Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Study protocol

Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users

Authors: Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Johanne Gagnon, Michèle St-Pierre, François-Pierre Gauvin, Florence Piron, Marc Rhainds, Martin Coulombe, Dolores Lepage-Savary, Marie Desmartis, Mylène Tantchou Dipankui, France Légaré

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The literature recognizes a need for greater patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA), but few studies have been reported, especially at the local level. Following the decentralisation of HTA in Quebec, Canada, the last few years have seen the creation of HTA units in many Quebec university hospital centres. These units represent a unique opportunity for increased patient involvement in HTA at the local level. Our project will engage patients in an assessment being carried out by a local HTA team to assess alternatives to isolation and restraint for hospitalized or institutionalized adults. Our objectives are to: 1) validate a reference framework for exploring the relevance and applicability of various models of patient involvement in HTA, 2) implement strategies that involve patients (including close relatives and representatives) at different stages of the HTA process, 3) evaluate intervention processes, and 4) explore the impact of these interventions on a) the applicability and acceptability of recommendations arising from the assessment, b) patient satisfaction, and c) the sustainability of this approach in HTA.

Methods

For Objective 1, we will conduct individual interviews with various stakeholders affected by the use of alternatives to isolation and restraint for hospitalized or institutionalized adults. For Objective 2, we will implement three specific strategies for patient involvement in HTA: a) direct participation in the HTA process, b) consultation of patients or their close relatives through data collection, and c) patient involvement in the dissemination of HTA results. For Objectives 3 and 4, we will evaluate the intervention processes and the impact of patient involvement strategies on the recommendations arising from the HTA and the understanding of the ethical and social implications of the HTA.

Discussion

This project is likely to influence future HTA practices because it directly targets knowledge users' need for strategies that increase patient involvement in HTA. By documenting the processes and outcomes of these involvement strategies, the project will contribute to the knowledge base related to patient involvement in HTA.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Health Equality Europe: Understanding Health Technology Assessement (HTA). HEA Guide to HTA for Patients. 2008, 48. Health Equality Europe: Understanding Health Technology Assessement (HTA). HEA Guide to HTA for Patients. 2008, 48.
2.
go back to reference Goven J: Assessing genetic testing: Who are the "lay experts"?. Health Policy. 2008, 85 (1): 1-18. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.06.004.CrossRefPubMed Goven J: Assessing genetic testing: Who are the "lay experts"?. Health Policy. 2008, 85 (1): 1-18. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.06.004.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference PLehoux P, Blume S: Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000, 25 (6): 1083-1120. 10.1215/03616878-25-6-1083.CrossRef PLehoux P, Blume S: Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000, 25 (6): 1083-1120. 10.1215/03616878-25-6-1083.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leys M: Health care policy: Qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. Health Policy. 2003, 65: 217-226. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00209-9.CrossRefPubMed Leys M: Health care policy: Qualitative evidence and health technology assessment. Health Policy. 2003, 65: 217-226. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00209-9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C: Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002, 61 (2): 213-236. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00214-7.CrossRefPubMed Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C: Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002, 61 (2): 213-236. 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00214-7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bridges JF, Jones C: Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (1): 30-35.CrossRefPubMed Bridges JF, Jones C: Patient-based health technology assessment: A vision of the future. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (1): 30-35.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Coulter A: Perspectives on health technology assessment: response from the patient's perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004, 20 (1): 92-96.CrossRefPubMed Coulter A: Perspectives on health technology assessment: response from the patient's perspective. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004, 20 (1): 92-96.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Pivik J, Rode E, Ward C: A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. Health Policy. 2004, 69 (2): 253-268. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.012.CrossRefPubMed Pivik J, Rode E, Ward C: A consumer involvement model for health technology assessment in Canada. Health Policy. 2004, 69 (2): 253-268. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.12.012.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hofmann BM: Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008, 24 (4): 423-429.CrossRefPubMed Hofmann BM: Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2008, 24 (4): 423-429.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B: Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (01): 9-16.CrossRefPubMed Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B: Mapping the integration of social and ethical issues in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007, 23 (01): 9-16.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ong BN: The lay perspective in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996, 12 (3): 511-517.PubMed Ong BN: The lay perspective in health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996, 12 (3): 511-517.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP: Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007, 82 (1): 37-50. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009.CrossRefPubMed Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP: Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007, 82 (1): 37-50. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.07.009.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Pollender H, Legare F: Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011, 27 (1): 31-42. 10.1017/S0266462310001315.CrossRefPubMed Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Pollender H, Legare F: Introducing patients' and the public's perspectives to health technology assessment: A systematic review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011, 27 (1): 31-42. 10.1017/S0266462310001315.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rowe G, Horlick-Jones T, Walls J, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF: Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations. Public Understanding of Science. 2008, 17 (4): 419-441. 10.1177/0963662506075351.CrossRef Rowe G, Horlick-Jones T, Walls J, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF: Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations. Public Understanding of Science. 2008, 17 (4): 419-441. 10.1177/0963662506075351.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kinter ET, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, dosReis S, Bridges JF: Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009, 25 (1): 35-41. 10.1017/S0266462309090059.CrossRefPubMed Kinter ET, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, dosReis S, Bridges JF: Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009, 25 (1): 35-41. 10.1017/S0266462309090059.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nixon J, Nelson EA, Cranny G, Iglesias CP, Hawkins K, Cullum NA, Phillips A, Spilsbury K, Torgerson DJ, Mason S: Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006, 10 (22): 1-163.CrossRef Nixon J, Nelson EA, Cranny G, Iglesias CP, Hawkins K, Cullum NA, Phillips A, Spilsbury K, Torgerson DJ, Mason S: Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006, 10 (22): 1-163.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Davies C, Wetherell M, Barnett E, Seymour-Smith S: Opening the Box. Evaluating the Citizens Council of NICE. 2005, The Open University: National Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology, NHS Research and Development Program Davies C, Wetherell M, Barnett E, Seymour-Smith S: Opening the Box. Evaluating the Citizens Council of NICE. 2005, The Open University: National Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology, NHS Research and Development Program
18.
go back to reference Oliver S, Armes D, Gyte G: Evaluation of public influence on the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Social Science Research Unit. 2006, Institute of Education, University of London Oliver S, Armes D, Gyte G: Evaluation of public influence on the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme. Social Science Research Unit. 2006, Institute of Education, University of London
19.
go back to reference Oliver S, Milne R, Bradburn J, Buchanan P, Kerridge L, Walley T, Gabbay J: Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project. Health Expectations. 2001, 4 (1): 18-28. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00113.x.CrossRefPubMed Oliver S, Milne R, Bradburn J, Buchanan P, Kerridge L, Walley T, Gabbay J: Involving consumers in a needs-led research programme: a pilot project. Health Expectations. 2001, 4 (1): 18-28. 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00113.x.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Royle J, Oliver S: Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004, 20 (4): 493-497.CrossRefPubMed Royle J, Oliver S: Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004, 20 (4): 493-497.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference NVivo 8: NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd, NVivo 8. 2008 NVivo 8: NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd, NVivo 8. 2008
22.
go back to reference Huberman AM, Miles MB: Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2 Huberman AM, Miles MB: Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 1994, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2
23.
go back to reference Menon D, Stafinski T: Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury. Health Expectations. 2008, 11 (3): 282-293. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00501.x.CrossRefPubMed Menon D, Stafinski T: Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury. Health Expectations. 2008, 11 (3): 282-293. 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00501.x.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Gauvin FP, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN: "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010, 70 (10): 1518-1526. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.036.CrossRefPubMed Gauvin FP, Abelson J, Giacomini M, Eyles J, Lavis JN: "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies. Soc Sci Med. 2010, 70 (10): 1518-1526. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.036.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Burchell M, Ruiz F, Barnett D: NICE Health Technology Appraisal Programme. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005, 87 (4): 283-284. 10.1308/003588405X51092.CrossRef Burchell M, Ruiz F, Barnett D: NICE Health Technology Appraisal Programme. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005, 87 (4): 283-284. 10.1308/003588405X51092.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Jolly K, Taylor R, Lip GY, Greenfield S, Raftery J, Mant J, Lane D, Jones M, Lee KW, Stevens A: The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technol Assess. 2007, 11 (35): 1-118.CrossRefPubMed Jolly K, Taylor R, Lip GY, Greenfield S, Raftery J, Mant J, Lane D, Jones M, Lee KW, Stevens A: The Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM). Home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in a multi-ethnic population: cost-effectiveness and patient adherence. Health Technol Assess. 2007, 11 (35): 1-118.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hutchinson AB: A health technology assessment of HIV counseling and testing technologies: Evidence of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and the consumer perspective. 2003, PhD Georgia State University Hutchinson AB: A health technology assessment of HIV counseling and testing technologies: Evidence of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and the consumer perspective. 2003, PhD Georgia State University
28.
go back to reference Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Davis H, Dickson R, Pickard D, Rosser J: Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers. The experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998, 14 (1): 47-70. 10.1017/S0266462300010527.CrossRefPubMed Entwistle VA, Watt IS, Davis H, Dickson R, Pickard D, Rosser J: Developing information materials to present the findings of technology assessments to consumers. The experience of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998, 14 (1): 47-70. 10.1017/S0266462300010527.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Gagnon MP, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Simard C, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Desmartis M, Legare F: Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level. BMC health services research. 2009, 9: 54-10.1186/1472-6963-9-54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gagnon MP, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Simard C, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Desmartis M, Legare F: Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level. BMC health services research. 2009, 9: 54-10.1186/1472-6963-9-54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Gagliardi AR, Lemieux-Charles L, Brown AD, Sullivan T, Goel V: Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 70 (2): 234-241. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009.CrossRefPubMed Gagliardi AR, Lemieux-Charles L, Brown AD, Sullivan T, Goel V: Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008, 70 (2): 234-241. 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Rowe G, Frewer L: Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science Technology & Human Values. 2000, 25 (1): 3-29. 10.1177/016224390002500101.CrossRef Rowe G, Frewer L: Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Science Technology & Human Values. 2000, 25 (1): 3-29. 10.1177/016224390002500101.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Légaré F: Incorporating patients' perspectives in hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. 19th International Cochrane Colloquium: 2011; Madrid, Spain, October 19th-22nd, 2011. 2011 Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Lepage-Savary D, Gagnon J, St-Pierre M, Rhainds M, Lemieux R, Gauvin FP, Légaré F: Incorporating patients' perspectives in hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA): The views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients. 19th International Cochrane Colloquium: 2011; Madrid, Spain, October 19th-22nd, 2011. 2011
33.
go back to reference Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A: Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7 (4): 239-244. 10.1258/135581902320432778.CrossRefPubMed Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A: Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2002, 7 (4): 239-244. 10.1258/135581902320432778.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Guba EG, Lincoln YS: Fourth Generation Evaluation. 1989, Newbury Park: Sage Guba EG, Lincoln YS: Fourth Generation Evaluation. 1989, Newbury Park: Sage
36.
go back to reference Patton MQ: Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 2008, Sage Publications, 4 Patton MQ: Utilization-Focused Evaluation. 2008, Sage Publications, 4
37.
go back to reference Weiss C: Have We Learned Anything New about the Use of Evaluation?. Am J Eval. 1998, 19 (1): 21-33.CrossRef Weiss C: Have We Learned Anything New about the Use of Evaluation?. Am J Eval. 1998, 19 (1): 21-33.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference White MA, Verhoef MJ: Toward a patient-centered approach: incorporating principles of participatory action research into clinical studies. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005, 4 (1): 21-24. 10.1177/1534735404273727.CrossRefPubMed White MA, Verhoef MJ: Toward a patient-centered approach: incorporating principles of participatory action research into clinical studies. Integr Cancer Ther. 2005, 4 (1): 21-24. 10.1177/1534735404273727.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Preskill H, Compton DW, Baizerman M, Smith IE: Integrating theory and practice. Conceptual frameworks of the CEFP. Cancer Pract. 2001, 9 (Suppl 1): S17-22.PubMed Preskill H, Compton DW, Baizerman M, Smith IE: Integrating theory and practice. Conceptual frameworks of the CEFP. Cancer Pract. 2001, 9 (Suppl 1): S17-22.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N: Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006, 26 (1): 13-24. 10.1002/chp.47.CrossRefPubMed Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N: Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map?. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006, 26 (1): 13-24. 10.1002/chp.47.CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Green LW, George MA, Daniel M, Frankish CJ, Herbert CJ, Bowie WR, et al: Study of participatory research in health promotion. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada. 1994 Green LW, George MA, Daniel M, Frankish CJ, Herbert CJ, Bowie WR, et al: Study of participatory research in health promotion. Ottawa: Royal Society of Canada. 1994
42.
go back to reference Legare F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Pakenham C, Burgers J, Legare J, St-Jacques S, Gagnon S: Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making. 2011, 31 (6): E45-74. 10.1177/0272989X11424401.CrossRefPubMed Legare F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Pakenham C, Burgers J, Legare J, St-Jacques S, Gagnon S: Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Med Decis Making. 2011, 31 (6): E45-74. 10.1177/0272989X11424401.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users
Authors
Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Johanne Gagnon
Michèle St-Pierre
François-Pierre Gauvin
Florence Piron
Marc Rhainds
Martin Coulombe
Dolores Lepage-Savary
Marie Desmartis
Mylène Tantchou Dipankui
France Légaré
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-14

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Go to the issue