Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2009

Open Access 01-12-2009 | Research article

Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study

Authors: Jonathan Ives, Sheila Greenfield, Jayne M Parry, Heather Draper, Christine Gratus, Judith I Petts, Tom Sorell, Sue Wilson

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Healthcare workers (HCWs) will play a key role in any response to pandemic influenza, and the UK healthcare system's ability to cope during an influenza pandemic will depend, to a large extent, on the number of HCWs who are able and willing to work through the crisis. UK emergency planning will be improved if planners have a better understanding of the reasons UK HCWs may have for their absenteeism, and what might motivate them to work during an influenza pandemic.
This paper reports the results of a qualitative study that explored UK HCWs' views (n = 64) about working during an influenza pandemic, in order to identify factors that might influence their willingness and ability to work and to identify potential sources of any perceived duty on HCWs to work.

Methods

A qualitative study, using focus groups (n = 9) and interviews (n = 5).

Results

HCWs across a range of roles and grades tended to feel motivated by a sense of obligation to work through an influenza pandemic. A number of significant barriers that may prevent them from doing so were also identified. Perceived barriers to the ability to work included being ill oneself, transport difficulties, and childcare responsibilities. Perceived barriers to the willingness to work included: prioritising the wellbeing of family members; a lack of trust in, and goodwill towards, the NHS; a lack of information about the risks and what is expected of them during the crisis; fear of litigation; and the feeling that employers do not take the needs of staff seriously. Barriers to ability and barriers to willingness, however, are difficult to separate out.

Conclusion

Although our participants tended to feel a general obligation to work during an influenza pandemic, there are barriers to working, which, if generalisable, may significantly reduce the NHS workforce during a pandemic. The barriers identified are both barriers to willingness and to ability. This suggests that pandemic planning needs to take into account the possibility that staff may be absent for reasons beyond those currently anticipated in UK planning documents. In particular, staff who are physically able to attend work may nonetheless be unwilling to do so. Although there are some barriers that cannot be mitigated by employers (such as illness, transport infrastructure etc.), there are a number of remedial steps that can be taken to lesson the impact of others (providing accommodation, building reciprocity, provision of information and guidance etc). We suggest that barriers to working lie along an ability/willingness continuum, and that absenteeism may be reduced by taking steps to prevent barriers to willingness becoming perceived barriers to ability.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
6.
go back to reference Daniels N: Duty to treat or right to refuse?. Hastings centre report. 1991, 21 (2): 36-46. 10.2307/3562338.CrossRef Daniels N: Duty to treat or right to refuse?. Hastings centre report. 1991, 21 (2): 36-46. 10.2307/3562338.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Annas GJ: Legal risks and responsibilities of physicians in the HIV epidemic. Hastings Center Report. 1988, 18 (2): S26-32. 10.2307/3562423.CrossRefPubMed Annas GJ: Legal risks and responsibilities of physicians in the HIV epidemic. Hastings Center Report. 1988, 18 (2): S26-32. 10.2307/3562423.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Freedman B: Health professionals, codes and the right to refuse to treat HIV-infected patients. Hastings Center Report. 1988, 18 (2): S20-25. 10.2307/3562422.CrossRefPubMed Freedman B: Health professionals, codes and the right to refuse to treat HIV-infected patients. Hastings Center Report. 1988, 18 (2): S20-25. 10.2307/3562422.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Arras JD: The fragile web of responsibility: AIDS and the duty to treat. Hastings Center Report. 1988, 18 (2): S10-20.CrossRefPubMed Arras JD: The fragile web of responsibility: AIDS and the duty to treat. Hastings Center Report. 1988, 18 (2): S10-20.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Zuger A, Miles SH: Physicians, AIDS, and occupational risk. Historic traditions and ethical obligations. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987, 258 (14): 1924-192. 10.1001/jama.258.14.1924.CrossRefPubMed Zuger A, Miles SH: Physicians, AIDS, and occupational risk. Historic traditions and ethical obligations. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1987, 258 (14): 1924-192. 10.1001/jama.258.14.1924.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ruderman C, Shawn Tracy C, Bensimon CM, Bernstein M, Hawryluck L, Zlotnik Shaul R, Upshur REG: On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares?. BMC Medical Ethics. 2006, 7: 5-10.1186/1472-6939-7-5.CrossRefPubMedCentral Ruderman C, Shawn Tracy C, Bensimon CM, Bernstein M, Hawryluck L, Zlotnik Shaul R, Upshur REG: On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares?. BMC Medical Ethics. 2006, 7: 5-10.1186/1472-6939-7-5.CrossRefPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Bevan JC, Upshur RE: Anaesthesia, ethics and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003, 50: 977-979.CrossRefPubMed Bevan JC, Upshur RE: Anaesthesia, ethics and severe acute respiratory syndrome. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia. 2003, 50: 977-979.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hui E: The SARS epidemic in Hong Kong 2003: Interplay of Law, Medicine and Ethics. The Nexus of Law and Biology: New ethical challenges. Edited by: Hocking B. 2008, Ashgate Publishing ltd, forthcoming December Hui E: The SARS epidemic in Hong Kong 2003: Interplay of Law, Medicine and Ethics. The Nexus of Law and Biology: New ethical challenges. Edited by: Hocking B. 2008, Ashgate Publishing ltd, forthcoming December
14.
go back to reference Tzeng H-M, Yin C-Y: Nurses' fears and professional obligations concerning possible human-to-human avain flu. Nursing Ethics. 2006, 13 (5): 455-470. 10.1191/0969733006nej893oa.CrossRefPubMed Tzeng H-M, Yin C-Y: Nurses' fears and professional obligations concerning possible human-to-human avain flu. Nursing Ethics. 2006, 13 (5): 455-470. 10.1191/0969733006nej893oa.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Young C, Persell D: Biological, chemical, and nuclear terrorism readiness: Major concerns and preparedness of future nurses. Disaster Management & Response. 2005, 2 (4): 109-114. 10.1016/j.dmr.2004.08.010.CrossRef Young C, Persell D: Biological, chemical, and nuclear terrorism readiness: Major concerns and preparedness of future nurses. Disaster Management & Response. 2005, 2 (4): 109-114. 10.1016/j.dmr.2004.08.010.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shaw KA, Chilcott A, Hansen E, Winzenberg T: The GP's response to pandemic influenza: a qualitative study. Family Practice. 2006, 23 (3): 267-272. 10.1093/fampra/cml014.CrossRefPubMed Shaw KA, Chilcott A, Hansen E, Winzenberg T: The GP's response to pandemic influenza: a qualitative study. Family Practice. 2006, 23 (3): 267-272. 10.1093/fampra/cml014.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ehrenstein BP, Hanses F, Salzberger B: Influenza pandemic and professional duty: family or patient's first? A qualitative survey of hospital employees. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 311-10.1186/1471-2458-6-311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ehrenstein BP, Hanses F, Salzberger B: Influenza pandemic and professional duty: family or patient's first? A qualitative survey of hospital employees. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 311-10.1186/1471-2458-6-311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Qureshi K, Gershon RRM, Sherman MF, Straub T, Gebbie E, McCollum M, Erwin MJ, Morse SS: Healthcare workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 2005, 82 (3): 378-88. 10.1093/jurban/jti086.CrossRef Qureshi K, Gershon RRM, Sherman MF, Straub T, Gebbie E, McCollum M, Erwin MJ, Morse SS: Healthcare workers' ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 2005, 82 (3): 378-88. 10.1093/jurban/jti086.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Balicer RD, Omer SB, Barnett DJ, Everly GS: Local public health workers' perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 99-10.1186/1471-2458-6-99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Balicer RD, Omer SB, Barnett DJ, Everly GS: Local public health workers' perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2006, 6: 99-10.1186/1471-2458-6-99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Yee Wong T, Koh G, Kwing Yong S, Sundram M, Koh K, Eng Chia S, Koh D: A cross-sectional study of primary care physicians in Singapore on their concerns and preparedness for an avian influenza outbreak. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore. 2008, 37 (6): 458-464. Yee Wong T, Koh G, Kwing Yong S, Sundram M, Koh K, Eng Chia S, Koh D: A cross-sectional study of primary care physicians in Singapore on their concerns and preparedness for an avian influenza outbreak. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore. 2008, 37 (6): 458-464.
22.
go back to reference Kitzinger J, Barbour R: Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. Edited by: Barbour R, Kitzinger R. 1999, London; Sage Kitzinger J, Barbour R: Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice. Edited by: Barbour R, Kitzinger R. 1999, London; Sage
23.
go back to reference Morgan D, Kreuger RA: When to use focus groups and why. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Edited by: Morgan D. 1993, London; SageCrossRef Morgan D, Kreuger RA: When to use focus groups and why. Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art. Edited by: Morgan D. 1993, London; SageCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K: Focus Groups in Social Research. 2001, London; SageCrossRef Bloor M, Frankland J, Thomas M, Robson K: Focus Groups in Social Research. 2001, London; SageCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Silverman D: Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. 2004, Sage; London Silverman D: Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. 2004, Sage; London
26.
go back to reference Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures. 1990, London; Sage Strauss A, Corbin J: Basics of Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory Procedures. 1990, London; Sage
27.
go back to reference Finch H, Lewis J: Focus Groups. Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Edited by: Ritchie J, Lewis J. 2005, Sage; London Finch H, Lewis J: Focus Groups. Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Edited by: Ritchie J, Lewis J. 2005, Sage; London
28.
go back to reference Bowling A: Research Methods in Health: Investigating health and health services. 2004, OUP;Maidenhead, 2 Bowling A: Research Methods in Health: Investigating health and health services. 2004, OUP;Maidenhead, 2
29.
go back to reference Draper H, Wilson S, Ives J, Gratus C, Greenfield S, Parry J, Petts J, Sorell T: Healthcare worker's attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: A multi-method study. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 192-10.1186/1471-2458-8-192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Draper H, Wilson S, Ives J, Gratus C, Greenfield S, Parry J, Petts J, Sorell T: Healthcare worker's attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: A multi-method study. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8: 192-10.1186/1471-2458-8-192.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Wong L, Kolditz T, Millen R, Potter T: Why they fight: combat motivation in the Iraq war. 2003, DIANE publishing Wong L, Kolditz T, Millen R, Potter T: Why they fight: combat motivation in the Iraq war. 2003, DIANE publishing
33.
go back to reference MacCoun R, Kier E, Belkin A: Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces and Society. 2005, 32 (1): 1-9. MacCoun R, Kier E, Belkin A: Does social cohesion determine motivation in combat? An old question with an old answer. Armed Forces and Society. 2005, 32 (1): 1-9.
Metadata
Title
Healthcare workers' attitudes to working during pandemic influenza: a qualitative study
Authors
Jonathan Ives
Sheila Greenfield
Jayne M Parry
Heather Draper
Christine Gratus
Judith I Petts
Tom Sorell
Sue Wilson
Publication date
01-12-2009
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2009
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-56

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

BMC Public Health 1/2009 Go to the issue