Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research

“Can community level interventions have an impact on equity and utilization of maternal health care” – Evidence from rural Bangladesh

Authors: Zahidul Quayyum, Mohammad Nasir Uddin Khan, Tasmeen Quayyum, Hashima E Nasreen, Morseda Chowdhury, Tim Ensor

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evidence from low and middle income countries (LMICs) suggests that maternal mortality is more prevalent among the poor whereas access to maternal health services is concentrated among the rich. In Bangladesh substantial inequities exist both in the use of facility-based basic obstetric care and for home births attended by skilled birth attendant. BRAC initiated an intervention on Improving Maternal, Neonatal, and Child Survival (IMNCS) in the rural areas of Bangladesh in 2008. One of the objectives of the intervention is to improve the utilization of maternal and child health care services among the poor. This study aimed to look at the impact of the intervention on utilization and also on equity of access to maternal health services.

Methods

A quasi-experimental pre-post comparison study was conducted in rural areas of five districts comprising three intervention (Gaibandha, Rangpur and Mymensingh) and two comparison districts (Netrokona and Naogaon). Data on health seeking behaviour for maternal health were collected from a repeated cross sectional household survey conducted in 2008 and 2010.

Results

Results show that the intervention appears to cause an increase in the utilization of antenatal care. The concentration index (CI) shows that this has become pro-poor over time (from CI: 0.30 to CI: 0.04) in the intervention areas. In contrast the use of ANC from medically trained providers has become pro-rich (from, CI: 0.18 to CI: 0.22). There was a significant increase in the utilisation of trained attendants for home delivery in the intervention areas compared to the comparison areas and the change was found to be pro-poor. Use of postnatal care cervices was also found to be pro-poor (from CI: 0.37 to CI: 0.14). Utilization of ANC services provided by medically trained provider did not improve in the intervention area. However, where the intervention had a positive effect on utilization it also seemed to have had a positive effect on equity.

Conclusions

To sustain equity in health care utilization, the IMNCS programme needs to continue providing free home based services. In addition to this, the programme should also continue to provide funding to bear the cost to those mothers who are not able to have the comprehensive ANC from medically trained providers.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Gatwin D, Bhuiya A, Victoria C: Making Health systems more equitable. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9441): 1273-1280. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17145-6.CrossRef
2.
Wirth M, Sacks E, Delamonica E, Storeygard A, Minujin A, Balk D: “Delivering” on the MDGs?: Equity and maternal health in ghana, Ethiopia and Kenya. East Afr J Pub Health. 2008, 5 (3): 33-41.
3.
Zere E, Kirigia JM, Duale S, Akazili J: Inequities in maternal and child health outcomes and interventions in Ghana. BMC Pub Health. 2012, 12 (252): 1-10.
4.
Khadr Z: Monitoring socioeconomic inequity in maternal health indicators in Egypt: 1995-2005. Int J Equity Health. 2008, 8 (38): 1-12. 10.1186/1475-9276-8-38.
5.
Graham WJ, Fitzmaurice A, Bell J, Cairns J: The familial technique for linking maternal death with poverty. Lancet. 2004, 363 (9402): 23-27. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15165-3.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Rahman M, Haque SE, Mostofa MG, Tarivonda L, Shuaib M: Wealth inequality and utilization of reproductive health services in the Republic of Vanuatu: insights from the multiple indicator cluster survey, 2007. Int J Equity Health. 2011, 10 (58): 1-10. 10.1186/1475-9276-10-58.
7.
Pathak PK, Singh A, Subramanian SV: Economic inequalities in maternal health care: prenatal care and skilled birth attendance in India, 1992–2006. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5 (10): e13593-10.1371/journal.pone.0013593.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
Barros AJD, Ronsmans C, Axelson H, Loaiza E, Bertoldi AD, França GVA: Equity in maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in Countdown to 2015: a retrospective review of survey data from 54 countries. Lancet. 2012, 379: 1225-1233. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60113-5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zere E, Tumusiime P, Walker O, Kirigia J, Mwikisa C, Mbeeli T: Inequities in utilization of maternal health interventions in Namibia: implications for progress towards MDG 5 targets. Int J Equity Health. 2010, 9 (16): 10.1186/1471-2393-11-34.
10.
Ensor T, Cooper S: Overcoming barriers to health service access: influencing the demand side. Health Policy Plann. 2004, 19 (2): 69-79. 10.1093/heapol/czh009.CrossRef
11.
Rahman MH, Mosley WH, Ahmed S, Akhter HH: Does service accessibility reduce socioeconomic differentials in maternal care seeking? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. J Biosoc Sci. 2008, 40: 19-33.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Rosato M, Laverack G, Grabman LH, Tripathy P, Nair N, Mwansambo C: Community participation: lessons for maternal, newborn, and child health. Lancet. 2008, 372 (9642): 962-971. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61406-3.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Mushi D, Mpembeni R, Jahn A: Effectiveness of community based safe motherhood promoters in improving the utilization of obstetric care. The case of Mtwara Rural District in Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010, 10: 14-10.1186/1471-2393-10-14.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
Lassi Z, Haider B, Bhutta Z: Community-based intervention packages for reducing maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and improving neonatal outcomes, (Review) The Cochrane Collaboration. 2010, Ltd: JohnWiley & Sons
15.
Sharma SK, Sawangdee Y, Sirirassam B: Access to health: women’s status and utilization of maternal health services in Nepal. J.biosoc.Sci. 2007, 39: 671-692. 10.1017/S0021932007001952.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Hatt L, Stanton C, Makowiecka K, Adisasmita A, Achadic E, Ronsmansb C: Did the strategy of skilled attendance at birth reach the poor in Indonesia?. Bull World Health Organ. 2005, 85 (10): 773-784.
17.
Mullany LC, Lee TJ, Yone L, Lee CI, Teela KC, Paw P: Impact of community-based maternal health workers on coverage of essential maternal health interventions among internally displaced communities in Eastern Burma: The MOM Project. PLoS Med. 2010, 7 (8): e1000317-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000317.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
Canavan A: KIT Working Papers Series H3. Review of global literature on maternal health interventions and outcomes related to provision of skilled birth attendance. 2009, Amsterdam: KIT
19.
Schiffman J, Darmstadt GL, Agarwal S, Baqui AH: Community-based intervention packages for improving perinatal health in developing countries: a review of the evidence. Semin Perinatol. 2010, 34 (6): 462-476. 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.008.CrossRefPubMed
20.
NIPORT, ICDDR,B: Bangladesh Maternal Mortality and Health Care Survey 2010. Centre for Health and Population Research, Bangladesh, Measures Evaluation. 2011, Dhaka, Bangladesh and Chapel Hill, NC: NIPORT, ICCDR,B, and Measure Evaluation
21.
Anwar I, Sami M, Akhtar N, Chowdhury M, Salma U, Rahman M: Inequity in maternal health-care services: evidence from home-based skilled-birth-attendant programmes in Bangladesh. Bull World Health Organ. 2008, 86 (4): 252-259. 10.2471/BLT.07.042754.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
22.
Amin R, Shah NM, Becker S: Socioeconomic factors differentiating maternal and child health-seeking behavior in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional analysis. Int J Equity Health. 2010, 9 (9): 1-12. 10.1186/1475-9276-9-9.
23.
Rahman M, Mosley W, Ahmed S, Akhter H: Does service accessibility reduce socioeconomic differentials in maternal care seeking? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. J Bio-social Sci. 2007, 40: 19-33.
24.
Chowdhury ME, Ronsmans C, Killewo J, Anwar I, Gausia K, Das-Gupta S: Equity in use of home-based or facility-based skilled obstetric care in rural Bangladesh: an observational study. Lancet. 2006, 367: 327-332. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68070-7.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Halder AK, Saha UR, Kabir M: Inequities in reproductive healthcare utilization: evidence from Bangladesh demographic and health survey 2004. World Health Population. 2007, 9 (2): 48-63.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Amin R, Chowdhury S, Kamal G, Chowdhury J, Amin R, Chowdhury SA, Kamal GM: Community health services and health care utilization in rural Bangladesh. Social science and medicine. Soc Sci Med. 1989, 29: 1343-1349. 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90234-7.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Amin R, Pierre MS, Ahmed A, Huq M: Integration of an Essential Services Package (ESP) in child and reproductive health and family planning with a microcredit program for poor women: experience from a pilot project in rural Bangladesh. World Dev. 2001, 29 (9): 1611-1621. 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00055-9.CrossRef
28.
Nasreen H-E, Nahar S, Mamun MA, Afsana K, Byass P: Oral misoprostol for preventing postpartum haemorrhage in home births in rural Bangladesh: how effective is it?. Glob Health Act. 2011, 4 (7017): 7017-
29.
Khandker SR, Koolwal GB, Samad HA: Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. 2010, Washington: The World Bank
30.
Rutstein SO, Johnson K: The DHS Wealth Index. DHS Comparative Reports No. 6. 2004, Calverton, MD: Measures DHS, ORC Macro
31.
Ashenfelter O, Card D: Using the longitudinal structure of earnings to estimate the effects of training programs”, 67, 648–660. Rev Econ Stat. 1985, 67: 648-660. 10.2307/1924810.CrossRef
32.
33.
Kakwani NC, Wagstaff A, Doorslaer EV: Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation and statistical inference. J Econ. 1997, 77 (1): 87-104.CrossRef
34.
Becker SO, Andrea I: “Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores”. Stata Journal, StataCorp LP. 2002, 2 (4): 358-377.
35.
Midhet F, Becker S: Impact of community-based interventions on maternal and neonatal health indicators: results from a community randomized trial in rural Balochistan, Pakistan. Rep Health. 2010, 7 (30): 1-11. 10.1186/1742-4755-7-30.
36.
Titaley C, Dibley M, Roberts C: Factors associated with non-utilisation of postnatal care services in Indonesia. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009, 63 (10): 827-831. 10.1136/jech.2008.081604.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Mamun MMA, Billah M, Mistry SK, Nichols P, Dineen B, Nasreen HE: Maternal, neonatal and child health innorthern districts ofrural Bangladesh –profiling the changes during 2008-2010. 2012, Dhaka and Aberdeen: BRAC and Ipact (University of Aberdeen), A research report published by RED, BRAC
38.
Paul B, Rumsey D: Utilization of health facilities and trained birth attendants for childbirth in rural Bangladesh: an empirical study. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (12): 1755-1765. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00148-4.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Magoma M, Requejo J, Campbell OM, Cousens S, Filippi V: High ANC coverage and low skilled attendance in a rural Tanzanian district: a case for implementing a birth plan intervention. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2010, 10 (13): 1-11.
40.
Bloom S, Lippeveld T, Wypij D: Does antenatal care make a difference to safe delivery? A study in urban Uttar Pradesh, India. Health Policy Plan. 1999, 14 (1): 38-48. 10.1093/heapol/14.1.38.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Yanagisawa S, Oum S, Wakai S: Determinants of skilled birth attendance in rural Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health. 2006, 11 (2): 238-251. 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01547.x.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
“Can community level interventions have an impact on equity and utilization of maternal health care” – Evidence from rural Bangladesh
Authors
Zahidul Quayyum
Mohammad Nasir Uddin Khan
Tasmeen Quayyum
Hashima E Nasreen
Morseda Chowdhury
Tim Ensor
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-12-22

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2013 Go to the issue

Research

Involving traditional birth attendants in emergency obstetric care in Tanzania: policy implications of a study of their knowledge and practices in Kigoma Rural District

Research

Inequalities in multimorbidity in South Africa

Research

Health inequity in the Northern Territory, Australia

Research

A systematic review of the relationships between social capital and socioeconomic inequalities in health: a contribution to understanding the psychosocial pathway of health inequalities

Research

“Everyone just keeps their eyes closed and their fingers crossed”: Sexual health communication among black parents and children in Nova Scotia, Canada

Research

Benefits and constraints of intimate partnerships for HIV positive sex workers in Kibera, Kenya