Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Review

Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services

Authors: Stuart Anderson, Pauline Allen, Stephen Peckham, Nick Goodwin

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Scoping studies have been used across a range of disciplines for a wide variety of purposes. However, their value is increasingly limited by a lack of definition and clarity of purpose. The UK's Service Delivery and Organisation Research Programme (SDO) has extensive experience of commissioning and using such studies; twenty four have now been completed.
This review article has four objectives; to describe the nature of the scoping studies that have been commissioned by the SDO Programme; to consider the impact of and uses made of such studies; to provide definitions for the different elements that may constitute a scoping study; and to describe the lessons learnt by the SDO Programme in commissioning scoping studies.
Scoping studies are imprecisely defined but usually consist of one or more discrete components; most commonly they are non-systematic reviews of the literature, but other important elements are literature mapping, conceptual mapping and policy mapping. Some scoping studies also involve consultations with stakeholders including the end users of research.
Scoping studies have been used for a wide variety of purposes, although a common feature is to identify questions and topics for future research. The reports of scoping studies often have an impact that extends beyond informing research commissioners about future research areas; some have been published in peer reviewed journals, and others have been published in research summaries aimed at a broader audience of health service managers and policymakers.
Key lessons from the SDO experience are the need to relate scoping studies to a particular health service context; the need for scoping teams to be multi-disciplinary and to be given enough time to integrate diverse findings; and the need for the research commissioners to be explicit not only about the aims of scoping studies but also about their intended uses. This necessitates regular contact between researchers and commissioners.
Scoping studies are an essential element in the portfolio of approaches to research, particularly as a mechanism for helping research commissioners and policy makers to ask the right questions. Their utility will be further enhanced by greater recognition of the individual components, definitions for which are provided.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Harper RJ, Hatton TJ, Crombie DS, Dawes WR, Abbott LK, Challen RP, House C: Phase farming with trees: a scoping study of its potential for salinity control and soil quality. 2000, Kingston, ACT, Australia: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation
2.
Turrall A, Mulhall A, Rees D, Okwadi J, Emerot J, Omadi R: Understanding the communication context in Teso and Lango farming systems: The agricultural information scoping study. 2000, London: Department for International Development
3.
Mukerjee S, Ellenson WD, Lewis RG, Stevens RK, Somerville MC, Shadwick DS, Willis RD: An environmental scoping study in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Environment International. 1997, 23 (5): 657-673. 10.1016/S0160-4120(97)00068-8.CrossRef
4.
Barber MI: Scoping study on business process re-engineering: towards successful IT application. International Journal of Production Research. 1998, 36 (3): 575-601. 10.1080/002075498193589.CrossRef
5.
Davis P, Florian L: Teaching strategies and approaches for pupils with special educational needs: a scoping study. Research Report RR516. 2005, London: Department for Education and Skills
6.
Harris R, Hall J, Muirhead A: Impact of e-learning on learner participation, attainment, retention and progression in further education: report of a scoping study. 2005, Glasgow: SCRE Centre, University of Glasgow
7.
O'Malley L, Croucher K: Supported housing services for people with mental health problems: a scoping study. Housing Studies. 2005, 20 (5): 831-845. 10.1080/02673030500214126.CrossRef
8.
Clinton M, Hazelton M: Scoping mental health nursing education. Aust N Z J Ment Health Nurs. 2000, 9 (1): 2-10. 10.1046/j.1440-0979.2000.00155.x.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mays N, Roberts E, Popay J: Synthesising research evidence. Studying the organization and delivery of health services: research methods. Edited by: Fulop N, Allen P, Clarke A, Black N. 2001, London: Routledge, 188-220.
10.
Shaw RL, Booth A, Sutton AJ, Miller T, Smith JA, Young B, Jones DR, Dixon-Woods M: Finding qualitative research: an evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodologies. 2004, 4: 5-10.1186/1471-2288-4-5.CrossRef
11.
Grayson L, Gomersall A: A difficult business: finding the evidence for social science reviews. Working Paper 19. 2003, London: ESRC Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Queen Mary College
12.
Nutley SM, Walter I, Davies HTO: Using evidence: how research can inform public services. 2007, Bristol: The Policy Press
13.
Lavis JN, Becerra Posada F, Haines A, Osei E: Use of research to inform public policy making. Lancet. 2004, 364: 1615-21. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17317-0.CrossRefPubMed
14.
National Institutes of Health Working Group on Priority Setting: Setting research priorities at the National Institutes of Health. Publication number 97-4265. 2007, Bethesda MD: NIH
15.
Callahan D: Shaping biomedical research priorities: the case of the National Institutes of Health. Health Care Analysis. 1999, 7: 115-129. 10.1023/A:1009401507982.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Allen P, Peckham S, Anderson S, Goodwin N: Commissioning research that is used: the experience of the NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development Programme. Evidence and Policy. 2007, 3 (1): 119-134.CrossRef
17.
Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block , Buxton MJ, Kogan M: The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2003, 1 (2): 1-51.
18.
Harries U, Elliott H, Higgins A: Evidence-based policy-making in the NHS: exploring the interface between research and the commissioning process. J Public Health Med. 1999, 2 (18): 29-36. 10.1093/pubmed/21.1.29.CrossRef
19.
Goodwin N, Allen P, Anderson S, Gagnon D, Grant R, Law S, Peckham S: Influencing policy makers and practitioners: towards a new model in the provision of evidence-based research to support decision-making. Paper given at Health Services Research Network Conference, Sheffield. 2007
20.
Vella K, Goldfrad C, Rowan K, Bion J, Black N: Use of consensus development to establish national research priorities in critical care. British Medical Journal. 2000, 320: 976-980. 10.1136/bmj.320.7240.976.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Rogers J, Lamont T, Haines A: Setting priorities for research and development in the NHS: a case study on the interface between primary and secondary care. British Medical Journal. 1995, 311: 1076-1080.CrossRef
22.
Black N, Murphy M, Lamping D, McKee M, Sanderson C, Askham J, Marteau T: Consensus development methods: A review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999, 4 (4): 236-48.PubMed
23.
Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P: On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Quarterly. 2003, 81 (3): 363-388. 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
26.
Research and Development Directorate: Best research for best health: a new national health research strategy. 2007, London: Department of Health
27.
Arksey H, O'Malley L: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005, 8: 1-14. 10.1080/1364557032000119616.CrossRef
28.
Mays N, Pope C, Popay J: Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policy-making in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005, 10 (Suppl 1): 6-20. 10.1258/1355819054308576.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Ferlie E, McGivern G: Relationships between health care organisations: a critical overview of the literature and a research agenda. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/19a/2002)
30.
Sheaff R, Schofield J, Mannion R, Dowling B, Marshall M, McNally R: Organisational factors and performance: a review of the literature. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/55/2003)
31.
Hunter D: Scoping study of the public health system in England. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/150/2006)
32.
Roland M, McDonald R, Sibbald B: Outpatient services and primary care: a scoping review of research into strategies for improving outpatient effectiveness and efficiency. 2006, London: NCC SDO (SDO/82/2005)
33.
Gladman J: Specialist rehabilitation for neurological conditions: a literature review and mapping study. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/132/2006)
34.
Burns T: Measuring outcomes for carers for people with mental health problems. 2004, London: NCC SDO (SDO/81/2004)
35.
Fulop N, Allen P: National listening exercise: report of the findings. 2000, London: NCC SDO
36.
Programme of research on continuity of care: commissioning of short term projects. Commissioning Briefs. 2000, London: NCC SDO
37.
Ehrich K, Freeman G, Richards S, Robinson I, Shepperd S: How to do a scoping exercise: continuity of care. Research Policy and Planning. 2002, 20 (1): 25-29.
38.
Programme of research on research methods: eliciting and assessing users' views on the processes of health care. Commissioning Briefs. 2000, London: NCC SDO
39.
Gulliford M, Morgan M, Hughes D, Beech R, Figeroa-Munoz J, Gibson B, Hudson M, Arumugam C, Connell P, Mohiddin A, Sedgwick J: Access to health care: report of a scoping exercise. 2001, London: NCC SDO (SDO/05/2000)
40.
Rosen R, Florin D, Dixon J: Access to health care: taking forward the findings from the scoping exercise. 2001, London: NCC SDO (SDO/12/2000)
41.
Carr-Hill R, Currie L, Dixon P: Skill mix in secondary care: a scoping exercise. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/51/2003)
42.
Hewitt C, Lankshear A, Maynard A, Sheldon T, Smith K: Health service workforce and health outcomes: a scoping study. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/50/2003)
43.
Elliott R, Scott A, Skatun D, Farrar S, Napper M: The impact of local labour market factors on the organisation and delivery of health services. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/52/2003)
44.
Jones R: E-health policy context and consultation with stakeholders. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/59/2003)
45.
Pagliari C: Literature review and conceptual map of the area of e-health. 2003, London: NCC SDO (SDO/60/2003)
46.
Cherry C: Review of scoping exercises commissioned by the SDO Programme 2000–02: opportunities for commissioning. 2000, London: NCC SDO
47.
Ross F, MacKenzie A, Smith E, Masterson A, Wood C: Identifying research priorities in nursing and midwifery service delivery and organisation. 2002, London: NCC SDO (SDO/20/2002)
48.
Keating F, Samele C, Furnish K, Greatley A: Research priorities for service user and carer-centred mental health services: a synthesis of the literature and policy documents. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/85/2005)
49.
Naylor C, Wallcraft J, Samele C, Greatley A: Research Priorities for service user and carer-centred mental health services: a consultation report. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/86/2005)
50.
Samele C, Wallcraft J, Naylor C, Keating F, Greatley A: Research priorities for service user and carer-centred mental health services: overview report. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/85/86/2005)
51.
Townsley R: Shaping our future: a scoping and consultation exercise to establish research priorities in learning disabilities for the next ten years. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/152/2006)
52.
The Impact of the NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research and Development Programme 2001–2006. 2007, London: NCC SDO
53.
Peckham S, Willmott M, Allen P, Anderson S, Goodwin N: Assessing the impact of the NHS Service Delivery and Organisation Research Programme. Evidence and Policy. 2008,
54.
Services to support carers of people with mental health problems. Briefing paper. 2002, London: NCC SDO (SDO/15/2001)
55.
Achieving high performance in health care systems: the impact and influence of organisational arrangements. Briefing paper. 2006, London: NCC SDO (SDO/55/2003)
56.
Improving children's health: can nurses, midwives and health visitors make a difference? Research summary. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/68/2004)
57.
Can primary care reform reduce demand on hospital outpatient departments? Research summary. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/82/2005)
58.
Arksey H: Scoping the field: services for carers of people with mental health problems. Health and Social Care in the Community. 2003, 11 (4): 335-344. 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00433.x.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Ross F, Smith E, MacKenzie , Masterson A: Identifying research priorities in nursing and midwifery service delivery and organisation: a scoping study. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2004, 41: 547-558. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.12.008.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Gulliford M, Morgan M: Access to health care. 2003, London: Routledge
61.
Freeman G, Woloshynowych M, Baker R, Boulton M, Guthrie B, Car J, Haggerty J, Tarrant C: Continuity of Care 2006: What have we learned since 2000 and what are the policy imperatives now?. 2007, London:NCC SDO (SDO/138/2006)
62.
Hart C: Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. 1998, Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press
63.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman D: Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2001, London: BMJ PublicationsCrossRef
64.
Harden A, Garcia J, Oliver S, Rees R, Shepherd J, Brunton G, Oakley A: Applying systematic review methods to studies of people's views: an example from public health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58 (9): 794-800. 10.1136/jech.2003.014829.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
65.
Pope C, Mays N, Popay J: Synthesising qualitative and quantitative health evidence: a guide to methods. 2007, Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press
66.
Greenhalgh T: Meta-narrative mapping: a new approach to the synthesis of complex evidence. Narrative Research in Health and Illness. Edited by: Hurwitz B, Greenhalgh T, Skultans V. 2004, London: BMJ Publications
67.
Knox C: Concept mapping in policy evaluation: a research review of community relations in Northern Ireland. Evaluation. 1995, 1: 65-79. 10.1177/135638909500100105.CrossRef
68.
Freeman G, Sheppard S, Robinson I, Ehrich K, Richards S: Continuity of care: report of a scoping exercise. 2000, London: NCC SDO (SDO/02/2000)
69.
Gulliford M, Morgan M, Hughes D, Beech R, Figeroa-Munoz J, Gibson B, Hudson M, Arumugam C, Connell P, Mohiddin A, Sedgwick J: Access to health care: report of a scoping exercise. 2001, London: NCC SDO (SDO/05/2000)
70.
Horne R: Concordance, adherence and compliance in medicine taking: a scoping exercise. 2004, London: NCC SDO (SDO/76/2004)
71.
Lamb S, Gates S, Fisher J, Cooke M, Carter Y, McCabe C: Scoping exercise on fallers' clinics. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/139/2006)
72.
Clarke A, Pillaye J: National policy initiatives: implications for the SDO Programme. 2002, London: NCC SDO
73.
Dalziel M: Using research to improve health care services. 2000, London: NCC SDO
74.
Fulop N, Allen P: National listening exercise: report of the findings. 2000, London: NCC SDO
75.
Cherry C, Anderson S: Refreshing the national listening exercise: report of the findings. 2002, London: NCC SDO
76.
Clarke A, Cherry C, Anderson S: Informing commissioning priorities: overview report. 2002, London: NCC SDO
77.
Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P: On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research. Milbank Quarterly. 2003, 81 (3): 363-388. 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Nicolson P: Eliciting users' views of the processes of health care: a scoping exercise. 2000, London: NCC SDO (SDO/03/2000)
79.
While A, Forbes A, Ullman R, Murgatroyd B: A scoping exercise to conceptualise the actual and potential contribution of nurses, midwives and health visitors to child health and child health services. 2004, London: NCC SDO (SDO/68/2004)
80.
Allen P, Fulop N, Clarke A: Commissioning scoping exercises: experience to date and lessons learnt. 2001, London: NCC SDO
81.
Ehrich K, Freeman G, Richards S, Robinson I, Shepperd S: How to do a scoping exercise: continuity of care. Research Policy and Planning. 2002, 20 (1): 25-29.
82.
Arksey H, O'Malley L: Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005, 8: 1-14. 10.1080/1364557032000119616.CrossRef
83.
Arksey H: Mental health scoping exercise: research on services to support carers for people with mental health problems. 2001, London: NCC SDO (SDO/15/2001)
84.
Gysels M, Higginson I, White P, Barclay S, Worth A, Murray S, Shipman C, Dewar S, Richardson A, Hotopf M, Lorenz K, Koffman J: A scoping exercise on generalist services for adults at the end of life: research, knowledge, policy and future research needs. 2007, London: NCC SDO (SDO/143/2006)
Metadata
Title
Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services
Authors
Stuart Anderson
Pauline Allen
Stephen Peckham
Nick Goodwin
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-6-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2008 Go to the issue

Research

Step-wedge cluster-randomised community-based trials: An application to the study of the impact of community health insurance

Research

Developing health systems research capacities through north-south partnership: An evaluation of collaboration with South Africa and Thailand

Research

Medicines coverage and community-based health insurance in low-income countries

Commentary

Exploring evidence-policy linkages in health research plans: A case study from six countries

Review

Freedom and need: The evolution of public strategy for biomedical and health research in England

Research

Translating research into maternal health care policy: a qualitative case study of the use of evidence in policies for the treatment of eclampsia and pre-eclampsia in South Africa