Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Rachel Reeves, Elizabeth West, David Barron

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

England’s extensive NHS patient survey programme has not fulfilled government promises of widespread improvements in patients’ experiences, and media reports of poor nursing care in NHS hospitals are increasingly common. Impediments to the surveys’ impact on the quality of nursing care may include: the fact that they are not ward-specific, so nurses claim “that doesn’t happen on my ward”; nurses’ scepticism about the relevance of patient feedback to their practice; and lack of prompt communication of results. The surveys’ impact could be increased by: conducting ward-specific surveys; returning results to ward staff more quickly; including patients’ written comments in reports; and offering nurses an opportunity to discuss the feedback. Very few randomised trials have been conducted to test the effectiveness of patient feedback on quality improvement and there have been few, if any, published trials of ward-specific patient surveys.

Methods

Over two years, postal surveys of recent inpatients were conducted at four-monthly intervals in 18 wards in two NHS Trusts in England. Wards were randomly allocated to Basic Feedback (ward-specific printed patient survey results including patients’ written comments sent to nurses by letter); Feedback Plus (in addition to printed results, ward meetings to discuss results and plan improvements) or Control (no active feedback of survey results). Patient survey responses to questions about nursing care were used to compute wards’ average Nursing Care Scores at each interval. Nurses’ reactions to the patient feedback were recorded.

Results

Conducting ward-level surveys and delivering ward-specific results was feasible. Ward meetings were effective for engaging nurses and challenging scepticism and patients’ written comments stimulated interest. 4,236 (47%) patients returned questionnaires. Nursing Care Scores improved more for Feedback Plus than Basic Feedback or Control (difference between Control and Feedback Plus = 8.28 ± 7.2 (p = 0.02)).

Conclusions

This study provides preliminary evidence that facilitated patient feedback can improve patients’ experiences such that a full trial is justified. These findings suggest that merely informing nurses of patient survey results in writing does not stimulate improvements, even if results are disaggregated by ward, but the addition of ward meetings had an important and significant impact.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Department of Health: The New NHS: Modern, Dependable. 1997, London: The Stationery Office Department of Health: The New NHS: Modern, Dependable. 1997, London: The Stationery Office
2.
go back to reference Department of Health: Shifting the Balance of Power within the NHS: Securing Delivery. 2001, London: The Stationery Office Department of Health: Shifting the Balance of Power within the NHS: Securing Delivery. 2001, London: The Stationery Office
3.
go back to reference Department of Health: The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. 2000, London: The Stationery Office Department of Health: The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. 2000, London: The Stationery Office
4.
go back to reference Department of Health: Creating a Patient-led NHS, Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. 2005, London: The Stationery Office Department of Health: Creating a Patient-led NHS, Delivering the NHS Improvement Plan. 2005, London: The Stationery Office
5.
go back to reference Department of Health: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010, London: The Stationery Office Department of Health: Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. 2010, London: The Stationery Office
9.
go back to reference Reeves R, Seccombe I: Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality improvement initiatives. Qual Saf Healthc. 2008, 17: 437-441. 10.1136/qshc.2007.022749.CrossRef Reeves R, Seccombe I: Do patient surveys work? The influence of a national survey programme on local quality improvement initiatives. Qual Saf Healthc. 2008, 17: 437-441. 10.1136/qshc.2007.022749.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference YouGov: The patient experience. 2005, London: The Health Foundation YouGov: The patient experience. 2005, London: The Health Foundation
11.
go back to reference Draper M, Cohen P, Buchan H: Seeking consumer views: what use are results of hospital patient satisfaction surveys?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001, 13: 463-468. 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.463.CrossRefPubMed Draper M, Cohen P, Buchan H: Seeking consumer views: what use are results of hospital patient satisfaction surveys?. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001, 13: 463-468. 10.1093/intqhc/13.6.463.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Davies E, Cleary PD: Hearing the patient’s voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005, 14: 428-432. 10.1136/qshc.2004.012955.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davies E, Cleary PD: Hearing the patient’s voice? Factors affecting the use of patient survey data in quality improvement. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005, 14: 428-432. 10.1136/qshc.2004.012955.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Davies E, Meterko M, Charns M, Nealon M, Cleary P: Factors affecting the use of patient survey data for quality improvement in the Veterans Health Administration. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011, 11: 334-10.1186/1472-6963-11-334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davies E, Meterko M, Charns M, Nealon M, Cleary P: Factors affecting the use of patient survey data for quality improvement in the Veterans Health Administration. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011, 11: 334-10.1186/1472-6963-11-334.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Ham C: Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership. Lancet. 2003, 361: 1978-1980. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13593-3.CrossRefPubMed Ham C: Improving the performance of health services: the role of clinical leadership. Lancet. 2003, 361: 1978-1980. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13593-3.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Boyer L, Francois P, Doutre E, Weil G, Labarere J: Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006, 18: 359-364. 10.1093/intqhc/mzl029.CrossRefPubMed Boyer L, Francois P, Doutre E, Weil G, Labarere J: Perception and use of the results of patient satisfaction surveys by care providers in a French teaching hospital. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006, 18: 359-364. 10.1093/intqhc/mzl029.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Conry MC, Humphries N, Morgan K, McGowan Y, Montgomery A, Vedhara K, Panagopoulou E, McGee H: A 10 year (2000–2010) systematic review of interventions to improve quality of care in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012, 12: 275-10.1186/1472-6963-12-275.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Conry MC, Humphries N, Morgan K, McGowan Y, Montgomery A, Vedhara K, Panagopoulou E, McGee H: A 10 year (2000–2010) systematic review of interventions to improve quality of care in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012, 12: 275-10.1186/1472-6963-12-275.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Delamothe T: We need to talk about nursing. BMJ. 2011, 342: d3416-10.1136/bmj.d3416. doiCrossRef Delamothe T: We need to talk about nursing. BMJ. 2011, 342: d3416-10.1136/bmj.d3416. doiCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Groves R, Fowler F, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Singer E, Tourangeau R: Survey Methodology. 2004, New York: Wiley Groves R, Fowler F, Couper M, Lepkowski J, Singer E, Tourangeau R: Survey Methodology. 2004, New York: Wiley
25.
go back to reference Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al: Framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000, 321: 694-696. 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al: Framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000, 321: 694-696. 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: 979-983. 10.1136/bmj.a979.CrossRef Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008, 337: 979-983. 10.1136/bmj.a979.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Goldsmith CH: A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and How. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010, 10: 1-10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, Robson R, Thabane M, Goldsmith CH: A tutorial on pilot studies: The what, why and How. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010, 10: 1-10.1186/1471-2288-10-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG: Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999, 3: iii-92.PubMed Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG: Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999, 3: iii-92.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Facilitated patient experience feedback can improve nursing care: a pilot study for a phase III cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Rachel Reeves
Elizabeth West
David Barron
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-259

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Health Services Research 1/2013 Go to the issue