Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic review

Authors: Shelley Peacock, Stephanie Konrad, Erin Watson, Darren Nickel, Nazeem Muhajarine

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of paraprofessional home-visitations on improving the circumstances of disadvantaged families is unclear. The purpose of this paper is to systematically review the effectiveness of paraprofessional home-visiting programs on developmental and health outcomes of young children from disadvantaged families.

Methods

A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., CINAHL PLUS, Cochrane, EMBASE, MEDLINE) from 1990 through May 2012 was supplemented by reference lists to search for relevant studies. Through the use of reliable tools, studies were assessed in duplicate. English language studies of paraprofessional home-visiting programs assessing specific outcomes for children (0-6 years) from disadvantaged families were eligible for inclusion in the review. Data extraction included the characteristics of the participants, intervention, outcomes and quality of the studies.

Results

Studies that scored 13 or greater out of a total of 15 on the validity tool (n = 21) are the focus of this review. All studies are randomized controlled trials and most were conducted in the United States. Significant improvements to the development and health of young children as a result of a home-visiting program are noted for particular groups. These include: (a) prevention of child abuse in some cases, particularly when the intervention is initiated prenatally; (b) developmental benefits in relation to cognition and problem behaviours, and less consistently with language skills; and (c) reduced incidence of low birth weights and health problems in older children, and increased incidence of appropriate weight gain in early childhood. However, overall home-visiting programs are limited in improving the lives of socially high-risk children who live in disadvantaged families.

Conclusions

Home visitation by paraprofessionals is an intervention that holds promise for socially high-risk families with young children. Initiating the intervention prenatally and increasing the number of visits improves development and health outcomes for particular groups of children. Future studies should consider what dose of the intervention is most beneficial and address retention issues.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
Elkan R, Kendrick D, Hewitt M, Robinson J, Tolley K, Blair M, George B: The effectiveness of domiciliary health visiting: A systematic review of international studies and a selective review of the British literature. Health Tech Assess. 2000, 4 (13): i-v. 1-339
5.
Olds D, Sadler L, Kitzman H: Programs for parents of infants and toddlers: Recent evidence from randomized trials. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007, 48: 355-391. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01702.x.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Sikorski J, Renfrew M, Pindoria SAW: Support for breastfeeding mothers. Database Syst Rev. 2012, Art No: CD00141.pub 4, 5
7.
Sweet M, Appelbaum M: Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Dev. 2004, 74 (5): 1435-1456.CrossRef
8.
Bilukha O, Hahn R, Crosby A, Fullilove M, Liberman A, Moscicki E, et al: The effectiveness of early childhood home visitation in preventing violence: A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2005, 28 (2S1): 11-39.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Geeraert L, Noortage W, Grietens H, Onghena P: The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical abuse and neglect: A meta-analysis. Child Maltreat. 2004, 9 (3): 277-291. 10.1177/1077559504264265.CrossRefPubMed
10.
MacLeod J, Nelson G: Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment. A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse Negl. 2000, 24 (9): 1127-1149. 10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00178-2.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Forbes D: Strategies for managing behavioural symptomatology associated with dementia of the Alzheimer's type: A systematic overview. Can J Nur Res. 1998, 30: 67-86.
12.
Peacock S, Forbes D: Interventions for caregivers of persons with dementia: a systematic review. Can J Nur Res. 2003, 35: 88-107.
13.
Aracena M, Krause M, Perez C, Mendez MJ, Salvatierra L, Soto M, Pantoja T, Navarro S, Salinas A, Farah C, et al: A cost-effectiveness evaluation of a home visit program for adolescent mothers. J Health Psychol. 2009, 14: 878-887. 10.1177/1359105309340988.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Barth RP: An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse Negl. 1991, 15: 363-375. 10.1016/0145-2134(91)90021-5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Black MM, Dubowitz H, Hutcheson J, Berenson-Howard J, Starr RH: A randomized clinical trial of home intervention for children with failure to thrive. Pediatr. 1995, 95: 807-814.
16.
Bugental DB, Ellerson PC, Lin EK, Rainey B, Kokotovic A, O'Hara N: A cognitive approach to child abuse prevention. J Fam Psychol. 2002, 16: 243-258.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Caldera D, Burrell L, Rodriguez K, Crowne SS, Rohde C, Duggan A: Impact of a statewide home visiting program on parenting and on child health and development. Child Abuse Negl. 2007, 31: 829-852. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.02.008.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Cupples ME, Stewart MC, Percy A, Hepper P, Murphy C, Halliday HL: A RCT of peer-mentoring for first-time mothers in socially disadvantaged areas (The MOMENTS Study). Arch Dis Child. 2011, 96: 252-258. 10.1136/adc.2009.167387.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Duggan A, Fuddy L, Burrell L, Higman SM, McFarlane E, Windham A, Sia C: Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program to prevent child abuse: impact in reducing parental risk factors. Child Abuse Negl. 2004, 28: 623-643. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.08.008.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Duggan A, McFarlane E, Fuddy L, Burrell L, Higman SM, Windham A, Sia C: Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: impact in preventing child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl. 2004, 28: 597-622. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.08.007.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Duggan A, Berlin LJ, Cassidy J, Burrell L, Tandon D: Examining maternal depression and attachment insecurity as moderators of the impacts of home visiting for at-risk mothers and infants. J Consult Clin Psych. 2009, 77: 788-799.CrossRef
22.
DuMont K, Mitchell-Herzfeld S, Green R, Lee E, Lowenfels A, Rodriguez M, Dorabawila V: Healthy Families New York (HFNY) randomized trial: Effects on early child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Negl. 2008, 32: 295-315. 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.07.007.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Grantham-McGregor SM, Powell CA, Walker SP, Himes JH: Nutritional supplementation, psychosocial stimulation, and mental development of stunted children: the Jamaican study. Lancet. 1991, 338: 1-5. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90001-6.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Hamadani JD, Huda SN, Khatun F, Grantham-McGregor SM: Psychosocial stimulation improves the development of undernourished children in rural Bangladesh. J Nutr. 2006, 136: 2645-2652.PubMed
25.
Johnson Z, Howell F, Molloy B: Community mothers' programme: randomized controlled trial of non-professional intervention in parenting. Br Med J. 1993, 306: 1449-1452. 10.1136/bmj.306.6890.1449.CrossRef
26.
Kartin D, Grant TN, Streissguth AP, Sampson PD, Ernst CC: Three-year developmental outcomes in children with prenatal alcohol and drug exposure. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002, 14: 145-153. 10.1097/00001577-200214030-00004.CrossRefPubMed
27.
King TM, Rosenberg LA, Fuddy L, McFarlane E, Sia C, Duggan AK: Prevalence and early identification of language delays among at-risk three year olds. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005, 26: 293-303. 10.1097/00004703-200508000-00006.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Lee E, Mitchell-Herzfeld SD, Lowenfels AA, Green R, Dorabawila V, DuMont KA: Reducing low birth weight through home visitation: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2009, 36: 154-160. 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.029.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Le Roux IM, Le Roux K, Comulada WS, Greco EM, Desmond KA, Mbewu N, Rotheram-Borus MJ: Home visits by neighborhood mentor mothers provide timely recovery from childhood malnutrition in South Africa: results from a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2010, 9 (56): 1-10.
30.
McLaughlin FJ, Altemeier WA, Christensen MJ, Sherrod KB, Dietrich MS, Stern DT: Randomized trial of comprehensive prenatal care for low-income women: Effect on infant birth weight. Pediatr. 1992, 89: 128-132.
31.
Nair P, Schuler ME, Black MM, Kettinger L, Harrington D: Cumulative environmental risk in substance abusing women: early intervention, parenting stress, child abuse potential and child development. Child Abuse Negl. 2003, 27: 997-1017. 10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00169-8.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Necoechea DM: Children at-risk for poor school readiness: The effect of an early intervention home visiting program on children and parents [dissertation]. 2007, Riverside: University of California
33.
Scheiwe A, Hardy R, Watt RG: Four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trail of a social support intervention on infant feeding practices. Matern Child Nutr. 2010, 6: 328-227. 10.1111/j.1740-8709.2009.00231.x.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness of home visiting programs on child outcomes: a systematic review
Authors
Shelley Peacock
Stephanie Konrad
Erin Watson
Darren Nickel
Nazeem Muhajarine
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-17

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Public Health 1/2013 Go to the issue

Research article

Perceived risks and benefits of cigarette smoking among Nepalese adolescents: a population-based cross-sectional study

Research article

Exclusive breastfeeding practices in relation to social and health determinants: a comparison of the 2006 and 2011 Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys

Research article

Health-related quality of life and long-term care needs among elderly individuals living alone: a cross-sectional study in rural areas of Shaanxi Province, China

Study protocol

Design and methods for evaluating an early childhood obesity prevention program in the childcare center setting

Research article

Dental caries in 14- and 15-year-olds in New South Wales, Australia

Study protocol

Design of the Bottom-up Innovation project - a participatory, primary preventive, organizational level intervention on work-related stress and well-being for workers in Dutch vocational education