Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

How has the flu virus infected the Web? 2010 influenza and vaccine information available on the Internet

Authors: Loredana Covolo, Silvia Mascaretti, Anna Caruana, Grazia Orizio, Luigi Caimi, Umberto Gelatti

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The 2009–10 influenza pandemic was a major public health concern. Vaccination was recommended by the health authorities, but compliance was not optimal and perception of the presumed associated risks was high among the public. The Internet is increasingly being used as a source of health information and advice. The aim of the study was to investigate the characteristics of websites providing information about flu vaccine and the quality of the information provided.

Methods

Website selection was performed in autumn 2010 by entering eight keywords in two of the most commonly used search engines (Google.com and Yahoo.com). The first three result pages were analysed for each search, giving a total of 480 occurrences. Page rank was evaluated to assess visibility. Websites based on Web 2.0 philosophy, websites merely displaying popular news/articles and single files were excluded from the subsequent analysis. We analysed the selected websites (using WHO criteria) as well as the information provided, using a codebook for pro/neutral websites and a qualitative approach for the adverse ones.

Results

Of the 89 websites selected, 54 dealt with seasonal vaccination, three with anti-H1N1 vaccination and 32 with both. Rank analysis showed that only classic websites (ones not falling in any other category) and one social network were provided on the first pages by Yahoo; 21 classic websites, six displaying popular news/articles and one blog by Google. Analysis of the selected websites revealed that the majority of them (88.8%) had a positive/neutral attitude to flu vaccination. Pro/neutral websites distinguished themselves from the adverse ones by some revealing features like greater transparency, credibility and privacy protection.

Conclusions

We found that the majority of the websites providing information on flu vaccination were pro/neutral and gave sufficient information. We suggest that antivaccinationist information may have been spread by a different route, such as via Web 2.0 tools, which may be more prone to the dissemination of “viral” information. The page ranking analysis revealed the crucial role of search engines regarding access to information on the Internet.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
Wolfe R, Sharp L: Vaccination or immunization? The impact of search terms on the internet. J Health Commun. 2005, 10 (6): 537-551. 10.1080/10810730500228847.CrossRefPubMed
4.
KARE Knowledge Acquisition, Reuse and Evaluation: Ontology and Semantic Web Services for Knowledge Management. 2010, Third International Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Reuse and Evaluation. Available: https://​acsp.​utbm.​fr/​Kare2010/​ Accessed Sept 2010
5.
Betsch C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T, Ulshöfer C: The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks. J Health Psychol. 2010, 15 (3): 446-455. 10.1177/1359105309353647.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Wolfe R, Sharp L, Lipsky M: Content and design attributes of antivaccination web sites. JAMA. 2002, 287 (24): 3245-3248. 10.1001/jama.287.24.3245.CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
Kata A: A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine. 2010, 28 (7): 1709-1716. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Mayer MA, Leis A, Sanz F: Health information on the Internet and trust marks as quality indicators: vaccines case study. Aten Primaria. 2009, 41 (10): 534-542. 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.003.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, Wilson K: YouTube as a Source of Information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA. 2007, 298 (21): 2482-2484.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, Sood A, Singh G: Youtube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med. 2010, 38 (3): e1-e3. 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.11.007.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Betsch C: Innovations in communication: the internet and the psychology of vaccination decisions. Euro Surveill. 2011, 16 (17): pii: 19849-
13.
Chew C, Eysenbach G: Pandemics in the age of Twitter: Content analysis of tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS One. 2009, 5 (11): e14118-CrossRef
14.
Gesualdo F, Romano M, Pandolfi E, Rizzo C, Ravà L: Surfing the web during pandemic flu: availability of World Health Organization recommendations on prevention. BMC. 2010, 10: 561-
15.
Bish A, Yardley L, Nicoll A, Michie S: Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: a systematic review. Vaccine. 2011, 29 (38): 6472-6484. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Tozzi AE, Buonuomo PS, Atti ML Cd, Carloni E, Meloni M: Comparison of quality of Internet pages on Human Papillomavirus immunization in Italian and in English. Adolesc Health. 2010, 46 (1): 83-89. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.006.CrossRef
18.
19.
Riffle D, Lacy S, Fico FG: Analyzing media messages. Using quantitative content analysis in research. 2005, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
20.
World Health Organization: Position Paper on Influenza. Wkly Epidemiol Record. 2005, 33 (19 Aug): 279-287.
21.
22.
Fitzsimons GJ, Hutchinson JW, Williams P: Non-conscious Influence on Consumer Choice. Marketing Letters. 2002, 13 (3): 267-7.CrossRef
23.
Betsch C, Ulshöfer C, Renkewitz F, Betsch T: The influence of narrative v. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Med Decis Making. 2011, 31 (5): 742-753. 10.1177/0272989X11400419.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Spink A, Wolfram D, Jansen MBJ, Saracevi T: Searching the web: The public and their queries. Journal of The American Society For Information Science And Technology. 2001, 52 (3): 226-234. 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1591>3.0.CO;2-R.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How has the flu virus infected the Web? 2010 influenza and vaccine information available on the Internet
Authors
Loredana Covolo
Silvia Mascaretti
Anna Caruana
Grazia Orizio
Luigi Caimi
Umberto Gelatti
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-83

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Public Health 1/2013 Go to the issue

Research article

Assessment of primary health care received by the elderly and health related quality of life: a cross-sectional study

Research article

Association between parity and dentition status among Japanese women: Japan public health center-based oral health study

Research article

Monitoring the profile of cervical cancer in a developing city

Research article

Stigma towards a Neglected Tropical Disease: Felt and enacted Stigma Scores among Podoconiosis Patients in Northern Ethiopia

Research article

Respiratory symptoms and lung function 8–10 months after community exposure to chlorine gas: a public health intervention and cross-sectional analysis

Research article

The utility of fat mass index vs. body mass index and percentage of body fat in the screening of metabolic syndrome