Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Patients (PCQ-P): Reliability, validity and acceptability

Authors: Carolyn Tarrant, Richard Baker, Andrew M Colman, Paul Sinfield, Shona Agarwal, John K Mellon, William Steward, Roger Kockelbergh

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In England, prostate cancer patients report worse experience of care than patients with other cancers. However, no standard measure of patient experience of prostate cancer care is currently available. This paper describes an evaluation of the reliability, validity and acceptability of the PCQ-P, a newly developed instrument designed to measure patient experience of prostate cancer care.

Methods

The reliability, acceptability and validity of the PCQ-P were tested through a postal survey and interviews with patients. The PCQ-P was posted to 1087 prostate cancer patients varying in age, occupation, and overall health status, sampled from five hospitals in England. Nonresponders received one reminder. To assess criterion validity, 935 patients were also sent sections of the National Centre for Social Research Shortened Questionnaire; and to assess test-retest reliability, 296 patients who responded to the questionnaire were resent it a second time three weeks later. A subsample of 20 prostate cancer patients from one hospital took part in qualitative interviews to assess validity and acceptability of the PCQ-P. Acceptability to service providers was evaluated based on four hospitals' experiences of running a survey using the PCQ-P.

Results

Questionnaires were returned by 865 patients (69.2%). Missing data was low across the sections, with the proportion of patients completing less than 50% of each section ranging from 4.5% to 6.9%. Across the sections of the questionnaire, internal consistency was moderate to high (Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.63 to 0.80), and test-retest stability was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.57 to 0.73). Findings on criterion validity were significant. Patient interviews indicated that the PCQ-P had high face validity and acceptability. Feedback from hospitals indicated that they found the questionnaire useful, and highlighted important considerations for its future use as part of quality improvement initiatives.

Conclusion

The PCQ-P has been found to be acceptable to patients and service providers, and is ready for use for the measurement of patient experience in routine practice, service improvement programmes, and research.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Airey C, Becher H, Erens B, Fuller E: National Survey of NHS Patients - Cancer: National Overview 1999/2000. 2002, London: Department of Health Airey C, Becher H, Erens B, Fuller E: National Survey of NHS Patients - Cancer: National Overview 1999/2000. 2002, London: Department of Health
2.
go back to reference National Audit Office: National Patient Survey (Cancer). 2004, Oxford: Picker Institute National Audit Office: National Patient Survey (Cancer). 2004, Oxford: Picker Institute
3.
go back to reference Department of Health: The NHS Cancer Plan and the new NHS: Providing a patientcentred service. 2004, London: Department of Health Department of Health: The NHS Cancer Plan and the new NHS: Providing a patientcentred service. 2004, London: Department of Health
4.
go back to reference Department of Health: Cancer Reform Strategy. 2007, London: Department of Health Department of Health: Cancer Reform Strategy. 2007, London: Department of Health
5.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30 (6): 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Sherbourne CD: The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992, 30 (6): 473-483. 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference McNaughton M, Collins M, Walker-Corkery E, Barry MJ: Health-related quality of life, satisfaction and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment 1990-2000. J Natl Cancer I Monogr. 2004, 33: 78-101. 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh016.CrossRef McNaughton M, Collins M, Walker-Corkery E, Barry MJ: Health-related quality of life, satisfaction and economic outcome measures in studies of prostate cancer screening and treatment 1990-2000. J Natl Cancer I Monogr. 2004, 33: 78-101. 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgh016.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Darzi A: High Quality Care for All. 2008, London, Department of Health Darzi A: High Quality Care for All. 2008, London, Department of Health
9.
go back to reference Sinfield P, Baker R, Tarrant C, Agarwal S, Colman AM, Steward W, Kockelbergh R, Mellon JK: Development of measures of patient and carer experience of prostate cancer care. 3. Reliability, validity and acceptability of the Prostate Care Questionnaire for Carers (PCQ-C). BMC Health Serv Res. Sinfield P, Baker R, Tarrant C, Agarwal S, Colman AM, Steward W, Kockelbergh R, Mellon JK: Development of measures of patient and carer experience of prostate cancer care. 3. Reliability, validity and acceptability of the Prostate Care Questionnaire for Carers (PCQ-C). BMC Health Serv Res.
10.
go back to reference Baker R, Sinfield P, Agarwal S, Tarrant C, Mellon K, Steward W, Colman AM, Kockelbergh R, Sproston K: Prostate Cancer Care: Improving Measures of the Patient Experience Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D. London: NCCSDO. 2007, [http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/sdo772004.html] Baker R, Sinfield P, Agarwal S, Tarrant C, Mellon K, Steward W, Colman AM, Kockelbergh R, Sproston K: Prostate Cancer Care: Improving Measures of the Patient Experience Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R&D. London: NCCSDO. 2007, [http://​www.​sdo.​nihr.​ac.​uk/​sdo772004.​html]
11.
go back to reference Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C: Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners?. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 73: 91-6. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.001.CrossRefPubMed Sinfield P, Baker R, Agarwal S, Tarrant C: Patient-centred care: what are the experiences of prostate cancer patients and their partners?. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 73: 91-6. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.001.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sinfield P, Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Colman AM, Tarrant C, Mellon JK, Steward W, Kockelbergh R, Agarwal S: Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review. Health Expect. 2009, 12 (3): 301-312. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00546.x.CrossRefPubMed Sinfield P, Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Colman AM, Tarrant C, Mellon JK, Steward W, Kockelbergh R, Agarwal S: Men's and carers' experiences of care for prostate cancer: a narrative literature review. Health Expect. 2009, 12 (3): 301-312. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00546.x.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Prescott A: National Survey of NHS Patients - Cancer: Analysis of Themes. 2004, London: Department of Health Prescott A: National Survey of NHS Patients - Cancer: Analysis of Themes. 2004, London: Department of Health
15.
go back to reference Cohen J: A power primer. Psych Bull. 1992, 112: 155-9. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRef Cohen J: A power primer. Psych Bull. 1992, 112: 155-9. 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Edited by: Hillsdale NJ. 1988, Country: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2 Cohen J: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Edited by: Hillsdale NJ. 1988, Country: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2
17.
go back to reference Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951, 16: 297-333. 10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRef Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951, 16: 297-333. 10.1007/BF02310555.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pasta DJ, Suhr D: Creating scales from questionnaires: PROC VARCLUS vs. factor analysis. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (Paper 205-29). 2004, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc Pasta DJ, Suhr D: Creating scales from questionnaires: PROC VARCLUS vs. factor analysis. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference (Paper 205-29). 2004, Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc
20.
go back to reference Department of Health: World Class Commissioning: Competencies. 2007, London: Department of Health Department of Health: World Class Commissioning: Competencies. 2007, London: Department of Health
Metadata
Title
The Prostate Care Questionnaire for Patients (PCQ-P): Reliability, validity and acceptability
Authors
Carolyn Tarrant
Richard Baker
Andrew M Colman
Paul Sinfield
Shona Agarwal
John K Mellon
William Steward
Roger Kockelbergh
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-9-199

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Health Services Research 1/2009 Go to the issue