Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Medicine 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

The risk of colorectal cancer with symptoms at different ages and between the sexes: a case-control study

Authors: William Hamilton, Robert Lancashire, Debbie Sharp, Tim J Peters, KK Cheng, Tom Marshall

Published in: BMC Medicine | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer is generally diagnosed following a symptomatic presentation to primary care. Although the presenting features of the cancer are well described, the risks they convey are less well known. This study aimed to quantify the risk of cancer for different symptoms, across age groups and in both sexes.

Methods

This was a case-control study using pre-existing records in a large electronic primary care database. Cases were patients aged 30 years or older with a diagnosis of colorectal cancer between January 2001 and July 2006, matched to seven controls by age, sex and practice. All features of colorectal cancer recorded in the 2 years before diagnosis were identified. Features independently associated with cancer were identified using multivariable conditional logistic regression, and their risk of cancer quantified.

Results

We identified 5477 cases, with 38,314 age, sex and practice-matched controls. Six symptoms and two abnormal investigations (anaemia and microcytosis) were independently associated with colorectal cancer. The positive predictive values of symptoms were: rectal bleeding, positive predictive value for a male aged ≥ 80 years 4.5% (95% confidence interval 3.5, 5.9); change in bowel habit 3.9% (2.8, 5.5); weight loss 0.8% (0.5, 1.3); abdominal pain 1.2% (1.0, 1.4); diarrhoea 1.2% (1.0, 1.5) and constipation 0.7% (0.6, 0.8). Positive predictive values were lower in females and younger patients. Only 27% of patients had reported either of the two higher risk symptoms.

Conclusion

Most symptomatic colorectal cancers present with only a low-risk symptom. There is a need to find a method of identifying those at highest risk of cancer from the large number presenting with such symptoms.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Office for National Statistics: Cancer statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2004, England. Series MB1, No 35. London. 2007 Office for National Statistics: Cancer statistics registrations: registrations of cancer diagnosed in 2004, England. Series MB1, No 35. London. 2007
2.
go back to reference Gatta G, Ciccolallo L, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, Hakulinen T, Moller H, Berrino F: Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 2214-2222. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00549-5.CrossRefPubMed Gatta G, Ciccolallo L, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, Hakulinen T, Moller H, Berrino F: Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology. Eur J Cancer. 2003, 39: 2214-2222. 10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00549-5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mitchell E, Macdonald S, Campbell NC, Weller D, Macleod U: Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 60-70. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604096.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell E, Macdonald S, Campbell NC, Weller D, Macleod U: Influences on pre-hospital delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 60-70. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604096.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Towler B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, Kewenter J, Weller D, Silagy C: A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, haemoccult. BMJ. 1998, 317: 559-565.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Towler B, Irwig L, Glasziou P, Kewenter J, Weller D, Silagy C: A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, haemoccult. BMJ. 1998, 317: 559-565.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Group: Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2004, 329: 133-10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C.CrossRefPubMedCentral UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot Group: Results of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2004, 329: 133-10.1136/bmj.38153.491887.7C.CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Anonymous: Colorectal cancer: not an embarrassing problem. Lancet. 2005, 366: 521-10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67071-7.CrossRef Anonymous: Colorectal cancer: not an embarrassing problem. Lancet. 2005, 366: 521-10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67071-7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, Butler P, Melia J, Campbell C, Parker R, Patnick J, Moss S: The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 1601-1605. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604089.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, Butler P, Melia J, Campbell C, Parker R, Patnick J, Moss S: The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer. 2007, 97: 1601-1605. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604089.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Goodyear SN, Stallard AG, Parker R, Williams N, Wong L: Local impact of the English arm of the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot study. Br J Surg. 2008, 95: 1172-1179. 10.1002/bjs.6230.CrossRefPubMed Goodyear SN, Stallard AG, Parker R, Williams N, Wong L: Local impact of the English arm of the UK Bowel Cancer Screening Pilot study. Br J Surg. 2008, 95: 1172-1179. 10.1002/bjs.6230.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hamilton W: Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis. Br J Gen Pract. Hamilton W: Five misconceptions in cancer diagnosis. Br J Gen Pract.
10.
go back to reference Jiwa M, Hamilton W: Referral of suspected colorectal cancer: have guidelines made a difference?. Br J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 608-610.PubMedPubMedCentral Jiwa M, Hamilton W: Referral of suspected colorectal cancer: have guidelines made a difference?. Br J Gen Pract. 2004, 54: 608-610.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer. London. 2005 National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Referral Guidelines for Suspected Cancer. London. 2005
13.
go back to reference Jones R, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Gulliford MC: Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ. 2007, 334 (7602): 1040-10.1136/bmj.39171.637106.AE.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones R, Latinovic R, Charlton J, Gulliford MC: Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ. 2007, 334 (7602): 1040-10.1136/bmj.39171.637106.AE.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Lawrenson R, Logle J, Marks C: Risk of colorectal cancer in general practice patients presenting with rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit or anaemia. Eur J Cancer Care. 2006, 15: 267-271. 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00637.x.CrossRef Lawrenson R, Logle J, Marks C: Risk of colorectal cancer in general practice patients presenting with rectal bleeding, change in bowel habit or anaemia. Eur J Cancer Care. 2006, 15: 267-271. 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00637.x.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hamilton W, Round A, Sharp D, Peters T: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2005, 93: 399-405. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hamilton W, Round A, Sharp D, Peters T: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before diagnosis: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2005, 93: 399-405. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference du Toit J, Hamilton W, Barraclough K: Risk in primary care of colorectal cancer from new onset rectal bleeding: 10 year prospective study. BMJ. 2006, 333: 69-70. 10.1136/bmj.38846.684850.2F.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral du Toit J, Hamilton W, Barraclough K: Risk in primary care of colorectal cancer from new onset rectal bleeding: 10 year prospective study. BMJ. 2006, 333: 69-70. 10.1136/bmj.38846.684850.2F.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Hamilton W, Lancashire R, Sharp D, Peters TJ, Cheng K, Marshall T: The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 323-327. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hamilton W, Lancashire R, Sharp D, Peters TJ, Cheng K, Marshall T: The importance of anaemia in diagnosing colorectal cancer: a case-control study using electronic primary care records. Br J Cancer. 2008, 98: 323-327. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604165.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Curless R, French JM, Williams GV, James OF: Colorectal carcinoma: do elderly patients present differently?. Age Ageing. 1994, 23: 102-107. 10.1093/ageing/23.2.102.CrossRefPubMed Curless R, French JM, Williams GV, James OF: Colorectal carcinoma: do elderly patients present differently?. Age Ageing. 1994, 23: 102-107. 10.1093/ageing/23.2.102.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Knottnerus JA: The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis. 2002, London: BMJ Books Knottnerus JA: The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis. 2002, London: BMJ Books
21.
go back to reference Hamilton W: Derivation of a score for identifying colorectal cancer in primary care. Gut. 2007, 56 (Suppl 2): A49. Hamilton W: Derivation of a score for identifying colorectal cancer in primary care. Gut. 2007, 56 (Suppl 2): A49.
22.
go back to reference Loktionov A: Cell exfoliation in the human colon: Myth, reality and implications for colorectal cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 2281-2289. 10.1002/ijc.22647.CrossRefPubMed Loktionov A: Cell exfoliation in the human colon: Myth, reality and implications for colorectal cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 2281-2289. 10.1002/ijc.22647.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cleary J, Peters TJ, Sharp D, Hamilton W: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before emergency presentation: a population-based case-control study. Fam Pract. 2007, 24: 3-6. 10.1093/fampra/cml059.CrossRefPubMed Cleary J, Peters TJ, Sharp D, Hamilton W: Clinical features of colorectal cancer before emergency presentation: a population-based case-control study. Fam Pract. 2007, 24: 3-6. 10.1093/fampra/cml059.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hamilton W: Colorectal cancer in the young. Am J Surg. 2005, 189: 504-10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.014.CrossRefPubMed Hamilton W: Colorectal cancer in the young. Am J Surg. 2005, 189: 504-10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.014.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The risk of colorectal cancer with symptoms at different ages and between the sexes: a case-control study
Authors
William Hamilton
Robert Lancashire
Debbie Sharp
Tim J Peters
KK Cheng
Tom Marshall
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Medicine / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1741-7015
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-17

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Medicine 1/2009 Go to the issue