Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Commentary

Mobile phone radiation health risk controversy: the reliability and sufficiency of science behind the safety standards

Authors: Dariusz Leszczynski, Zhengping Xu

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

There is ongoing discussion whether the mobile phone radiation causes any health effects. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, the International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety and the World Health Organization are assuring that there is no proven health risk and that the present safety limits protect all mobile phone users. However, based on the available scientific evidence, the situation is not as clear. The majority of the evidence comes from in vitro laboratory studies and is of very limited use for determining health risk. Animal toxicology studies are inadequate because it is not possible to "overdose" microwave radiation, as it is done with chemical agents, due to simultaneous induction of heating side-effects. There is a lack of human volunteer studies that would, in unbiased way, demonstrate whether human body responds at all to mobile phone radiation. Finally, the epidemiological evidence is insufficient due to, among others, selection and misclassification bias and the low sensitivity of this approach in detection of health risk within the population. This indicates that the presently available scientific evidence is insufficient to prove reliability of the current safety standards. Therefore, we recommend to use precaution when dealing with mobile phones and, whenever possible and feasible, to limit body exposure to this radiation. Continuation of the research on mobile phone radiation effects is needed in order to improve the basis and the reliability of the safety standards.
Literature
1.
go back to reference ICNIRP: Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics. 1998, 74: 494-522. ICNIRP: Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Physics. 1998, 74: 494-522.
3.
go back to reference ICNIRP Statement: Health issues related to the use of hand-held radiotelephones and base transmitters. Health Physics. 1996, 70: 578-593. ICNIRP Statement: Health issues related to the use of hand-held radiotelephones and base transmitters. Health Physics. 1996, 70: 578-593.
4.
go back to reference IARC: Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Hum. 2002, 80: IARC: Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risk Hum. 2002, 80:
5.
go back to reference Focke F, Schuermann D, Kuster N, Schär P: DNA fragmentation in human fibroblasts under extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Mutation Res. 2010, 683: 74-83.CrossRefPubMed Focke F, Schuermann D, Kuster N, Schär P: DNA fragmentation in human fibroblasts under extremely low frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Mutation Res. 2010, 683: 74-83.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kheifets L, Renew D, Sias G, Swanson J: Extremely low frequency electric fields and cancer: Assessing the evidence. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009, 31 (2): 102-103. Kheifets L, Renew D, Sias G, Swanson J: Extremely low frequency electric fields and cancer: Assessing the evidence. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009, 31 (2): 102-103.
7.
go back to reference Cohen D: It's good to talk (interview with Mays Swicord). New Scientist. 2003, 46-48. 2412 Cohen D: It's good to talk (interview with Mays Swicord). New Scientist. 2003, 46-48. 2412
8.
go back to reference Kundi M: The controversy about a possible relationship between mobile phone use and cancer. Env Health Perspectives. 2009, 117: 316-324.CrossRef Kundi M: The controversy about a possible relationship between mobile phone use and cancer. Env Health Perspectives. 2009, 117: 316-324.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cardis E, Richardson L, Deltour I, Armstrong B, Feychting M, Johansen C, Kilkenny M, McKinney P, Modan B, Sadetzki S, Schüz J, Swerdlow A, Vrijheid M, Auvinen A, Berg G, Blettner M, Bowman J, Brown J, Chetrit A, Christensen HC, Cook A, Hepworth S, Giles G, Hours M, Iavarone I, Jarus-Hakak A, Klaeboe L, Krewski D, Lagorio S, Lönn S, Mann S, McBride M, Muir K, Nadon L, Parent ME, Pearce N, Salminen T, Schoemaker M, Schlehofer B, Siemiatycki J, Taki M, Takebayashi T, Tynes T, van Tongeren M, Vecchia P, Wiart J, Woodward A, Yamaguchi N: The Interphone study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007, 22: 647-664. 10.1007/s10654-007-9152-z.CrossRefPubMed Cardis E, Richardson L, Deltour I, Armstrong B, Feychting M, Johansen C, Kilkenny M, McKinney P, Modan B, Sadetzki S, Schüz J, Swerdlow A, Vrijheid M, Auvinen A, Berg G, Blettner M, Bowman J, Brown J, Chetrit A, Christensen HC, Cook A, Hepworth S, Giles G, Hours M, Iavarone I, Jarus-Hakak A, Klaeboe L, Krewski D, Lagorio S, Lönn S, Mann S, McBride M, Muir K, Nadon L, Parent ME, Pearce N, Salminen T, Schoemaker M, Schlehofer B, Siemiatycki J, Taki M, Takebayashi T, Tynes T, van Tongeren M, Vecchia P, Wiart J, Woodward A, Yamaguchi N: The Interphone study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007, 22: 647-664. 10.1007/s10654-007-9152-z.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schüz J, Böhler E, Berg G, Schlehofer B, Hettinger I, Schlaefer K, Wahrendorf J, Kunna-Grass K, Blettner M: Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). Am J Epidemiol. 2006, 163: 512-520. 10.1093/aje/kwj068.CrossRefPubMed Schüz J, Böhler E, Berg G, Schlehofer B, Hettinger I, Schlaefer K, Wahrendorf J, Kunna-Grass K, Blettner M: Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). Am J Epidemiol. 2006, 163: 512-520. 10.1093/aje/kwj068.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lahkola A, Auvinen A, Raitanen J, Schoemaker MJ, Christensen HC, Feychting M, Johansen C, Klaeboe L, Lönn S, Swerdlow AJ, Tynes T, Salminen T: Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 1769-1775. 10.1002/ijc.22503.CrossRefPubMed Lahkola A, Auvinen A, Raitanen J, Schoemaker MJ, Christensen HC, Feychting M, Johansen C, Klaeboe L, Lönn S, Swerdlow AJ, Tynes T, Salminen T: Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. Int J Cancer. 2007, 120: 1769-1775. 10.1002/ijc.22503.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hardell L, Carlberg M: Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. Int J Oncol. 2009, 35: 5-17. 10.3892/ijo_00000307.CrossRefPubMed Hardell L, Carlberg M: Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours. Int J Oncol. 2009, 35: 5-17. 10.3892/ijo_00000307.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ahlbom A, Feychting M, Green AC, Kheifets L, Savitz DA, Swerdlow AJ: Epidemiologic evidence on mobile phones and tumor risk: a review. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 639-652. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b0927d.CrossRefPubMed Ahlbom A, Feychting M, Green AC, Kheifets L, Savitz DA, Swerdlow AJ: Epidemiologic evidence on mobile phones and tumor risk: a review. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 639-652. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b0927d.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rothman K: Commentary: Health effects of mobile telephones. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 653-655. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181aff1f7.CrossRefPubMed Rothman K: Commentary: Health effects of mobile telephones. Epidemiology. 2009, 20: 653-655. 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181aff1f7.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Myung SK, Ju W, McDonnell DD, Lee YJ, Kazinets G, Cheng CT, Moskowitz JM: Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009 , 27 (22): 5562-5572. Myung SK, Ju W, McDonnell DD, Lee YJ, Kazinets G, Cheng CT, Moskowitz JM: Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Tumors: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009 , 27 (22): 5562-5572.
16.
go back to reference Röösli M: Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review. Environ Res. 2008, 107: 277-287. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003.CrossRefPubMed Röösli M: Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: A systematic review. Environ Res. 2008, 107: 277-287. 10.1016/j.envres.2008.02.003.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Leszczynski D, Nylund R, Joenväärä S, Reivinen J: Applicability of Discovery Science-Approach to Determine Biological Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation. Proteomics. 2004, 4: 426-431. 10.1002/pmic.200300646.CrossRefPubMed Leszczynski D, Nylund R, Joenväärä S, Reivinen J: Applicability of Discovery Science-Approach to Determine Biological Effects of Mobile Phone Radiation. Proteomics. 2004, 4: 426-431. 10.1002/pmic.200300646.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Leszczynski D, Meltz ML: Report: Questions and answers concerning applicability of proteomics and transcriptomics in EMF research. Proteomics. 2006, 6: 4674-4677. 10.1002/pmic.200600414.CrossRefPubMed Leszczynski D, Meltz ML: Report: Questions and answers concerning applicability of proteomics and transcriptomics in EMF research. Proteomics. 2006, 6: 4674-4677. 10.1002/pmic.200600414.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Vecchia P: Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and Regulations. Ann Inst Super Sanita. 2007, 43: 260-267. Vecchia P: Exposure of humans to electromagnetic fields. Standards and Regulations. Ann Inst Super Sanita. 2007, 43: 260-267.
20.
21.
go back to reference SSI Independent Expert Group on Electromagnetic Fields: Recent research on EMF and health effects. SSI Reports. 2008, 12: 1-70. SSI Independent Expert Group on Electromagnetic Fields: Recent research on EMF and health effects. SSI Reports. 2008, 12: 1-70.
22.
go back to reference Hardell L, Sage C: Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2008, 62: 104-109.CrossRef Hardell L, Sage C: Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy. 2008, 62: 104-109.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schüz J: Mobile phone use and exposures in children. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005, S45-50. 10.1002/bem.20129. Suppl 7 Schüz J: Mobile phone use and exposures in children. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005, S45-50. 10.1002/bem.20129. Suppl 7
24.
go back to reference Vecchia P: The approach of ICNIRP to Protection of children. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005, S157-160. 10.1002/bem.20154. Suppl 7 Vecchia P: The approach of ICNIRP to Protection of children. Bioelectromagnetics. 2005, S157-160. 10.1002/bem.20154. Suppl 7
25.
go back to reference Scincariello F, De Rosa CT: Genetic heterogeneity and its effect on susceptibility to environmental factors. Eur J Oncol. 2007, 12: 155-170. Scincariello F, De Rosa CT: Genetic heterogeneity and its effect on susceptibility to environmental factors. Eur J Oncol. 2007, 12: 155-170.
26.
go back to reference Hamad NM, Elconin JH, Karnoub AE, Bai W, Rich JN, Abraham RT, Der CJ, Counter CM: Distinct requirements for Ras oncogenesis in human versus mouse cells. Genes & Development. 2002, 16: 2045-2057.CrossRef Hamad NM, Elconin JH, Karnoub AE, Bai W, Rich JN, Abraham RT, Der CJ, Counter CM: Distinct requirements for Ras oncogenesis in human versus mouse cells. Genes & Development. 2002, 16: 2045-2057.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mobile phone radiation health risk controversy: the reliability and sufficiency of science behind the safety standards
Authors
Dariusz Leszczynski
Zhengping Xu
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-8-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2010 Go to the issue