Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Commentary

The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey program: Overview, context, and near-term prospects

Authors: Nathaniel Jones III, Stephanie L Jones, Nancy A Miller

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

In 1996, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) initiated the development of the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (HOS). It is the first national survey to measure the quality of life and functional health status of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in managed care. The program seeks to gather valid and reliable health status data in Medicare managed care for use in quality improvement activities, public reporting, plan accountability and improving health outcomes based on competition. The context that led to the development of the HOS was formed by the convergence of the following factors: 1) a recognized need to monitor the performance of managed care plans, 2) technical expertise and advancement in the areas of quality measurement and health outcomes assessment, 3) the existence of a tested functional health status assessment tool (SF-36®)1, which was valid for an elderly population, 4) CMS leadership, and 5) political interest in quality improvement.
Since 1998, there have been six baseline surveys and four follow up surveys. CMS, working with its partners, performs the following tasks as part of the HOS program: 1) Supports the technical/scientific development of the HOS measure, 2) Certifies survey vendors, 3) Collects Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set(HEDIS®)2 HOS data, 4) Cleans, scores, and disseminates annual rounds of HOS data, public use files and reports to CMS, Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs), Medicare+Choice Organizations (M+COs), and other stakeholders, 5) Trains M+COs and QIOs in the use of functional status measures and best practices for improving care, 6) Provides technical assistance to CMS, QIOs, M+COs and other data users, and 7) Conducts analyses using HOS data to support CMS and HHS priorities.
CMS has recently sponsored an evaluation of the HOS program, which will provide the information necessary to enhance the future administration of the program. Information collected to date reveals that the HOS program is a valuable tool that provides a rich set of data that is useful for quality monitoring and improvement efforts. To enhance the future of the HOS program, many stakeholders recommend the implementation of incentives to encourage the use of the data, while others identify the need to monitor the health status of plan disenrollees.
Overall, the HOS program represents an important vehicle for collecting outcomes data from Medicare beneficiaries. The new Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act (2003) mandates the collection and use of data for quality, outcomes measurement, program administration, and facilitating consumer choice. Consequently, it is important that the HOS program effectively meet this mandate.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Gluck ME, Hanson Kristina W: Medicare Chart Book. The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation Menlo Park, CA 2001. Gluck ME, Hanson Kristina W: Medicare Chart Book. The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation Menlo Park, CA 2001.
3.
go back to reference Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Program Information on Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, and other programs of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Baltimore, MD, Office of Research, Development and Information 2002. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: Program Information on Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, and other programs of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Baltimore, MD, Office of Research, Development and Information 2002.
4.
go back to reference Manton KG, et al.: Social Health Maintenance Organization and Fee-for-Service health outcomes over time. Health Care Financing Review 1993,15(winter):173–202.PubMedCentralPubMed Manton KG, et al.: Social Health Maintenance Organization and Fee-for-Service health outcomes over time. Health Care Financing Review 1993,15(winter):173–202.PubMedCentralPubMed
5.
go back to reference Miller NA: An evaluation of substance misuse treatment providers used by an Employee Assistance Program. International Journal of the Addictions 1992,27(5):533–559.PubMed Miller NA: An evaluation of substance misuse treatment providers used by an Employee Assistance Program. International Journal of the Addictions 1992,27(5):533–559.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Sherborne C, Meredith LS: Quality of self-report data: A comparison of older and younger chronically ill patients. Journal of Gerontology 1992,47(4):S204–211.CrossRef Sherborne C, Meredith LS: Quality of self-report data: A comparison of older and younger chronically ill patients. Journal of Gerontology 1992,47(4):S204–211.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ware JE, Bayliss MS, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR: Differences in 4 year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and Fee-for Service Systems. JAMA 1996, 276: 1039–1047. 10.1001/jama.276.13.1039bPubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Bayliss MS, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR: Differences in 4 year health outcomes for elderly and poor, chronically ill patients treated in HMO and Fee-for Service Systems. JAMA 1996, 276: 1039–1047. 10.1001/jama.276.13.1039bPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA): Group Interview. Washington, DC Oct. 1, 2003 National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA): Group Interview. Washington, DC Oct. 1, 2003
10.
go back to reference National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA): HEDIS ® 2003: Specifications for the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Washington, DC 2003., 6: National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA): HEDIS ® 2003: Specifications for the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey. Washington, DC 2003., 6:
11.
go back to reference Donabedian A: The quality of care. How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association 1988,260(12):1743–1748. 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743PubMedCrossRef Donabedian A: The quality of care. How can it be assessed? Journal of the American Medical Association 1988,260(12):1743–1748. 10.1001/jama.260.12.1743PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ware JE: Patient Based Assessment: Tools for Monitoring and Improving Healthcare Outcomes. New England Medical Center 1997. Ware JE: Patient Based Assessment: Tools for Monitoring and Improving Healthcare Outcomes. New England Medical Center 1997.
13.
go back to reference Berwick DM: A User's Manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' Report. Health Affairs 2002. Berwick DM: A User's Manual for the IOM's 'Quality Chasm' Report. Health Affairs 2002.
14.
15.
go back to reference Bierman AS, Lawrence WF, Haffer SC, Clancy CM: Functional health outcomes as a measure of health care quality for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res 2001,36(6):90–109.PubMedCentralPubMed Bierman AS, Lawrence WF, Haffer SC, Clancy CM: Functional health outcomes as a measure of health care quality for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res 2001,36(6):90–109.PubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference McHorney CA: Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 ® Health Survey. The Gerontologist 1996,36(5):571–583.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA: Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF-36 ® Health Survey. The Gerontologist 1996,36(5):571–583.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Office of the Inspector General: Medicare's Oversight of managed Care: Implications for Regional Staffing. Report OEI-01–96–00190. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC 1997. Office of the Inspector General: Medicare's Oversight of managed Care: Implications for Regional Staffing. Report OEI-01–96–00190. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC 1997.
19.
go back to reference Bailit Health Purchasing LLC: Assessment of the Medicare Managed Care Compliance Monitoring Program. Report 1 Unpublished report November 4, 1997 (a). Bailit Health Purchasing LLC: Assessment of the Medicare Managed Care Compliance Monitoring Program. Report 1 Unpublished report November 4, 1997 (a).
20.
go back to reference Bailit Health Purchasing LLC: Review of the Managed Care Contractor Compliance Monitoring Programs of Major U.S. Health Care Purchasers. Unpublished report November 12, 1997 (b) Bailit Health Purchasing LLC: Review of the Managed Care Contractor Compliance Monitoring Programs of Major U.S. Health Care Purchasers. Unpublished report November 12, 1997 (b)
21.
go back to reference Sheingold S, Lied T: An Overview: The Future of Plan Performance Measurement. Health Care Financing Review, Spring 2001,22(3):1–5. Sheingold S, Lied T: An Overview: The Future of Plan Performance Measurement. Health Care Financing Review, Spring 2001,22(3):1–5.
22.
go back to reference Stevic M: Telephone Interview Oct. 21, 2003 Stevic M: Telephone Interview Oct. 21, 2003
23.
go back to reference Jencks S: Personal Communication Baltimore, Maryland Oct. 8, 2003 Jencks S: Personal Communication Baltimore, Maryland Oct. 8, 2003
24.
go back to reference Kang J: Personal Communication Baltimore, Maryland Oct. 27, 2003 Kang J: Personal Communication Baltimore, Maryland Oct. 27, 2003
25.
go back to reference Paul B: Personal Communication Baltimore, MD Oct. 29, 2003 Paul B: Personal Communication Baltimore, MD Oct. 29, 2003
26.
go back to reference Haffer SC: Personal Communication Baltimore, Maryland Oct. 29, 2003 Haffer SC: Personal Communication Baltimore, Maryland Oct. 29, 2003
27.
go back to reference Turner-Bowker DM, Bartley PJ, Ware JE Jr: SF-36® Health Survey & "SF" Bibliography: Third Edition (1988–2000) Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated 2002. Turner-Bowker DM, Bartley PJ, Ware JE Jr: SF-36® Health Survey & "SF" Bibliography: Third Edition (1988–2000) Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated 2002.
28.
go back to reference Kantz ME, Harris WJ, Levitsky K, Ware JE, Davies AR: Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care 1992,30(5 Suppl):MS240-MS252.PubMed Kantz ME, Harris WJ, Levitsky K, Ware JE, Davies AR: Methods for assessing condition-specific and generic functional status outcomes after total knee replacement. Med Care 1992,30(5 Suppl):MS240-MS252.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Phillips RC, Lansky DJ: Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1992,1(1):42–50.PubMed Phillips RC, Lansky DJ: Outcomes management in heart valve replacement surgery: early experience. J Heart Valve Dis 1992,1(1):42–50.PubMed
30.
31.
go back to reference Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M: The SF-36 ® health survey questionnaire: Is it suitable for use with older adults? Age and Aging 1995, 24: 120–125.CrossRef Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M: The SF-36 ® health survey questionnaire: Is it suitable for use with older adults? Age and Aging 1995, 24: 120–125.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BN: Evidence for the validity of the Short-Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age and Ageing 1994, 23: 182–184.PubMedCrossRef Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BN: Evidence for the validity of the Short-Form 36 Questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age and Ageing 1994, 23: 182–184.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Teno J, Lu JFR, Sherbourne C, Ware JE: The use of standardized measures of functional status and well being among cognitively impaired and intact elders. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Boston, MA 1990. McHorney CA, Teno J, Lu JFR, Sherbourne C, Ware JE: The use of standardized measures of functional status and well being among cognitively impaired and intact elders. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Paper presented at the 43rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Boston, MA 1990.
35.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M: SF-36 ® Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated 2001. Ware JE, Kosinski M: SF-36 ® Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated 2001.
36.
go back to reference Malsbary R: Personal Communication. Baltimore, MD Oct. 29, 2003 Malsbary R: Personal Communication. Baltimore, MD Oct. 29, 2003
37.
go back to reference Bierman AS, Clancy CM: "Health Disparities Among Older Women: Identifying Opportunities to Improve Quality of Care and Functional Health Outcomes.". Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. Fall 2001 2001,56(4):155–160. Bierman AS, Clancy CM: "Health Disparities Among Older Women: Identifying Opportunities to Improve Quality of Care and Functional Health Outcomes.". Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. Fall 2001 2001,56(4):155–160.
38.
go back to reference Tudor C: Personal Communication Baltimore, MD May 5, 2003 Tudor C: Personal Communication Baltimore, MD May 5, 2003
39.
go back to reference Haffer SC, Bowen SE, Shannon ED, Fowler BM: Assessing beneficiary health outcomes and disease management initiatives in Medicare. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2003,11(2):111–124.CrossRef Haffer SC, Bowen SE, Shannon ED, Fowler BM: Assessing beneficiary health outcomes and disease management initiatives in Medicare. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 2003,11(2):111–124.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B: SF-36® Health Survey Manual & Interpretation Guide Boston MA: The Health Institute 1993. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Gandek B: SF-36® Health Survey Manual & Interpretation Guide Boston MA: The Health Institute 1993.
41.
go back to reference Cooper J, Kohlmann T, Michael JA, Haffer SC, Stevic M: Health outcomes: New quality measure for Medicare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2001,13(1):9–16. 10.1093/intqhc/13.1.9PubMedCrossRef Cooper J, Kohlmann T, Michael JA, Haffer SC, Stevic M: Health outcomes: New quality measure for Medicare. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2001,13(1):9–16. 10.1093/intqhc/13.1.9PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act: Section 722 Amending Section 1852e of Social Security Act, H.R. 1.ENR. 2003. Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act: Section 722 Amending Section 1852e of Social Security Act, H.R. 1.ENR. 2003.
Metadata
Title
The Medicare Health Outcomes Survey program: Overview, context, and near-term prospects
Authors
Nathaniel Jones III
Stephanie L Jones
Nancy A Miller
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-33

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2004 Go to the issue