Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2010

Open Access 01-12-2010 | Erratum

Erratum to: Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer

Authors: A Simon Pickard, Maureen P Neary, David Cella

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Excerpt

We wish to correct a mistake in the abstract and conclusion of our published paper [1]. In the abstract and conclusion, the MID for EQ-VAS score should be reported as 7 rather than 0.07. EQ-VAS scores range from 0 to 100, while EQ-5D index-based scores are anchored by 0 (dead) and 1 (perfect health). The specific wording in the conclusion of the abstract should read "Important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores were similar for all cancers and lung cancer, with the lower end of the range of estimates closer to the MID, i.e. 0.08 for UK-index scores, 0.06 for US-index scores, and 7 for VAS scores. …
Literature
1.
Pickard AS, Neary MP, Cella D: Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007, 5: 70. 10.1186/1477-7525-5-70PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Erratum to: Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer
Authors
A Simon Pickard
Maureen P Neary
David Cella
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-8-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2010 Go to the issue

Research

Validation of the Rasch-based Depression Screening in a large scale German general population sample

Research

Does quality of life among breast cancer survivors one year after diagnosis differ depending on urban and non-urban residence? A comparative study

Research

Daily physical activity and its contribution to the health-related quality of life of ambulatory individuals with chronic stroke

Research

Mapping of the EQ-5D index from clinical outcome measures and demographic variables in patients with coronary heart disease

Research

Mapping onto Eq-5 D for patients in poor health

Research

Health status in routine clinical practice: validity of the clinical COPD questionnaire at the individual patient level