Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Prospects for progress on health inequalities in England in the post-primary care trust era: professional views on challenges, risks and opportunities

Authors: Daniel Turner, Sarah Salway, Ghazala Mir, George TH Ellison, John Skinner, Lynne Carter, Bushara Bostan

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Addressing health inequalities remains a prominent policy objective of the current UK government, but current NHS reforms involve a significant shift in roles and responsibilities. Clinicians are now placed at the heart of healthcare commissioning through which significant inequalities in access, uptake and impact of healthcare services must be addressed. Questions arise as to whether these new arrangements will help or hinder progress on health inequalities. This paper explores the perspectives of experienced healthcare professionals working within the commissioning arena; many of whom are likely to remain key actors in this unfolding scenario.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 professionals involved with health and social care commissioning at national and local levels. These included representatives from the Department of Health, Primary Care Trusts, Strategic Health Authorities, Local Authorities, and third sector organisations.

Results

In general, respondents lamented the lack of progress on health inequalities during the PCT commissioning era, where strong policy had not resulted in measurable improvements. However, there was concern that GP-led commissioning will fare little better, particularly in a time of reduced spending. Specific concerns centred on: reduced commitment to a health inequalities agenda; inadequate skills and loss of expertise; and weakened partnership working and engagement. There were more mixed opinions as to whether GP commissioners would be better able than their predecessors to challenge large provider trusts and shift spend towards prevention and early intervention, and whether GPs’ clinical experience would support commissioning action on inequalities. Though largely pessimistic, respondents highlighted some opportunities, including the potential for greater accountability of healthcare commissioners to the public and more influential needs assessments via emergent Health & Wellbeing Boards.

Conclusions

There is doubt about the ability of GP commissioners to take clearer action on health inequalities than PCTs have historically achieved. Key actors expect the contribution from commissioning to address health inequalities to become even more piecemeal in the new arrangements, as it will be dependent upon the interest and agency of particular individuals within the new commissioning groups to engage and influence a wider range of stakeholders.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Black D: Inequalities in Health: Report of a research working group. 1980, London: DHSS Black D: Inequalities in Health: Report of a research working group. 1980, London: DHSS
3.
go back to reference Acheson D: Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. 1998, London: TSO Acheson D: Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. 1998, London: TSO
4.
go back to reference Department of Health: Tackling health inequalities. 2002, London: cross-cutting review Department of Health: Tackling health inequalities. 2002, London: cross-cutting review
5.
go back to reference Department of Health: Tackling health inequalities. 2003, London: A Programme for Action Department of Health: Tackling health inequalities. 2003, London: A Programme for Action
6.
go back to reference Institute of Health Equity: Fair Society, Health Lives. 2002, London: The Marmot Review Institute of Health Equity: Fair Society, Health Lives. 2002, London: The Marmot Review
7.
go back to reference Department of Health: Joint strategic needs assessment. 2007, London Department of Health: Joint strategic needs assessment. 2007, London
8.
go back to reference Smith J, Curry N: Commissioning. Understanding New Labour’s Market Reforms of the English NHS. Edited by: Dixon A, Jones L. 2011, London: King’s Fund Smith J, Curry N: Commissioning. Understanding New Labour’s Market Reforms of the English NHS. Edited by: Dixon A, Jones L. 2011, London: King’s Fund
9.
go back to reference Bull J, Hamer L: Closing the gap: setting local targets to reduce health inequalities. 2001, London: Health Development Agency Bull J, Hamer L: Closing the gap: setting local targets to reduce health inequalities. 2001, London: Health Development Agency
10.
go back to reference Gilliam S, Florin D: Reducing health inequalities: primary care organisations and public health. 2002, London: Kings Fund Gilliam S, Florin D: Reducing health inequalities: primary care organisations and public health. 2002, London: Kings Fund
11.
go back to reference Shaw M, Davey-Smith G, Dorling D: Health inequalities and New Labour: how the promises compare with real progress. BMJ. 2005, 330: 1016-10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shaw M, Davey-Smith G, Dorling D: Health inequalities and New Labour: how the promises compare with real progress. BMJ. 2005, 330: 1016-10.1136/bmj.330.7498.1016.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Thomas B, Dorling D, Smith GD: Inequalities in premature mortality in Britain: observational study from 1921 to 2007. BMJ. 2010, 341: c3639-10.1136/bmj.c3639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thomas B, Dorling D, Smith GD: Inequalities in premature mortality in Britain: observational study from 1921 to 2007. BMJ. 2010, 341: c3639-10.1136/bmj.c3639.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Thorlby R, Maybin J: A high-performing NHS? A review of progress 1997–2010. 2010, London: King’s Fund Thorlby R, Maybin J: A high-performing NHS? A review of progress 1997–2010. 2010, London: King’s Fund
14.
go back to reference Davison C, Frankel S, Davey-Smith G: The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing ‘fatalism’ in the popular culture of illness prevention. Soc Sci Med. 1992, 34: 675-685. 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90195-V.CrossRefPubMed Davison C, Frankel S, Davey-Smith G: The limits of lifestyle: re-assessing ‘fatalism’ in the popular culture of illness prevention. Soc Sci Med. 1992, 34: 675-685. 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90195-V.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Burton P, Goodlad R, Croft J: How would we know what works? Context and complexity in the evaluation of community involvement. Evaluation. 2006, 12: 294-312. 10.1177/1356389006069136.CrossRef Burton P, Goodlad R, Croft J: How would we know what works? Context and complexity in the evaluation of community involvement. Evaluation. 2006, 12: 294-312. 10.1177/1356389006069136.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Carlisle S: Tackling health inequalities and social exclusion through partnership and community engagement? A reality check for policy and practice aspirations from a Social Inclusion Partnership in Scotland. Critical Public Health. 2010, 20 (1): 117-127. 10.1080/09581590802277341.CrossRef Carlisle S: Tackling health inequalities and social exclusion through partnership and community engagement? A reality check for policy and practice aspirations from a Social Inclusion Partnership in Scotland. Critical Public Health. 2010, 20 (1): 117-127. 10.1080/09581590802277341.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Allen P: A socio-legal and economic analysis of contracting in the NHS internal market using a case study of contracting for district nursing. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (2): 255-266. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00025-9.CrossRefPubMed Allen P: A socio-legal and economic analysis of contracting in the NHS internal market using a case study of contracting for district nursing. Soc Sci Med. 2002, 54 (2): 255-266. 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00025-9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Bravo Vergel Y, Ferguson B: Difficult commissioning choices: lessons from English primary care trusts. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006, 11 (3): 150-154. 10.1258/135581906777641749.CrossRefPubMed Bravo Vergel Y, Ferguson B: Difficult commissioning choices: lessons from English primary care trusts. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2006, 11 (3): 150-154. 10.1258/135581906777641749.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Committee of Public Accounts: Tackling inequalities in life expectancy in areas with the worst health and deprivation, Third Report of Session 2010–11. 2010, London: Crown Copyright Committee of Public Accounts: Tackling inequalities in life expectancy in areas with the worst health and deprivation, Third Report of Session 2010–11. 2010, London: Crown Copyright
20.
go back to reference Dixon A, Khahcatryan A, Wallace A, Peckham S, Boyce T, Gillam S: Impact of Quality and Outcomes Framework on health inequalities. 2011, London: The King’s Fund Dixon A, Khahcatryan A, Wallace A, Peckham S, Boyce T, Gillam S: Impact of Quality and Outcomes Framework on health inequalities. 2011, London: The King’s Fund
21.
go back to reference Exworthy M, Berney L, Powell M: How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally’: the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities. Policy and Politics. 2002, 30: 79-96. 10.1332/0305573022501584.CrossRef Exworthy M, Berney L, Powell M: How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally’: the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities. Policy and Politics. 2002, 30: 79-96. 10.1332/0305573022501584.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Marks L, Hunter DJ: Moving upstream or muddying the waters? Incentives for managing for health. Public Health. 2005, 119 (11): 974-980. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.08.009.CrossRefPubMed Marks L, Hunter DJ: Moving upstream or muddying the waters? Incentives for managing for health. Public Health. 2005, 119 (11): 974-980. 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.08.009.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gridley K, Spiers G, Aspinal F, Bernard S, Atkin K, Parker G: Can general practitioner commissioning deliver equity and excellence? Evidence from two studies of service improvement in the English NHS. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012, 17 (2): 87-93. 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010176.CrossRefPubMed Gridley K, Spiers G, Aspinal F, Bernard S, Atkin K, Parker G: Can general practitioner commissioning deliver equity and excellence? Evidence from two studies of service improvement in the English NHS. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012, 17 (2): 87-93. 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.010176.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Orton LC, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson DC, Moonan M, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S: Prioritising public health: a qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities. BMC Publ Health. 2011, 11: 821-10.1186/1471-2458-11-821.CrossRef Orton LC, Lloyd-Williams F, Taylor-Robinson DC, Moonan M, O’Flaherty M, Capewell S: Prioritising public health: a qualitative study of decision making to reduce health inequalities. BMC Publ Health. 2011, 11: 821-10.1186/1471-2458-11-821.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Egan M, Bambra C, Petticrew M, Whitehead M: Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009, 61: 4-11.CrossRef Egan M, Bambra C, Petticrew M, Whitehead M: Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009, 61: 4-11.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pollock AM, Price D, Roderick P, Treuherz T, McCoy D, McKee M, Reynolds L: How the Health and Social Care Bill 2011 would end entitlement to comprehensive health care in England. Lancet. 2012, 379 (9814): 387-389. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60119-6.CrossRefPubMed Pollock AM, Price D, Roderick P, Treuherz T, McCoy D, McKee M, Reynolds L: How the Health and Social Care Bill 2011 would end entitlement to comprehensive health care in England. Lancet. 2012, 379 (9814): 387-389. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60119-6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Department of Health: Public Health Outcomes Framework. 2013, London Department of Health: Public Health Outcomes Framework. 2013, London
29.
go back to reference Curry N, Mundle C, Sheil F, Weaks L: The voluntary and community sector in health: Implications of the proposed NHS reforms. 2011, London: Kings Fund Curry N, Mundle C, Sheil F, Weaks L: The voluntary and community sector in health: Implications of the proposed NHS reforms. 2011, London: Kings Fund
30.
go back to reference Iacobucci G: CCGs further widen health inequality, analysis shows. Pulse. 2012, 72: 3- Iacobucci G: CCGs further widen health inequality, analysis shows. Pulse. 2012, 72: 3-
31.
go back to reference Hawkes N: Allocation of NHS resources: are some patients more equal than others?. BMJ. 2012, 344: 10.1136/bmj.e3362. Hawkes N: Allocation of NHS resources: are some patients more equal than others?. BMJ. 2012, 344: 10.1136/bmj.e3362.
32.
go back to reference Race for Health: Tackling Health Inequalities in the New NHS. 2011, London: Recommendations for Action Race for Health: Tackling Health Inequalities in the New NHS. 2011, London: Recommendations for Action
33.
go back to reference Berndtson K, Daid T, Tracy CS, Bhan A, Cohen ERM, Upshur REG, Singh JA, Daarm AS, Lavery JV, Singer PA: Grand Challenges in Global Health: Ethical, Social, and Cultural Issues Based on Key Informant Perspectives. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (9): e268-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berndtson K, Daid T, Tracy CS, Bhan A, Cohen ERM, Upshur REG, Singh JA, Daarm AS, Lavery JV, Singer PA: Grand Challenges in Global Health: Ethical, Social, and Cultural Issues Based on Key Informant Perspectives. PLoS Med. 2007, 4 (9): e268-10.1371/journal.pmed.0040268.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference May T: Social research: issues, methods and process. 1997, Buckingham: Open University Press May T: Social research: issues, methods and process. 1997, Buckingham: Open University Press
35.
go back to reference Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL: A call for qualitative power analyses. Qual Quant. 2007, 41: 105-121. 10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1.CrossRef Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL: A call for qualitative power analyses. Qual Quant. 2007, 41: 105-121. 10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Noy C: Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2008, 11 (4): 327-344. 10.1080/13645570701401305.CrossRef Noy C: Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2008, 11 (4): 327-344. 10.1080/13645570701401305.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bryman A: Social Research Methods. 2012, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4 Bryman A: Social Research Methods. 2012, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4
38.
go back to reference Blackman T, Harrington B, Elliott E, Greene A, Hunter D, Marks L, McKee L, Williams G: Performance assessment and wicked issues: the case of health inequalities. Public Policy and Administration. 2006, 21 (2): 66-80. 10.1177/095207670602100206.CrossRef Blackman T, Harrington B, Elliott E, Greene A, Hunter D, Marks L, McKee L, Williams G: Performance assessment and wicked issues: the case of health inequalities. Public Policy and Administration. 2006, 21 (2): 66-80. 10.1177/095207670602100206.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Petticrew M, Whitehead M, Macintyre SJ, Graham H, Egan M: Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: The reality according to policymakers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 11-16. 10.1136/jech.58.1.11.CrossRef Petticrew M, Whitehead M, Macintyre SJ, Graham H, Egan M: Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 1: The reality according to policymakers. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 11-16. 10.1136/jech.58.1.11.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Whitehead M, Petticre M, Graham H, Macintyre SJ, Bambra C, Egan M: Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: Assembling the evidence jigsaw. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 817-821. 10.1136/jech.2003.015297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Whitehead M, Petticre M, Graham H, Macintyre SJ, Bambra C, Egan M: Evidence for public health policy on inequalities: 2: Assembling the evidence jigsaw. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 817-821. 10.1136/jech.2003.015297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Davies H, Nutley S, Walter I: Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 188-190. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008055.CrossRefPubMed Davies H, Nutley S, Walter I: Why ‘knowledge transfer’ is misconceived for applied social research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008, 13: 188-190. 10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008055.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Yanow D: How does a policy mean?. 1996, Washington, DC: Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Georgetown University Press Yanow D: How does a policy mean?. 1996, Washington, DC: Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Georgetown University Press
43.
go back to reference Colebatch HK: Policy analysis, policy practice and political science. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2005, 64 (3): 14-23. 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00448.x.CrossRef Colebatch HK: Policy analysis, policy practice and political science. Australian Journal of Public Administration. 2005, 64 (3): 14-23. 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00448.x.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Swallow V, Newton J: How to manage and display qualitative data using ‘Framework’ and Microsoft Excel. J Clin Nurs. 2003, 12 (4): 610-612. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00728.x.CrossRefPubMed Swallow V, Newton J: How to manage and display qualitative data using ‘Framework’ and Microsoft Excel. J Clin Nurs. 2003, 12 (4): 610-612. 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00728.x.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Lee A: The coalition government’s plans for the NHS in England. BMJ. 2010, 341: c3790-10.1136/bmj.c3790.CrossRef Lee A: The coalition government’s plans for the NHS in England. BMJ. 2010, 341: c3790-10.1136/bmj.c3790.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Smith J, Mays N: GP led commissioning: time for a cool appraisal. BMJ. 2012, 344: e980-10.1136/bmj.e980.CrossRefPubMed Smith J, Mays N: GP led commissioning: time for a cool appraisal. BMJ. 2012, 344: e980-10.1136/bmj.e980.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prospects for progress on health inequalities in England in the post-primary care trust era: professional views on challenges, risks and opportunities
Authors
Daniel Turner
Sarah Salway
Ghazala Mir
George TH Ellison
John Skinner
Lynne Carter
Bushara Bostan
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-274

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Public Health 1/2013 Go to the issue