Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2007

Open Access 01-12-2007 | Research

Focus on sex differences in grant applications submitted to the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development

Authors: Debby G Keuken, Joke A Haafkens, Niek S Klazinga

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several measures have been implemented at international level to ensure that there is a greater focus on sex differences in health research. This study evaluates the effect of various formal incentives that were introduced by a Dutch financer of health research to encourage applicants to include sex differences in research proposals.

Methods

We sampled 213 health research proposals submitted in 2003 to the programmes Prevention (N = 104) and Innovation (N = 109) by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). These proposals were analysed and categorized with regard to the expressed intention to take sex differences into consideration. Furthermore, those proposals in which such intention was absent were appraised by researchers to determine whether an intention of this kind would have been relevant.

Results

We found that 23 % of proposals submitted to Prevention (incentive: programme specific instructions) and 10% of those submitted to Innovation (general set of guidelines) took account of sex differences (difference 13%; 95% CI: 3.1–22.9). Conversely, 66% of the research proposals in Prevention, and 20% in Innovation, failed to take sex differences into consideration, even though this might well have been relevant.

Conclusion

There is still insufficient incentive for those submitting research proposals to ZonMw to systematically incorporate sex differences when drafting such documents. The provisions in ZonMw's policy need to be amended and better monitored. For this, we formulated some recommendations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D, eds: Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies, Committee on Ethical and Legal Issues Relating to the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Studies, Institute of Medicine. 1994, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1: Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D, eds: Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies, Committee on Ethical and Legal Issues Relating to the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Studies, Institute of Medicine. 1994, Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1:
2.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993 (public law 103-43), 107, Stat 22 (Codified at 42 U.S.C. 289.a-1) June 10, 1993, at 486 (d) (4) (D). National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993 (public law 103-43), 107, Stat 22 (Codified at 42 U.S.C. 289.a-1) June 10, 1993, at 486 (d) (4) (D).
3.
go back to reference Health Canada Therapeutics Products Programme: Inclusion of Women in Clinical Trials. 1997, Ottawa: Health Canada Health Canada Therapeutics Products Programme: Inclusion of Women in Clinical Trials. 1997, Ottawa: Health Canada
5.
go back to reference Vidaver RM, Lafleur B, Tong C, Bradshaw R, Marts SA: Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of women's health & gender based medicine. 2000, 9 (5): 495-504. 10.1089/15246090050073576.CrossRef Vidaver RM, Lafleur B, Tong C, Bradshaw R, Marts SA: Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of women's health & gender based medicine. 2000, 9 (5): 495-504. 10.1089/15246090050073576.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Greenberger P, Marts SA: Women in NIH-funded research studies: There's good news, and there's bad news. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine. 2000, 9 (5): 463-4. 10.1089/15246090050073503.CrossRefPubMed Greenberger P, Marts SA: Women in NIH-funded research studies: There's good news, and there's bad news. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine. 2000, 9 (5): 463-4. 10.1089/15246090050073503.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marrocco A, Stewart DE: We've come a long way, maybe: recruitment of women and analysis of results by sex in clinical research. Journal of women's health & gender based medicine. 2001, 10 (2): 175-179. 10.1089/152460901300039520.CrossRef Marrocco A, Stewart DE: We've come a long way, maybe: recruitment of women and analysis of results by sex in clinical research. Journal of women's health & gender based medicine. 2001, 10 (2): 175-179. 10.1089/152460901300039520.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klinge I, Bosch M: Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment study of the specific programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme: Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources of the Fifth Framework Programme. 2001, Brussels: European Commission Klinge I, Bosch M: Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment study of the specific programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme: Quality of Life and Management of Living Resources of the Fifth Framework Programme. 2001, Brussels: European Commission
9.
go back to reference Directorate-General of Research and Technological Development Unit 5: Women and Science. Vademecum. Gender mainstreaming in the 6th framework programme. Reference guide for scientific officers/project officers. 2003, Brussels: European Commission Directorate-General of Research and Technological Development Unit 5: Women and Science. Vademecum. Gender mainstreaming in the 6th framework programme. Reference guide for scientific officers/project officers. 2003, Brussels: European Commission
11.
go back to reference ZonMw. Procedures ZonMw. Den Haag: ZonMw. 2002 ZonMw. Procedures ZonMw. Den Haag: ZonMw. 2002
12.
go back to reference Joling W: Zon heeft een nieuwe procedure. Mediator. 1999, 10 (8): 19-20. Joling W: Zon heeft een nieuwe procedure. Mediator. 1999, 10 (8): 19-20.
17.
go back to reference Legato MJ, (Editor): Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine. Volumes 1 and 2. 2004, London: Elsevier Academic Press Legato MJ, (Editor): Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine. Volumes 1 and 2. 2004, London: Elsevier Academic Press
18.
go back to reference Anthony M, Berg MJ: Biologic and Molecular Mechanisms for Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics: Part I. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine. 2002, 11 (7): 601-615. 10.1089/152460902760360559.CrossRefPubMed Anthony M, Berg MJ: Biologic and Molecular Mechanisms for Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics: Part I. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine. 2002, 11 (7): 601-615. 10.1089/152460902760360559.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Anthony M, Berg MJ: Biologic and Molecular Mechanisms for Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics: Part II. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine. 2002, 11 (7): 617-629. 10.1089/152460902760360568.CrossRefPubMed Anthony M, Berg MJ: Biologic and Molecular Mechanisms for Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacogenetics: Part II. Journal of Women's Health and Gender Based Medicine. 2002, 11 (7): 617-629. 10.1089/152460902760360568.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine: Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health; Does Sex Matter?. 2001, Washington: Institute of Medicine Institute of Medicine: Exploring the Biological Contributions to Human Health; Does Sex Matter?. 2001, Washington: Institute of Medicine
21.
go back to reference Phillips SP: Defining and measuring gender: a social determinant of health whose time has come. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2005, 4: 11-10.1186/1475-9276-4-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phillips SP: Defining and measuring gender: a social determinant of health whose time has come. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2005, 4: 11-10.1186/1475-9276-4-11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Krieger N: Genders, sexes and health: what are the connections-and why does it matter?. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003, 32: 652-657. 10.1093/ije/dyg156.CrossRefPubMed Krieger N: Genders, sexes and health: what are the connections-and why does it matter?. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2003, 32: 652-657. 10.1093/ije/dyg156.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bosch M: Duidelijke taal! Evaluatie in het diversiteitsbeleid in ZonMw, 1998–2002. Rapport in opdracht van ZonMw. 2002, Maastricht: Centrum voor Gender en Diversiteit, Universiteit Maastricht Bosch M: Duidelijke taal! Evaluatie in het diversiteitsbeleid in ZonMw, 1998–2002. Rapport in opdracht van ZonMw. 2002, Maastricht: Centrum voor Gender en Diversiteit, Universiteit Maastricht
25.
go back to reference NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research, 59 Fed. Reg. 14508-14513. 1994 NIH Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research, 59 Fed. Reg. 14508-14513. 1994
28.
Metadata
Title
Focus on sex differences in grant applications submitted to the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development
Authors
Debby G Keuken
Joke A Haafkens
Niek S Klazinga
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2007
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-6-13

Other articles of this Issue 1/2007

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2007 Go to the issue