Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2012

Open Access 01-12-2012 | Research article

Dilemmas in providing resilience-enhancing social services to long-term social assistance clients. A qualitative study of Swedish social workers

Authors: Anneli Marttila, Eva Johansson, Margaret Whitehead, Bo Burström

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Long-term recipients of social assistance face barriers to social and economic inclusion, and have poorer health and more limited opportunities for improving their health than many other groups in the population. During recent decades there have been changes in Swedish social policy, with cutbacks in public benefits and a re-emphasis on means-tested policies. In this context, it is important to investigate the necessary conditions for social workers to offer social assistance and services, as well as the mediating role of social workers between public policies and their clients. Swedish social services aim to promote social inclusion by strengthening the individual´s own resources. We investigated the issues that arise when providing social services to long-term social assistance clients within the framework of resilience, which focuses on the processes leading to positive functioning in adverse conditions.

Methods

Interviews were conducted with 23 social workers in Stockholm and analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Results

The main theme to emerge from the interviews concerned the constraints that the social workers faced in providing social services to social assistance clients. The first subtheme focused on dilemmas in the interaction between social workers and clients resulting from the dual role of exercising authority and supporting and building trust with clients. Working conditions of social workers also played a crucial role. The second subtheme addressed the impact of the societal context, such as labour market opportunities and coordination between authorities.

Conclusions

Overall, we found that social workers to a great extent tried to find individual solutions to structural problems. To provide resilience-enhancing social services to long-term social assistance clients with varying obstacles and needs requires a constructive working environment, supportive societal structures and inter-sectoral cooperation between different authorities.
Literature
1.
Shaw M, Dorling D, Smith GD: Poverty, social exclusion, and minorities. Social Determinants of health. Edited by: Marmot M, Wilkinson R. 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2
2.
Graham H: Unequal lives. 2007, Open University Press, Health and socioeconomic inequalities. Berkshire
3.
4.
Fritzell J, Ritakallio V-M: Societal shifts and changed patterns of poverty. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2010, 19: S25-S41.CrossRef
5.
Kuivalainen S: A comparative study on last resort social assistance schemes in six European countries. 2004, Gummerus Printing, Saarijärvi, PhD thesis. University of Turku, Social sciences, Department of social policy. Stakes, Research report 146
6.
Minas R: Administrating poverty – studies of intake organisation and social assistance in Sweden. 2005, Akademitryck AB, Stockholm, PhD Thesis. Stockholm Studies Social Work, No. 21. Stockholm University, Department of Social Work
7.
Meeuwisse A, Scaramuzzino R, Swärd H: Everyday realities and visionary ideals among social workers in the Nordic countries: a matter of specialization and work task?. Nordic Social Work Research. 2011, 1 (1): 5-23. 10.1080/2156857X.2011.562030.CrossRef
8.
Kuivalainen S, Nelson K: The Nordic welfare model in a European perspective. 2010, Institute for future studies, Stockholm, Working paper 2010:11
9.
Lipsky M: Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. 30th anniversary expanded edition. 2010, Russell Sage Foundation, New York
10.
National Board of Health and Welfare: Ekonomiskt bistånd årsstatistik 2010. Utbetalda belopp samt antal biståndsmottagare och antal. Biståndshushåll. [Statistics of Sweden, Statistics – Social Welfare - Social assistance: 2010. County and Municipal Expenditures]. 2011, Article nr 2011-6-25; 2011. www.​socialstyrelsen.​se
11.
Hammarstedt M: Assimilation and participation in social assistance among immigrants. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2009, 18 (1): 85-94. 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2008.00555.x.CrossRef
12.
Andrén T, Gustafsson B: Patterns of social assistance receipt in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2004, 13 (1): 55-68. 10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00297.x.CrossRef
13.
Mood C: Lagging behind in good times: immigrants and the increased dependence on social assistance in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2011, 20 (1): 55-65. 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00686.x.CrossRef
14.
Bergmark Å, Bäckman O: Stuck with welfare? Long-term social assistance recipiency in Sweden. European Sociological Review. 2004, 20 (5): 425-443. 10.1093/esr/jch036.CrossRef
15.
Dahl E, Lorentzen T: Explaining exit to work among social assistance recipients in Norway: heterogeneity or dependency?. European Sociological Review. 2003, 19 (5): 519-536. 10.1093/esr/19.5.519.CrossRef
16.
Bergmark Å, Minas R: Rescaling Social Welfare Policies in Sweden. 2006, Institute for Future Studies, National report Sweden. A comparative study on the path towards multi-level governance in Europa. European Centre for social welfare policy and research. Stockholm
17.
Grönvall L, Holgersson L, Nasenius J: Socialtjänstens mål och medel. Handboken om socialtjänsten. [The goals and means of social services. The handbook of social services]. 1991, Gothia, Stockholm, 3
18.
Minas R: Intake strategies: organising the intake of new social assistance inquirers. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2006, 15 (1): 63-74. 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2006.00552.x.CrossRef
19.
Nybom J: Activation in social work with social assistance claimants in four Swedish municipalities. European Journal of Social Work. 2011, 1-23. iFirst article, available online 31 jan; 2011
20.
Hjörne E, Juhila K, van Nijnatten C: Negotiating dilemmas in the practices of street-level welfare work. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2010, 19 (3): 303-309. 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2010.00721.x.CrossRef
21.
Prottas J: People-processing. 1979, Lexington Books, The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Toronto
22.
Billquist L: Rummet, mötet och ritualerna. En studie av socialbyrån, klientarbetet och klientskapet. [The room, the encounter and the rituals – a study on the social services agency, client related work and clientship]. 1999, Kompendiet AB, Gothenburg, PhD thesis. Gothenburg University, Department of social work
23.
Lipsky M: Street-level bureaucracy. 1980, Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, Russell Sage Foundation
24.
Evans T, Harris J: Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discreation. British Journal of Social Work. 2004, 34: 871-895. 10.1093/bjsw/bch106.CrossRef
25.
Järvinen M: Mötet mellan klient och system – om forskning i socialt arbete. [The encounter between the client and system – research in social work]. Dansk Sociologi. Dansk Sociologi 2002, 13 (2): 73-84.
26.
Bourdieu P: Outline of a theory of practice. 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
27.
Liebenberg L, Ungar M: Researching resilience. 2009, University of Toronto Press, Toronto
28.
Luthar S, Cicchetti D, Becker B: The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development. 2000, 71 (3): 543-562. 10.1111/1467-8624.00164.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Rutter M: Resilience in the face of adversity. Protective factors and resistance to psychiatric disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry. 1985, 147: 598-611. 10.1192/bjp.147.6.598.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Rutter M: Resilience: some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health. 1993, 14: 626-631. 10.1016/1054-139X(93)90196-V.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Schoon I: Risk and resilience. 2006, Cambridge university Press, Adaptations in changing times. CambridgeCrossRef
32.
Schoon I, Bynner J: Risk and resilience in the life cource: implications for interventions and social policies. Journal of Youth Studies. 2003, 6 (1): 21-31. 10.1080/1367626032000068145.CrossRef
33.
Morgan A, Davies M, Ziglio E: Health assets in a global context. Theory, methods, action. 2010, Springer, LondonCrossRef
34.
Seccombe K: “Beating the odds” versus “changing the odds”: poverty, resilience and family policy. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2002, 64: 384-394. 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00384.x.CrossRef
35.
Marttila A, Whitehead M, Canvin K: Burström B (a): Controlled and dependent – experiences of living on social assistance in Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare. 2010, 19 (2): 142-152. 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2009.00638.x.CrossRef
36.
Marttila A, Johansson E, Whitehead M, Burström B: Living on social assistance with chronic illness: buffering and undermining features to well-being. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 754-10.1186/1471-2458-10-754.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Charmaz K: Constructing grounded theory. 2009, Sage publications, A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London
38.
Morse J: The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Edited by: Bryant A, Charmaz K. 2010, Sage, London, 229-245.
39.
Graneheim U, Lundman B: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today. 2004, 24: 105-112. 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Byberg I: Kontroll eller handlingsfrihet. En studie av organiseringens betydelse i socialbidragsarbetet. [Control or discretion – a study of the impact of the organizational form of social assistance activities]. 2002, Akademitryck, Edsbruk, PhD thesis. Report in social work nr 101. University of Stockholm, Department of social work
41.
Salonen T: Margins of Welfare. 2004, Hällestad Press, Torna Hällestad
42.
Hermodsson A: Report in social work nr 86. University of Stockholm, Department for social work. Klientdemokrati – vision och verklighet. En studie i fem kommuner. [Client democracy – vision and reality. A study of five Swedish municipalities]. 1998, Akademitryck AB, Edsbruk
43.
Canvin K, Marttila A, Burström B, Whitehead M: Tales of the unexpected? Hidden resilience in poor households in Britain. Social Science and Medicine. 2009, 69: 238-245. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.05.009.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Ungar M: Cultural dimensions of resilience among adults. Handbook of adult resilience. Edited by: Reich JW, Zautra AJ, Hall JS. 2010, The Guildford Press, New York
45.
Ungar M: Qualitative contributions to resilience research. Qualitative Social Work. 2003, 2: 85-102. 10.1177/1473325003002001123.CrossRef
46.
Tham P: Why are they leaving? Factors affecting intention to leave among social workers in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work. 2007, 37 (7): 1225-1246.CrossRef
47.
Tham P, Meagher G: Working in human services: how do experiences and working conditions in child welfare social work compare?. British Journal of Social Work. 2009, 39 (5): 1-21.CrossRef
48.
Metadata
Title
Dilemmas in providing resilience-enhancing social services to long-term social assistance clients. A qualitative study of Swedish social workers
Authors
Anneli Marttila
Eva Johansson
Margaret Whitehead
Bo Burström
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-517

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

BMC Public Health 1/2012 Go to the issue

Research article

Analyzing the spatio-temporal relationship between dengue vector larval density and land-use using factor analysis and spatial ring mapping

Research article

Household knowledge, attitudes and practices related to pet contact and associated zoonoses in Ontario, Canada

Research article

Modelling strategic interventions in a population with a total fertility rate of 8.3: a cross-sectional study of Idjwi Island, DRC

Research article

Cost-effectiveness of adding vaccination with the AS04-adjuvanted human papillomavirus 16/18 vaccine to cervical cancer screening in Hungary

Research article

Nighttime assaults: using a national emergency department monitoring system to predict occurrence, target prevention and plan services

Research article

Nutritional status and risk factors of overweight and obesity for children aged 9–15 years in Chengdu, Southwest China