Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research

Construction of the descriptive system for the assessment of quality of life AQoL-6D utility instrument

Authors: Jeffrey RJ Richardson, Stuart J Peacock, Graeme Hawthorne, Angelo Iezzi, Gerald Elsworth, Neil A Day

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Multi attribute utility (MAU) instruments are used to include the health related quality of life (HRQoL) in economic evaluations of health programs. Comparative studies suggest different MAU instruments measure related but different constructs. The objective of this paper is to describe the methods employed to achieve content validity in the descriptive system of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL)-6D, MAU instrument.

Methods

The AQoL program introduced the use of psychometric methods in the construction of health related MAU instruments. To develop the AQoL-6D we selected 112 items from previous research, focus groups and expert judgment and administered them to 316 members of the public and 302 hospital patients. The search for content validity across a broad spectrum of health states required both formative and reflective modelling. We employed Exploratory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to meet these dual requirements.

Results and Discussion

The resulting instrument employs 20 items in a multi-tier descriptive system. Latent dimension variables achieve sensitive descriptions of 6 dimensions which, in turn, combine to form a single latent QoL variable. Diagnostic statistics from the SEM analysis are exceptionally good and confirm the hypothesised structure of the model.

Conclusions

The AQoL-6D descriptive system has good psychometric properties. They imply that the instrument has achieved construct validity and provides a sensitive description of HRQoL. This means that it may be used with confidence for measuring health related quality of life and that it is a suitable basis for modelling utilities for inclusion in the economic evaluation of health programs.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Richardson J, Peacock S, Iezzi A, Day NA, Hawthorne G: Construction and Validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Mark 2 Instrument Research Paper 24. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2007. Richardson J, Peacock S, Iezzi A, Day NA, Hawthorne G: Construction and Validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Mark 2 Instrument Research Paper 24. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2007.
2.
go back to reference Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A: Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Brazier J, Ratcliffe J, Salomon J, Tsuchiya A: Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
3.
go back to reference Fryback DG, Palta M, Cherepanov D, Bolt D, Kim J: Comparison of 5 health related quality of life indexes using item response theory analysis. Med Decis Making 2010, 30(1):5–15. 10.1177/0272989X09347016PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fryback DG, Palta M, Cherepanov D, Bolt D, Kim J: Comparison of 5 health related quality of life indexes using item response theory analysis. Med Decis Making 2010, 30(1):5–15. 10.1177/0272989X09347016PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day NA: A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann Med 2001, 33: 358–370. 10.3109/07853890109002090CrossRefPubMed Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Day NA: A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann Med 2001, 33: 358–370. 10.3109/07853890109002090CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Richardson J, McKie J, Bariola E: Review and Critique of Related Multi Attribute Utility Instruments, Research Paper 64. In Encyclopedia of Health Economics, Elsevier Science San Diego. Edited by: Culyer AJ. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011. Richardson J, McKie J, Bariola E: Review and Critique of Related Multi Attribute Utility Instruments, Research Paper 64. In Encyclopedia of Health Economics, Elsevier Science San Diego. Edited by: Culyer AJ. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011.
6.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Machin D: Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2000.CrossRef Fayers PM, Machin D: Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2000.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Streiner D, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003. Streiner D, Norman GR: Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
8.
go back to reference Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R: The Australian Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999, 8: 209–224. 10.1023/A:1008815005736CrossRefPubMed Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R: The Australian Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1999, 8: 209–224. 10.1023/A:1008815005736CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hawthorne G: Assessing utility where short measures are required: development of the short Assessment of Quality of Life 8 (AQoL 8) instrument. Value in Health 2009, 12(6):948–957. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00526.xCrossRefPubMed Hawthorne G: Assessing utility where short measures are required: development of the short Assessment of Quality of Life 8 (AQoL 8) instrument. Value in Health 2009, 12(6):948–957. 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00526.xCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Richardson J, Iezzi A, Peacock S, Sinha K, Misajon R, Keeffe J: Utility weights for the Vision Related Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) 7D instrument, Research Paper 67. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics; 2011. Richardson J, Iezzi A, Peacock S, Sinha K, Misajon R, Keeffe J: Utility weights for the Vision Related Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) 7D instrument, Research Paper 67. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics; 2011.
11.
go back to reference Misajon R, Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Barton J, Peacock S, Iezzi A, Keeffe J: Vision and quality of life: The development of a utility measure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005, 46(11):4007–4015. 10.1167/iovs.04-1389CrossRefPubMed Misajon R, Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Barton J, Peacock S, Iezzi A, Keeffe J: Vision and quality of life: The development of a utility measure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005, 46(11):4007–4015. 10.1167/iovs.04-1389CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Richardson J, Elsworth G, Iezzi A, Mihalopoulos C, Schweitzer I, Herrman H: Increasing the Sensitivity of the AQoL Inventory for Evaluation of Interventions Affecting Mental Health, Research Paper 61. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011. Richardson J, Elsworth G, Iezzi A, Mihalopoulos C, Schweitzer I, Herrman H: Increasing the Sensitivity of the AQoL Inventory for Evaluation of Interventions Affecting Mental Health, Research Paper 61. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Richardson J, Sinha K, Iezzi A, Khan M: Modelling the Utility of Health States with the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) 8D Instrument: Overview and Utility Scoring Algorithm, Research Paper 63. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011. Richardson J, Sinha K, Iezzi A, Khan M: Modelling the Utility of Health States with the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) 8D Instrument: Overview and Utility Scoring Algorithm, Research Paper 63. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2011.
14.
go back to reference World Health Organisation: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO; 1980. World Health Organisation: International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: WHO; 1980.
15.
go back to reference Raykov T: Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement 1997, 21: 173–184. 10.1177/01466216970212006CrossRef Raykov T: Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement 1997, 21: 173–184. 10.1177/01466216970212006CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Day NA, Richardson J, Hawthorne G: Modelling Health Related Quality of Life for the AQoL-6D, Research Paper 51. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2010. Day NA, Richardson J, Hawthorne G: Modelling Health Related Quality of Life for the AQoL-6D, Research Paper 51. Melbourne: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University; 2010.
17.
go back to reference SPSS: SPSS for Windows Version 11.5. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2004. SPSS: SPSS for Windows Version 11.5. Chicago: SPSS Inc; 2004.
18.
go back to reference Yu CY: Evaluating Cut-off Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes, Dissertation for PhD. Los Angeles: University of California; 2002. Yu CY: Evaluating Cut-off Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Variable Models with Binary and Continuous Outcomes, Dissertation for PhD. Los Angeles: University of California; 2002.
19.
go back to reference Brown MW, Cudeck R: Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models. Edited by: Bollen KA, Long JS. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1993. Brown MW, Cudeck R: Alternate ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models. Edited by: Bollen KA, Long JS. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1993.
20.
go back to reference Edwards J, Bagozzi R: On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods 2000, 5: 155–174.CrossRefPubMed Edwards J, Bagozzi R: On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods 2000, 5: 155–174.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Construction of the descriptive system for the assessment of quality of life AQoL-6D utility instrument
Authors
Jeffrey RJ Richardson
Stuart J Peacock
Graeme Hawthorne
Angelo Iezzi
Gerald Elsworth
Neil A Day
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-10-38

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2012 Go to the issue