Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research

Establishment of comparative performance criteria for IVF centers: correlation of live birth rates in autologous and donor oocyte IVF cycles

Published in: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To assess whether an objective performance criterion for in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers can be established.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 2011 National ART Surveillance System data for 451 U.S. IVF centers, 137 of which were included in the analysis since they performed >20 fresh embryo transfers per age group and >20 fresh oocyte donor transfers. The analysis of autologous cycles was restricted to women under age 40. The main outcome measure was correlation between center-specific live birth rates (LBR) in autologous and donor oocyte cycles.

Results

55.6% donor and 46.7%, 39.1% and 28.7% (for ages <35, 35–37 and 38–40 years) autologous cycles resulted in live births per fresh embryo transfer. Donor LBR predicted autologous LBR (< 35 years, P < 0.001; 35 – 38 years, P < 0.001; 38 – 40 years, P = 0.015). Clinics with high prevalence of patients with diminished ovarian reserve had lower autologous LBR per age group (P = 0.015). Every 10% increase in donor LBR increased odds of autologous LBR above the age-adjusted national average by 68% (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.36 – 2.07; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Since center-specific donor and autologous IVF cycle outcomes correlate, and as donor cycles reflect fewer patient covariates, they represent a first comparable performance measure between centers, allowing for internal as well as external quality control.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Kushnir VA, Vidali A, Barad DH, Gleicher N: The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2013, 100 (3): 736-741. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.012.CrossRefPubMed Kushnir VA, Vidali A, Barad DH, Gleicher N: The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2013, 100 (3): 736-741. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.012.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Kushnir VA, Jamieson DJ: Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 123 (2 Pt 1): 239-347.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Kushnir VA, Jamieson DJ: Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2014, 123 (2 Pt 1): 239-347.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL: What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19 (1): 3-7. 10.1093/humrep/deh028.CrossRefPubMed Min JK, Breheny SA, MacLachlan V, Healy DL: What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2004, 19 (1): 3-7. 10.1093/humrep/deh028.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Gleicher N: Defining assisted reproductive technology success. Fertil Steril. 2013, 100 (4): e30-10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.036.CrossRefPubMed Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Gleicher N: Defining assisted reproductive technology success. Fertil Steril. 2013, 100 (4): e30-10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.036.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Perfetto CO, Westphal LM: Success and Anticipated pregnancy Outcomes for Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Edited by: Sauer MV. 2013, London: Springer, 24-28. 2 Perfetto CO, Westphal LM: Success and Anticipated pregnancy Outcomes for Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Principles of Oocyte and Embryo Donation. Edited by: Sauer MV. 2013, London: Springer, 24-28. 2
8.
go back to reference van Lendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F: Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010, 16 (6): 577-589. 10.1093/humupd/dmq015.CrossRef van Lendersloot LL, van Wely M, Limpens J, Bossuyt PM, Repping S, van der Veen F: Predictive factors in in vitro fertilization (IVF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2010, 16 (6): 577-589. 10.1093/humupd/dmq015.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ: Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000–2010. JAMA. 2013, 310 (22): 2426-2434.PubMedCentralPubMed Kawwass JF, Monsour M, Crawford S, Kissin DM, Session DR, Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ: Trends and outcomes for donor oocyte cycles in the United States, 2000–2010. JAMA. 2013, 310 (22): 2426-2434.PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013, 99 (1): 47-62.CrossRef Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine: Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013, 99 (1): 47-62.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kushnir VA, Khanna P, Barad DH, Gleicher N: Assessment of practice in IVF clinics in which success in autologous and donor oocyte cycles do not correlate. Fertil Steril. 2014, 102: e113-e114.CrossRef Kushnir VA, Khanna P, Barad DH, Gleicher N: Assessment of practice in IVF clinics in which success in autologous and donor oocyte cycles do not correlate. Fertil Steril. 2014, 102: e113-e114.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Establishment of comparative performance criteria for IVF centers: correlation of live birth rates in autologous and donor oocyte IVF cycles
Publication date
01-12-2014
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-122

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 1/2014 Go to the issue