Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

ACC 2024 Congress

Catch up on all the top stories and latest evidence in cardiology research with our ACC 2024 Congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Cost-effectiveness of a health-social partnership transitional program for post-discharge medical patients

Authors: Frances Kam Yuet Wong, June Chau, Ching So, Stanley Ku Fu Tam, Sarah McGhee

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Readmissions are costly and have implications for quality of care. Studies have been reported to support effects of transitional care programs in reducing hospital readmissions and enhancing clinical outcomes. However, there is a paucity of studies executing full economic evaluation to assess the cost-effectiveness of these transitional care programs. This study is therefore launched to fill this knowledge gap.

Methods

Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a randomized controlled trial that examined the effects of a Health-Social Transitional Care Management Program (HSTCMP) for medical patients discharged from an acute regional hospital in Hong Kong. The cost and health outcomes were compared between the patients receiving the HSTCMP and usual care. The total costs comprised the pre-program, program, and healthcare utilization costs. Quality of life was measured with SF-36 and transformed to utility values between 0 and 1.

Results

The readmission rates within 28 (control 10.2%, study 4.0%) and 84 days (control 19.4%, study 8.1%) were significantly higher in the control group. Utility values showed no difference between the control and study groups at baseline (p = 0.308). Utility values for the study group were significantly higher than in the control group at 28 (p < 0.001) and 84 days (p = 0.002). The study group also had a significantly higher QALYs gain (p < 0.001) over time at 28 and 84 days when compared with the control group. The intervention had an 89% chance of being cost-effective at the threshold of £20000/QALY.

Conclusions

Previous studies on transitional care focused mainly on clinical outcomes and not too many included cost as an outcome measure. Studies examining the cost-effectiveness of the post-discharge support services are scanty. This study is the first to examine the cost-effectiveness of a transitional care program that used nurse-led services participated by volunteers. Results have shown that a health-social partnership transitional care program is cost-effective in reducing healthcare costs and attaining QALY gains. Economic evaluation helps to inform funders and guide decisions for the effective use of competing healthcare resources.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Hammer JB: State of the Science: Posthospitalization nursing interventions in congestive heart failure. Adv Nurs Sci. 2005, 28: 175-190.CrossRef
2.
Wong FK, Mok MP, Chan T, Tsang MW: Nurse follow-up of patients with diabetes: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2005, 50: 391-402.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Yu DS, Thompson DR, Lee DT: Disease management programmes for older people with heart failure: crucial characteristics which improve post-discharge outcomes. Eur Heart J. 2006, 27: 596-612.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Naylor MD, Brooten DA, Campbell RL, Maislin G, McCauley KM, Schwartz JS: Transitional care of older adults hospitalized with heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004, 52: 675-684.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Gonseth J, Guallar-Castillon P, Banegas JR, Rodriguez-Artalejo F: The effectiveness of disease management programmes in reducing hospital re-admission in older patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published reports. Eur Heart J. 2004, 25: 1570-1595.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Wong FK, Ho MM, Yeung S, Tam SK, Chow SK: Effects of a health-social partnership transitional program on hospital readmission: A randomized controlled trial. Soc Sci Med. 2011, 73: 960-969.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Wong FK, Chow SK, Chung L, Chang K, Chan T, Lee WM, Lee R: Can home visits help reduce hospital readmissions? Randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2008, 62: 585-595.CrossRefPubMed
8.
McCusker J, Verdon J: Do geriatric interventions reduce emergency department visits? A systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006, 61: 53-62.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Courtney M, Edwards H, Chang A, Parker A, Finlayson K, Hamilton K: Fewer emergency readmissions and better quality of life for older adults at risk of hospital readmission: A randomized controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of a 24-weeks exercise and telephone follow-up program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009, 57: 395-402.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Ledwidge M, Barry M, Cahill J, Ryan E, Mauer B, Ryder M, Travers B, Timmons L, McDonald K: Is multidisciplinary care of heart failure cost-beneficial when combined with optimal medical care. Eur J Heart Fail. 2003, 5: 381-389.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Legrain S, Tubach F, Bonnet-Zamponi D, Lemaire A, Aquino JP, Paillaud E, Taillandier-Hieriche E, Thomas C, Verny M, Pasquet B, Moutet AL, Lieberherr D, Lacaille S: A new multimodal geriatric discharge-planning intervention to prevent emergency visits and rehospitalizations of older adults: the optimization of medication in AGEd Multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011, 59: 2017-2028.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Kwok T, Lee J, Woo J, Lee DT, Griffith S: A randomized controlled trial of a community nurse-supported hospital discharge programme in older patients with chronic heart failure. J Clin Nurs. 2008, 1: 109-117.
13.
Miller P, Gladman JR, Cunliffe AL, Husbands SL, Dewey ME, Harwood RH: Economic analysis of an early discharge rehabilitation service for older people. Age Ageing. 2005, 34: 274-280.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Drummond MF, Sculper MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL: Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2005, Oxford: Oxford University Press
15.
Patel A, Knapp M, Perez I, Evans A, Kalra L: Alternative strategies for stroke care. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2004, 35: 196-203.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Stewart S, Blue L, Walker A, Morrison C, Mcmurray JJ: An economic analysis of specialist heart failure nurse management in the UK: Can we afford not to implement it?. Eur Heart J. 2002, 23: 1369-1378.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Martin K: The Omaha System: A key to practice, documentation, and information management. 2005, St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders, 2nd
18.
Faulkner M, Davies S: Social support in the healthcare setting: the role of volunteers. Health Soc Care Community. 2005, 13: 38-45.CrossRefPubMed
19.
McGhee SM, Brazier J, Lam CL, Wong LC, Chau J, Cheung A, Ho A: Quality-adjusted life years: population-specific measurement of the quality component. Hong Kong Med J. 2011, 17 (Suppl 6): 17-21.PubMed
20.
21.
22.
23.
Carpenter J, Bithell J: Bootstrap confidence intervals: when, which, what? A practical guide for medical statisticians. Stat Med. 2000, 19: 1141-1164.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Rummery K, Coleman A: Primary health and social care services in the UK: progress towards partnership?. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56: 1773-1782.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Petersson P, Springett J, Blomqvist K: Telling stories from everyday practice, an opportunity to see a bigger picture: a participatory action research project about developing discharge planning. Health Soc Care Community. 2009, 17: 548-556.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Karwalajtys T, McDonough B, Hall H, Guirguis-Younger M, Chambers LW, Kaczorowski J, Lohfeld L, Hutchison B: Development of the volunteer peer educator role in a community cardiovascular health awareness program (CHAP): A process evaluation in two communities. J Community Health. 2009, 34: 336-345.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Sandhaus S, Zalon ML, Valenti D, Dzielak E, Smego RA, Arzamasova U: A volunteer-based hospital elderly life program to reduce delirium. Health Care Manag. 2010, 29: 150-156.
29.
Kodner DL: Whole-system approaches to health and social care partnerships for the frail elderly: an exploration of North American models and lessons. Health Soc Care Community. 2006, 14: 384-390.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Whitehead SJ, Ali S: Health outcomes in economic evaluation: the QALY and utilities. Br Med Bull. 2010, 96: 5-21.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Mason JM, Young RJ, New JP, Gibson JM, Long AF, Gambling T, Friede T: Economic analysis of a telemedicine intervention to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus. Dis Management Health Outcomes. 2006, 14: 377-385.CrossRef
32.
Richardson G, Kennedy A, Reeves D, Bower P, Lee V, Middleton E, Gardner C, Rogers A: Cost effectiveness of the expert patients programme (EPP) for patients with chronic conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008, 62: 361-367.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hudson DL: See change or quick fix? Policy on long-term conditions in England. Health Soc Care Community. 2005, 13: 378-385.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Hickey J: Integrating health and social care services. Nur Man. 2008, 15: 20-24.
Metadata
Title
Cost-effectiveness of a health-social partnership transitional program for post-discharge medical patients
Authors
Frances Kam Yuet Wong
June Chau
Ching So
Stanley Ku Fu Tam
Sarah McGhee
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-479

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Go to the issue

Research article

How does lean work in emergency care? A case study of a lean-inspired intervention at the Astrid Lindgren Children's hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Research article

HIV/aids related home based care practices among primary health care workers in Ogun state, Nigeria

Debate

Building a house on shifting sand: methodological considerations when evaluating the implementation and adoption of national electronic health record systems

Research article

Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis

Research article

Service provision and barriers to care for homeless people with mental health problems across 14 European capital cities

Research article

Effect of the delegation of GP-home visits on the development of the number of patients in an ambulatory healthcare centre in Germany