Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Women's Health 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Study protocol

Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study

Authors: Dawn R Swancutt, Sheila M Greenfield, Sue Wilson

Published in: BMC Women's Health | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The colposcopy service is a key component in the UK Cervical Screening Programme. Over 120,000 women are referred to the service annually, however up to 25% of women fail to attend their appointment. Little is known about patients' preferences for colposcopic investigation and treatment. This study aims to investigate women's experience of colposcopy, to identify patients' preferences for aspects of appointments within the colposcopy service, and to make suggestions for service improvement.

Methods/Design

This study has been designed as a two stage, mixed method project. Stage one will involve in-depth interviews with new colposcopy patients to ascertain their experience of colposcopy services. This qualitative stage will generate factors thought to be important by service users in their experience. Stage two will utilise a choice based quantitative technique to identify women's preferences and determine the representativeness of factors generated through the interviews.
The initial stage of in-depth interviews will be conducted with patients who are newly referred to colposcopy clinics to investigate the experience that they have of the referral process and appointment attendance. The outcome of these interviews will be analysed qualitatively using Framework analysis. Factors found to be important in women's experience will be extracted and used to construct a choice based questionnaire.
The discrete choice experiment (questionnaire) will apply a best-worst technique through scenario-based questions to find women's relative preferences for different aspects of the service. It will be offered to women attending follow-up appointments at two colposcopy clinics in the West Midlands. Women will complete the questionnaire whilst they wait for their appointment, or, if they prefer, will take it home to complete in private. Women who do not attend their appointment will be posted the research information and questionnaire. The questionnaire analysis will use a weighted least squares regression technique for each best/worst pair. The accept/reject 'would you attend this appointment' question will be analysed using a random effects logit model.

Discussion

Colposcopy is a common procedure and one that is associated with raised anxiety among women experiencing the service. Little is known about women's experience of the service or their preferences for service delivery. The outcomes of the study will comprise a description of women's experience of colposcopy and establishing their preferences for how aspects of the service should be provided. Women's preferences will be fed back to service providers to enable improvements to the service to be made.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Byrom J, Clarke T, Neale J, Dunn PD, Hughes GM, Redman CW, Pitts M: Can pre-colposcopy sessions reduce anxiety at the time of colposcopy? A prospective randomised study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002, 22: 415-420. 10.1080/01443610220141407.CrossRefPubMed Byrom J, Clarke T, Neale J, Dunn PD, Hughes GM, Redman CW, Pitts M: Can pre-colposcopy sessions reduce anxiety at the time of colposcopy? A prospective randomised study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002, 22: 415-420. 10.1080/01443610220141407.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kitchener HC, Cruickshank ME, Farmery E: The 1993 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Coordinating Network United Kingdom Colposcopy Survey. Comparison with 1988 and the response to introduction of guidelines. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995, 102: 549-552.CrossRefPubMed Kitchener HC, Cruickshank ME, Farmery E: The 1993 British Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology/National Coordinating Network United Kingdom Colposcopy Survey. Comparison with 1988 and the response to introduction of guidelines. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995, 102: 549-552.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Todd RW, Wilson S, Etherington I, Luesley D: Effect of nurse colposcopists on a hospital-based service. Hosp Med. 2002, 63: 218-223.CrossRefPubMed Todd RW, Wilson S, Etherington I, Luesley D: Effect of nurse colposcopists on a hospital-based service. Hosp Med. 2002, 63: 218-223.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Patterson T, Roworth M, Hill M: An investigation into the default rate at the Fife colposcopy clinic: implications for target setting. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1995, 17: 65-69.PubMed Patterson T, Roworth M, Hill M: An investigation into the default rate at the Fife colposcopy clinic: implications for target setting. Journal of Public Health Medicine. 1995, 17: 65-69.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Sanders G, Craddock C, Wagstaff I: Factors influencing default at a hospital colposcopy clinic. Qual Health Care. 1992, Hospital colposcopy clinic, 1: 236-240. Sanders G, Craddock C, Wagstaff I: Factors influencing default at a hospital colposcopy clinic. Qual Health Care. 1992, Hospital colposcopy clinic, 1: 236-240.
6.
go back to reference Cartwright PS, Reed G: No-Show Behaviour in a County Hospital Colposcopy Clinic. The American Journal of Gynecologic Health. 1990, Hospital colposcopy clinic, USA, IV: 15-21. Cartwright PS, Reed G: No-Show Behaviour in a County Hospital Colposcopy Clinic. The American Journal of Gynecologic Health. 1990, Hospital colposcopy clinic, USA, IV: 15-21.
7.
go back to reference Eger RR, Peipert JF: Risk factors for noncompliance in a colposcopy clinic. J Reprod Med. 1996, Hospital colposcopy clinic, USA, 41: 671-674. Eger RR, Peipert JF: Risk factors for noncompliance in a colposcopy clinic. J Reprod Med. 1996, Hospital colposcopy clinic, USA, 41: 671-674.
8.
go back to reference Usha Kiran TS, Jayawickrama NS: Who are the women who default from colposcopy clinics?. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2002, Hospital colposcopy clinic, Wales, 22: 537-539. 10.1080/01443610000003717. Usha Kiran TS, Jayawickrama NS: Who are the women who default from colposcopy clinics?. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2002, Hospital colposcopy clinic, Wales, 22: 537-539. 10.1080/01443610000003717.
9.
go back to reference Lester H, Wilson S: Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of General Practice. 1999, -, 49: 223-229. Lester H, Wilson S: Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of General Practice. 1999, -, 49: 223-229.
10.
go back to reference Posner T, Vessey M: Prevention of Cervical Cancer: The Patient's View. 1988, Hospital colposcopy clinics, UK, King Edward's Hospital Fund for London Posner T, Vessey M: Prevention of Cervical Cancer: The Patient's View. 1988, Hospital colposcopy clinics, UK, King Edward's Hospital Fund for London
11.
go back to reference Roberts RA, Blunt SM: The psychological reaction of women to a colposcopy clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994, 101: 751-752.CrossRefPubMed Roberts RA, Blunt SM: The psychological reaction of women to a colposcopy clinic. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994, 101: 751-752.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rogstad KE: The psychological impact of abnormal cytology and colposcopy. BJOG. 2002, 109: 364-368. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.99023.x.CrossRefPubMed Rogstad KE: The psychological impact of abnormal cytology and colposcopy. BJOG. 2002, 109: 364-368. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.99023.x.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Silverman D: Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. 2000, Sage Publications Ltd Silverman D: Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. 2000, Sage Publications Ltd
14.
go back to reference Bowling A: Research methods in health. 2002, Open University Press, 2nd Bowling A: Research methods in health. 2002, Open University Press, 2nd
16.
go back to reference Morse J: Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research. 2000, -, 10: 3-5. 10.1177/104973200129118183. Morse J: Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research. 2000, -, 10: 3-5. 10.1177/104973200129118183.
17.
go back to reference Ryan M: Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ. 2004, -, 328: 360-361. 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.360. Ryan M: Discrete choice experiments in health care. BMJ. 2004, -, 328: 360-361. 10.1136/bmj.328.7436.360.
18.
go back to reference Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. 2000, Cambridge University PressCrossRef Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. 2000, Cambridge University PressCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ryan M, Hughes J: Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ. 1997, 6: 261-273. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::AID-HEC262>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefPubMed Ryan M, Hughes J: Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ. 1997, 6: 261-273. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<261::AID-HEC262>3.0.CO;2-N.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Coast J, Salisbury C, de Berker D, Noble A, Horrocks S, Peters TJ, Flynn TN: Preferences for aspects of a dermatology consultation. British Journal of Dermatology. 2006, 155: 387-392. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07328.x.CrossRefPubMed Coast J, Salisbury C, de Berker D, Noble A, Horrocks S, Peters TJ, Flynn TN: Preferences for aspects of a dermatology consultation. British Journal of Dermatology. 2006, 155: 387-392. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07328.x.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Street DJ, Burgess L, Louviere JJ: Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2005, 22: 459-470. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003.CrossRef Street DJ, Burgess L, Louviere JJ: Quick and easy choice sets: Constructing optimal and nearly optimal stated choice experiments. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2005, 22: 459-470. 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2005.09.003.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Women's colposcopy experience and preferences: a mixed methods study
Authors
Dawn R Swancutt
Sheila M Greenfield
Sue Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Women's Health / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6874
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-8-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Women's Health 1/2008 Go to the issue