Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2011

Open Access 01-12-2011 | Research article

The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review

Authors: Selena Gray, Laurence Carmichael, Hugh Barton, Julie Mytton, Helen Lease, Jennifer Joynt

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Spatial planning affects the built environment, which in turn has the potential to have a significant impact on health, for good or ill. One way of ensuring that spatial plans take due account of health is through the inclusion of health considerations in the statutory and non statutory appraisal processes linked to plan-making processes.

Methods

A systematic review to identify evaluation studies of appraisals or assessments of plans where health issues were considered from 1987 to 2010.

Results

A total of 6161 citations were identified: 6069 from electronic databases, 57 fromwebsite searches, with a further 35 citations from grey literature, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. These 20 citations reported on a total of 135 different case studies: 11 UK HIA; 11 non UK high income countries HIA, 5 UK SEA or other integrated appraisal; 108 non UK high income SEA or other integrated appraisal. All studies were in English. No relevant studies were identified reporting on low or middle income countries.
The studies were limited by potential bias (no independent evaluation, with those undertaking the appraisal also responsible for reporting outcomes), lack of detail and a lack of triangulation of results. Health impact assessments generally covered the four specified health domains (physical activity, mental health and wellbeing, environmental health issues such as pollution and noise, injury) more comprehensively than SEA or other integrated appraisals, although mental health and wellbeing was an underdeveloped area. There was no evidence available on the incorporation of health in Sustainability Appraisal, limited evidence that the recommendations from any type of appraisal were implemented, and almost no evidence that the recommendations had led to the anticipated outcomes or improvements in health postulated.

Conclusion

Research is needed to assess (i) the degree to which statutory plan appraisal processes (SA in the UK) incorporate health; (ii) whether recommendations arising from health appraisal translate into the development process and (iii) whether outcomes are as anticipated.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Barton H: Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Policy. 2009, 26S: S115-S123.CrossRef Barton H: Land use planning and health and well-being. Land Use Policy. 2009, 26S: S115-S123.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Posas P: The UK's Draft Guidance for Health in SEA in light of HIA community priorities. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2011 Posas P: The UK's Draft Guidance for Health in SEA in light of HIA community priorities. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2011
3.
go back to reference University of West of England: The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in use to address health and wellbeing during plan appraisal. Report prepared for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2011, London: NICE, [http://www.nice.org.uk] University of West of England: The effectiveness and cost effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in use to address health and wellbeing during plan appraisal. Report prepared for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). 2011, London: NICE, [http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk]
4.
5.
go back to reference Corburn J, Bhatia R: HIA in San Francisco: incorporating the social determinants of health into environmental planning. J Environ Plann Manage. 2007, 50 (3): 323-341. 10.1080/09640560701260283.CrossRef Corburn J, Bhatia R: HIA in San Francisco: incorporating the social determinants of health into environmental planning. J Environ Plann Manage. 2007, 50 (3): 323-341. 10.1080/09640560701260283.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dannenberg A, Bhatia R, Cole B, Heaton S, Feldman J, Rutt D: Use of Health Impact Assessment in the US, 27 case studies, 1999-2007. Am J Prevent Med. 2008, 34 (3): Dannenberg A, Bhatia R, Cole B, Heaton S, Feldman J, Rutt D: Use of Health Impact Assessment in the US, 27 case studies, 1999-2007. Am J Prevent Med. 2008, 34 (3):
7.
go back to reference Douglas M, Conway L, Gorman D, Gavin S, Hanlon P: Achieving better health through health impact assessment. Health Bull. 2001, 59 (5): Douglas M, Conway L, Gorman D, Gavin S, Hanlon P: Achieving better health through health impact assessment. Health Bull. 2001, 59 (5):
8.
go back to reference Douglas M, Thomson H, Jepson R, Hurley F, Higgins M, Muirie J, Gorman D, (eds): HIA of Transport Initiatives - A Guide. 2007, Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland Douglas M, Thomson H, Jepson R, Hurley F, Higgins M, Muirie J, Gorman D, (eds): HIA of Transport Initiatives - A Guide. 2007, Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland
9.
go back to reference Farhang L, Bhatia R, Comerford SC, Corburn J, Gaydos M, Malekafzali S: Creating tools for healthy development: case study of San Francisco's Eastern neighborhoods community HIA. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2008, 14 (3): 255-265.CrossRef Farhang L, Bhatia R, Comerford SC, Corburn J, Gaydos M, Malekafzali S: Creating tools for healthy development: case study of San Francisco's Eastern neighborhoods community HIA. J Public Health Manage Pract. 2008, 14 (3): 255-265.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fischer T, Matuzzi M, Nowacki J: The consideration of health in strategic environmental assessment (SEA.). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2009, 30 (3): 200-210.CrossRef Fischer T, Matuzzi M, Nowacki J: The consideration of health in strategic environmental assessment (SEA.). Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2009, 30 (3): 200-210.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference France C: Health contribution to local government planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004, 24: 189-198. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.009.CrossRef France C: Health contribution to local government planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004, 24: 189-198. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.009.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Glasgow Centre for Population Health: Piloting HIA as a Method of Integrating Health into Planning: a Case Study of the Draft East End Local Development Strategy. 2007, Glasgow Centre for Population Health Glasgow Centre for Population Health: Piloting HIA as a Method of Integrating Health into Planning: a Case Study of the Draft East End Local Development Strategy. 2007, Glasgow Centre for Population Health
13.
go back to reference Gow A, Dubois L: Bungendore Health Impact Assessment: Urban development in a rural setting. NSW Public Health Bull. 2007, 18 (9-10): Gow A, Dubois L: Bungendore Health Impact Assessment: Urban development in a rural setting. NSW Public Health Bull. 2007, 18 (9-10):
14.
go back to reference Greig S, Parry N, Rimmington B: Promoting sustainable regeneration: learning from a case study in participatory HIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004, 24: 255-267. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.020.CrossRef Greig S, Parry N, Rimmington B: Promoting sustainable regeneration: learning from a case study in participatory HIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2004, 24: 255-267. 10.1016/j.eiar.2003.10.020.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kørnøv L: Strategic Environmental Assessment as a catalyst of healthier spatial planning: the Danish guidance and practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2009, 29: 60-65. 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.04.003.CrossRef Kørnøv L: Strategic Environmental Assessment as a catalyst of healthier spatial planning: the Danish guidance and practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2009, 29: 60-65. 10.1016/j.eiar.2008.04.003.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ng K, Obbard J: Strategic environmental assessment in Hong Kong. Environ Int. 2005, 31: 483-492. 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.023.CrossRefPubMed Ng K, Obbard J: Strategic environmental assessment in Hong Kong. Environ Int. 2005, 31: 483-492. 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.023.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mathias K, Harris-Roxas B: Process and Impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban development HI.A. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 97-10.1186/1471-2458-9-97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mathias K, Harris-Roxas B: Process and Impact evaluation of the Greater Christchurch Urban development HI.A. BMC Public Health. 2009, 9: 97-10.1186/1471-2458-9-97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Mindell J, Sheridan L, Joffe M, Samson-Barry H, Atkinson S: Health impact assessment as an agent of policy change: improving the health impacts of the mayor of London's draft transport strategy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 169-174. 10.1136/jech.2003.012385.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mindell J, Sheridan L, Joffe M, Samson-Barry H, Atkinson S: Health impact assessment as an agent of policy change: improving the health impacts of the mayor of London's draft transport strategy. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004, 58: 169-174. 10.1136/jech.2003.012385.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Neville L, Furber S, Thackway S, Gray E, Mayne D: A health impact assessment of an environmental management plan: the impact on physical activity and social cohesion. Health Promot J Aust. 2005, 16 (3): Neville L, Furber S, Thackway S, Gray E, Mayne D: A health impact assessment of an environmental management plan: the impact on physical activity and social cohesion. Health Promot J Aust. 2005, 16 (3):
20.
go back to reference Planning Advisory Service: Equality and diversity: improving planning outcomes for the whole of the community. IDeA. 2008 Planning Advisory Service: Equality and diversity: improving planning outcomes for the whole of the community. IDeA. 2008
21.
go back to reference Plant P, Herriot N, Atkinson S: Healthy Planning in London. 2007, Town & Country Planning, 50-51. Plant P, Herriot N, Atkinson S: Healthy Planning in London. 2007, Town & Country Planning, 50-51.
22.
go back to reference Stevenson A, Banswell K, Pink R: Greater Christchurch Draft Urban Development Strategy. NSW Public Health Bull. 2005, 18 (9-10): Stevenson A, Banswell K, Pink R: Greater Christchurch Draft Urban Development Strategy. NSW Public Health Bull. 2005, 18 (9-10):
23.
go back to reference Tennant K, Newman C: Greater Granville Regeneration Strategy. NSW Public Health Bull. 2007, 18 (9-10): Tennant K, Newman C: Greater Granville Regeneration Strategy. NSW Public Health Bull. 2007, 18 (9-10):
24.
go back to reference Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J: The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment, Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. 2007, World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst K, Figueras J: The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment, Scope and limitations of supporting decision-making in Europe. 2007, World Health Organization, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies
25.
go back to reference Quigley RJ, Taylor LC: Evaluation as a key part of health impact assessment; the English experience. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 415-419.PubMedPubMedCentral Quigley RJ, Taylor LC: Evaluation as a key part of health impact assessment; the English experience. Bull World Health Organ. 2003, 81: 415-419.PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Breeze CH, Lock K: Health impact assessment as a part of strategic environmental assessment. 2001, WHO Regional Office for Europe Breeze CH, Lock K: Health impact assessment as a part of strategic environmental assessment. 2001, WHO Regional Office for Europe
27.
go back to reference Williams C, Fisher P: Draft guidance on health in strategic environmental assessment: a consultation. 2007, London: Department of Health Williams C, Fisher P: Draft guidance on health in strategic environmental assessment: a consultation. 2007, London: Department of Health
28.
go back to reference Erlanger TE, Krieger GR, Singer BH, Utzinger J: The 6/94 gap in health impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2008, 28: 349-358. 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.003.CrossRef Erlanger TE, Krieger GR, Singer BH, Utzinger J: The 6/94 gap in health impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 2008, 28: 349-358. 10.1016/j.eiar.2007.07.003.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
Authors
Selena Gray
Laurence Carmichael
Hugh Barton
Julie Mytton
Helen Lease
Jennifer Joynt
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2011
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-889

Other articles of this Issue 1/2011

BMC Public Health 1/2011 Go to the issue