Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2014

Open Access 01-12-2014 | Research article

The role and utilisation of public health evaluations in Europe: a case study of national hand hygiene campaigns

Authors: Jonathan R Latham, Anna-Pelagia Magiorakos, Dominique L Monnet, Sophie Alleaume, Olov Aspevall, Alexander Blacky, Michael Borg, Maria Ciurus, Ana Cristina Costa, Robert Cunney, Mojca Dolinšek, Uga Dumpis, Sabine Erne, Olafur Gudlaugsson, Dana Hedlova, Elisabeth Heisbourg, Jette Holt, Natalia Kerbo, Nina Kristine Sorknes, Outi Lyytikäinen, Helena C Maltezou, Stavroula Michael, Maria Luisa Moro, Christiane Reichardt, Maria Stefkovicova, Emese Szilágyi, Rolanda Valinteliene, Rossitza Vatcheva-Dobrevska, Natacha Viseur, Andreas Voss, Suzette Woodward, Laura Cordier, Andreas Jansen, Spanish Hand Hygiene Campaign

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Evaluations are essential to judge the success of public health programmes. In Europe, the proportion of public health programmes that undergo evaluation remains unclear. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control sought to determine the frequency of evaluations amongst European national public health programmes by using national hand hygiene campaigns as an example of intervention.

Methods

A cohort of all national hand hygiene campaigns initiated between 2000 and 2012 was utilised for the analysis. The aim was to collect information about evaluations of hand hygiene campaigns and their frequency. The survey was sent to nominated contact points for healthcare-associated infection surveillance in European Union and European Economic Area Member States.

Results

Thirty-six hand hygiene campaigns in 20 countries were performed between 2000 and 2012. Of these, 50% had undergone an evaluation and 55% of those utilised the WHO hand hygiene intervention self-assessment tool. Evaluations utilised a variety of methodologies and indicators in assessing changes in hand hygiene behaviours pre and post intervention. Of the 50% of campaigns that were not evaluated, two thirds reported that both human and financial resource constraints posed significant barriers for the evaluation.

Conclusion

The study identified an upward trend in the number of hand hygiene campaigns implemented in Europe. It is likely that the availability of the internationally-accepted evaluation methodology developed by the WHO contributed to the evaluation of more hand hygiene campaigns in Europe. Despite this rise, hand hygiene campaigns appear to be under-evaluated. The development of simple, programme-specific, standardised guidelines, evaluation indicators and other evidence-based public health materials could help promote evaluations across all areas of public health.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999, 48 (RR11): 1-40. Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Framework for program evaluation in public health. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1999, 48 (RR11): 1-40.
3.
go back to reference Smith RD, Petticrew M: Public health evaluation in the twenty-first century: time to see the wood as well as the trees. J Public Health. 2010, 32 (1): 2-7. 10.1093/pubmed/fdp122.CrossRef Smith RD, Petticrew M: Public health evaluation in the twenty-first century: time to see the wood as well as the trees. J Public Health. 2010, 32 (1): 2-7. 10.1093/pubmed/fdp122.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Son C, Chuck T, Childers T, et al: Rethinking hand hygiene improvement programs in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2011, 39 (9): 716-724. 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.12.008.CrossRefPubMed Son C, Chuck T, Childers T, et al: Rethinking hand hygiene improvement programs in health care settings. Am J Infect Control. 2011, 39 (9): 716-724. 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.12.008.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Magiorakos AP, Suetens C, Boyd L, et al: National hand hygiene campaigns in Europe, 2000–2009. Euro Surveill. 2009, 14 (17): pii: 19190- Magiorakos AP, Suetens C, Boyd L, et al: National hand hygiene campaigns in Europe, 2000–2009. Euro Surveill. 2009, 14 (17): pii: 19190-
9.
go back to reference Elliott P: Recognising the psychosocial issues involved in hand hygiene. J R Soc Promot Health. 2003, 123 (2): 88-94. 10.1177/146642400312300212.CrossRefPubMed Elliott P: Recognising the psychosocial issues involved in hand hygiene. J R Soc Promot Health. 2003, 123 (2): 88-94. 10.1177/146642400312300212.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Guidelines of hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002, 51 ((RR-16): 1-45. Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Guidelines of hand hygiene in health-care settings. Recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002, 51 ((RR-16): 1-45.
13.
go back to reference Haas JP, Larson EL: Compliance with hand hygiene guidelines: where are we in 2008?. Am J Nursing. 2008, 108 (8): 40-44. 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000330260.76229.71.CrossRef Haas JP, Larson EL: Compliance with hand hygiene guidelines: where are we in 2008?. Am J Nursing. 2008, 108 (8): 40-44. 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000330260.76229.71.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sax H, et al: Determinants of good adherence to hand hygiene among healthcare workers who have extensive exposure to hand hygiene campaigns. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007, 28: 1267-1274. 10.1086/521663.CrossRefPubMed Sax H, et al: Determinants of good adherence to hand hygiene among healthcare workers who have extensive exposure to hand hygiene campaigns. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007, 28: 1267-1274. 10.1086/521663.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Allegranzi B, Pittet D: Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2009, 73 (4): 305-315. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.019.CrossRefPubMed Allegranzi B, Pittet D: Role of hand hygiene in healthcare-associated infection prevention. J Hosp Infect. 2009, 73 (4): 305-315. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.019.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stout A, Ritchie K, Macpherson K: Clinical effectiveness of alcohol-based products in increasing hand hygiene compliance and reducing infection rates: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2007, 66 (4): 308-312. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.04.017.CrossRefPubMed Stout A, Ritchie K, Macpherson K: Clinical effectiveness of alcohol-based products in increasing hand hygiene compliance and reducing infection rates: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect. 2007, 66 (4): 308-312. 10.1016/j.jhin.2007.04.017.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gordin FM, Schultz ME, Huber RA, Gill JA: Reduction in nosocomial transmission of drug-resistant bacteria after introduction of an alcohol-based handrub. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005, 26 (7): 650-653. 10.1086/502596.CrossRefPubMed Gordin FM, Schultz ME, Huber RA, Gill JA: Reduction in nosocomial transmission of drug-resistant bacteria after introduction of an alcohol-based handrub. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2005, 26 (7): 650-653. 10.1086/502596.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Girou E, Legrand P, Soing-Altrach S, et al: Association between hand hygiene compliance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence in a French rehabilitation hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006, 27 (10): 1128-1130. 10.1086/507967.CrossRefPubMed Girou E, Legrand P, Soing-Altrach S, et al: Association between hand hygiene compliance and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prevalence in a French rehabilitation hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006, 27 (10): 1128-1130. 10.1086/507967.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stone SP, Fuller C, Savage J, et al: Evaluation of the national Cleanyourhands campaign to reduce Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals in England and Wales by improved hand hygiene: four year, prospective, ecological, interrupted time series study. BMJ. 2012, 344: e3005-10.1136/bmj.e3005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stone SP, Fuller C, Savage J, et al: Evaluation of the national Cleanyourhands campaign to reduce Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals in England and Wales by improved hand hygiene: four year, prospective, ecological, interrupted time series study. BMJ. 2012, 344: e3005-10.1136/bmj.e3005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Churchill AA: Rural Water Supply and Sanitation: Time for a Change. 1987, World Bank: Washington (DC) Churchill AA: Rural Water Supply and Sanitation: Time for a Change. 1987, World Bank: Washington (DC)
Metadata
Title
The role and utilisation of public health evaluations in Europe: a case study of national hand hygiene campaigns
Authors
Jonathan R Latham
Anna-Pelagia Magiorakos
Dominique L Monnet
Sophie Alleaume
Olov Aspevall
Alexander Blacky
Michael Borg
Maria Ciurus
Ana Cristina Costa
Robert Cunney
Mojca Dolinšek
Uga Dumpis
Sabine Erne
Olafur Gudlaugsson
Dana Hedlova
Elisabeth Heisbourg
Jette Holt
Natalia Kerbo
Nina Kristine Sorknes
Outi Lyytikäinen
Helena C Maltezou
Stavroula Michael
Maria Luisa Moro
Christiane Reichardt
Maria Stefkovicova
Emese Szilágyi
Rolanda Valinteliene
Rossitza Vatcheva-Dobrevska
Natacha Viseur
Andreas Voss
Suzette Woodward
Laura Cordier
Andreas Jansen
Spanish Hand Hygiene Campaign
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-131

Other articles of this Issue 1/2014

BMC Public Health 1/2014 Go to the issue