, Alice Reid, Gorette Nalwadda, James Ntozi, Lynn Atuyambe

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Spousal communication can improve family planning use and continuation. Yet, in countries with high fertility rates and unmet need, men have often been regarded as unsupportive of their partner’s use of family planning methods. This study examines men and women’s perceptions regarding obstacles to men’s support and uptake of modern contraceptives.

Methods

A qualitative study using 18 focus group discussions (FGDs) with purposively selected men aged 15–54 and women aged 15–49 as well as eight key informant interviews (KIIs) with government and community leaders was conducted in 2012 in Bugiri and Mpigi Districts, Uganda. Open-ended question guides were used to explore men and women’s perceptions regarding barriers to men’s involvement in reproductive health. All FGDs and KIIs were recorded, translated, and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were coded and analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti.

Results

Five themes were identified as rationale for men’s limited involvement: (i) perceived side effects of female contraceptive methods which disrupt sexual activity, (ii) limited choices of available male contraceptives, including fear and concerns relating to vasectomy, (iii) perceptions that reproductive health was a woman’s domain due to gender norms and traditional family planning communication geared towards women, (iv) preference for large family sizes which are uninhibited by prolonged birth spacing; and (v) concerns that women’s use of contraceptives will lead to extramarital sexual relations. In general, knowledge of effective contraceptive methods was high. However, lack of time and overall limited awareness regarding the specific role of men in reproductive health was also thought to deter men’s meaningful involvement in issues related to fertility regulation.

Conclusion

Decision-making on contraceptive use is the shared responsibility of men and women. Effective development and implementation of male-involvement family planning initiatives should address barriers to men’s supportive participation in reproductive health, including addressing men's negative beliefs regarding contraceptive services.
Literature
1.
Hartmann M, Gilles K, Shattuck D, Kerner B, Guest G: Changes in couple’s communication as a result of a male-involvement family planning intervention. J Health Commun. 2012, 17 (7): 802-819. 10.1080/10810730.2011.650825.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Sternberg P, Hubley J: Evaluating men’s involvement as a strategy in sexual and reproductive health program. Health Promo Int. 2004, 19: 389-396. 10.1093/heapro/dah312.CrossRef
3.
Bawah A: Spousal communication and family planning behavior in Navrongo: a longitudinal assessment. Stud Fam Plann. 2002, 33 (2): 185-194. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2002.00185.x.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Sharan M, Valente T: Spousal communication and family planning adoption: effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal. Int Fam Plan Perspec. 2002, 28 (1): 16-25. 10.2307/3088271.CrossRef
5.
Kim Y, Kols A: Programming for male involvement in reproductive health. 2001, Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Counseling and communicating with men to promote family planning in Kenya and Zimbabwe: findings, lessons learned, and programme suggestions, Report of the Meeting of WHO Regional Advisors in Reproductive Health,
6.
Yue K, O’Donnel C, Sparks PL: The effect of spousal communication on contraceptive use in Central Terai, Nepal. Patient Educ Couns. 2010, 81 (3): 402-408. 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.018.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Tuloro T, Deressa W, Ali A, Gail DG: The role of men in contraceptive use and fertility preference in Hossana Town, southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2009, 20 (3): 1-8.CrossRef
8.
Dudgeon M, Inhorn M: Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: medical anthropological perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2004, 59: 1379-1395. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.11.035.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Greene ME: Changing women and avoiding men: gender stereotypes and reproductive health programmes. IDS Bull Inst Deve Stud. 2000, 31 (2): 49-59.CrossRef
10.
Soldan V: How family planning ideas are spread with social groups in rural Malawi. Stud Family Plann. 2004, 35: 275-290. 10.1111/j.0039-3665.2004.00031.x.CrossRef
11.
Oyediran K, Isiugo-Abanihe U: Husband-wife communication and couple’s fertility desires among the Yoruba of Nigeria. Afr Pop Stud. 2002, 17: 61-80.
12.
Miller W, Severy L, Pasta D: A framework for modeling fertility motivation in couples. Pop Stud. 2004, 58: 193-205. 10.1080/0032472042000213712.CrossRef
13.
Bankole A, Singh S: Couple’s fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: hearing the man’s voice. Int Fam Plan Perspec. 1998, 24 (1): 15-24. 10.2307/2991915.CrossRef
14.
Biddlecom A, Fapohunda B: Covert contraceptive use: prevalence, motivations, and consequences. Stud Fam Plann. 1998, 29: 360-372. 10.2307/172249.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Mosha I, Ruben R, Kakoko D: Family planning decision, perceptions and gender dynamics among couples in Mwanza, Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2013, 13: 523-10.1186/1471-2458-13-523.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Westoff CF: DHS Comparative Reports No. 1. Unmet need at the end of the century. 2001, Calverton, Maryland: ORC Macro
17.
Shahjahan M, Mumu S, Afroz A, Chowdhury H, Kabir R, Ahmed K: Determinants of male participation in reproductive healthcare services: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2013, 10: 27-10.1186/1742-4755-10-27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Stover J, Ross J: How increased contraceptive use has reduced maternal mortality. Matern Child Healt J. 2010, 14 (5): 687-695. 10.1007/s10995-009-0505-y.CrossRef
19.
Tsui A, McDonald-Mosely R, Burke A: Family planning and the burden of unintended pregnancies. Epidemiol Rev. 2010, 32 (1): 152-174. 10.1093/epirev/mxq012.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Yeakey MP, Muntifering CJ, Ramachandran DV, Myint Y, Creanga AA, Tsui AO: How contraceptive use affects birth intervals: results of a literature review. Stud Fam Plann. 2009, 40 (3): 205-214. 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2009.00203.x.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Rosliza A, Majdah M: Male participation and sharing of responsibility in strengthening family planning activities in Malaysia. Malays J Pub Healt Med. 2010, 10 (1): 23-27.
22.
Blake M, Babalola S: Impact of a male motivation campaign on family planning ideation and practice in Guinea. Field Report No.13. 2002, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, Retrieved from URL: http://​pdf.​usaid.​gov/​pdf_​docs/​PNACS563.​pdf
23.
Azmat SK: Mobilizing male opinion leaders’ support for family planning to improve maternal health: a theory-based qualitative study from Pakistan. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2011, 4: 421-431.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Haider S, Todd C, Ahmadzai M, Rahimi S, Azfar P, Morris JL, Miller S: Childbearing and contraceptive decision making amongst Afghan men and women: a qualitative analysis. Health Care Women Int. 2009, 30 (10): 935-953. 10.1080/07399330903052129.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Save D, Erbaydar T, Kalaca S, Harmanci S, Cali S, Karavus M: Resistance against contraception or medical contraceptive methods: a qualitative study on women and men in Instanbul. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2004, 9 (2): 94-101. 10.1080/13625180410001715663.CrossRef
26.
Petro-Nustas W, Al-Qutob R: Jordanian men’s attitudes and views of birth-spacing and contraceptive use (A qualitative approach). Health Care Women Int. 2002, 23 (6–7): 516-529.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Kaida A, Kipp W, Hessel P, Konde-Lule J: Male participation in family planning: results from a qualitative study in Mpigi District, Uganda. J Biosocial Sci. 2005, 37: 269-286.CrossRef
28.
Onyango MA, Owoko S, Oguttu M: Factors that influence male involvement in sexual and reproductive health in western Kenya: a qualitative study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010, 14 (4 Spec no): 32-42.PubMed
29.
Nalwadda G, Mirembe F, Byamugisha J, Faxelid E: Persitstent high fertility in Uganda: young people recount obstacles and enabling factors to use of contraceptives. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 530-10.1186/1471-2458-10-530.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Ntozi JP, Odwee JO: High fertility in rural Uganda: the role of socioeconomic and biological factors, 3: xi. 1995, Kampala, Uganda: Foundation Publishers, 218-
31.
Ijadunola MY, Abiona TC, Ijadunola KT, Afolabi OT, Esimai OA, OlaOlorun FM: Male involvement in family planning decision making in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2010, 14 (4 Spec no): 43-50.PubMed
32.
33.
34.
35.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS): Population Size and Distribution. Uganda Population and Housing Census, Vol. 3. 2002, Kampala-Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistic
36.
37.
Saha K, Singh N, Saha U, Roy J: Male involvement in reproductive health among scheduled tribe: experience from Khairwars of central India. Rur Rem Healt. 2007, 7 (605): 1-9.
38.
Campbell M, Nuriye N, Malcolm P: Barriers to fertility regulation: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann. 2006, 37 (Suppl 2): 87-98.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Marchi NM, de Alvarenga AT, Osis MJ, Bahamondes L: Contraceptive methods with male participation: a perspective of Brazilian couples. Int Nurs Rev. 2008, 55 (1): 103-109. 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2007.00572.x.CrossRefPubMed
40.
41.
Mullany B, Hindin M, Becker S: Can women’s autonomy impede male involvement in pregnant health in Katmandu, Nepal?. Soc Sci Med. 2005, 61: 1993-2006. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.006.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Barriers to male involvement in contraceptive uptake and reproductive health services: a qualitative study of men and women’s perceptions in two rural districts in Uganda
Authors
Allen Kabagenyi
Larissa Jennings
Alice Reid
Gorette Nalwadda
James Ntozi
Lynn Atuyambe
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-11-21

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Reproductive Health 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research

Toll free mobile communication: overcoming barriers in maternal and neonatal emergencies in Rural Bangladesh

Research

Modern contraceptive utilization among female ART attendees in health facilities of Gimbie town, West Ethiopia

Research

Challenges in accessing sexual and reproductive health services by people with physical disabilities in Kampala, Uganda

Research

A spatial analysis to study access to emergency obstetric transport services under the public private “Janani Express Yojana” program in two districts of Madhya Pradesh, India

Reviewer acknowledgement

Annual acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers

Study protocol

Social capital in association with health status of women in reproductive age: study protocol for a sequential explanatory mixed methods study