Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research

A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation

Authors: Ben F Harris-Roxas, Patrick J Harris, Elizabeth Harris, Lynn A Kemp

Published in: International Journal for Equity in Health | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Equity focused health impact assessments (EFHIAs), or health equity impact assessments, are being increasingly promoted internationally as a mechanism for enhancing the consideration of health equity in the development of policies, programs and projects. Despite this there are relatively few examples of examples of completed EFHIAs available. This paper presents a case study of a rapid EFHIA that was conducted in Australia on a health promotion policy implementation plan. It briefly describes the process and findings of the EFHIA and evaluates the impact on decision-making and implementation.

Methods

The rapid EFHIA was undertaken in four days, drawing on an expert panel and limited review of the literature. A process evaluation was undertaken by email one month after the EFHIA was completed. An impact evaluation was undertaken two years later based on five semi-structured interviews with members of the EFHIA working group and policy officers and managers responsible for implementing the plan. A cost estimation was conducted by the EFHIA working group.

Findings

The EFHIA made both general and specific recommendations about how the health equity impacts of the policy implementation plan could be improved. The impact evaluation identified changes to development and implementation that occurred as a result of the EFHIA, though there was disagreement about the extent to which changes could be attributed solely to the EFHIA. Those responsible considered the recommendations of the EFHIA in the next versions of their ABHI implementation plans. Factors that influenced the impact of the EFHIA included consolidating understandings of equity, enabling discussion of alternatives, and differing understandings of the purpose of the EFHIA. The EFHIA cost US$4,036 to undertake.

Conclusions

This EFHIA was conducted in a short timeframe using relatively few resources. It had some reported impacts on the development of the implementation plan and enhanced overall consideration of health equity. This case highlights some of the factors and preconditions that may maximise the impact of future EFHIAs on decision-making and implementation.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Commission of the European Communities: Together for Health: A Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013. White Paper. 2007, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities Commission of the European Communities: Together for Health: A Strategic Approach for the EU 2008-2013. White Paper. 2007, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities
2.
go back to reference Thai National Health Commission: National Health Act, B.E.2550. 2007, Bangkok: The Kingdom of Thailand Thai National Health Commission: National Health Act, B.E.2550. 2007, Bangkok: The Kingdom of Thailand
3.
go back to reference Gagnon F, Turgeon J, Dallaire C: Healthy public policy: A conceptual cognitive framework. Health Policy. 2007, 81 (1): 42-55. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.012.CrossRefPubMed Gagnon F, Turgeon J, Dallaire C: Healthy public policy: A conceptual cognitive framework. Health Policy. 2007, 81 (1): 42-55. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.05.012.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference WHO: Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. 2008, Geneva: Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization WHO: Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. 2008, Geneva: Commission on the Social Determinants of Health, World Health Organization
5.
go back to reference WHO: World Health Report 2008: Primary health care - Now more than ever. 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization WHO: World Health Report 2008: Primary health care - Now more than ever. 2008, Geneva: World Health Organization
6.
go back to reference Dahlgren G, Whitehead M: Levelling up (part 2): a discussion paper on European strategies for tackling social inequities in health. 2006, Copenhagen,: WHO Regional Office for Europe Dahlgren G, Whitehead M: Levelling up (part 2): a discussion paper on European strategies for tackling social inequities in health. 2006, Copenhagen,: WHO Regional Office for Europe
7.
go back to reference Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Elliott E, Golby A, van Herten L, Lavin T, Stricka M, Williams G: Implementing and Institutionalizing Health Impact Assessment in Europe. Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials. Edited by: Ståhl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. 2006, Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 231-252. Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Elliott E, Golby A, van Herten L, Lavin T, Stricka M, Williams G: Implementing and Institutionalizing Health Impact Assessment in Europe. Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials. Edited by: Ståhl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. 2006, Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 231-252.
8.
go back to reference Equator Principles: The Equator Principles: A financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing and managing social & environmental risk in project financing. 2006, Washington D.C.: Equator Principles Financial Institutions Equator Principles: The Equator Principles: A financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing and managing social & environmental risk in project financing. 2006, Washington D.C.: Equator Principles Financial Institutions
9.
go back to reference IFC: Performance Standards on Social & Environmental Sustainability. 2006, Washington DC: International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group IFC: Performance Standards on Social & Environmental Sustainability. 2006, Washington DC: International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group
10.
go back to reference Kemm J: Health Impact Assessment and Health in All Policies. Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials. Edited by: Ståhl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. 2006, Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 189-208. Kemm J: Health Impact Assessment and Health in All Policies. Health in All Policies: Prospects and potentials. Edited by: Ståhl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. 2006, Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 189-208.
11.
go back to reference Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S: Health Impact Assessment. 2004, Oxford, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRef Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S: Health Impact Assessment. 2004, Oxford, New York: Oxford University PressCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Acheson D: Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health. 1998, London: Stationery Office Acheson D: Independent Inquiry into Inequalities in Health. 1998, London: Stationery Office
13.
go back to reference Sukkumnoed D: Better Power for Health: Healthy public policy and sustainable energy in the Thai power sector. PhD. 2007, Aalborg: Aalborg University Sukkumnoed D: Better Power for Health: Healthy public policy and sustainable energy in the Thai power sector. PhD. 2007, Aalborg: Aalborg University
14.
go back to reference Sukkumnoed D, Nuntavorakarn S, Phoolchaeron W, Sabrum N, Sukkumnoed R: Toward Healthy Society: Healthy public policy and health impact assessment in Thailand. 2005, Bangkok Sukkumnoed D, Nuntavorakarn S, Phoolchaeron W, Sabrum N, Sukkumnoed R: Toward Healthy Society: Healthy public policy and health impact assessment in Thailand. 2005, Bangkok
16.
go back to reference Harris-Roxas B, Harris P: Learning by Doing: The value of case studies of health impact assessment. NSW Pub Health Bull. 2007, 18 (9-10): 161-163. 10.1071/NB07110.CrossRef Harris-Roxas B, Harris P: Learning by Doing: The value of case studies of health impact assessment. NSW Pub Health Bull. 2007, 18 (9-10): 161-163. 10.1071/NB07110.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Harris-Roxas B, Simpson S: The New South Wales Health Impact Assessment Project. NSW Pub Health Bull. 2005, 16 (7-8): 120-123. Harris-Roxas B, Simpson S: The New South Wales Health Impact Assessment Project. NSW Pub Health Bull. 2005, 16 (7-8): 120-123.
18.
go back to reference NPHP: Health Impact Assessment: Legislative and administrative frameworks. 2005, Melbourne: National Public Health Partnership NPHP: Health Impact Assessment: Legislative and administrative frameworks. 2005, Melbourne: National Public Health Partnership
19.
go back to reference Morgan RK: Institutionalising Health Impact Assessment: The New Zealand experience. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2008, 26 (1): 2-16. 10.3152/146155108X300547.CrossRef Morgan RK: Institutionalising Health Impact Assessment: The New Zealand experience. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2008, 26 (1): 2-16. 10.3152/146155108X300547.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference PHAC: An Idea Whose Time Has Come: New opportunities for health impact assessment in New Zealand public policy and planning. 2007, Wellington: Public Health Advisory Committee PHAC: An Idea Whose Time Has Come: New opportunities for health impact assessment in New Zealand public policy and planning. 2007, Wellington: Public Health Advisory Committee
21.
go back to reference Signal L, Durham G: Health Impact Assessment in the New Zealand Policy Context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2000, 15: 11-26. Signal L, Durham G: Health Impact Assessment in the New Zealand Policy Context. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand. 2000, 15: 11-26.
22.
go back to reference Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Heaton SK, Feldman JD, Rutt CD: Use of Health Impact Assessment in the US: 27 Case Studies, 1999-2007. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008, 34 (3): 241-256. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.015.CrossRefPubMed Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Heaton SK, Feldman JD, Rutt CD: Use of Health Impact Assessment in the US: 27 Case Studies, 1999-2007. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2008, 34 (3): 241-256. 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.015.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cole BL, Shimkhada R, Fielding JE, Kominski G, Morgenstern H: Methodologies for Realizing the Potential of Health Impact Assessment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005, 28 (4): 382-389. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.010.CrossRefPubMed Cole BL, Shimkhada R, Fielding JE, Kominski G, Morgenstern H: Methodologies for Realizing the Potential of Health Impact Assessment. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2005, 28 (4): 382-389. 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.01.010.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rutt C, Pratt M, Dannenberg A, Cole B: Connecting Public Health and Planning Professionals: Health impact assessment. Places: A Forum of Environmental Design. 2005, 17 (1): 86-87. Rutt C, Pratt M, Dannenberg A, Cole B: Connecting Public Health and Planning Professionals: Health impact assessment. Places: A Forum of Environmental Design. 2005, 17 (1): 86-87.
25.
go back to reference Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Dora C, Fielding JE, Kraft K, McClymont-Peace D, Mindell J, Onyekere C, Roberts JA, Ross CL, Rutt CD, Scott-Samuel A, Tilson HH: Growing the Field of Health Impact Assessment in the United States: An agenda for research and practice. Am J Public Health. 2006, 96 (2): 262-270. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069880.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Dannenberg AL, Bhatia R, Cole BL, Dora C, Fielding JE, Kraft K, McClymont-Peace D, Mindell J, Onyekere C, Roberts JA, Ross CL, Rutt CD, Scott-Samuel A, Tilson HH: Growing the Field of Health Impact Assessment in the United States: An agenda for research and practice. Am J Public Health. 2006, 96 (2): 262-270. 10.2105/AJPH.2005.069880.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Vohra S: International perspective on health impact assessment in urban settings. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin. 2007, 18 (9-10): 152-154. 10.1071/NB07085.CrossRefPubMed Vohra S: International perspective on health impact assessment in urban settings. New South Wales Public Health Bulletin. 2007, 18 (9-10): 152-154. 10.1071/NB07085.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference ECHP: Gothenburg Consensus Paper on Health Impact Assessment: Main concepts and suggested approach. 1999, Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Regional Office for Europe ECHP: Gothenburg Consensus Paper on Health Impact Assessment: Main concepts and suggested approach. 1999, Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Regional Office for Europe
28.
go back to reference Banken R: Strategies for Institutionalising HIA. ECHP Health Impact Assessment Discussion Papers Number 1. 2001, Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Europe Banken R: Strategies for Institutionalising HIA. ECHP Health Impact Assessment Discussion Papers Number 1. 2001, Brussels: European Centre for Health Policy, WHO Europe
29.
go back to reference Wright J, Parry J, Scully E: Institutionalizing Policy-Level Health Impact Assessment in Europe: Is coupling health impact assessment with strategic environmental assessment the next step forward?. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007, 83 (6): 472-477. Wright J, Parry J, Scully E: Institutionalizing Policy-Level Health Impact Assessment in Europe: Is coupling health impact assessment with strategic environmental assessment the next step forward?. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007, 83 (6): 472-477.
30.
go back to reference Douglas MJ, Scott-Samuel A: Addressing Health Inequalities in Health Impact Assessment. JECH. 2001, 55 (7): 450-451. Douglas MJ, Scott-Samuel A: Addressing Health Inequalities in Health Impact Assessment. JECH. 2001, 55 (7): 450-451.
31.
go back to reference Harris-Roxas B, Simpson S, Harris E: Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment: A literature review. 2004, Sydney: CHETRE on behalf of the Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment Harris-Roxas B, Simpson S, Harris E: Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment: A literature review. 2004, Sydney: CHETRE on behalf of the Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment
32.
go back to reference Mackenbach J, Veerman L, Barendregt J, Kunst A: Health Inequalities and HIA. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. 2004, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 25-39. Mackenbach J, Veerman L, Barendregt J, Kunst A: Health Inequalities and HIA. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. 2004, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 25-39.
33.
go back to reference Parry J, Scully E: Health impact assessment and the consideration of health inequalities. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2003, 25 (3): 243-245. 10.1093/pubmed/fdg042.CrossRefPubMed Parry J, Scully E: Health impact assessment and the consideration of health inequalities. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 2003, 25 (3): 243-245. 10.1093/pubmed/fdg042.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Blau J, Ernst K, Wismar M, Baro F, Blenkus MG, von Bremen K, Fehr R, Gulis G, Kauppinen T, Mekel O, Nelimarkka N, Perttilä K, Scagnetti N, Sprenger M, Stegeman I, Welteke R: The use of HIA across Europe. The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment: Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. Edited by: Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J. 2007, Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 37-55. Blau J, Ernst K, Wismar M, Baro F, Blenkus MG, von Bremen K, Fehr R, Gulis G, Kauppinen T, Mekel O, Nelimarkka N, Perttilä K, Scagnetti N, Sprenger M, Stegeman I, Welteke R: The use of HIA across Europe. The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment: Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. Edited by: Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J. 2007, Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 37-55.
35.
go back to reference Kemm J: The future challenges for HIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25 (7-8): 799-807. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.012.CrossRef Kemm J: The future challenges for HIA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25 (7-8): 799-807. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.012.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Davenport C, Mathers J, Parry J: Use of Health Impact Assessment in Incorporating Health Considerations in Decision Making. JECH. 2006, 60: 196-201. Davenport C, Mathers J, Parry J: Use of Health Impact Assessment in Incorporating Health Considerations in Decision Making. JECH. 2006, 60: 196-201.
37.
go back to reference Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, Bassett M, Rehkopf DH, Miller C: Assessing Health Impact Assessment: Multidisciplinary and international perspectives. JECH. 2003, 57: 659-662. Krieger N, Northridge M, Gruskin S, Quinn M, Kriebel D, Davey Smith G, Bassett M, Rehkopf DH, Miller C: Assessing Health Impact Assessment: Multidisciplinary and international perspectives. JECH. 2003, 57: 659-662.
38.
go back to reference Fell G, Haroon S: Learning from a Rapid Health Impact Assessment of a Proposed Maternity Service Reconfiguration in the English NHS. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8 (138): Fell G, Haroon S: Learning from a Rapid Health Impact Assessment of a Proposed Maternity Service Reconfiguration in the English NHS. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8 (138):
39.
go back to reference Ahmad BS: Integrating Health into Impact Assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal. 2004, 22 (1): 2-4.CrossRef Ahmad BS: Integrating Health into Impact Assessment: Challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal. 2004, 22 (1): 2-4.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Birley M: A Review of Trends in Health-Impact Assessment and the Nature of the Evidence Used. Environmental Management and Health. 2002, 13 (1): 21-39. 10.1108/09566160210417804.CrossRef Birley M: A Review of Trends in Health-Impact Assessment and the Nature of the Evidence Used. Environmental Management and Health. 2002, 13 (1): 21-39. 10.1108/09566160210417804.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bond A: Lessons from EIA. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131-142. Bond A: Lessons from EIA. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131-142.
42.
go back to reference Kemm J: Can Health Impact Assessment Fulfil the Expectations it Raises?. Public Health. 2000, 114: 432-433. 10.1016/S0033-3506(00)00382-6.CrossRef Kemm J: Can Health Impact Assessment Fulfil the Expectations it Raises?. Public Health. 2000, 114: 432-433. 10.1016/S0033-3506(00)00382-6.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Everett S: The Policy Cycle: Democratic process or rational paradigm revisited?. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2003, 32 (2): 65-70. 10.1111/1467-8497.00325.CrossRef Everett S: The Policy Cycle: Democratic process or rational paradigm revisited?. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2003, 32 (2): 65-70. 10.1111/1467-8497.00325.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Stewart-Weeks M: From Control to Networks. Beyond the Policy Cycle: The policy process in Australia. Edited by: Colebatch H. 2006, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 184-202. Stewart-Weeks M: From Control to Networks. Beyond the Policy Cycle: The policy process in Australia. Edited by: Colebatch H. 2006, Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 184-202.
45.
go back to reference Quigley R, Cave B, Elliston K, Pratt A, Vohra S, Taylor L: Practical lessons for dealing with inequalities in health impact assessment. 2005, London: Health Development Agency Quigley R, Cave B, Elliston K, Pratt A, Vohra S, Taylor L: Practical lessons for dealing with inequalities in health impact assessment. 2005, London: Health Development Agency
46.
go back to reference Mahoney M, Simpson S, Harris E, Aldrich R, Stewart Williams J: Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment Framework. 2004, Newcastle: Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment Mahoney M, Simpson S, Harris E, Aldrich R, Stewart Williams J: Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment Framework. 2004, Newcastle: Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment
47.
go back to reference Simpson S, Mahoney M, Harris E, Aldrich R, Stewart-Williams J: Equity-Focused Health Impact Assessment: A tool to assist policy makers in addressing health inequalities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25: 772-782. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.010.CrossRef Simpson S, Mahoney M, Harris E, Aldrich R, Stewart-Williams J: Equity-Focused Health Impact Assessment: A tool to assist policy makers in addressing health inequalities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2005, 25: 772-782. 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.010.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Harris P, Harris-Roxas B, Kemp L: Health Impact Assessment in Urban Settings (Editorial). NSW Pub Health Bull. 2007, 18: 149-150. 10.1071/NB07104.CrossRef Harris P, Harris-Roxas B, Kemp L: Health Impact Assessment in Urban Settings (Editorial). NSW Pub Health Bull. 2007, 18: 149-150. 10.1071/NB07104.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference UCL: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post 2010 (Marmot Review). 2010, London: University College London UCL: Strategic Review of Health Inequalities in England Post 2010 (Marmot Review). 2010, London: University College London
50.
go back to reference Acheson D: Health Inequalities Impact Assessment. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation. 2000, 75-76. 78 Acheson D: Health Inequalities Impact Assessment. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation. 2000, 75-76. 78
51.
go back to reference WHO Europe: Health Impact Assessment: From theory to practice. Report on the Leo Kaprio Workshop Gothenburg 28-30 Octiber 1999. 2001, Stockholm: Nordic School of Public Health WHO Europe: Health Impact Assessment: From theory to practice. Report on the Leo Kaprio Workshop Gothenburg 28-30 Octiber 1999. 2001, Stockholm: Nordic School of Public Health
52.
go back to reference Barnes R: Equity and Health Impact Assessment Seminar Report, Manchester 16-17 June. 2000, Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory Barnes R: Equity and Health Impact Assessment Seminar Report, Manchester 16-17 June. 2000, Liverpool: Liverpool Public Health Observatory
53.
go back to reference WHO: The Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century. 1997, Geneva: World Health Organisation WHO: The Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century. 1997, Geneva: World Health Organisation
54.
go back to reference WHO: The Bangkok Charter on Health Promotion in a Globalized World. 2006, Geneva: World Health Organisation WHO: The Bangkok Charter on Health Promotion in a Globalized World. 2006, Geneva: World Health Organisation
55.
go back to reference Stewart Williams J, Aldrich R, Mahoney M, Harris E, Simpson S: Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment: Working collaboratively for a strategic framework. 2004, Newcastle: Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment Stewart Williams J, Aldrich R, Mahoney M, Harris E, Simpson S: Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment: Working collaboratively for a strategic framework. 2004, Newcastle: Australasian Collaboration for Health Equity Impact Assessment
56.
go back to reference Harris P, Harris-Roxas B, Harris E, Kemp L: Health Impact Assessment: A practical guide. 2007, Sydney: UNSW Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity and NSW Health Harris P, Harris-Roxas B, Harris E, Kemp L: Health Impact Assessment: A practical guide. 2007, Sydney: UNSW Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity and NSW Health
57.
go back to reference Abott T: Media Release: Better Health For All Australians. 2006, Canberra: Australian Government Minister for Health and Ageing Abott T: Media Release: Better Health For All Australians. 2006, Canberra: Australian Government Minister for Health and Ageing
58.
go back to reference Turrell G, Stanley L, de Looper MBO: Health Inequalities in Australia: Morbidity, health behaviours, risk factors and health service use. Health Inequalities Monitoring Series No 2. 2006, Canberra: Queensland University: AIHW Turrell G, Stanley L, de Looper MBO: Health Inequalities in Australia: Morbidity, health behaviours, risk factors and health service use. Health Inequalities Monitoring Series No 2. 2006, Canberra: Queensland University: AIHW
59.
go back to reference AIHW: Chronic Diseases and Associated Risk Factors in Australia. 2006, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cat. No PHE, 81 AIHW: Chronic Diseases and Associated Risk Factors in Australia. 2006, Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cat. No PHE, 81
60.
go back to reference Aldrich R, Kemp L, Williams JS, Harris E, Simpson S, Wilson A, McGill K, Byles J, Lowe J, Jackson T: Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2003, 327 (7426): 1283-1285. 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1283.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Aldrich R, Kemp L, Williams JS, Harris E, Simpson S, Wilson A, McGill K, Byles J, Lowe J, Jackson T: Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2003, 327 (7426): 1283-1285. 10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1283.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Lester C, Temple M: Health Impact Assessment and Community Involvement in Land Remediation Decisions. Public Health. 2006, 120 (10): 915-922. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.011.CrossRefPubMed Lester C, Temple M: Health Impact Assessment and Community Involvement in Land Remediation Decisions. Public Health. 2006, 120 (10): 915-922. 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.05.011.CrossRefPubMed
62.
go back to reference Lester C, Temple M: Rapid Collaborative Health Impact Assessment: A three-meeting process. Public Health. 2004, 118: 218-224. 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.08.005.CrossRefPubMed Lester C, Temple M: Rapid Collaborative Health Impact Assessment: A three-meeting process. Public Health. 2004, 118: 218-224. 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.08.005.CrossRefPubMed
63.
go back to reference PHAC: A Guide to Health Impact Assessment: A policy tool for New Zealand. 2005, Wellington: Public Health Advisory Committee, 2 PHAC: A Guide to Health Impact Assessment: A policy tool for New Zealand. 2005, Wellington: Public Health Advisory Committee, 2
64.
go back to reference Signal L, Martin J, Cram F, Robson B: Health Equity Assessment Tool: A user's guide. 2008, Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health Signal L, Martin J, Cram F, Robson B: Health Equity Assessment Tool: A user's guide. 2008, Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Health
65.
go back to reference Harris E, Harris P, Kemp L: Rapid Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment of the Australia Better Health Initiative: Assessing the NSW components of priorities 1 and 3. 2006, Sydney: Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales Harris E, Harris P, Kemp L: Rapid Equity Focused Health Impact Assessment of the Australia Better Health Initiative: Assessing the NSW components of priorities 1 and 3. 2006, Sydney: Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, University of New South Wales
66.
go back to reference Quigley R, Taylor L: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. Public Health. 2004, 118 (8): 544-552. 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.012.CrossRefPubMed Quigley R, Taylor L: Evaluating Health Impact Assessment. Public Health. 2004, 118 (8): 544-552. 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.012.CrossRefPubMed
67.
go back to reference Parry JM, Kemm JR, Evaluation of Health Impact Assessment W: Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments. Public Health. 2005, 119 (12): 1122-1129. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.002.CrossRefPubMed Parry JM, Kemm JR, Evaluation of Health Impact Assessment W: Criteria for use in the evaluation of health impact assessments. Public Health. 2005, 119 (12): 1122-1129. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.05.002.CrossRefPubMed
68.
go back to reference Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007, 19 (6): 349-357. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J: Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2007, 19 (6): 349-357. 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.CrossRefPubMed
69.
go back to reference Colaizzi PF: Psychological Research as the Phenomenologist Views It. Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. Edited by: Valle RS, King M. 1978, New York: Oxford University Press, 48-71. Colaizzi PF: Psychological Research as the Phenomenologist Views It. Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. Edited by: Valle RS, King M. 1978, New York: Oxford University Press, 48-71.
70.
go back to reference Wojnar DM, Swanson KM: Phenomenology: An Exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2007, 25 (3): 172-180. 10.1177/0898010106295172.CrossRefPubMed Wojnar DM, Swanson KM: Phenomenology: An Exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2007, 25 (3): 172-180. 10.1177/0898010106295172.CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference NSW Health: NSW Health and Equity Statement: In All Fairness. 2004, Sydney: New South Wales Department of Health NSW Health: NSW Health and Equity Statement: In All Fairness. 2004, Sydney: New South Wales Department of Health
72.
go back to reference Mathias K, Harris-Roxas B: Process and Impact Evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9 (1): 97-10.1186/1471-2458-9-97.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mathias K, Harris-Roxas B: Process and Impact Evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban Development Strategy Health Impact Assessment. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9 (1): 97-10.1186/1471-2458-9-97.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
73.
go back to reference Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J, (eds.): The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment: Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. 2007, Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, World Health Organization Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J, (eds.): The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment: Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. 2007, Copenhagen: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, World Health Organization
74.
go back to reference O'Reilly J, Trueman P, Redmond S, Yi Y, Wright D: Cost Benefit Analysis of Health Impact Assessment. 2006, York: York Health Economics Consortium O'Reilly J, Trueman P, Redmond S, Yi Y, Wright D: Cost Benefit Analysis of Health Impact Assessment. 2006, York: York Health Economics Consortium
75.
go back to reference Veerman JL, Bekker MP, Mackenbach JP: Health Impact Assessment and Advocacy: A challenging combination. Sozial-und Praventivmedizin. 2006, 51: 151-152. 10.1007/s00038-006-0034-z.CrossRefPubMed Veerman JL, Bekker MP, Mackenbach JP: Health Impact Assessment and Advocacy: A challenging combination. Sozial-und Praventivmedizin. 2006, 51: 151-152. 10.1007/s00038-006-0034-z.CrossRefPubMed
76.
go back to reference Bekker M: The Politics of Healthy Policies: Redesigning health impact assessment to to integrate health in public policy. 2007, Delft: Eburon Uitgeverij B.V Bekker M: The Politics of Healthy Policies: Redesigning health impact assessment to to integrate health in public policy. 2007, Delft: Eburon Uitgeverij B.V
77.
go back to reference Sadler B: Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating to improve performace - Final report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. 1996, Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the International Association for Impact Assessment Sadler B: Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluating to improve performace - Final report of the International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment. 1996, Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the International Association for Impact Assessment
78.
go back to reference Steinemann A: Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2001, 21 (1): 3-21. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00075-5.CrossRef Steinemann A: Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2001, 21 (1): 3-21. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00075-5.CrossRef
79.
go back to reference Benson JF: What is the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2003, 21 (4): 261-280. 10.3152/147154603781766185.CrossRef Benson JF: What is the alternative? Impact assessment tools and sustainable planning. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 2003, 21 (4): 261-280. 10.3152/147154603781766185.CrossRef
80.
go back to reference Kearney M: Walking the Walk? Community Participation in HIA: A qualitative interview study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2004, 24 (2): 217-229. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.012.CrossRef Kearney M: Walking the Walk? Community Participation in HIA: A qualitative interview study. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2004, 24 (2): 217-229. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.012.CrossRef
81.
go back to reference Mahoney M, Potter JL, Marsh R: Community participation in HIA: Discords in teleology and terminology. Critical Public Health. 2007, 17 (3): 229-241. 10.1080/09581590601080953.CrossRef Mahoney M, Potter JL, Marsh R: Community participation in HIA: Discords in teleology and terminology. Critical Public Health. 2007, 17 (3): 229-241. 10.1080/09581590601080953.CrossRef
82.
go back to reference Fiorino DJ: Environmental Policy As Learning: A new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review. 2001, 61 (3): 322-334. 10.1111/0033-3352.00033.CrossRef Fiorino DJ: Environmental Policy As Learning: A new view of an old landscape. Public Administration Review. 2001, 61 (3): 322-334. 10.1111/0033-3352.00033.CrossRef
83.
go back to reference Hayward G, Diduck A, Mitchell B: Social Learning Outcomes in the Red River Floodway Environmental Assessment. Environmental Practice. 2007, 9 (4): 239-250. 10.1017/S1466046607070561.CrossRef Hayward G, Diduck A, Mitchell B: Social Learning Outcomes in the Red River Floodway Environmental Assessment. Environmental Practice. 2007, 9 (4): 239-250. 10.1017/S1466046607070561.CrossRef
84.
go back to reference Muro M, Jeffrey P: A Critical Review of the Theory and Application of Social Learning in Participatory Natural Resource Management Processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2008, 51 (3): 325-344. 10.1080/09640560801977190.CrossRef Muro M, Jeffrey P: A Critical Review of the Theory and Application of Social Learning in Participatory Natural Resource Management Processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. 2008, 51 (3): 325-344. 10.1080/09640560801977190.CrossRef
85.
go back to reference Saarikoski H: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as Collaborative Learning Process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2000, 20 (6): 681-700. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00059-7.CrossRef Saarikoski H: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as Collaborative Learning Process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 2000, 20 (6): 681-700. 10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00059-7.CrossRef
86.
go back to reference Glasbergen P: Learning to Manage the Environment. Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Edited by: Lafferty W, Meadowcroft J. 1999, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 175-193. Glasbergen P: Learning to Manage the Environment. Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects. Edited by: Lafferty W, Meadowcroft J. 1999, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 175-193.
87.
go back to reference Bandura A, Walters R: Social Learning and Personality Development. 1963, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston Bandura A, Walters R: Social Learning and Personality Development. 1963, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
88.
go back to reference Abdel Aziz M, Radford J, McCabe J: The Finningley Airport HIA: A case study in health impact assessment. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 285-298. Abdel Aziz M, Radford J, McCabe J: The Finningley Airport HIA: A case study in health impact assessment. Health Impact Assessment. Edited by: Kemm J, Parry J, Palmer S. 2004, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 285-298.
89.
go back to reference Close N: Alconbury Airfield Development Health Impact Assessment Evaluation Report. 2001, Cambridge: Cambridgeshire Health Authority Close N: Alconbury Airfield Development Health Impact Assessment Evaluation Report. 2001, Cambridge: Cambridgeshire Health Authority
90.
go back to reference Scott-Samuel A, Birley M, Ardern K: The Merseyside Guidelines for Health Impact Assessment. 2001, Liverpool: International Health Impact Assessment Consortium (IMPACT), 2 Scott-Samuel A, Birley M, Ardern K: The Merseyside Guidelines for Health Impact Assessment. 2001, Liverpool: International Health Impact Assessment Consortium (IMPACT), 2
91.
go back to reference Sackett D: Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Disease. 1979, 32: 51-63. 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2.CrossRef Sackett D: Bias in analytic research. Journal of Chronic Disease. 1979, 32: 51-63. 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2.CrossRef
92.
go back to reference QSR: NVivo. 2008, Melbourne: QSR International, 8 QSR: NVivo. 2008, Melbourne: QSR International, 8
Metadata
Title
A rapid equity focused health impact assessment of a policy implementation plan: An Australian case study and impact evaluation
Authors
Ben F Harris-Roxas
Patrick J Harris
Elizabeth Harris
Lynn A Kemp
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1475-9276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

International Journal for Equity in Health 1/2011 Go to the issue