Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

The acceptability, feasibility and impact of a lay health counsellor delivered health promoting schools programme in India: a case study evaluation

Authors: Divya Rajaraman, Sandra Travasso, Achira Chatterjee, Bhargav Bhat, Gracy Andrew, Suraj Parab, Vikram Patel

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Studies in resource-limited settings have shown that there are constraints to the use of teachers, peers or health professionals to deliver school health promotion interventions. School health programmes delivered by trained lay health counsellors could offer a cost-effective alternative. This paper presents a case study of a multi-component school health promotion intervention in India that was delivered by lay school health counsellors, who possessed neither formal educational nor health provider qualifications.

Methods

The intervention was based on the WHO’s Health Promoting Schools framework, and included health screening camps; an anonymous letter box for student questions and complaints; classroom-based life skills training; and, individual psycho-social and academic counselling for students. The intervention was delivered by a lay school health counsellor who had attained a minimum of a high school education. The counsellor was trained over four weeks and received structured supervision from health professionals working for the implementing NGO. The evaluation design was a mixed methods case study. Quantitative process indicators were collected to assess the extent to which the programme was delivered as planned (feasibility), the uptake of services (acceptability), and the number of students who received corrective health treatment (evidence of impact). Semi-structured interviews were conducted over two years with 108 stakeholders, and were analysed to identify barriers and facilitators for the programme (feasibility), evaluate acceptability, and gather evidence of positive or negative effects of the programme.

Results

Feasibility was established by the high reported coverage of all the targeted activities by the school health counsellor. Acceptability was indicated by a growing number of submissions to the students’ anonymous letter-box; more students self-referring for counselling services over time; and, the perceived need for the programme, as expressed by principals, parents and students. A minority of teachers complained that there was inadequate information sharing about the programme and mentioned reservations about the capacities of the lay health counsellor. Preliminary evidence of the positive effects of the programme included the correction of vision problems detected in health screening camps, and qualitative evidence of changes in health-related knowledge and behaviour of students.

Conclusion

A task-shifting approach of delegating school health promotion activities to lay school health counsellors rather than education or health professionals shows promise of effectiveness as a scalable model for promoting the health and well being of school based adolescents in resource constrained settings.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Yin R: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks Yin R: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks
2.
go back to reference Santhya K, Jejeebhoy S: Young people's sexual and reproductive health in India. Policies, programmes and realities. South and East Asia Regional Working Papers. 2007, Population Council, New Delhi Santhya K, Jejeebhoy S: Young people's sexual and reproductive health in India. Policies, programmes and realities. South and East Asia Regional Working Papers. 2007, Population Council, New Delhi
3.
go back to reference Subramanian SV, Smith GD: Patterns, distribution, and determinants of under- and overnutrition: a population-based study of women in India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84 (3): 633-640.PubMed Subramanian SV, Smith GD: Patterns, distribution, and determinants of under- and overnutrition: a population-based study of women in India. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 84 (3): 633-640.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Vaz M, Yusuf S, Bharathi A, Kurpad A, Swaminathan S: The nutrition transition in India. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2005, 18 (2): 198-201. Vaz M, Yusuf S, Bharathi A, Kurpad A, Swaminathan S: The nutrition transition in India. S Afr J Clin Nutr. 2005, 18 (2): 198-201.
5.
go back to reference Andrew G, Patel V, Ramakrishna J: Sex, studies or strife? What to integrate in adolescent health services. Reprod Health Matters. 2003, 11: 120-129. 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02167-0.CrossRefPubMed Andrew G, Patel V, Ramakrishna J: Sex, studies or strife? What to integrate in adolescent health services. Reprod Health Matters. 2003, 11: 120-129. 10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02167-0.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Dooris M: Health promoting settings: future directions. IUHPE – Promotion and education. 2006, 13 (1): 4-6. Dooris M: Health promoting settings: future directions. IUHPE – Promotion and education. 2006, 13 (1): 4-6.
7.
go back to reference World Health Organization: Ottawa charter for health promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion. 1986, , Ottawa World Health Organization: Ottawa charter for health promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion. 1986, , Ottawa
8.
go back to reference Whitehead D: The health-promoting school: what role for nursing?`. Critical Nursing. 2011, 15: 264-271. Whitehead D: The health-promoting school: what role for nursing?`. Critical Nursing. 2011, 15: 264-271.
9.
go back to reference World Health Organization: Promoting health through schools. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Comprehensive School Health Education and Promotion. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. vol. 870. 1997 World Health Organization: Promoting health through schools. Report of a WHO Expert Committee on Comprehensive School Health Education and Promotion. World Health Organization Technical Report Series. vol. 870. 1997
10.
go back to reference Terre L: Back to school health promotion. Behavioural Medicine. 2008, 402-405. Terre L: Back to school health promotion. Behavioural Medicine. 2008, 402-405.
11.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: National Health Policy. 2002, Government of India, New Delhi Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: National Health Policy. 2002, Government of India, New Delhi
12.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Report of the National Meeting of the Directors of State Council for Education Research and Training (SCERT) on School Health Promotion. New Delhi 19–21 June 2007. 2007, Government of India, New Delhi Ministry of Health and Family Welfare: Report of the National Meeting of the Directors of State Council for Education Research and Training (SCERT) on School Health Promotion. New Delhi 19–21 June 2007. 2007, Government of India, New Delhi
13.
go back to reference St Leger L: Schools, health literacy and public health: possibilities and challenges. Health Promot Int. 2001, 16 (2): 197-205. 10.1093/heapro/16.2.197.CrossRefPubMed St Leger L: Schools, health literacy and public health: possibilities and challenges. Health Promot Int. 2001, 16 (2): 197-205. 10.1093/heapro/16.2.197.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference School health services in India. The social and economic contexts. Edited by: Baru R. 2008, Sage, New Delhi School health services in India. The social and economic contexts. Edited by: Baru R. 2008, Sage, New Delhi
15.
go back to reference Mukhopadhyay S: UDAAN: Towards a better future improving lives of young people in Jharkhand India. 2009, CEDPA India, New Delhi Mukhopadhyay S: UDAAN: Towards a better future improving lives of young people in Jharkhand India. 2009, CEDPA India, New Delhi
16.
go back to reference Dongre A, Deshmukh P, Garg B: Health-promoting school initiative in Ashram schools of Wardha District. Natl Med J India. 2011, 24 (3): 140-143.PubMed Dongre A, Deshmukh P, Garg B: Health-promoting school initiative in Ashram schools of Wardha District. Natl Med J India. 2011, 24 (3): 140-143.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Arora M, Stigler M, Reddy S: Effectiveness of health promotion in preventing tobacco use among adolescents in India. Glob Health Promot. 2011, 18 (1): 9-12. 10.1177/1757975910393163.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Arora M, Stigler M, Reddy S: Effectiveness of health promotion in preventing tobacco use among adolescents in India. Glob Health Promot. 2011, 18 (1): 9-12. 10.1177/1757975910393163.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference UNESCO: Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2011. 2011, United Nations, New York UNESCO: Education for All Global Monitoring Report 2011. 2011, United Nations, New York
22.
go back to reference WHO: Task shifting to tackle health worker shortages. 2007, World Health Organization, Geneva WHO: Task shifting to tackle health worker shortages. 2007, World Health Organization, Geneva
23.
go back to reference Balaji M, Andrew G, Andrew T, Patel V: The acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of a population-based Intervention to promote youth health: an exploratory study in Goa, India. J Adolesc Health. 2011, 48 (5): 453-460. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.029.CrossRefPubMed Balaji M, Andrew G, Andrew T, Patel V: The acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of a population-based Intervention to promote youth health: an exploratory study in Goa, India. J Adolesc Health. 2011, 48 (5): 453-460. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.07.029.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Padgett D: Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. 2012, Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef Padgett D: Qualitative and mixed methods in public health. 2012, Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lim R: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks Lim R: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks
26.
go back to reference Baxter P, Jack S: Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 2008, 13 (4): 544-559. Baxter P, Jack S: Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report. 2008, 13 (4): 544-559.
27.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Br Med J. 2008, 337: a1665. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Br Med J. 2008, 337: a1665.
28.
go back to reference SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 12.0. 2003, IBM, Chicago SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 12.0. 2003, IBM, Chicago
29.
go back to reference ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH: Atlas.Ti v6.1. 2010, , Berlin ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH: Atlas.Ti v6.1. 2010, , Berlin
30.
go back to reference Reddy KS, Arora M, Perry CL, Nair B, Kohli A, Lytle LA, Stigler M, Prabhakaran D: Tobacco and alcohol use outcomes of a school-based intervention in New Delhi. Am J Health Behav. 2002, 26 (3): 173-181. 10.5993/AJHB.26.3.2.CrossRefPubMed Reddy KS, Arora M, Perry CL, Nair B, Kohli A, Lytle LA, Stigler M, Prabhakaran D: Tobacco and alcohol use outcomes of a school-based intervention in New Delhi. Am J Health Behav. 2002, 26 (3): 173-181. 10.5993/AJHB.26.3.2.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Wight D: Theoretical bases for teacher- and peer-delivered sexual health promotion. Health Educ. 2007, 108 (1): 10-28.CrossRef Wight D: Theoretical bases for teacher- and peer-delivered sexual health promotion. Health Educ. 2007, 108 (1): 10-28.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Inchley J, Currie C, Young I: Evaluating the health promoting school: a case study approach. Health Educ. 2000, 100: 200-206. 10.1108/09654280010343573.CrossRef Inchley J, Currie C, Young I: Evaluating the health promoting school: a case study approach. Health Educ. 2000, 100: 200-206. 10.1108/09654280010343573.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006, 332 (7538): 413-416. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J: Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2006, 332 (7538): 413-416. 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Mukoma W, Flisher AJ: Evaluations of health promoting schools: a review of nine studies. Health Promot Int. 2004, 19 (3): 357-368. 10.1093/heapro/dah309.CrossRefPubMed Mukoma W, Flisher AJ: Evaluations of health promoting schools: a review of nine studies. Health Promot Int. 2004, 19 (3): 357-368. 10.1093/heapro/dah309.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Stewart-Brown S: What is the evidence on school health promotion in improving health or preventing disease and, specifically, what is the effectiveness of the health promoting schools approach?In. 2006, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen Stewart-Brown S: What is the evidence on school health promotion in improving health or preventing disease and, specifically, what is the effectiveness of the health promoting schools approach?In. 2006, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen
36.
go back to reference Lister-Sharp D, Chapman S, Stewart-Brown S, Sowden A: Health promoting schools and health promotion in schools. Two systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 1999, 3: 1-207.PubMed Lister-Sharp D, Chapman S, Stewart-Brown S, Sowden A: Health promoting schools and health promotion in schools. Two systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 1999, 3: 1-207.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Inchley J, Muldoon J, Currie C: Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland. Health Promot Int. 2007, 22 (1): 65-71. 10.1093/heapro/dal059.CrossRefPubMed Inchley J, Muldoon J, Currie C: Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland. Health Promot Int. 2007, 22 (1): 65-71. 10.1093/heapro/dal059.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluatin complex interventions: New guidance. 2008, Medical Research Council, London, a1665. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M: Developing and evaluatin complex interventions: New guidance. 2008, Medical Research Council, London, a1665.
Metadata
Title
The acceptability, feasibility and impact of a lay health counsellor delivered health promoting schools programme in India: a case study evaluation
Authors
Divya Rajaraman
Sandra Travasso
Achira Chatterjee
Bhargav Bhat
Gracy Andrew
Suraj Parab
Vikram Patel
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-127

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Health Services Research 1/2012 Go to the issue