Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2008

Open Access 01-12-2008 | Research article

The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results

Authors: Elmer V Villanueva, Sandra Jones, Caroline Nehill, Simone Favelle, David Steel, Donald Iverson, Helen Zorbas

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The Breast Health Surveys, conducted by the National Breast Cancer Centre (NBCC) in 1996 and 2003, are designed to gain insight into the knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of a nationally representative sample of Australian women on issues relevant to breast cancer. In this article, we focus on major aspects of the design and present results on respondents' knowledge about mammographic screening.

Methods

The 2003 BHS surveyed English-speaking Australian women aged 30–69 without a history of breast cancer using computer-assisted telephone interviewing. Questions covered the following themes: knowledge and perceptions about incidence, mortality and risk; knowledge and behaviour regarding early detection, symptoms and diagnosis; mammographic screening; treatment; and accessibility and availability of information and services. Respondents were selected using a complex sample design involving stratification. Sample weights against Australian population benchmarks were used in all statistical analyses. Means and proportions for the entire population and by age group and area of residence were calculated. Statistical tests were conducted using a level of significance of 0.01.

Results

Of the 3,144 respondents who consented to being interviewed, 138 (4.4%) had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer and were excluded leaving 3,006 completed interviews eligible for analysis. A majority of respondents (61.1%) reported ever having had a mammogram and 29.1% identified mammography as being the best way of finding breast cancer. A majority of women (85.9%) had heard of the BreastScreen Australia (BSA) program, the national mammographic screening program providing free biennial screening mammograms, with 94.5% believing that BSA attendance was available regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms. There have been substantial gains in women's knowledge about mammographic screening over the seven years between the two surveys.

Conclusion

The NBCC Breast Health Surveys provide a valuable picture of the knowledge of Australian women about a range of issues. The present analysis shows significant gains in knowledge and behaviours relating to mammographic screening, while identifying additional areas for targeted improvement, as in the need to better communicate with women about screening and diagnostic services. Further analysis of additional core topic areas (eg., incidence, mortality, risk and treatment) will provide equally noteworthy insight.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Breast Cancer Centre: Breast Cancer in Australia: An Overview, 2006. 2006, Canberra: AIHW Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Breast Cancer Centre: Breast Cancer in Australia: An Overview, 2006. 2006, Canberra: AIHW
2.
go back to reference Barratt A, Cockburn J, Lowe J, Paul C, Perkins J, Redman S: Report of the 1996 Breast Health Survey. 1997, Woolloomooloo: NHMRC NBCC Barratt A, Cockburn J, Lowe J, Paul C, Perkins J, Redman S: Report of the 1996 Breast Health Survey. 1997, Woolloomooloo: NHMRC NBCC
3.
go back to reference Barratt AL, Cockburn J, Redman S, Paul C, Perkins J: Mammographic screening: results from the 1996 National Breast Health Survey. Med J Aust. 1997, 167 (10): 521-524.PubMed Barratt AL, Cockburn J, Redman S, Paul C, Perkins J: Mammographic screening: results from the 1996 National Breast Health Survey. Med J Aust. 1997, 167 (10): 521-524.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Australia on Disk: Australia on Disk. Sydney. 2003 Australia on Disk: Australia on Disk. Sydney. 2003
5.
go back to reference Salmon CT, Nichols JS: The next-birthday method of respondent selection. Publ Opinion Quart. 1983, 47: 270-276. 10.1086/268785.CrossRef Salmon CT, Nichols JS: The next-birthday method of respondent selection. Publ Opinion Quart. 1983, 47: 270-276. 10.1086/268785.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC). 2001, Canberra: ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC). 2001, Canberra: ABS
7.
go back to reference Kish L, Anderson DW: Multivariate and multipurpose stratification. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978, 73: 24-34. 10.2307/2286511.CrossRef Kish L, Anderson DW: Multivariate and multipurpose stratification. J Am Stat Assoc. 1978, 73: 24-34. 10.2307/2286511.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics: Census of Population and Housing. 2003, Canberra: ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics: Census of Population and Housing. 2003, Canberra: ABS
9.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics: Labour Force, Australia. 2003, Canberra: ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics: Labour Force, Australia. 2003, Canberra: ABS
10.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics: Information Paper: ABS Views on Remoteness. 2001, Canberra: ABS Australian Bureau of Statistics: Information Paper: ABS Views on Remoteness. 2001, Canberra: ABS
11.
go back to reference Kish L: Weighting for unequal pi. J Official Stat. 1992, 8: 183-200. Kish L: Weighting for unequal pi. J Official Stat. 1992, 8: 183-200.
12.
go back to reference Carney PA, Goodrich ME, Mackenzie T, Weiss JE, Poplack SP, Wells WS, Titus-Ernstoff L: Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire: a population-based assessment. Cancer. 2005, 104 (8): 1726-1732. 10.1002/cncr.21365.CrossRefPubMed Carney PA, Goodrich ME, Mackenzie T, Weiss JE, Poplack SP, Wells WS, Titus-Ernstoff L: Utilization of screening mammography in New Hampshire: a population-based assessment. Cancer. 2005, 104 (8): 1726-1732. 10.1002/cncr.21365.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Seeff L, Richards T, Stallings F: Breast, cervical, and colorectal carcinoma screening in a demographically defined region of the southern U.S. Cancer. 2002, 95 (10): 2211-2222. 10.1002/cncr.10933.CrossRefPubMed Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Seeff L, Richards T, Stallings F: Breast, cervical, and colorectal carcinoma screening in a demographically defined region of the southern U.S. Cancer. 2002, 95 (10): 2211-2222. 10.1002/cncr.10933.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Segura JM, Castells X, Casamitjana M, Macia F, Ferrer F: Utilization of screening mammography as a preventive practice prior to initiating a population-based breast cancer screening program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53 (6): 595-603. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00201-2.CrossRefPubMed Segura JM, Castells X, Casamitjana M, Macia F, Ferrer F: Utilization of screening mammography as a preventive practice prior to initiating a population-based breast cancer screening program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000, 53 (6): 595-603. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00201-2.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference BreastScreen Australia National Advisory Committee, Department of Health and Aged Care: BreastScreen Australia Evaluation Plan Phase II. 2000, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia BreastScreen Australia National Advisory Committee, Department of Health and Aged Care: BreastScreen Australia Evaluation Plan Phase II. 2000, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia
16.
go back to reference Cockburn J, Murphy B, Schofield P, Hill D, Borland R: Development of a strategy to encourage attendance for screening mammography. Health Educ Res. 1991, 6 (3): 279-290. 10.1093/her/6.3.279.CrossRefPubMed Cockburn J, Murphy B, Schofield P, Hill D, Borland R: Development of a strategy to encourage attendance for screening mammography. Health Educ Res. 1991, 6 (3): 279-290. 10.1093/her/6.3.279.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Haas JS, Liang SY, Baker LC, Tye S, Kerlikowske K, Sakowski J, Spetz J: Are gatekeeper requirements associated with cancer screening utilization?. Health Serv Res. 2004, 39 (1): 153-178. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00220.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phillips KA, Haas JS, Liang SY, Baker LC, Tye S, Kerlikowske K, Sakowski J, Spetz J: Are gatekeeper requirements associated with cancer screening utilization?. Health Serv Res. 2004, 39 (1): 153-178. 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00220.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Eilat-Tsanani S, Sorek M, Gay N, Chaimovitch O, Kulton L, Tabenkin H: Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography – an innovative community project. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001, 3 (12): 920-924.PubMed Eilat-Tsanani S, Sorek M, Gay N, Chaimovitch O, Kulton L, Tabenkin H: Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography – an innovative community project. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001, 3 (12): 920-924.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Keller B, Stutz EZ, Tibblin M, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Faisst K, Probst-Hensch N: Screening mammographies in Switzerland: what makes female and male physicians prescribe them?. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001, 131 (21–22): 311-319.PubMed Keller B, Stutz EZ, Tibblin M, Ackermann-Liebrich U, Faisst K, Probst-Hensch N: Screening mammographies in Switzerland: what makes female and male physicians prescribe them?. Swiss Med Wkly. 2001, 131 (21–22): 311-319.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L: Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001, 14 (5): 352-361.PubMed Nutting PA, Baier M, Werner JJ, Cutter G, Conry C, Stewart L: Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001, 14 (5): 352-361.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: BreastScreen Australia Monitoring Report 2001–2002. 2005, Canberra: AIHW Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: BreastScreen Australia Monitoring Report 2001–2002. 2005, Canberra: AIHW
22.
go back to reference Cockburn J, Redman S, Hill D, Henry E: Public understanding of medical screening. J Med Screen. 1995, 2 (4): 224-227.PubMed Cockburn J, Redman S, Hill D, Henry E: Public understanding of medical screening. J Med Screen. 1995, 2 (4): 224-227.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Zorbas H, Villanueva EV, Nehill C: Investigation of breast symptoms: Meeting the challenge. Med Today. 2006, 7 (2): 52-57. Zorbas H, Villanueva EV, Nehill C: Investigation of breast symptoms: Meeting the challenge. Med Today. 2006, 7 (2): 52-57.
24.
go back to reference Fox J: Social desirability, prediction equation, regression equations, and intrinsic response bias. Psychol Bull. 1967, 67: 391-400. 10.1037/h0024553.CrossRefPubMed Fox J: Social desirability, prediction equation, regression equations, and intrinsic response bias. Psychol Bull. 1967, 67: 391-400. 10.1037/h0024553.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Singer E, Hippler HJ, Schwarz N: Confidentiality assurances in surveys: reassurance or threat. Int J Public Opinion Red. 1992, 4: 256-268. 10.1093/ijpor/4.3.256.CrossRef Singer E, Hippler HJ, Schwarz N: Confidentiality assurances in surveys: reassurance or threat. Int J Public Opinion Red. 1992, 4: 256-268. 10.1093/ijpor/4.3.256.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fisher RF: Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consumer Res. 1993, 20: 303-313. 10.1086/209351.CrossRef Fisher RF: Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J Consumer Res. 1993, 20: 303-313. 10.1086/209351.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Groves RM, Couper MP, Eds: Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. 1998, New York: Wiley Groves RM, Couper MP, Eds: Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. 1998, New York: Wiley
28.
go back to reference Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJ, Eds: Survey Nonresponse. 2002, New York: Wiley Groves RM, Dillman DA, Eltinge JL, Little RJ, Eds: Survey Nonresponse. 2002, New York: Wiley
29.
go back to reference Tuckel PS, O'Neill H: The vanishing respondent in telephone surveys. J Advertising Res. 2002, 42: 26-48.CrossRef Tuckel PS, O'Neill H: The vanishing respondent in telephone surveys. J Advertising Res. 2002, 42: 26-48.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E: Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q. 2005, 69: 87-98. 10.1093/poq/nfi002.CrossRef Curtin R, Presser S, Singer E: Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century. Public Opin Q. 2005, 69: 87-98. 10.1093/poq/nfi002.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results
Authors
Elmer V Villanueva
Sandra Jones
Caroline Nehill
Simone Favelle
David Steel
Donald Iverson
Helen Zorbas
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-13

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

BMC Public Health 1/2008 Go to the issue