Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance activity in the United Kingdom: a survey on behalf of the british society of cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Authors: Renjith Antony, Marwa Daghem, Gerry P McCann, Safa Daghem, James Moon, Dudley J Pennell, Stefan Neubauer, Henry J Dargie, Colin Berry, John Payne, Mark C Petrie, Nathaniel M Hawkins

Published in: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The indications, complexity and capabilities of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) have rapidly expanded. Whether actual service provision and training have developed in parallel is unknown.

Methods

We undertook a systematic telephone and postal survey of all public hospitals on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance to identify all CMR providers within the United Kingdom.

Results

Of the 60 CMR centres identified, 88% responded to a detailed questionnaire. Services are led by cardiologists and radiologists in equal proportion, though the majority of current trainees are cardiologists. The mean number of CMR scans performed annually per centre increased by 44% over two years. This trend was consistent across centres of different scanning volumes. The commonest indication for CMR was assessment of heart failure and cardiomyopathy (39%), followed by coronary artery disease and congenital heart disease. There was striking geographical variation in CMR availability, numbers of scans performed, and distribution of trainees. Centres without on site scanning capability refer very few patients for CMR. Just over half of centres had a formal training programme, and few performed regular audit.

Conclusion

The number of CMR scans performed in the UK has increased dramatically in just two years. Trainees are mainly located in large volume centres and enrolled in cardiology as opposed to radiology training programmes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al: Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004, 25 (21): 1940-1965. 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040.CrossRefPubMed Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al: Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004, 25 (21): 1940-1965. 10.1016/j.ehj.2004.06.040.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al: ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48 (7): 1475-1497. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.003.CrossRefPubMed Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM, et al: ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006, 48 (7): 1475-1497. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.07.003.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Hundley WG, Bluemke D, Bogaert JG, et al: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009, 11 (1): 5.-10.1186/1532-429X-11-5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Hundley WG, Bluemke D, Bogaert JG, et al: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009, 11 (1): 5.-10.1186/1532-429X-11-5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim RJ, de RA, Fleck E, et al: Guidelines for training in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance(CMR). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007, 9 (1): 3-4. 10.1080/10976640600778064.CrossRefPubMed Kim RJ, de RA, Fleck E, et al: Guidelines for training in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance(CMR). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007, 9 (1): 3-4. 10.1080/10976640600778064.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Pohost GM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM, et al: Task Force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (cardiovascular magnetic resonance [CMR]) endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 51 (3): 404-408. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.020.CrossRefPubMed Pohost GM, Kim RJ, Kramer CM, et al: Task Force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (cardiovascular magnetic resonance [CMR]) endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 51 (3): 404-408. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.11.020.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Woodard PK, Bluemke DA, Cascade PN, et al: ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Am Coll Radiol. 2006, 3 (9): 665-676. 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.007.CrossRefPubMed Woodard PK, Bluemke DA, Cascade PN, et al: ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Am Coll Radiol. 2006, 3 (9): 665-676. 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.007.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Plein S, Schulz-Menger J, Almeida A, et al: Training and accreditation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Europe: a position statement of the working group on cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2011 Plein S, Schulz-Menger J, Almeida A, et al: Training and accreditation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Europe: a position statement of the working group on cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2011
8.
go back to reference Gershlick AH, de BM, Chambers J, et al: Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group. Heart. 2007, 93 (4): 423-431. 10.1136/hrt.2006.108779.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gershlick AH, de BM, Chambers J, et al: Role of non-invasive imaging in the management of coronary artery disease: an assessment of likely change over the next 10 years. A report from the British Cardiovascular Society Working Group. Heart. 2007, 93 (4): 423-431. 10.1136/hrt.2006.108779.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, et al: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324 (7347): 1183-10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, et al: Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ. 2002, 324 (7347): 1183-10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, MR000008-3 Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, MR000008-3
12.
go back to reference Edwards P: Mailed questionnaires: length matters. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004, 26 (2): 214-215.CrossRef Edwards P: Mailed questionnaires: length matters. J Public Health (Oxf). 2004, 26 (2): 214-215.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Edwards P, Roberts I, Sandercock P, et al: Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?. Control Clin Trials. 2004, 25 (1): 31-52. 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013.CrossRefPubMed Edwards P, Roberts I, Sandercock P, et al: Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?. Control Clin Trials. 2004, 25 (1): 31-52. 10.1016/j.cct.2003.08.013.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance activity in the United Kingdom: a survey on behalf of the british society of cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Authors
Renjith Antony
Marwa Daghem
Gerry P McCann
Safa Daghem
James Moon
Dudley J Pennell
Stefan Neubauer
Henry J Dargie
Colin Berry
John Payne
Mark C Petrie
Nathaniel M Hawkins
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1532-429X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-13-57

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 1/2011 Go to the issue