Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

Motivations of physicians and nurses to practice voluntary euthanasia: a systematic review

Authors: Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im, Mireille Lavoie, Pawel Krol, Marianne Olivier-D’Avignon

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While a number of reviews have explored the attitude of health professionals toward euthanasia, none of them documented their motivations to practice euthanasia. The objective of the present systematic review was to identify physicians’ and nurses’ motives for having the intention or for performing an act of voluntary euthanasia and compare findings from countries where the practice is legalized to those where it is not.

Methods

The following databases were investigated: MEDLINE/PubMed (1950+), PsycINFO (1806+), CINAHL (1982+), EMBASE (1974+) and FRANCIS (1984+). Proquest Dissertations and Theses (1861+) was also investigated for gray literature. Additional studies were included by checking the references of the articles included in the systematic review as well as by looking at our personal collection of articles on euthanasia.

Results

This paper reviews a total of 27 empirical quantitative studies out of the 1 703 articles identified at the beginning. Five studies were in countries where euthanasia is legal and 22 in countries where it is not. Seventeen studies were targeting physicians, 9 targeted nurses and 1 both health professionals. Six studies identified the motivations underlying the intention to practice euthanasia, 16 the behavior itself and 5 both intention and behavior. The category of variables most consistently associated with euthanasia is psychological variables. All categories collapsed, the four variables most frequently associated with euthanasia are past behavior, medical specialty, whether the patient is depressed and the patient’s life expectancy.

Conclusions

The present review suggests that physicians and nurses are motivated to practice voluntary euthanasia especially when they are familiar with the act of euthanasia, when the patient does not have depressive symptoms and has a short life expectancy and their motivation varies according to their medical specialty. Additional studies among nurses and in countries where euthanasia is legal are needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Emanuel EJ: Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a review of the empirical data from the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162 (2): 142-152. 10.1001/archinte.162.2.142.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Dickinson GE, Clark D, Winslow M, Marples R: US physicians’ attitudes concerning euthanasia and physician-assisted death: A systematic literature review. Mortality. 2005, 10 (1): 43-52. 10.1080/13576270500030982.CrossRef
3.
McCormack R, Clifford M, Conroy M: Attitudes of UK doctors towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a systematic literature review. Palliat Med. 2012, 26 (1): 23-33. 10.1177/0269216310397688.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Gielen J, Van Den Branden S, Broeckaert B: Attitudes of European physicians toward euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a review of the recent literature. J Palliat Care. 2008, 24 (3): 173-184.PubMed
5.
Verpoort C, Gastmans C, De Bal N, Dierckx De Casterle B: Nurses’ attitudes to euthanasia: a review of the literature. Nurs Ethics. 2004, 11 (4): 349-365. 10.1191/0969733004ne708oa.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Berghs M, Dierckx De Casterle B, Gastmans C: The complexity of nurses’ attitudes toward euthanasia: a review of the literature. J Med Ethics. 2005, 31 (8): 441-446. 10.1136/jme.2004.009092.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Quaghebeur T, Dierckx De Casterle B, Gastmans C: Nursing and euthanasia: a review of argument-based ethics literature. Nurs Ethics. 2009, 16 (4): 466-486. 10.1177/0969733009104610.CrossRefPubMed
8.
De Beer T, Gastmans C, Dierckx De Casterle B: Involvement of nurses in euthanasia: a review of the literature. J Med Ethics. 2004, 30 (5): 494-498. 10.1136/jme.2003.004028.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
De Bal N, Gastmans C, Dierckx De Casterle B: Nurses’ involvement in the care of patients requesting euthanasia: a review of the literature. Int J of Nur Stud. 2008, 45 (4): 626-644.CrossRef
10.
Gielen J, van den Branden S, Broeckaert B: Religion and nurses’ attitudes to euthanasia and physician assisted suicide. Nurs Ethics. 2009, 16 (3): 303-318. 10.1177/0969733009102692.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Gielen J, Van den Branden S, Broeckaert B: The operationalisation of religion and world view in surveys of nurses’ attitudes toward euthanasia and assisted suicide. Med Health Care Philos. 2009, 12 (4): 423-431. 10.1007/s11019-009-9217-8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S: Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012, 7: 37-10.1186/1748-5908-7-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Godin G, Belanger-Gravel A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J: Healthcare professionals’ intentions and behaviours: a systematic review of studies based on social cognitive theories. Implement Sci. 2008, 3: 36-10.1186/1748-5908-3-36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A: Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005, 14 (1): 26-33. 10.1136/qshc.2004.011155.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Guillaumie L, Godin G, Vezina-Im LA: Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010, 7: 12-10.1186/1479-5868-7-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Amireault S, Godin G, Vezina-Im LA: Determinants of physical activity maintenance: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Health Psychol Rev. 2013, 7 (1): 55-91. 10.1080/17437199.2012.701060.CrossRef
17.
Sierles FS: How to do research with self-administered surveys. Acad Psychiatry. 2003, 27 (2): 104-113. 10.1176/appi.ap.27.2.104.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Kristman V, Manno M, Cote P: Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much?. Eur J Epidemiol. 2004, 19 (8): 751-760.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Babyak MA: What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004, 66 (3): 411-421. 10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9.PubMed
20.
Asch DA, DeKay ML: Euthanasia among US critical care nurses: Practices, attitudes, and social and professional correlates. Med Care. 1997, 35 (9): 890-900. 10.1097/00005650-199709000-00002.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Back AL, Wallace JI, Starks HE, Pearlman RA: Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington State. Patient requests and physician responses. Jama. 1996, 275 (12): 919-925. 10.1001/jama.1996.03530360029034.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Davis AJ, Davidson B, Hirschfield M, Lauri S, Lin JY, Norberg A, Phillips L, Pitman E, Shen CH, Laan RV, Zhang HL, Ziv L: An international perspective of active euthanasia: attitudes of nurses in seven countries. Int j nur stud. 1993, 30 (4): 301-310. 10.1016/0020-7489(93)90102-Z.CrossRef
23.
DeKeyser GF, Musgrave CF: Israeli critical care nurses’ attitudes toward physician-assisted dying. Heart Lung. 2006, 35 (6): 412-422. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2006.06.008.CrossRef
24.
Doukas DJ, Waterhouse D, Gorenflo DW, Seid J: Attitudes and behaviors on physician-assisted death: a study of Michigan oncologists. J Clin Oncol. 1995, 13 (5): 1055-1061.PubMed
25.
Essinger D: Attitudes of Tennessee physicians toward euthanasia and assisted death. South Med J. 2003, 96 (5): 427-435. 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000051144.80620.C1.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Folker AP, Holtug N, Jensen AB, Kappel K, Nielsen JK, Norup M: Experiences and attitudes towards end-of-life decisions amongst Danish physicians. Bioethics. 1996, 10 (3): 233-249. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1996.tb00122.x.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Kinsella TD, Verhoef MJ: Alberta euthanasia survey: 1. Physicians’ opinions about the morality and legalization of active euthanasia. Cmaj. 1993, 148 (11): 1921-1926.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Kohart BL: A Study Of Physicians’ And Medical Students’ Attitudes Towards Euthanasia [M.S.]. 1977, United States -- New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook
29.
Kuhse H, Singer P: Doctors’ practices and attitudes regarding voluntary euthanasia. Med J Aust. 1988, 148 (12): 623-627.PubMed
30.
Kuhse H, Singer P: Voluntary euthanasia and the nurse: an Australian survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 1993, 30 (4): 311-322. 10.1016/0020-7489(93)90103-2.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Kunene SS, Zungu BM: An investigation into the attitude of professional nurses towards euthanasia. Curationis. 1996, 19 (4): 26-30.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Maitra RT, Harfst A, Bjerre LM, Kochen MM, Becker A: Do German general practitioners support euthanasia? Results of a nation-wide questionnaire survey. Eur J Gen Pract. 2005, 11 (3–4): 94-100.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Matzo ML: Registered Nurses’ Attitudes Toward And Practices Of Assisted Suicide And Patient-Requested Euthanasia [Ph.D.]. 1996, United States - Massachusetts: University of Massachusetts Boston
34.
Meier DE, Emmons CA, Litke A, Wallenstein S, Morrison RS: Characteristics of patients requesting and receiving physician-assisted death. Arch Intern Med. 2003, 163 (13): 1537-1542. 10.1001/archinte.163.13.1537.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Fisher S, Cartwright C, Deliens L, Miccinesi G, Norup M, Nilstun T, van der Heide A, van der Wal G: End-of-life decision making in Europe and Australia: a physician survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006, 166 (8): 921-929. 10.1001/archinte.166.8.921.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Oz F: Nurses’ and physicians’ views about euthanasia. Clin Excell Nurse Pract. 2001, 5 (4): 222-231. 10.1054/xc.2001.25009.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Parker MH, Cartwright CM, Williams GM: Impact of specialty on attitudes of Australian medical practitioners to end-of-life decisions. Med J Aust. 2008, 188 (8): 450-456.PubMed
38.
Richardson DS: Oncology nurses’ attitudes toward the legalization of voluntary active euthanasia. Cancer Nurs. 1994, 17 (4): 348-354.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Shapiro RS, Derse AR, Gottlieb M, Schiedermayer D, Olson M: Willingness to perform euthanasia. A survey of physician attitudes. Arch Intern Med. 1994, 154 (5): 575-584. 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420050143013.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Stevens CA, Hassan R: Management of death, dying and euthanasia: attitudes and practices of medical practitioners in South Australia. J Med Ethics. 1994, 20 (1): 41-46. 10.1136/jme.20.1.41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Stevens CA, Hassan R: Nurses and the management of death, dying and euthanasia. Med Law. 1994, 13 (5–6): 541-554.PubMed
42.
Inghelbrecht E, Bilsen J, Mortier F, Deliens L: Attitudes of nurses towards euthanasia and towards their role in euthanasia: a nationwide study in Flanders, Belgium. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009, 46 (9): 1209-1218. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.009.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Meeussen K, Van den Block L, Bossuyt N, Echteld M, Bilsen J, Deliens L: Dealing with requests for euthanasia: interview study among general practitioners in Belgium. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011, 41 (6): 1060-1072. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.09.020.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Obstein KL, Kimsma G, Chambers T: Practicing euthanasia: the perspective of physicians. J Clin Ethics. 2004, 15 (3): 223-231.PubMed
45.
Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Brinkman-Stoppelenburg A, Penning C, de Jong-Krul GJF, van Delden JJM, van der Heide A: Trends in end-of-life practices before and after the enactment of the euthanasia law in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2010: A repeated cross-sectional survey. Lancet. 2012, 380 (9845): 908-915. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61034-4.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Smets T, Cohen J, Bilsen J, Van Wesemael Y, Rurup ML, Deliens L: Attitudes and experiences of Belgian physicians regarding euthanasia practice and the euthanasia law. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011, 41 (3): 580-593. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.05.015.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I: Belief, Attitude, Intention And Behavior: An Introduction To Theory And Research. 1975, Reading Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Compagny
48.
Kohlberg L: The Philosophy Of Moral Development: Moral Stages And The Idea Of Justice. 1981, San Francisco: Harper & Row
49.
Kohlberg L: The Psychology Of Moral Developmement: The Nature And Validity Of Moral Stages. 1984, San Francisco: Harper & Row
50.
Ouellette JA, Wood W: Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple process by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull. 1998, 124 (1): 54-74.CrossRef
51.
Triandis HC: Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Beliefs, Attitudes and Values. Edited by: Page MM. 1980, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1: 195-259.
52.
Rosenfeld B: Methodological issues in assisted suicide and euthanasia research. Psychol Public Policy Law. 2000, 6 (2): 559-574.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991, 50: 179-211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.CrossRef
54.
Sheeran P: Intention-behavior relations: a conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology. Edited by: Stroebe W, Hewstone M. 2002, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 12: 1-36. 10.1080/14792772143000003.
55.
Baranowski T, Lin LS, Wetter DW, Resnicow K, Hearn MD: Theory as mediating variables: Why aren’t community interventions working as desired?. Ann Epidemiol. 1997, S7: S89-S95.CrossRef
56.
Fishbein M, Yzer MC: Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. Commun Theory. 2003, 13: 164-183. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00287.x.CrossRef
57.
Michie S, Abraham C: Interventions to change health behaviours: Evidence-based or evidence-inspired?. Psychol Health. 2004, 19: 29-49. 10.1080/0887044031000141199.CrossRef
58.
Glanz K, Bishop DB: The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010, 31: 399-418. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Michie S, Prestwich A: Are interventions theory-based? Development of a theory coding scheme. Health Psychol. 2010, 29 (1): 1-8.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Michie S, Fixsen D, Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP: Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method. Implement Sci. 2009, 4: 40-10.1186/1748-5908-4-40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
61.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151 (4): 264-269. 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. W264CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Motivations of physicians and nurses to practice voluntary euthanasia: a systematic review
Authors
Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im
Mireille Lavoie
Pawel Krol
Marianne Olivier-D’Avignon
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-13-20

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Palliative Care 1/2014 Go to the issue

Research article

Initiating decision-making conversations in palliative care: an ethnographic discourse analysis

Research article

Characteristics of a palliative care consultation service with a focus on pain in a German university hospital

Research article

Choosing care homes as the least preferred place to die: a cross-national survey of public preferences in seven European countries

Erratum

Erratum to: The feasibility and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation to improve exercise performance in patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study

Reviewer acknowledgement

BMC Palliative Care reviewer acknowledgement, 2013

Research article

Blended e-learning and end of life care in nursing homes: a small-scale mixed-methods case study