Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2004

Open Access 01-12-2004 | Research article

The lack of public health research output from India

Authors: Lalit Dandona, Yegnanarayana S Sivan, Mukkamala N Jyothi, VS Udaya Bhaskar, Rakhi Dandona

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Systematic assessment of recent health research output from India, and its relation with the estimated disease burden, is not available. This information would help understand the areas in health research that need improvement in India to enhance the health of India's population.

Methods

The health research output from India during 2002, which was accessible in the public domain, was assessed by searching PubMed and other internet health literature databases, and was related to the disease burden suggested by the Global Burden of Disease Study. The main outcome measures were number of health papers with abstracts in basic, clinical and public health sciences; quality-adjusted research output based on the impact factors of journals in which the papers were published; classification of papers in disease/condition categories and comparison of research output with the estimated disease burden in each category. Comparison of the health papers from India during 2002 included in PubMed was done with those from Australia during one quarter of 2002.

Results

Of the 4876 health papers from India in 2002 in PubMed, 48.4%, 47.1% and 4.4% were in basic, clinical and public health sciences, respectively. Of the 4495 papers based on original research, only 3.3% were in public health. Quality-adjusted original research output was highest for non-communicable diseases (62% of total). Of the total quality-adjusted original research output, the proportions in injuries (0.7%), cardiovascular diseases (3.6%), respiratory infections (0.2%), diarrhoeal diseases (1.9%), perinatal conditions (0.4%), childhood cluster diseases (0.5%), unipolar major depression (0%), and HIV/AIDS (1.5%) were substantially lower than their proportional contribution to the disease burden in India. Human resources, health policy, health economics, and impact assessment of interventions were particularly poorly represented in public health research. The Australia-India ratio for quality-adjusted health research output per unit gross domestic product was 20 and for public health research output was 31.

Conclusions

Good-quality public health research output from India is grossly inadequate, and strategic planning to improve it is necessary if substantial enhancement of population health were to be made possible. There is inordinately low relative research output in several diseases/conditions that cause major disease burden in India.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report 2003 New York. 2003 United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Report 2003 New York. 2003
2.
go back to reference Murray CJL, Lopez AD: The Global Burden of Disease. 1996, Boston: Harvard University Press Murray CJL, Lopez AD: The Global Burden of Disease. 1996, Boston: Harvard University Press
5.
go back to reference Institute for Scientific Information: Journal Citation Reports: Impact Factor Philadelphia. 2003 Institute for Scientific Information: Journal Citation Reports: Impact Factor Philadelphia. 2003
6.
go back to reference Garfield E: Journal impact factor: a brief overview. Can Med Assoc J. 1999, 161: 979-980. Garfield E: Journal impact factor: a brief overview. Can Med Assoc J. 1999, 161: 979-980.
14.
go back to reference Dandona L: Conceptualizing health policy. Natl Med J India. 2002, 15: 226-231.PubMed Dandona L: Conceptualizing health policy. Natl Med J India. 2002, 15: 226-231.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sahni P, Reddy PP, Kiran R, Reddy KS, Pande GK, Nundy S: Indian medical journals. Lancet. 1992, 339: 1589-1591. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91844-X.CrossRefPubMed Sahni P, Reddy PP, Kiran R, Reddy KS, Pande GK, Nundy S: Indian medical journals. Lancet. 1992, 339: 1589-1591. 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91844-X.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vohora SB, Vohora D: Why are Indian journals' impact factors so low?. Nature. 2001, 412: 583-10.1038/35088214.CrossRefPubMed Vohora SB, Vohora D: Why are Indian journals' impact factors so low?. Nature. 2001, 412: 583-10.1038/35088214.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Favaloro EJ: Medical research in New South Wales 1993–1996 assessed by Medline publication capture. Med J Aust. 1998, 169: 617-622.PubMed Favaloro EJ: Medical research in New South Wales 1993–1996 assessed by Medline publication capture. Med J Aust. 1998, 169: 617-622.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Rosselli D: Latin American biomedical publications: the case of Colombia in Medline. Med Educ. 1998, 32: 274-277. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00214.x.CrossRefPubMed Rosselli D: Latin American biomedical publications: the case of Colombia in Medline. Med Educ. 1998, 32: 274-277. 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00214.x.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Bunout D, Reyes H: Biomedical papers written by Chilean authors published in international journals in 1997. A review from MEDLINE. Rev Med Chil. 1998, 126: 677-688.PubMed Bunout D, Reyes H: Biomedical papers written by Chilean authors published in international journals in 1997. A review from MEDLINE. Rev Med Chil. 1998, 126: 677-688.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hefler L, Tempfer C, Kainz C: Geography of biomedical publications in the European Union, 1990–98. Lancet. 1999, 353: 1856-10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01278-7.CrossRefPubMed Hefler L, Tempfer C, Kainz C: Geography of biomedical publications in the European Union, 1990–98. Lancet. 1999, 353: 1856-10.1016/S0140-6736(99)01278-7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Thompson DF: Geography of U.S. biomedical publications, 1990 to 1997. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 817-818. 10.1056/NEJM199903113401020.CrossRefPubMed Thompson DF: Geography of U.S. biomedical publications, 1990 to 1997. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340: 817-818. 10.1056/NEJM199903113401020.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rahman M, Laz TH, Fukui T: Health related research in Bangladesh: MEDLINE based analysis. J Epidemiol. 1999, 9: 235-239.CrossRefPubMed Rahman M, Laz TH, Fukui T: Health related research in Bangladesh: MEDLINE based analysis. J Epidemiol. 1999, 9: 235-239.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Han MC, Lee CS: Scientific publication productivity of Korean medical colleges: an analysis of 1988–1999 MEDLINE papers. J Korean Med Sci. 2000, 15: 3-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han MC, Lee CS: Scientific publication productivity of Korean medical colleges: an analysis of 1988–1999 MEDLINE papers. J Korean Med Sci. 2000, 15: 3-12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Tadmouri GO, Bissar-Tadmouri N: Biomedical publications in an unstable world: the Arab world, 1988–2002. Lancet. 2003, 362: 1766-10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14868-4.CrossRefPubMed Tadmouri GO, Bissar-Tadmouri N: Biomedical publications in an unstable world: the Arab world, 1988–2002. Lancet. 2003, 362: 1766-10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14868-4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Arunachalam S: Does India perform medical research in areas where it is most needed?. Natl Med J India. 1998, 11: 27-34.PubMed Arunachalam S: Does India perform medical research in areas where it is most needed?. Natl Med J India. 1998, 11: 27-34.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Dandona L: Enhancing the evidence base for HIV/AIDS control in India. Natl Med J India. 2004, 17: 160-166.PubMed Dandona L: Enhancing the evidence base for HIV/AIDS control in India. Natl Med J India. 2004, 17: 160-166.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: National Consultation on Institutes of Public Health in India – From Concept to Reality: 16–17 September 2004. 2004, New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: National Consultation on Institutes of Public Health in India – From Concept to Reality: 16–17 September 2004. 2004, New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
29.
go back to reference International Working Party to Promote and Revitalis Academic Medicine: Academic medicine: the evidence base. BMJ. 2004, 329: 789-792. 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.789.CrossRef International Working Party to Promote and Revitalis Academic Medicine: Academic medicine: the evidence base. BMJ. 2004, 329: 789-792. 10.1136/bmj.329.7469.789.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Buekens P, Keusch G, Belizan J, Bhutta ZA: Evidence-based global health. JAMA. 2004, 291: 2639-2641. 10.1001/jama.291.21.2639.CrossRefPubMed Buekens P, Keusch G, Belizan J, Bhutta ZA: Evidence-based global health. JAMA. 2004, 291: 2639-2641. 10.1001/jama.291.21.2639.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The lack of public health research output from India
Authors
Lalit Dandona
Yegnanarayana S Sivan
Mukkamala N Jyothi
VS Udaya Bhaskar
Rakhi Dandona
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2004
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-4-55

Other articles of this Issue 1/2004

BMC Public Health 1/2004 Go to the issue