Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Patients' views on responsibility for the management of musculoskeletal disorders – A qualitative study

Authors: Maria EH Larsson, Lena A Nordholm, Ingbritt Öhrn

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Musculoskeletal disorders are very common and almost inevitable in an individual's lifetime. Enabling self-management and allowing the individual to take responsibility for care is stated as desired in the management of these disorders, but this may be asking more than people can generally manage. A willingness among people to take responsibility for musculoskeletal disorders and not place responsibility out of their hands or on employers but to be shared with medical professionals has been shown. The aim of the present study was to describe how people with musculoskeletal disorders think and reason regarding responsibility for prevention, treatment and management of the disorder.

Methods

Individual interviews with a strategic sample of 20 individuals with musculoskeletal disorders were performed. The interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed according to qualitative content analysis.

Results

From the interviews an overarching theme was identified: own responsibility needs to be met. The analysis revealed six interrelated categories: Taking on responsibility, Ambiguity about responsibility, Collaborating responsibility, Complying with recommendations, Disclaiming responsibility, and Responsibility irrelevant. These categories described different thoughts and reasoning regarding the responsibility for managing musculoskeletal disorders. Generally the responsibility for prevention of musculoskeletal disorders was described to lie primarily on society/authorities as they have knowledge of what to prevent and how to prevent it. When musculoskeletal disorders have occurred, health care should provide fast accessibility, diagnosis, prognosis and support for recovery. For long-term management, the individuals themselves are responsible for making the most out of life despite disorders.

Conclusion

No matter what the expressions of responsibility for musculoskeletal disorders are, own responsibility needs to be met by society, health care, employers and family in an appropriate way, with as much or as little of the "right type" of support needed, based on the individual's expectations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L, Kruger A: An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain. 1988, 32 (2): 173-183. 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90066-8.CrossRefPubMed Von Korff M, Dworkin SF, Le Resche L, Kruger A: An epidemiologic comparison of pain complaints. Pain. 1988, 32 (2): 173-183. 10.1016/0304-3959(88)90066-8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Walsh NE, Brooks P, Hazes JM, Walsh RM, Dreinhofer K, Woolf AD, Akesson K, Lidgren L: Standards of care for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain: the Bone and Joint Decade (2000–2010). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008, 89 (9): 1830-1845. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.009.CrossRefPubMed Walsh NE, Brooks P, Hazes JM, Walsh RM, Dreinhofer K, Woolf AD, Akesson K, Lidgren L: Standards of care for acute and chronic musculoskeletal pain: the Bone and Joint Decade (2000–2010). Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2008, 89 (9): 1830-1845. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.009.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kjellström S: Ansvar, hälsa och människa: en studie av idéer om individens ansvar för sin hälsa. 2005, Linköping: Institutionen för hälsa och samhälle Linköpings universitet distributör; Kjellström S: Ansvar, hälsa och människa: en studie av idéer om individens ansvar för sin hälsa. 2005, Linköping: Institutionen för hälsa och samhälle Linköpings universitet distributör;
5.
go back to reference Larsson ME, Nordholm LA: Responsibility for managing musculoskeletal disorders – a cross-sectional postal survey of attitudes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008, 9: 110-10.1186/1471-2474-9-110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Larsson ME, Nordholm LA: Responsibility for managing musculoskeletal disorders – a cross-sectional postal survey of attitudes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008, 9: 110-10.1186/1471-2474-9-110.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Patton MQ: Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 2002, London: SAGE, 3 Patton MQ: Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 2002, London: SAGE, 3
7.
go back to reference Graneheim UH, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004, 24 (2): 105-112. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefPubMed Graneheim UH, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004, 24 (2): 105-112. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sandelowski M: Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Research in Nursing and Health. 2000, 23 (4): 334-340. 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefPubMed Sandelowski M: Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Research in Nursing and Health. 2000, 23 (4): 334-340. 10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Polkinghorne DE: Narrative knowing and the human sciences. 1988, Albany: State University of New York Press; Polkinghorne DE: Narrative knowing and the human sciences. 1988, Albany: State University of New York Press;
10.
go back to reference Riessman CK: Narrative analysis. 1993, Newbury Park:Sage Riessman CK: Narrative analysis. 1993, Newbury Park:Sage
11.
go back to reference Bandura A: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977, 84 (2): 191-215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.CrossRefPubMed Bandura A: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977, 84 (2): 191-215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Bandura A: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. 1997, Basingstoke: W. H. Freeman;, ix- Bandura A: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. 1997, Basingstoke: W. H. Freeman;, ix-
13.
go back to reference Thomee P, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M, Thomee R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J: Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008, 16 (2): 118-127. 10.1007/s00167-007-0433-6.CrossRefPubMed Thomee P, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M, Thomee R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J: Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008, 16 (2): 118-127. 10.1007/s00167-007-0433-6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Friedman HS: Health psychology. 2002, Upper Saddle River, N.J. London: Prentice Hall; Pearson Education, 2 Friedman HS: Health psychology. 2002, Upper Saddle River, N.J. London: Prentice Hall; Pearson Education, 2
15.
go back to reference Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, appraisal, and coping. 1984, New York: Springer Lazarus RS, Folkman S: Stress, appraisal, and coping. 1984, New York: Springer
16.
go back to reference Brown GK, Nicassio PM: Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1987, 31 (1): 53-64. 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90006-6.CrossRefPubMed Brown GK, Nicassio PM: Development of a questionnaire for the assessment of active and passive coping strategies in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1987, 31 (1): 53-64. 10.1016/0304-3959(87)90006-6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Brown GK, Nicassio PM, Wallston KA: Pain coping strategies and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989, 57 (5): 652-657. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.5.652.CrossRefPubMed Brown GK, Nicassio PM, Wallston KA: Pain coping strategies and depression in rheumatoid arthritis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989, 57 (5): 652-657. 10.1037/0022-006X.57.5.652.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP: A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine. 2002, 27 (5): E109-120. 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017.CrossRefPubMed Pincus T, Burton AK, Vogel S, Field AP: A systematic review of psychological factors as predictors of chronicity/disability in prospective cohorts of low back pain. Spine. 2002, 27 (5): E109-120. 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rotter JB: Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs. 1966, 80 (1): 1-28.CrossRefPubMed Rotter JB: Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs. 1966, 80 (1): 1-28.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R: Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs. 1978, 6 (2): 160-170.CrossRefPubMed Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R: Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) scales. Health Education Monographs. 1978, 6 (2): 160-170.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Larsson MEH, Nordholm LA: Attitudes regarding responsibility for musculoskeletal disorders – Instrument development. Physiother Theory Pract. 2004, 20: 187-199. 10.1080/09593980490487447.CrossRef Larsson MEH, Nordholm LA: Attitudes regarding responsibility for musculoskeletal disorders – Instrument development. Physiother Theory Pract. 2004, 20: 187-199. 10.1080/09593980490487447.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference May S: Patients' attitudes and beliefs about back pain and its management after physiotherapy for low back pain. Physiotherapy Research International. 2007, 12 (3): 126-135. 10.1002/pri.367.CrossRefPubMed May S: Patients' attitudes and beliefs about back pain and its management after physiotherapy for low back pain. Physiotherapy Research International. 2007, 12 (3): 126-135. 10.1002/pri.367.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Polit DF, Hungler BP: Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. 1999, 6 Polit DF, Hungler BP: Nursing research: principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams &Wilkins. 1999, 6
24.
go back to reference Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Lincoln YS, Guba EG: Naturalistic inquiry. 1985, Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage
25.
go back to reference Antoniazzi M, Celinski M, Alcock J: Self-responsibility and coping with pain: disparate attitudes toward phychological issues in recovery from work place injury. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002, 24: 948-953. 10.1080/0963828021000007879.CrossRefPubMed Antoniazzi M, Celinski M, Alcock J: Self-responsibility and coping with pain: disparate attitudes toward phychological issues in recovery from work place injury. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002, 24: 948-953. 10.1080/0963828021000007879.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jamison JR: Patient-practitioner perceptions: can chiropractors assume congruence?. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000, 23 (6): 409-413. 10.1067/mmt.2000.108142.CrossRefPubMed Jamison JR: Patient-practitioner perceptions: can chiropractors assume congruence?. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000, 23 (6): 409-413. 10.1067/mmt.2000.108142.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patients' views on responsibility for the management of musculoskeletal disorders – A qualitative study
Authors
Maria EH Larsson
Lena A Nordholm
Ingbritt Öhrn
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-10-103

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2009 Go to the issue