Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Palliative Care
Published in: BMC Palliative Care 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

A qualitative study examining the sustainability of shared care in the delivery of palliative care services in the community

Authors: Lily DeMiglio, Allison M Williams

Published in: BMC Palliative Care | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This paper focuses on the sustainability of existing palliative care teams that provide home-based care in a shared care model. For the purposes of this study, following Evashwick and Ory (2003), sustainability is understood and approached as the ability to continue the program over time. Understanding factors that influence the sustainability of teams and ways to mitigate these factors is paramount to improving the longevity and quality of service delivery models of this kind.

Methods

Using qualitative data collected in interviews, the aim of this study is twofold: (1) to explore the factors that affect the sustainability of the teams at three different scales, and; (2) based on the results of this study, to propose a set of recommendations that will contribute to the sustainability of PC teams.

Results

Sustainability was conceptualized from two angles: internal and external. An overview of external sustainability was provided and the merging of data from all participant groups showed that the sustainability of teams was largely dependent on actors and organizations at the local (community), regional (Local Health Integration Network or LHIN) and provincial scales. The three scales are not self-contained or singular entities but rather are connected. Integration and collaboration within and between scales is necessary, as community capacity will inevitably reach its threshold without support of the province, which provides funding to the LHIN. While the community continues to advocate for the teams, in the long-term, they will need additional supports from the LHIN and province. The province has the authority and capacity to engrain its support for teams through a formal strategy. The recommendations are presented based on scale to better illustrate how actors and organizations could move forward.

Conclusions

This study may inform program and policy specific to strategic ways to improve the provision of team-based palliative home care using a shared care model, while simultaneously providing direction for team-based program delivery and sustainability for other jurisdictions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Wiles J, Rosenberg M: The role of scale in conceptualizing primary health care practice: considering social and institutional structures and systems. Primary health care: people, practice, place. Edited by: Crooks VA, Andrews GJ. 2009, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing, 75-92.
2.
Andrews G, Evans J: Understanding the reproduction of health care: towards geographies in health care work. Prog Hum Geogr. 2008, 32 (6): 759-780. 10.1177/0309132508089826.CrossRef
3.
Dudgeon D, Vaitonis V, Seow H, King S, Angus H, Sawka C: Using networks to integrate palliative care province-wide. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007, 33: 640-644. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.001.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Wilson D, Truman C, Thomas R, Fainsinger R, Kovacs-Burns K, Froggatt K, Justice C: The rapidly changing location of death in Canada, 1994–2004. Soc Sci Med. 2009, 68: 1752-1758. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.03.006.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Brazil K, Howell D, Bedard M, Krueger P, Heidebrecht C: Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill. Palliat Med. 2005, 19: 492-499. 10.1191/0269216305pm1050oa.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Brenneis C, Bruera E: The Interaction Between Family Physicians and Palliative Care Consultants in the Delivery of Palliative Care: Clinical and Educational Issues. J Palliat Care. 1998, 14 (3): 58-61.PubMed
7.
Yuen K, Behrndt M, Jacklyn C, Mitchell G: Palliative care at home: general practitioners working with palliative care teams. Med J Aust. 2003, 179 (15): 38-40.
8.
Lawson B, Burge F, McIntyre P, Field S, Maxwell D: Can the introduction of an integrated service model to an existing comprehensive palliative care service impact emergency department visits among enrolled patients?. J Palliat Med. 2009, 12 (3): 245-253. 10.1089/jpm.2008.0217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Marshall D, Howell D, Brazil K, Howard M, Taniguchi A: Enhancing family physician capacity to deliver quality palliative home care. Can Fam Physician. 2008, 54: 1703e1-7.
10.
Fainsinger R, Brenneis C, Fassbender K: Edmonton, Canada: a regional model of palliative care development. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007, 33 (5): 634-639. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.02.012.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Bruera E, Neumann C, Gagnon B, Brenneis C, Quan H, Hanson J: The impact of a regional palliative care program on the cost of palliative care delivery. J Palliat Med. 2000, 3 (2): 181-186. 10.1089/10966210050085241.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Moorhead R: Sharing care between allied health professionals and general Practitioners. Aust Fam Physician. 1995, 24 (11): 1985.PubMed
13.
Provincial Health Services Authority: A report on shared care (Part of the Primary Health Care Shared Network Development Initiative). 2005, British Columbia: Provincial Health Services Authority
14.
Howell D, Marshall D, Brazil K, Taniguchi A, Howard M, Foster G, Thabane L: A shared care model pilot for palliative home care in a rural area: impact on symptoms, distress, and place of death. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011, 42: 60-75. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.09.022.CrossRefPubMed
15.
DeMiglio L, Williams A: Shared care: the barriers encountered by community-based palliative care teams in Ontario, Canada. Health Soc Care Community. 2012, 20 (4): 420-429. 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2012.01060.x.CrossRefPubMed
16.
DeMiglio L, Williams A: Factors enabling shared care with primary health care providers in community settings: the experiences of interdisciplinary palliative care teams. J Palliat Care. 2012, 28 (4): 282-289.PubMed
17.
Evashwick C, Ory M: Organizational characteristics of successful innovative health care programs sustained over time. Family Community Health. 2003, 26 (3): 177-193. 10.1097/00003727-200307000-00003.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Yin R: Case study research: design and methods. 2009, Los Angeles, CA: Sage
19.
Patton M: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 2002, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
20.
Baxter J, Eyles J: Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing “rigour” in interview analysis. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 1997, 22: 505-525. 10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00505.x.CrossRef
21.
Giesbrecht M, Crooks V, Williams A: Scale as an explanatory concept: evaluating Canada’s Compassionate Care Benefit. Area. 2010, 42 (4): 457-467. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00941.x.CrossRef
22.
Cope M: Coding qualitative data. Qualitative Research Methods In Human Geography. Edited by: Hay I. 2010, Don Mills, Canada: Oxford University Press, 281-294.
23.
Mitchell E: Multiple triangulation: a methodology for nursing science. Advances In Nursing Science. 1986, 8 (3): 18-26.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Mays N, Pope C: Rigour and qualitative research. Br Med J. 1995, 311 (8): 109-112.CrossRef
25.
Howitt R: Scale as a relation: musical metaphors of geographical scale. Area. 1998, 30 (1): 49-58. 10.1111/j.1475-4762.1998.tb00047.x.CrossRef
26.
Marston S, Jones J, Woodward K: Human Geography without scale. Royal Geographical Society. 2005, 30: 416-432.
27.
Paasi A: Place and region: looking through the prism of scale. Prog Hum Geogr. 2004, 28 (4): 536-546. 10.1191/0309132504ph502pr.CrossRef
28.
Brenner N: The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Prog Hum Geogr. 2001, 25 (4): 591-614. 10.1191/030913201682688959.CrossRef
29.
Smith N: Scale. The Dictionary of Human Geography. Edited by: Johnston R, Gregory D, Pratt G, Watts M. 2000, Oxford: Blackwell, 724-727. 4
30.
Quality Hospice Palliative Care Coalition of Ontario: Creating an integrated hospice palliative care system in Ontario: setting the stage for change. 2010, Toronto, Canada: Quality Hospice Palliative Care Coalition of Ontario
31.
Shediac-Rizkallah M, Bone L: Planning for the sustainability of community-based health programs: conceptual frameworks and future directions for research, practice and policy. Health Educ Res. 1998, 13 (1): 87-108. 10.1093/her/13.1.87.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Sibthorpe B, Glasgow N, Wells R: Questioning the Sustainability of Primary Health Care Innovation. Med J Aust. 2005, 183 (10): S52-53.PubMed
33.
Kelley M: Developing Rural Communities’ Capacity for Palliative Care: a Conceptual Model. J Palliat Care. 2007, 23 (3): 143-153.PubMed
34.
Hanson H, Salmoni A, Volpe R: Defining program sustainability: differing views of stakeholders. Can J Public Health. 2009, 100 (3): 304-309.PubMed
35.
Byock I, Sheils J, Merriman M, Collins K: Promoting excellence in end-of-life care: a report on innovative models of palliative care. J Palliat Med. 2006, 9 (1): 137-146. 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.137.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Von Gunten C, Romer A: Designing and sustaining a palliative care and home hospice program. J Palliat Med. 2000, 3 (1): 115-122. 10.1089/jpm.2000.3.115.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Metz Morch M, Neuenschwander H, Bruer E, Ripamonti C, Nunez-Olarte JM, Maltoni M, Nauck F, Mazzocato C, Mercadente S: From roots to flowers: challenges of developing a sustainable palliative care program. J Palliat Care. 2003, 19 (1): 58-62.
38.
Bookbinder M, Glajchen M, McHugh M, Higgins P, Budis J, Solomon N, Homel P, Cassin C, Portenoy R: Nurse practitioner-based models of specialist palliative care at home: sustainability and evaluation of feasibility. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011, 41 (1): 25-34. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.011.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Marston S: The social construction of scale. Prog Hum Geogr. 2000, 24 (2): 219-242.CrossRef
40.
Moore A: Rethinking scale as a geographical category: from analysis to practice. Prog Hum Geogr. 2008, 32 (2): 203-225.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A qualitative study examining the sustainability of shared care in the delivery of palliative care services in the community
Authors
Lily DeMiglio
Allison M Williams
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Palliative Care / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1472-684X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-684X-12-32

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Palliative Care 1/2013 Go to the issue

Research article

Improving palliative care outcomes for Aboriginal Australians: service providers’ perspectives

Research article

Decision-making capacity and communication about care of older people during their last three months of life

Research article

'My dreams are shuttered down and it hurts lots’–a qualitative study of palliative care needs and their management by HIV outpatient services in Kenya and Uganda

Research article

Evaluation of the living with hope program for rural women caregivers of persons with advanced cancer

Research article

Musculoskeletal pain in older adults at the end-of-life: a systematic search and critical review of the literature with priorities for future research

Research article

International recommendations for outpatient palliative care and prehospital palliative emergencies – a prospective questionnaire-based investigation