Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

Validation of an instrument to evaluate quality of life in the aging population: WHOQOL-AGE

Authors: Francisco Félix Caballero, Marta Miret, Mick Power, Somnath Chatterji, Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk, Seppo Koskinen, Matilde Leonardi, Beatriz Olaya, Josep Maria Haro, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is a need for short, specific instruments that assess quality of life (QOL) adequately in the older adult population. The aims of the present study were to obtain evidence on the validity of the inferences that could be drawn from an instrument to measure QOL in the aging population (people 50+ years old), and to test its psychometric properties.

Methods

The instrument, WHOQOL-AGE, comprised 13 positive items, assessed on a five-point rating scale, and was administered to nationally representative samples (n = 9987) from Finland, Poland, and Spain. Cronbach’s alpha was employed to assess internal consistency reliability, whereas the validity of the questionnaire was assessed by means of factor analysis, graded response model, Pearson’s correlation coefficient and unpaired t-test. Normative values were calculated across countries and for different age groups.

Results

The satisfactory goodness-of-fit indices confirmed that the factorial structure of WHOQOL-AGE comprises two first-order factors. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.88 for factor 1, and 0.84 for factor 2. Evidence supporting a global score was found with a second-order factor model, according to the goodness-of-fit indices: CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.073. Convergent validity was estimated at r = 0.75 and adequate discriminant validity was also found. Significant differences were found between healthy individuals (74.19 ± 13.21) and individuals with at least one chronic condition (64.29 ± 16.29), supporting adequate known-groups validity.

Conclusions

WHOQOL-AGE has shown good psychometric properties in Finland, Poland, and Spain. Therefore, considerable support is provided to using the WHOQOL-AGE to measure QOL in older adults in these countries, and to compare the QOL of older and younger adults.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The WHOQOL group: The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef The WHOQOL group: The world health organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46: 1569–1585. 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S: Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 2197–2214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9PubMedCrossRef Power M, Quinn K, Schmidt S: Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Qual Life Res 2005, 14: 2197–2214. 10.1007/s11136-005-7380-9PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA: The world health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004, 13: 299–310.PubMedCrossRef Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA: The world health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 2004, 13: 299–310.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schmidt S, Muhlan H, Power M: The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16: 420–428. 10.1093/eurpub/cki155PubMedCrossRef Schmidt S, Muhlan H, Power M: The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study. Eur J Public Health 2006, 16: 420–428. 10.1093/eurpub/cki155PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Paschoal SM, Jacob FW, Litvoc J: Development of elderly quality of life index - EqoLI: item reduction and distribution into dimensions. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008, 63: 179–188.CrossRef Paschoal SM, Jacob FW, Litvoc J: Development of elderly quality of life index - EqoLI: item reduction and distribution into dimensions. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2008, 63: 179–188.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hoshino K, Yamada H, Endo H, Nagura E: [An preliminary study on quality of life scale for elderly: an examination in terms of psychological satisfaction]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 1996, 67: 134–140. 10.4992/jjpsy.67.134PubMedCrossRef Hoshino K, Yamada H, Endo H, Nagura E: [An preliminary study on quality of life scale for elderly: an examination in terms of psychological satisfaction]. Shinrigaku Kenkyu 1996, 67: 134–140. 10.4992/jjpsy.67.134PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Paschoal SM, Filho WJ, Litvoc J: Development of elderly quality of life index - EQOLI: theoretical-conceptual framework, chosen methodology, and relevant items generation. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2007, 62: 279–288. 10.1590/S1807-59322007000300012CrossRef Paschoal SM, Filho WJ, Litvoc J: Development of elderly quality of life index - EQOLI: theoretical-conceptual framework, chosen methodology, and relevant items generation. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2007, 62: 279–288. 10.1590/S1807-59322007000300012CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fang J, Power M, Lin Y, Zhang J, Hao Y, Chatterji S: Development of short versions for the WHOQOL-OLD module. Gerontologist 2012, 52: 66–78. 10.1093/geront/gnr085PubMedCrossRef Fang J, Power M, Lin Y, Zhang J, Hao Y, Chatterji S: Development of short versions for the WHOQOL-OLD module. Gerontologist 2012, 52: 66–78. 10.1093/geront/gnr085PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Börsch-Supan A, Hank K, Jürges H: A new comprehensive and international view on ageing: introducing the “Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe”. Eur J Ageing 2005, 2: 245–253. 10.1007/s10433-005-0014-9CrossRef Börsch-Supan A, Hank K, Jürges H: A new comprehensive and international view on ageing: introducing the “Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe”. Eur J Ageing 2005, 2: 245–253. 10.1007/s10433-005-0014-9CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Juster FT, Suzman R: An overview of the health and retirement study. J Hum Resour 1995, 30: S7-S56.CrossRef Juster FT, Suzman R: An overview of the health and retirement study. J Hum Resour 1995, 30: S7-S56.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marmot M, Banks J, Blundell R, Lessof C, Nazroo J: Health, Wealth, and Lifestyles of the Older Population in England. The 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. London: Institute for fiscal studies; 2003. Marmot M, Banks J, Blundell R, Lessof C, Nazroo J: Health, Wealth, and Lifestyles of the Older Population in England. The 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. London: Institute for fiscal studies; 2003.
12.
go back to reference Whelan BJ, Savva GM: Design and methodology of the irish longitudinal study on ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013,61(Suppl 2):S625-S628. Whelan BJ, Savva GM: Design and methodology of the irish longitudinal study on ageing. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013,61(Suppl 2):S625-S628.
13.
go back to reference Wong R, Espinoza M, Palloni A: [Mexican older adults with a wide socioeconomic perspective: health and aging]. Salud Publica Mex 2007,49(Suppl 4):S436-S447.PubMed Wong R, Espinoza M, Palloni A: [Mexican older adults with a wide socioeconomic perspective: health and aging]. Salud Publica Mex 2007,49(Suppl 4):S436-S447.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, Biritwum R, Fan W, Lopez RR, et al.: Data resource profile: the world health organization study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Int J Epidemiol 2012, 41: 1639–1649. 10.1093/ije/dys210PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kowal P, Chatterji S, Naidoo N, Biritwum R, Fan W, Lopez RR, et al.: Data resource profile: the world health organization study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). Int J Epidemiol 2012, 41: 1639–1649. 10.1093/ije/dys210PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 2004, 306: 1776–1780. 10.1126/science.1103572PubMedCrossRef Kahneman D, Krueger AB, Schkade DA, Schwarz N, Stone AA: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 2004, 306: 1776–1780. 10.1126/science.1103572PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M, Caballero FF, Olaya B, Haro JM, Kowal P, et al.: Multi-country evaluation of affective experience: validation of an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method in seven countries. PLoS ONE 2013, 8: e61534. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061534PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M, Caballero FF, Olaya B, Haro JM, Kowal P, et al.: Multi-country evaluation of affective experience: validation of an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method in seven countries. PLoS ONE 2013, 8: e61534. 10.1371/journal.pone.0061534PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Miret M, Caballero FF, Mathur A, Naidoo N, Kowal P, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al.: Validation of a measure of subjective well-being: an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method. PLoS ONE 2012, 7: e43887. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043887PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Miret M, Caballero FF, Mathur A, Naidoo N, Kowal P, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al.: Validation of a measure of subjective well-being: an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method. PLoS ONE 2012, 7: e43887. 10.1371/journal.pone.0043887PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Velicer WF: Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 1976, 41: 321–337. 10.1007/BF02293557CrossRef Velicer WF: Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 1976, 41: 321–337. 10.1007/BF02293557CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tucker LR Personnel Research Sections Report 984. In A Method for Synthesis of Factor Analysis Studies. Washington, D.C: Department of the Army; 1951. Tucker LR Personnel Research Sections Report 984. In A Method for Synthesis of Factor Analysis Studies. Washington, D.C: Department of the Army; 1951.
20.
go back to reference Mulaik SA: The Foundations of Factor Analysis. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1972. Mulaik SA: The Foundations of Factor Analysis. New York: Mc Graw-Hill; 1972.
21.
go back to reference Hu LT, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999, 6: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef Hu LT, Bentler PM: Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 1999, 6: 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reise SP, Widaman KF, Pugh RH: Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychol Bull 1993, 114: 552–566.PubMedCrossRef Reise SP, Widaman KF, Pugh RH: Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychol Bull 1993, 114: 552–566.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Steiger JH: Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personal Individ Differ 2007, 42: 893–898. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017CrossRef Steiger JH: Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personal Individ Differ 2007, 42: 893–898. 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schreider JB, Stage FK, King J, Nora A, Barlow EA: Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 2006, 99: 323–337. 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338CrossRef Schreider JB, Stage FK, King J, Nora A, Barlow EA: Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: a review. J Educ Res 2006, 99: 323–337. 10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Schumacker RE, Lomax RG: A biginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG: A biginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
26.
go back to reference Burnham KP, Anderson DR: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer; 2011. Burnham KP, Anderson DR: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. New York: Springer; 2011.
27.
go back to reference Schwarz G: Estimating dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978, 6: 461–464. 10.1214/aos/1176344136CrossRef Schwarz G: Estimating dimension of a model. Ann Stat 1978, 6: 461–464. 10.1214/aos/1176344136CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Samejima F: Graded Response Model. In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Edited by: Linden WV, Hambleton RK. New York: Springer; 1997:85–100.CrossRef Samejima F: Graded Response Model. In Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory. Edited by: Linden WV, Hambleton RK. New York: Springer; 1997:85–100.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rindskopf D, Rose T: Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res 1988, 23: 51–67. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3CrossRef Rindskopf D, Rose T: Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivar Behav Res 1988, 23: 51–67. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_3CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. Br Med J 1997, 314: 572. 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. Br Med J 1997, 314: 572. 10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Raykov T: Evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity with multitrait-multimethod correlations. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2011, 64: 38–52. 10.1348/000711009X478616PubMedCrossRef Raykov T: Evaluation of convergent and discriminant validity with multitrait-multimethod correlations. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2011, 64: 38–52. 10.1348/000711009X478616PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Campbell DT, Fiske DW: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959, 56: 81–105.PubMedCrossRef Campbell DT, Fiske DW: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 1959, 56: 81–105.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rizopoulos D: ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 2006,17(5):1–25. Rizopoulos D: ltm: an R package for latent variable modeling and item response theory analyses. J Stat Softw 2006,17(5):1–25.
34.
go back to reference R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008. R Development Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2008.
35.
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User’s Guide. 4th edition. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA; 2010. Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Mplus User’s Guide. 4th edition. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA; 2010.
36.
go back to reference StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software. Release 11. : College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2010. StataCorp: Stata Statistical Software. Release 11. : College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2010.
37.
go back to reference Draugalis JR, Coons SJ, Plaza CM: Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72: Article 11.CrossRef Draugalis JR, Coons SJ, Plaza CM: Best practices for survey research reports: a synopsis for authors and reviewers. Am J Pharm Educ 2008, 72: Article 11.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Fuchs C, Diamantopoulos A: Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research. DWS 2009, 69: 195–210. Fuchs C, Diamantopoulos A: Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research. DWS 2009, 69: 195–210.
Metadata
Title
Validation of an instrument to evaluate quality of life in the aging population: WHOQOL-AGE
Authors
Francisco Félix Caballero
Marta Miret
Mick Power
Somnath Chatterji
Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk
Seppo Koskinen
Matilde Leonardi
Beatriz Olaya
Josep Maria Haro
José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-177

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2013 Go to the issue