Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2003

Open Access 01-12-2003 | Research

A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)

Authors: Mark J Atkinson, William C Stewart, Joel M Fain, Jeanette A Stewart, Ravinder Dhawan, Essy Mozaffari, Jan Lohs

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To validate the treatment-specific Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP).

Methods

Item content was developed by 4 heterogeneous patient focus groups (n = 32). Instrument validation involved 250 patients on ocular hypotensive medications recruited from ophthalmology practices in the Southern USA. Participants responded to demographic and test questions during a clinic visit. Standard psychometric analyses were performed on the resulting data.

Sample

Of the 412 patients screened, 253 consented to participate, and 250 provided complete datasets. The sample included 44% male (n = 109), 44% Black (n = 109) and 57% brown eyed (n = 142) participants, with a mean age of 64.6 years (SD 13.1) and a history of elevated IOP for an average of 8.4 yrs (SD 7.8). A majority was receiving monotherapy (60%, n = 151).

Results

A PC Factor analysis (w/ varimax rotation) of the 31 items yielded 5 factors (Eigenvalues > 1.0) explaining 70% of the total variance. Weaker and conceptually redundant items were removed and the remaining 15 items reanalyzed. The satisfaction factors were; Eye Irritation (EI; 4 items), Convenience of Use (CofU; 3 items), Ease of Use (EofU; 3 items), Hyperemia (HYP; 3 items), and Medication Effectiveness (EFF; 2 items). Chronbach's Alphas ranged from .80 to .86. Greater distributional skew was found for less common experiences (i.e., HYP & EI with 65% & 48.4% ceilings) than for more common experiences (i.e., EofU, CofU, EFF with 10.8%, 20.8% & 15.9% ceilings). TSS-IOP scales converged with conceptually related scales on a previously validated measure of treatment satisfaction, the TSQM (r = .36 to .77). Evidence of concurrent criterion-related validity was found. Patients' symptomatic ratings of eye irritation, hyperemia and difficulties using the medication correlated with satisfaction on these dimensions (r = .30-.56, all p < .001). Clinicians' ratings of IOP control, severity of side effects and problematic medication use correlated with patients' satisfaction scores on these dimensions (r = .13-.26, all p < .01).

Conclusions

This study provides initial evidence that the TSS-IOP is a reliable and valid measure, assessing patients' satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Katz JN: Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA 2001,286(12):1506–1509. 10.1001/jama.286.12.1506PubMedCrossRef Katz JN: Patient preferences and health disparities. JAMA 2001,286(12):1506–1509. 10.1001/jama.286.12.1506PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Owens DK: Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine 1998,23(9):1073–1079. 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00023PubMedCrossRef Owens DK: Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines. Spine 1998,23(9):1073–1079. 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00023PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eriksen LR: Patient satisfaction with nursing care: concept clarification. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1995,3(1):59–76.PubMed Eriksen LR: Patient satisfaction with nursing care: concept clarification. Journal of Nursing Measurement 1995,3(1):59–76.PubMed
4.
go back to reference The Harmonization Meetings Coordination Committee: Report: A decisive step towards the recognition of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials. Proceedings of a Meeting with the FDA: Feb 16, 2001: Important Issues in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Research. QoL Newsletter 2001, 26: 24–25. The Harmonization Meetings Coordination Committee: Report: A decisive step towards the recognition of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials. Proceedings of a Meeting with the FDA: Feb 16, 2001: Important Issues in Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Research. QoL Newsletter 2001, 26: 24–25.
5.
go back to reference Morris LA, Burke LB: Outcomes research: An FDA perspective. Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Economics 1996,8(1):209–213.CrossRef Morris LA, Burke LB: Outcomes research: An FDA perspective. Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Economics 1996,8(1):209–213.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Burke LB: US regulation of pharmaceutical outcomes research. Value in Health 2001, 4: 5–7. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001005.xPubMedCrossRef Burke LB: US regulation of pharmaceutical outcomes research. Value in Health 2001, 4: 5–7. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2001.004001005.xPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH: Sharing decisions in cancer care. Social Science & Medicine 2001,52(12):1865–1878. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00303-8CrossRef Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH: Sharing decisions in cancer care. Social Science & Medicine 2001,52(12):1865–1878. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00303-8CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Turnbull JE, Luther KM: Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care. QRC Advisor 1996,13(1):1–7.PubMed Turnbull JE, Luther KM: Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care. QRC Advisor 1996,13(1):1–7.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Wright JG: Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't We be asking patients if they are better? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000,53(6):549–553. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00225-5PubMedCrossRef Wright JG: Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't We be asking patients if they are better? Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2000,53(6):549–553. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00225-5PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Brody D, Miller S, Lerman C, Smith D, Caputo G: Patient perception of involvement in medical care: Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1989, 4: 506–511.PubMedCrossRef Brody D, Miller S, Lerman C, Smith D, Caputo G: Patient perception of involvement in medical care: Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 1989, 4: 506–511.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Taylor TR: Understanding the choices that patients make. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2000,13(2):124–133.PubMedCrossRef Taylor TR: Understanding the choices that patients make. Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 2000,13(2):124–133.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Albrecht G, Hoogstraten J: Satisfaction as determination of compliance. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1998, 26: 139–146.PubMedCrossRef Albrecht G, Hoogstraten J: Satisfaction as determination of compliance. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1998, 26: 139–146.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McCracken LM, Klock A, Mingay KA: Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1997,14(5):292–299. 10.1016/S0885-3924(97)00225-XPubMedCrossRef McCracken LM, Klock A, Mingay KA: Assessment of satisfaction with treatment for chronic pain. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 1997,14(5):292–299. 10.1016/S0885-3924(97)00225-XPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Weaver M, Patrick DL, Markson LE, Martin D, Frederic I, Berger M: Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. American Journal of Managed Care 1997,3(4):579–594.PubMed Weaver M, Patrick DL, Markson LE, Martin D, Frederic I, Berger M: Issues in the measurement of satisfaction with treatment. American Journal of Managed Care 1997,3(4):579–594.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Anderson RB, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH: Physical Symptoms Distress Index: a sensitive tool to evaluate the impact of pharmacological agents on quality of life. Archives of Internal Medicine 1999,159(7):693–700. 10.1001/archinte.159.7.693PubMedCrossRef Anderson RB, Hollenberg NK, Williams GH: Physical Symptoms Distress Index: a sensitive tool to evaluate the impact of pharmacological agents on quality of life. Archives of Internal Medicine 1999,159(7):693–700. 10.1001/archinte.159.7.693PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Awad AG, Voruganti LN: Quality of life and new antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Are patients better off? International Journal of Social Psychiatry 1999,45(4):268–275.PubMedCrossRef Awad AG, Voruganti LN: Quality of life and new antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Are patients better off? International Journal of Social Psychiatry 1999,45(4):268–275.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Diamond R: Drugs and the quality of life: the patient's point of view. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1985,46(5 Pt 2):29–35.PubMed Diamond R: Drugs and the quality of life: the patient's point of view. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1985,46(5 Pt 2):29–35.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Unamed Reference: Adverse effects of the atypical antipsychotics. Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998,59(Suppl 12):17–22. Unamed Reference: Adverse effects of the atypical antipsychotics. Collaborative Working Group on Clinical Trial Evaluations. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1998,59(Suppl 12):17–22.
19.
go back to reference Bukstein DA: Incorporating quality of life data into managed care formulary decisions: a case study with salmeterol. American Journal of Managed Care 1997,3(11):1701–1706.PubMed Bukstein DA: Incorporating quality of life data into managed care formulary decisions: a case study with salmeterol. American Journal of Managed Care 1997,3(11):1701–1706.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Dunbar-Jacob J, Erlen JA, Schlenk EA, Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Doswell WM: Adherence in chronic disease. Annual Review of Nursing Research 2000, 18: 48–90.PubMed Dunbar-Jacob J, Erlen JA, Schlenk EA, Ryan CM, Sereika SM, Doswell WM: Adherence in chronic disease. Annual Review of Nursing Research 2000, 18: 48–90.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Strasser S, Aharony L, Greenberger D: The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model. Medical Care Review 1993,50(2):219–248.PubMedCrossRef Strasser S, Aharony L, Greenberger D: The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model. Medical Care Review 1993,50(2):219–248.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bredart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 1998,6(6):518–523. 10.1007/s005200050207PubMedCrossRef Bredart A, Razavi D, Delvaux N, Goodman V, Farvacques C, Van Heer C: A comprehensive assessment of satisfaction with care for cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 1998,6(6):518–523. 10.1007/s005200050207PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Didier F, Scaffidi E, Fonzo D, Autier P, de Haes J: Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction. Oncology 2001,61(2):120–128. 10.1159/000055362PubMedCrossRef Bredart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, Didier F, Scaffidi E, Fonzo D, Autier P, de Haes J: Assessment of quality of care in an oncology institute using information on patients' satisfaction. Oncology 2001,61(2):120–128. 10.1159/000055362PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Hudak PL, Wright JG: The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000,25(24):3167–3177. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012PubMedCrossRef Hudak PL, Wright JG: The characteristics of patient satisfaction measures. Spine 2000,25(24):3167–3177. 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00012PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Mathias SD, Bloor L, Carroll PR: An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE. American Journal of Managed Care 2000,6(1):70–76.PubMed Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Mathias SD, Bloor L, Carroll PR: An instrument to measure patient satisfaction with healthcare in an observational database: results of a validation study using data from CaPSURE. American Journal of Managed Care 2000,6(1):70–76.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Westbrook JI: Patient satisfaction: methodological issues and research findings. Australian Health Review 1993,16(1):75–88.PubMed Westbrook JI: Patient satisfaction: methodological issues and research findings. Australian Health Review 1993,16(1):75–88.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A: A quality-of-life-oriented endpoint for comparing therapies. Biometrics 1989,45(3):781–795.PubMedCrossRef Gelber RD, Gelman RS, Goldhirsch A: A quality-of-life-oriented endpoint for comparing therapies. Biometrics 1989,45(3):781–795.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Sinha A, Colman SS, Atkinson MJ, Hass SL, Rowland CR, Miller DP, Brod M: The Development of a Conceptual Model for Treatment Satisfaction. Social Science & Medicine (Under Review) Sinha A, Colman SS, Atkinson MJ, Hass SL, Rowland CR, Miller DP, Brod M: The Development of a Conceptual Model for Treatment Satisfaction. Social Science & Medicine (Under Review)
29.
go back to reference Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass Sl, Colman SS, Rowland CR: Validation of General Measure of Treatment Satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications (TSQM), using a National Panel Study of Chronic Disease. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, in press. Atkinson MJ, Sinha A, Hass Sl, Colman SS, Rowland CR: Validation of General Measure of Treatment Satisfaction, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications (TSQM), using a National Panel Study of Chronic Disease. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, in press.
30.
go back to reference Atkinson MJ, Caldwell L: The differential effects of mood on patients' ratings of life quality and satisfaction with their care: Preliminary findings. The Journal of Affective Disorders 1997, 44: 169–175. 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00041-4PubMedCrossRef Atkinson MJ, Caldwell L: The differential effects of mood on patients' ratings of life quality and satisfaction with their care: Preliminary findings. The Journal of Affective Disorders 1997, 44: 169–175. 10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00041-4PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Atkinson MJ, Violato C: Neuroticism and coping with anger: The trans-situational consistency of coping responses. Personality and Individual Differences 1994, 17: 769–782. 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90046-9CrossRef Atkinson MJ, Violato C: Neuroticism and coping with anger: The trans-situational consistency of coping responses. Personality and Individual Differences 1994, 17: 769–782. 10.1016/0191-8869(94)90046-9CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Morris LA, Miller DW: The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: Need for a flexible standard. Value in Health 2002, 5: 372–381. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.xPubMedCrossRef Morris LA, Miller DW: The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: Need for a flexible standard. Value in Health 2002, 5: 372–381. 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.xPubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Linder M, Chang TS, Scott IU, Hay D, Chambers K, Sibley LM, Weis E: Validity of the Visual Function Index (VF-14) in Patients With Retinal Disease. Archives of Ophthalmology 1999,117(12):1611–1616.PubMedCrossRef Linder M, Chang TS, Scott IU, Hay D, Chambers K, Sibley LM, Weis E: Validity of the Visual Function Index (VF-14) in Patients With Retinal Disease. Archives of Ophthalmology 1999,117(12):1611–1616.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD: for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology 2001,119(7):1050–1058.PubMedCrossRef Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD: for the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology 2001,119(7):1050–1058.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Margolis MK, Coyne K, Kennedy-Martin T, Baker T, Schein O, Revicki DA: Vision-Specific Instruments for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life and Visual Functioning: A Literature Review. Pharmacoeconomics 2002,20(12):791–812.PubMedCrossRef Margolis MK, Coyne K, Kennedy-Martin T, Baker T, Schein O, Revicki DA: Vision-Specific Instruments for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life and Visual Functioning: A Literature Review. Pharmacoeconomics 2002,20(12):791–812.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference D'Ambrosio FA: Assessing disability in the patient with cataracts. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 1999,10(1):42–45.PubMedCrossRef D'Ambrosio FA: Assessing disability in the patient with cataracts. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 1999,10(1):42–45.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Crabtree HL, Hildreth AJ, O'Connell JE, Phelan PS, Allen D, Gray CS: Measuring visual symptoms in British cataract patients: the cataract symptom scale. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999,83(5):519–523.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Crabtree HL, Hildreth AJ, O'Connell JE, Phelan PS, Allen D, Gray CS: Measuring visual symptoms in British cataract patients: the cataract symptom scale. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999,83(5):519–523.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Uiters E, van den Borne B, van der Horst F, Volker-Dieben HJM: Patient Satisfaction After Corneal Transplantation. Cornea 2001,20(7):687–694. 10.1097/00003226-200110000-00004PubMedCrossRef Uiters E, van den Borne B, van der Horst F, Volker-Dieben HJM: Patient Satisfaction After Corneal Transplantation. Cornea 2001,20(7):687–694. 10.1097/00003226-200110000-00004PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Odberg T, Jakobsen JE, Hultgren SJ, Halseide R: The impact of glaucoma on the quality of life of patients in Norway: I. Results from a self-administered questionnaire. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2001,79(2):116–120. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079002116.xPubMedCrossRef Odberg T, Jakobsen JE, Hultgren SJ, Halseide R: The impact of glaucoma on the quality of life of patients in Norway: I. Results from a self-administered questionnaire. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 2001,79(2):116–120. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2001.079002116.xPubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R: Glaucoma Patients' Assessment of Their Visual Function and Quality of Life. Journal of Glaucoma 2002,11(2):154–163.PubMedCrossRef Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R: Glaucoma Patients' Assessment of Their Visual Function and Quality of Life. Journal of Glaucoma 2002,11(2):154–163.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Nordmann J, Touboul C, Auzanneau N, Berdeaux G: Vision Related Quality of Life of French Patients is Affected by Topical Glaucoma Treatment Side Effects. Value in Health 2002,5(6):557–558.CrossRef Nordmann J, Touboul C, Auzanneau N, Berdeaux G: Vision Related Quality of Life of French Patients is Affected by Topical Glaucoma Treatment Side Effects. Value in Health 2002,5(6):557–558.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Waring George O III: One-year results of European Multicenter Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments: Part 2: Complications, Visual Symptoms and Patient Satisfaction. Evidence-Based Eye Care 2001,2(4):222–223.CrossRef Waring George O III: One-year results of European Multicenter Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments: Part 2: Complications, Visual Symptoms and Patient Satisfaction. Evidence-Based Eye Care 2001,2(4):222–223.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Katz L, Jay MD: Twelve-Month Evaluation of Brimonidine-Purite Versus Brimonidine in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. Journal of Glaucoma 2002,11(2):119–126.PubMedCrossRef Katz L, Jay MD: Twelve-Month Evaluation of Brimonidine-Purite Versus Brimonidine in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension. Journal of Glaucoma 2002,11(2):119–126.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Asch S, Goldzweig CL, Lee P: Do We Understand the Effects of 'Managed Care' in Ophthalmology?: A Review and Analysis. Archives of Ophthalmology 1997,115(4):531–536.PubMedCrossRef Asch S, Goldzweig CL, Lee P: Do We Understand the Effects of 'Managed Care' in Ophthalmology?: A Review and Analysis. Archives of Ophthalmology 1997,115(4):531–536.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Barber BL, Strahlman ER, Laibovitz R, Guess HA, Reines SA: Validation of a questionnaire for comparing the tolerability of ophthalmic medications. Ophthalmology 1997,104(2):334–42. Erratum in: Ophthalmology 1997, 104(5):736, 890–3PubMedCrossRef Barber BL, Strahlman ER, Laibovitz R, Guess HA, Reines SA: Validation of a questionnaire for comparing the tolerability of ophthalmic medications. Ophthalmology 1997,104(2):334–42. Erratum in: Ophthalmology 1997, 104(5):736, 890–3PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Stewart WC: Clinical Practice of Glaucoma. Thorofare, N.J.SLACK, Inc 1990. Stewart WC: Clinical Practice of Glaucoma. Thorofare, N.J.SLACK, Inc 1990.
47.
go back to reference Sheilds MB: Textbook of Glaucoma. 3 Edition Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore 1992. Sheilds MB: Textbook of Glaucoma. 3 Edition Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore 1992.
48.
go back to reference Stewart WC: New and current drug therapy for glaucoma. Ciba Clinical Symposium 1997. Stewart WC: New and current drug therapy for glaucoma. Ciba Clinical Symposium 1997.
49.
go back to reference Stewart WC: Glaucoma Medications and their side effects. Ophthalmic Practice 1999, 17: 2. Stewart WC: Glaucoma Medications and their side effects. Ophthalmic Practice 1999, 17: 2.
50.
go back to reference Camras CB, Alm A, Watson P, Stjernschantz J: Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, for glaucoma therapy. Efficacy and safety after 1 year of treatment in 198 patients. Latanoprost Study Groups. Ophthalmology 1996,103(11):1916–1924.PubMedCrossRef Camras CB, Alm A, Watson P, Stjernschantz J: Latanoprost, a prostaglandin analog, for glaucoma therapy. Efficacy and safety after 1 year of treatment in 198 patients. Latanoprost Study Groups. Ophthalmology 1996,103(11):1916–1924.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Netland PA, Landry T, Sullivan EK, Andrew R, Silver L, Weiner A, Mallick S, Dickerson J, Bergamini MV, Robertson SM, Davis AA: Travoprost Study Group. Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2001,132(4):472–484. 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01177-1PubMedCrossRef Netland PA, Landry T, Sullivan EK, Andrew R, Silver L, Weiner A, Mallick S, Dickerson J, Bergamini MV, Robertson SM, Davis AA: Travoprost Study Group. Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2001,132(4):472–484. 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01177-1PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Noecker RS, Dirks MS, Choplin NT, Bernstein P, Batoosingh AL, Whitcup SM, Bimatoprost/Latanoprost Study Group: A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003,135(1):55–63. 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01827-5PubMedCrossRef Noecker RS, Dirks MS, Choplin NT, Bernstein P, Batoosingh AL, Whitcup SM, Bimatoprost/Latanoprost Study Group: A six-month randomized clinical trial comparing the intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of bimatoprost and latanoprost in patients with ocular hypertension or glaucoma. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003,135(1):55–63. 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01827-5PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Castelli WP: Systemic side effects of topical beta-adrenergic blockers. Clinical Cardiology 1996, 19: 691–697.PubMedCrossRef Stewart WC, Castelli WP: Systemic side effects of topical beta-adrenergic blockers. Clinical Cardiology 1996, 19: 691–697.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Garrison PM: β-blocker-induced complications and the glaucoma patient: newer treatments to help reduce systemic side effects. Archives of Internal Medicine 1998, 158: 221–226. 10.1001/archinte.158.3.221PubMedCrossRef Stewart WC, Garrison PM: β-blocker-induced complications and the glaucoma patient: newer treatments to help reduce systemic side effects. Archives of Internal Medicine 1998, 158: 221–226. 10.1001/archinte.158.3.221PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Konstas AGP, Papapanos P, Tersis I, Houliara D, Stewart WC: Twenty-four hour diurnal curve comparison of commercially available latanoprost 0.005% versus timolol/dorzolamide fixed combination. Ophthalmology 2003, in press. Konstas AGP, Papapanos P, Tersis I, Houliara D, Stewart WC: Twenty-four hour diurnal curve comparison of commercially available latanoprost 0.005% versus timolol/dorzolamide fixed combination. Ophthalmology 2003, in press.
56.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Leech JN: Acute and chronic ocular symptoms of dorzolamide 2% compared with placebo. Journal of Glaucoma 2003,12(2):151–155.PubMedCrossRef Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Leech JN: Acute and chronic ocular symptoms of dorzolamide 2% compared with placebo. Journal of Glaucoma 2003,12(2):151–155.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Harbin TS Jr, Pastor SA, Day DG, Holmes KT, Stewart JA: Brimonidine 0.2% versus dorzolamide 2% each given three times daily to reduce intraocular pressure. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2000,129(6):723–727. 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00381-0PubMedCrossRef Stewart WC, Sharpe ED, Harbin TS Jr, Pastor SA, Day DG, Holmes KT, Stewart JA: Brimonidine 0.2% versus dorzolamide 2% each given three times daily to reduce intraocular pressure. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2000,129(6):723–727. 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00381-0PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference LeBlanc RP: Twelve-month results of an ongoing randomized trial comparing brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and timolol 0.5% given twice daily in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Brimonidine Study Group 2. Ophthalmology 1998,105(10):1960–1967. 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91048-XPubMedCrossRef LeBlanc RP: Twelve-month results of an ongoing randomized trial comparing brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and timolol 0.5% given twice daily in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Brimonidine Study Group 2. Ophthalmology 1998,105(10):1960–1967. 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91048-XPubMedCrossRef
59.
go back to reference Goldman AE: The Group Depth Interview. Principles and PracticePrentice-Hall, Inc. A division of Simon & Schuster. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1987. Goldman AE: The Group Depth Interview. Principles and PracticePrentice-Hall, Inc. A division of Simon & Schuster. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1987.
60.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics 4 Edition Boston: Allyn and Bacon 2001. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS: Using Multivariate Statistics 4 Edition Boston: Allyn and Bacon 2001.
61.
go back to reference Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D: Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Quality of Life Research 1993, 2: 441–449.PubMedCrossRef Hays RD, Anderson R, Revicki D: Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related quality of life measures. Quality of Life Research 1993, 2: 441–449.PubMedCrossRef
62.
go back to reference Ware J, Hays RD: Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Medical Care 1988, 26: 393–402.PubMedCrossRef Ware J, Hays RD: Methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. Medical Care 1988, 26: 393–402.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Juniper EF: Intrepreting of Quality of Life data. Quality of Life Newsletter 1999. Juniper EF: Intrepreting of Quality of Life data. Quality of Life Newsletter 1999.
Metadata
Title
A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)
Authors
Mark J Atkinson
William C Stewart
Joel M Fain
Jeanette A Stewart
Ravinder Dhawan
Essy Mozaffari
Jan Lohs
Publication date
01-12-2003
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2003
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-1-67

Other articles of this Issue 1/2003

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2003 Go to the issue