Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Research article

Impact of instrument error on the estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity in population-based surveys

Authors: Anna Biehl, Ragnhild Hovengen, Haakon E Meyer, Jøran Hjelmesæth, Jørgen Meisfjord, Else-Karin Grøholt, Mathieu Roelants, Bjørn Heine Strand

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The basis for this study is the fact that instrument error increases the variance of the distribution of body mass index (BMI). Combined with a defined cut-off value this may impact upon the estimated proportion of overweight and obesity. It is important to ensure high quality surveillance data in order to follow trends of estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity. The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of instrument error, due to uncalibrated scales and stadiometers, on prevalence estimates of overweight and obesity.

Methods

Anthropometric measurements from a nationally representative sample were used; the Norwegian Child Growth study (NCG) of 3474 children. Each of the 127 participating schools received a reference weight and a reference length to determine the correction value. Correction value corresponds to instrument error and is the difference between the true value and the measured, uncorrected weight and height at local scales and stadiometers. Simulations were used to determine the expected implications of instrument errors. To systematically investigate this, the coefficient of variation (CV) of instrument error was used in the simulations and was increased successively.

Results

Simulations showed that the estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity increased systematically with the size of instrument error when the mean instrument error was zero. The estimated prevalence was 16.4% with no instrument error and was, on average, overestimated by 0.5 percentage points based on observed variance of instrument error from the NCG-study. Further, the estimated prevalence was 16.7% with 1% CV of instrument error, and increased to 17.8%, 19.5% and 21.6% with 2%, 3% and 4% CV of instrument error, respectively.

Conclusions

Failure to calibrate measuring instruments is likely to lead to overestimation of the prevalence of overweight and obesity in population-based surveys.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Katzmarzyk PT, Baur LA, Blair SN, Lambert EV, Oppert JM, Riddoch C: International conference on physical activity and obesity in children: summary statement and recommendations. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3: 3-21.CrossRefPubMed Katzmarzyk PT, Baur LA, Blair SN, Lambert EV, Oppert JM, Riddoch C: International conference on physical activity and obesity in children: summary statement and recommendations. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2008, 3: 3-21.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Barlow SE, Expert Committee: Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007, 120 (Suppl 4): 164-192.CrossRef Barlow SE, Expert Committee: Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007, 120 (Suppl 4): 164-192.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference de Onis M: The use of anthropometry in the prevention of childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Obes. 2004, 28 (Suppl 3): 81-85.CrossRef de Onis M: The use of anthropometry in the prevention of childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Obes. 2004, 28 (Suppl 3): 81-85.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA: Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999, 82: 165-77. 10.1017/S0007114599001348.CrossRefPubMed Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA: Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr. 1999, 82: 165-77. 10.1017/S0007114599001348.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Himes JH: Challenges of accurately measuring and using BMI and other indicators of obesity in children. Pediatrics. 2009, 124 (Suppl 1): 3-22.CrossRef Himes JH: Challenges of accurately measuring and using BMI and other indicators of obesity in children. Pediatrics. 2009, 124 (Suppl 1): 3-22.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Townsend N, Rutter H, Foster C: Variations in data collection can influence outcome measures of BMI measuring programmes. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011, 6: 491-498. 10.3109/17477166.2011.605897.CrossRefPubMed Townsend N, Rutter H, Foster C: Variations in data collection can influence outcome measures of BMI measuring programmes. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011, 6: 491-498. 10.3109/17477166.2011.605897.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Schlegel-Pratt K, Heizer WD: The accuracy of scales used to weigh patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 1990, 5: 254-257. 10.1177/0115426590005006254.CrossRefPubMed Schlegel-Pratt K, Heizer WD: The accuracy of scales used to weigh patients. Nutr Clin Pract. 1990, 5: 254-257. 10.1177/0115426590005006254.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Oberlander J, Saunders RC, Knox L, Crosby L, Mullen J: Survey of weight scale variability. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1981, 4: 606- Oberlander J, Saunders RC, Knox L, Crosby L, Mullen J: Survey of weight scale variability. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1981, 4: 606-
9.
go back to reference Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA: Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. BMJ. 2007, 335: 194-10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cole TJ, Flegal KM, Nicholls D, Jackson AA: Body mass index cut offs to define thinness in children and adolescents: international survey. BMJ. 2007, 335: 194-10.1136/bmj.39238.399444.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Cole TJ, Bellizzini MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cole TJ, Bellizzini MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH: Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ. 2000, 320: 1240-1243. 10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Harris HE, Ellison GT, Holliday M, Nickson C: How accurate are antenatal weight measurements? A survey of hospital and community clinics in a South Thames Region NHS Trust. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998, 12: 163-175. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00100.x.CrossRefPubMed Harris HE, Ellison GT, Holliday M, Nickson C: How accurate are antenatal weight measurements? A survey of hospital and community clinics in a South Thames Region NHS Trust. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998, 12: 163-175. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00100.x.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Larsen RJ, Marx ML: An introduction to mathematical statistics and its applications. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Larsen RJ, Marx ML: An introduction to mathematical statistics and its applications. 1986, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
13.
go back to reference Cameron N: The method of Auxological Anthropometry. Human Growth a comprehensive treatise. Edited by: Falkner F, Tanner JM. 1986, New York: Plenum Press, 3-46. Cameron N: The method of Auxological Anthropometry. Human Growth a comprehensive treatise. Edited by: Falkner F, Tanner JM. 1986, New York: Plenum Press, 3-46.
14.
go back to reference Pederson D, Gore C: Anthropometry measurement error. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. Edited by: Norton K, Olds T. 1996, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd, 77-96. Pederson D, Gore C: Anthropometry measurement error. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. Edited by: Norton K, Olds T. 1996, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd, 77-96.
15.
go back to reference Cameron N: Human growth and development. 2002, San Diego, Calif: Academic Cameron N: Human growth and development. 2002, San Diego, Calif: Academic
16.
go back to reference International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. 1993, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology. 1993, Geneva: International Organization for Standardization
17.
go back to reference Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. 1995, Geneva: World Health Organization Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO Technical Report Series 854. 1995, Geneva: World Health Organization
19.
go back to reference Stein RJ, Haddock CK, Poston WS, Catanese D, Spertus JA: Precision in weighing: a comparison of scales found in physician offices, fitness centers, and weight loss centers. Public Health Rep. 2005, 120: 266-270.PubMedPubMedCentral Stein RJ, Haddock CK, Poston WS, Catanese D, Spertus JA: Precision in weighing: a comparison of scales found in physician offices, fitness centers, and weight loss centers. Public Health Rep. 2005, 120: 266-270.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D: Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000, 71 (Suppl 2): 59-73.CrossRefPubMed Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D: Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000, 71 (Suppl 2): 59-73.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Impact of instrument error on the estimated prevalence of overweight and obesity in population-based surveys
Authors
Anna Biehl
Ragnhild Hovengen
Haakon E Meyer
Jøran Hjelmesæth
Jørgen Meisfjord
Else-Karin Grøholt
Mathieu Roelants
Bjørn Heine Strand
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-146

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

BMC Public Health 1/2013 Go to the issue