Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research article

Psychometric properties of the Iranian interview-administered version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF): A population-based study

Authors: Saharnaz Nedjat, Ali Montazeri, Kourosh Holakouie, Kazem Mohammad, Reza Majdzadeh

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The objective of the current study was to translate and validate the Iranian version of the WHOQOL-BREF.

Methods

A forward-backward translation procedure was followed to develop the Iranian version of the questionnaire. A stratified random sample of individuals aged 18 and over completed the questionnaire in Tehran, Iran. Psychometric properties of the instrument including reliability (internal consistency, and test-retest analysis), validity (known groups' comparison and convergent validity), and items' correlation with their hypothesized domains were assessed.

Results

In all 1164 individuals entered into the study. The mean age of the participants was 36.6 (SD = 13.2) years, and the mean years of their formal education was 10.7 (SD = 4.4). In general the questionnaire received well and all domains met the minimum reliability standards (Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation > 0.7), except for social relationships (alpha = 0.55). Performing known groups' comparison analysis, the results indicated that the questionnaire discriminated well between subgroups of the study samples differing in their health status. Since the WHOQOL-BREF demonstrated statistically significant correlation with the Iranian version of the SF-36 as expected, the convergent validity of the questionnaire was found to be desirable. Correlation matrix also showed satisfactory results in all domains except for social relationships.

Conclusion

This study has provided some preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of the WHOQOL-BREF to be used in Iran, though further research is required to challenge the problems of reliability in one of the dimensions and the instrument's factor structure.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fairclough DL: Introduction. Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials. 2002, New York: Champan and Hall/CRC, 4-15. Fairclough DL: Introduction. Design and Analysis of Quality of Life Studies in Clinical Trials. 2002, New York: Champan and Hall/CRC, 4-15.
2.
go back to reference Fayers PM, Machin D: Introduction. Quality of Life Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. 2000, UK: John Willy and Sons, 3-10. Fayers PM, Machin D: Introduction. Quality of Life Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation. 2000, UK: John Willy and Sons, 3-10.
3.
go back to reference King CR: Overview of Quality of Life and Controversial Issues. Quality of Life from Nursing and Patient Perspective. 2003, New York: Jones and Bartlett publishers, 29-44. King CR: Overview of Quality of Life and Controversial Issues. Quality of Life from Nursing and Patient Perspective. 2003, New York: Jones and Bartlett publishers, 29-44.
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization's Quality of Life group: Measuring Quality of Life; Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). 1992 World Health Organization's Quality of Life group: Measuring Quality of Life; Development of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). 1992
5.
go back to reference World Health Organization's Quality of Life group: WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration and Scoring, Field Trial version. 1996 World Health Organization's Quality of Life group: WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration and Scoring, Field Trial version. 1996
6.
go back to reference Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B: The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005, 14: 875-882. 10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5.CrossRefPubMed Montazeri A, Goshtasebi A, Vahdaninia M, Gandek B: The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Qual Life Res. 2005, 14: 875-882. 10.1007/s11136-004-1014-5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M: Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53: 1-12. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00123-7.CrossRefPubMed Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M: Validation of the United States' version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53: 1-12. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00123-7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M: Quality of life measurement: will we ever be satisfied?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53: 19-23. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00121-3.CrossRefPubMed Bonomi AE, Patrick DL, Bushnell DM, Martin M: Quality of life measurement: will we ever be satisfied?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53: 19-23. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00121-3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Anastasia A: Validity: Basic Concepts. Psychological Testing. 1990, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 139-157. 6 Anastasia A: Validity: Basic Concepts. Psychological Testing. 1990, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 139-157. 6
11.
go back to reference Ruth M, Mickey OJD, Virginia A, Clark : Applied Statistics. Analyses of Variance and Regression. 2004, New Jersey: John Willey Interscience, 3 Ruth M, Mickey OJD, Virginia A, Clark : Applied Statistics. Analyses of Variance and Regression. 2004, New Jersey: John Willey Interscience, 3
12.
go back to reference Fliess JL: Reliability of Measurement. The design and analysis of clinical experiment. 1999, New York: John Willy and Sons, 1-28.CrossRef Fliess JL: Reliability of Measurement. The design and analysis of clinical experiment. 1999, New York: John Willy and Sons, 1-28.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA: The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 299-310. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.CrossRefPubMed Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA: The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 299-310. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Izutsu T, Tsutsumi A, Islam A, Matsuo Y, Yamada HS, Kurita H, Wakai S: Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh. Qual Life Res. 2005, 14: 1783-1789. 10.1007/s11136-005-1744-z.CrossRefPubMed Izutsu T, Tsutsumi A, Islam A, Matsuo Y, Yamada HS, Kurita H, Wakai S: Validity and reliability of the Bangla version of WHOQOL-BREF on an adolescent population in Bangladesh. Qual Life Res. 2005, 14: 1783-1789. 10.1007/s11136-005-1744-z.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Noerholm V, Groenvold M, Watt T, Bjorner JB, Rasmussen NA, Bech P: Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rash and item response theory models. Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 531-540. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018485.05372.d6.CrossRefPubMed Noerholm V, Groenvold M, Watt T, Bjorner JB, Rasmussen NA, Bech P: Quality of life in the Danish general population--normative data and validity of WHOQOL-BREF using Rash and item response theory models. Qual Life Res. 2004, 13: 531-540. 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018485.05372.d6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Huang IC, Wu AW, Frangakis C: Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population. Qual Life Res. 2006, 15: 15-24. 10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9.CrossRefPubMed Huang IC, Wu AW, Frangakis C: Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF measure the same constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan population. Qual Life Res. 2006, 15: 15-24. 10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ware GB: Methods for Testing Data Quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability; The IQOLA Project Approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998, 51: 945-952. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7.CrossRefPubMed Ware GB: Methods for Testing Data Quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability; The IQOLA Project Approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998, 51: 945-952. 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00085-7.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Psychometric properties of the Iranian interview-administered version of the World Health Organization's Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF): A population-based study
Authors
Saharnaz Nedjat
Ali Montazeri
Kourosh Holakouie
Kazem Mohammad
Reza Majdzadeh
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-61

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Health Services Research 1/2008 Go to the issue