Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Population Health Metrics 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research

The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation

Authors: Benjamin M Craig, Jan JV Busschbach

Published in: Population Health Metrics | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To present an episodic random utility model that unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation.

Methods

First, we introduce two alternative random utility models (RUMs) for health preferences: the episodic RUM and the more common instant RUM. For the interpretation of time trade-off (TTO) responses, we show that the episodic model implies a coefficient estimator, and the instant model implies a mean slope estimator. Secondly, we demonstrate these estimators and the differences between the estimates for 42 health states using TTO responses from the seminal Measurement and Valuation in Health (MVH) study conducted in the United Kingdom. Mean slopes are estimates with and without Dolan's transformation of worse-than-death (WTD) responses. Finally, we demonstrate an exploded probit estimator, an extension of the coefficient estimator for discrete choice data that accommodates both TTO and rank responses.

Results

By construction, mean slopes are less than or equal to coefficients, because slopes are fractions and, therefore, magnify downward errors in WTD responses. The Dolan transformation of WTD responses causes mean slopes to increase in similarity to coefficient estimates, yet they are not equivalent (i.e., absolute mean difference = 0.179). Unlike mean slopes, coefficient estimates demonstrate strong concordance with rank-based predictions (Lin's rho = 0.91). Combining TTO and rank responses under the exploded probit model improves the identification of health state values, decreasing the average width of confidence intervals from 0.057 to 0.041 compared to TTO only results.

Conclusion

The episodic RUM expands upon the theoretical framework underlying health state valuation and contributes to health econometrics by motivating the selection of coefficient and exploded probit estimators for the analysis of TTO and rank responses. In future MVH surveys, sample size requirements may be reduced through the incorporation of multiple responses under a single estimator.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Torrence GW: Multi-attribute utility theory as a method of measuring social preferences for health states in long-term care. In Values and Long Term Care. Edited by: Kane Rl, Kane RA. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books; 1982:127-156. Torrence GW: Multi-attribute utility theory as a method of measuring social preferences for health states in long-term care. In Values and Long Term Care. Edited by: Kane Rl, Kane RA. Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books; 1982:127-156.
2.
go back to reference Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA: Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making 1994, 14: 9-18. 10.1177/0272989X9401400102CrossRefPubMed Patrick DL, Starks HE, Cain KC, Uhlmann RF, Pearlman RA: Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making 1994, 14: 9-18. 10.1177/0272989X9401400102CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mullahy J: The Anatomy of Healthcare Cost Distributions. In 2nd Biennial Conference of the American Society of Health Economists. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, US; 2008. Mullahy J: The Anatomy of Healthcare Cost Distributions. In 2nd Biennial Conference of the American Society of Health Economists. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, US; 2008.
4.
go back to reference Craig BM, Ramachandran S: Relative risk of a shuffled deck: a generalizable logical consistency criterion for sample selection in health state valuation studies. Health Econ 2006, 15: 835-848. 10.1002/hec.1108CrossRefPubMed Craig BM, Ramachandran S: Relative risk of a shuffled deck: a generalizable logical consistency criterion for sample selection in health state valuation studies. Health Econ 2006, 15: 835-848. 10.1002/hec.1108CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Craig BM, Busschbach JJV, Salomon JA: Ranking, Time Trade-Off and Visual Analogue Scale Values for EQ-5D Health States. Under Review 2008. Craig BM, Busschbach JJV, Salomon JA: Ranking, Time Trade-Off and Visual Analogue Scale Values for EQ-5D Health States. Under Review 2008.
6.
go back to reference Busschbach JJV, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, Oppe S, Badia X, Dolan P, Greiner W, Kind P, Krabbe P, Ohinmaa A, et al.: A comparison of EQ-5D time trade-off values obtained in Germany, The United Kingdom and Spain. In The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Edited by: Brooks R, Rabin R, Charro Fd. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003:143-165.CrossRef Busschbach JJV, Weijnen T, Nieuwenhuizen M, Oppe S, Badia X, Dolan P, Greiner W, Kind P, Krabbe P, Ohinmaa A, et al.: A comparison of EQ-5D time trade-off values obtained in Germany, The United Kingdom and Spain. In The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective. Edited by: Brooks R, Rabin R, Charro Fd. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003:143-165.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stalmeier PF, Busschbach JJ, Lamers LM, Krabbe PF: The gap effect: discontinuities of preferences around dead. Health Econ 2005, 14: 679-685. 10.1002/hec.986CrossRefPubMed Stalmeier PF, Busschbach JJ, Lamers LM, Krabbe PF: The gap effect: discontinuities of preferences around dead. Health Econ 2005, 14: 679-685. 10.1002/hec.986CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Salomon JA: Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data. Popul Health Metr 2003, 1: 12. 10.1186/1478-7954-1-12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Salomon JA: Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: a model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data. Popul Health Metr 2003, 1: 12. 10.1186/1478-7954-1-12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference McCabe C, Brazier J, Gilks P, Tsuchiya A, Roberts J, O'Hagan A, Stevens K: Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. J Health Econ 2006, 25: 418-431. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.008CrossRefPubMed McCabe C, Brazier J, Gilks P, Tsuchiya A, Roberts J, O'Hagan A, Stevens K: Using rank data to estimate health state utility models. J Health Econ 2006, 25: 418-431. 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.07.008CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Krabbe PF, Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ: Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales. Qual Life Res 2006, 15: 1651-1661. 10.1007/s11136-006-0027-7CrossRefPubMed Krabbe PF, Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ: Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales. Qual Life Res 2006, 15: 1651-1661. 10.1007/s11136-006-0027-7CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nunnally JC: Psychometric Theory. 2nd edition. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1978. Nunnally JC: Psychometric Theory. 2nd edition. New York, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1978.
12.
go back to reference Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care 1997, 35: 1095-1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002CrossRefPubMed Dolan P: Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care 1997, 35: 1095-1108. 10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gudex C: Time Trade-Off User Manual: Props and Self-Completion Methods. In Report of the Centre for Health Economics. York, United Kingdom: University of York; 1994. Gudex C: Time Trade-Off User Manual: Props and Self-Completion Methods. In Report of the Centre for Health Economics. York, United Kingdom: University of York; 1994.
14.
go back to reference Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A: Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. Bmj 1998, 316: 736-741.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A: Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. Bmj 1998, 316: 736-741.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Craig BM: The duration effect: a link between TTO and VAS values. Health Econ 2008. Craig BM: The duration effect: a link between TTO and VAS values. Health Econ 2008.
16.
go back to reference Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, Krabbe PF: On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care 2007, 45: 835-841. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180ca9ac5CrossRefPubMed Stalmeier PF, Lamers LM, Busschbach JJ, Krabbe PF: On the assessment of preferences for health and duration: maximal endurable time and better than dead preferences. Med Care 2007, 45: 835-841. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180ca9ac5CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Goldberger AS: Econometric Theory. New York, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1964. Goldberger AS: Econometric Theory. New York, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1964.
18.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2005. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3rd edition. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
19.
go back to reference Mullahy J, Manning W: Statistical issues in cost-effectiveness analyses. In Valuing Health Care. Edited by: Sloan F. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge; 1995. Mullahy J, Manning W: Statistical issues in cost-effectiveness analyses. In Valuing Health Care. Edited by: Sloan F. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge; 1995.
20.
go back to reference Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005, 43: 203-220. 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003CrossRefPubMed Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ: US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005, 43: 203-220. 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Efron B: The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1977, 72: 557-565. 10.2307/2286217CrossRef Efron B: The efficiency of Cox's likelihood function for censored data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1977, 72: 557-565. 10.2307/2286217CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation
Authors
Benjamin M Craig
Jan JV Busschbach
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Population Health Metrics / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1478-7954
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-7-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Population Health Metrics 1/2009 Go to the issue